Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Obama try to Destroy America, or Cover Up his Failed Economic Record by Starting Class Warfare?
Graewoulf | February 9, 2012 | Graewoulf

Posted on 02/09/2012 7:13:19 PM PST by Graewoulf

Obama began to increase his divide-and-conquer Class Warfare rhetoric as his financial losses began to increase sharply.

Obama has had a lifelong, consistent hatred of America, and class warfare was merely a means to his end of Destroying America, in 4 years.

Unable to accept responsibility for his financial failures, Obama has consistently blamed men who have demonstrated strong support for the core values of America, such as President George W. Bush, as well as men who have made profits, such as JPM CEO Jamie Dimon.

This week Obama blamed America's Founding Fathers for making it difficult for Obama to change America rapidly.

Which if any of these statements best fits why Obama started his Class Warfare Campaign?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: arrogant; dictator; european; socialism; vanity
Is Obama trying to Destroy America before he loses in an election landslide, or was his Class Warfare Campaign merely a transparent attempt to try to divert attention away from his 1 Trillion Dollar a year financial loss each of his 3 complete years in office? What say all of you?
1 posted on 02/09/2012 7:13:31 PM PST by Graewoulf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

This shouldn’t be an “either OR question”. It is glaringly obvious that Obama has been very engaged and somewhat successful in both: trying to destroy America AND cover up his failed economic record - DUH!!!


2 posted on 02/09/2012 7:17:06 PM PST by demkicker (My passion for freedom is stronger than that of Democrats whose obsession is to enslave me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

Yes!


3 posted on 02/09/2012 7:17:28 PM PST by freedombird (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness. -A. DeTocqueville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

Yes


4 posted on 02/09/2012 7:17:35 PM PST by El Cid (Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

He’s nothing but a tool of the democratic party which has, over the last half century, been infiltrated by communists.


5 posted on 02/09/2012 7:18:27 PM PST by sonofagun (Some think my cynicism grows with age. I like to think of it as wisdom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

A little bit of both, I say.

He wants to bring America down from its high perch, compared to the rest of the world, because it is easier to tear America down then to build the rest of the world back up.

He’s also conducting class warfare, hoping by creating jealousy in the lower classes, he get use them to get re-elected.


6 posted on 02/09/2012 7:23:17 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
Zer0’s grandparents were active Alinsky method Commies or Mau Mau rebellion terrorists. His mommy was a Commie porno girl, his daddy was a Kenyan bigamist welfare moocher, and you suspect that class warfare was a recent idea?
7 posted on 02/09/2012 7:24:27 PM PST by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it. (plagiarized))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam; Kaslin; Nachum; DJ MacWoW; RKBA Democrat; Art in Idaho; Ernest_at_the_Beach; IbJensen; ...

Credit is hereby given to tonight’s MSNBC’s “Mr. Ed Show.” (NO! The other talking horse!). Thanks for providing the two questions of the night that were combined in the title of this thread. Well, maybe I changed a few nouns.


8 posted on 02/09/2012 7:25:06 PM PST by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofagun

Its all about power—if he must make America weak and a 4th world state to keep Democrat Billionaires in power—he will. Its about their vision of a “Worker’s Paradise” Later they will use guns and death camps to force a Communist utopia—poverty for all but Party members who will live like kings.


9 posted on 02/09/2012 7:27:22 PM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

UN high official Maurice Strong made the statement that it was their responsibility to bring about the collapse of the industralized countries (Agenda 21/Sustainable Development) is the tool of choice for this task using protecting the enviroment as the protocol. Obama has his foot on the Executive Order accelerator implementing this. What do you think his intentions are?


10 posted on 02/09/2012 7:32:04 PM PST by Captain7seas (FIRE JANE LUBCHENCO FROM NOAA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
Did Obama try to Destroy America, or Cover Up his Failed Economic Record by Starting Class Warfare?

Is the pope Catholic?

11 posted on 02/09/2012 7:36:48 PM PST by Jess Kitting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
Historically Class Warfare has been used break up governments. If these 20% of Americans that are technically Socialists can get the other 80% of American to go at each other’s throats for long enough they stand a good chance to grab an advantage. Stuff like that happened in Russia about a hundred years ago. When that 80% got weak enough from fighting, V Lenin returns from exile and culls out those that thought they were fighting for a free society.
12 posted on 02/09/2012 7:36:58 PM PST by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
If he recognizes that it is the Founding Fathers who have made it difficult for him to wield unconstitutional power and destroy the greatest place of liberty and opportunity that ever existed, then . . .

Thank God for the Founding Fathers!

Divine Providence must still be in charge of America's destiny, if the work that was done in 1776 and 1787 on behalf of individual liberty and as a stumblingblock to would-be destroyers of liberty is, by the President's own admission, doing what it was designed to do. All of us should express gratitude and devote ourselves to the cause of liberty.

Of the Founding principle, Lincoln said: ". . . it is no child's play to save the principles of Jefferson from total overthrow in this nation. . . .The principles of Jefferson are the definitions and axioms of free society . . . And yet, they are denied, and evaded, with no small show of success. . . All honor to Jefferson - to the man who, in the concrete pressure of a struggle for national independence by a single people, had the coolness, forecast, and capacity to introduce in a . . . revolutionary document, an abstract truth, applicable to all men and all times, and so to embalm it there, that today, and in all coming days, it shall be a rebuke and a stumbling-block to the very harbingers [initiators of threatening change] of reappearing tyranny and oppression."

13 posted on 02/09/2012 7:38:10 PM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofagun
He’s nothing but a tool of the democratic party which has, over the last half century, been infiltrated by communists.

Right. The Democratic party is actually the communists party. Our wanna be dictator King Obama is a communists black Muslim.

14 posted on 02/09/2012 7:58:13 PM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

My theory is that is why the democrat party has hung on to the color ‘blue’ in election result maps and ties, when it is normally switched every other election. The color red would make it all too obvious of the Marxist roots...


15 posted on 02/09/2012 8:08:12 PM PST by Wildbill22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

Both???


16 posted on 02/09/2012 8:13:09 PM PST by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
After World War II, the Soviet Union had set out bring the whole world under it influence. The USA provided the cornerstone that supported the resistance to the Soviet crusade and eventually exhausted the efforts of the USSR. Naturally the USA must never again carry that kind of influence and leadership.

Of course, the people of the Obama mindset believed that under the Soviet method the world would enter a state of Utopia. What would really happen that the rest of the world would become satellites and slaves of the Soviet bloc.

If anyone wants to know how life would be under the Soviets all the have to do is check out Burma, North Korea and Cuba.

17 posted on 02/09/2012 8:19:43 PM PST by oyez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

Absolutely! he is a red jihadist whoseend game is a caliphate and america destroyed. He is a vassal to the saudi king, the Sharif of Mecca!


18 posted on 02/09/2012 8:44:56 PM PST by sheik yerbouty ( Make America and the world a jihad free zone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade
Later they will use guns and death camps to force a Communist utopia—poverty for all but Party members who will live like kings.

If the mind-numbed lemmings who brought about this disaster in 2008 succeed in perpetuating it in 2012, they will deserve their fate. The rest of us will have failed in an almost impossible task of trying to win over a dumbed-down dependency class to conservatism.

19 posted on 02/09/2012 8:54:15 PM PST by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
I agree with all who connect Obama as a biological and ideological issue of 1960s Marxist- Alinsky campus radicals (spoiled brats is the correct term; violent, petulant, outrageous, OWS, undependable . . .)

which reminds me..

To the wall, street occupiers!

20 posted on 02/09/2012 9:21:04 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

NAILED IT!!! Obama campaigned as the agent for “change” the beguiled have put him in the WhiteHouse- the BEGUILDED defend him even today. Those who cling to their guns and the religion saw through it and have said Keep the Change -but we are not the ruling class we the ruled class.Obama has done both like any good student of Communism/or Islam.


21 posted on 02/10/2012 6:13:31 AM PST by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf
Credit is hereby given to tonight’s MSNBC’s “Mr. Ed Show.” (NO! The other talking horse!).

One was a talking horse. The other is a talking horse's ass.
22 posted on 02/10/2012 6:21:42 AM PST by crosshairs (Liberalism is to truth, what east is to west.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1; loveliberty2; StonyBurk; oyez; All

Starting with FDR, the Democrat Party began their attempt to incorporate the teachings of Karl Marx into the fabric of America by converting Marx’s dictum of “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.” into what we know today as “Class Warfare,” “the disparity between the haves and the have nots,” “wealth/income redistribution,” “ income inequality,” “the fairness doctrine,” “progressive taxation,” etc.

It took less than 80 years for the Social Security System to become a financially destructive program. This was FDR’s largest part of his New Deal. Since then, almost all Presidents, (from “both” political parties), have added their programs to the financially predatory, share-the-wealth, social-engineering plans started by FDR.

The result has been a pervasive appetite on the part of voters to expect each new presidential candidate to buy their votes with new “free” Federal programs that they think that they are entitled to. The Federal politicians in “both” political parties have been only to happy to comply.

Since we are a consumer-based society, we the consumers pay all the taxes. Businesses do not pay taxes. We pay the businesses for all additional expenses that the Federal, State and Local politicians add to the cost of selling goods and services to us.

Consider for a moment what the financial impact would be if there were no Federal, State, or Local taxes on any fuel used by trains, planes, ships and trucks that are part of the supply chain that delivers goods and services to us, the consumers. Would the cost of a loaf of bread, cell phone, or cost of gasoline at the pump go up or down?

The entitlement mentality of the American voter is still very strong. Consider for a moment who among us really wants in 2013 to receive 35% less financial payments from the Federal Government for our entitlements, including Food Stamps (Nixon), No Child Left Behind (GWB), Medicare (LBJ), Medicaid, and Social Security (FDR)?

Certainly not the Republican In Name Only, (RINO), Party, or the Democrat Party. Thus, we come to today where the RINOs are asked to accept the political plank that the Entitlements of the past are now liabilities for the future.

This concept was brought home forcefully in September, 2008 when the US Government’s Federal Housing Agency went Bankrupt. Americans lost 35 % of their wealth, but the US Federal Government has yet to cut its baselevel spending by the same 35 %.

The US Federal Government continues to live in denial by printing money backed only by the unsolicited pledge of American taxpayers to pay any future downside risk to owners of that money. This money is printed in the futile attempt, (it hasn’t worked yet), to stimulate the return of the 35 % loss of wealth.

The probability is that market forces of supply and demand will force the voters to choose politicians who will adjust Federal Entitlement spending down below market expectations.

The question of that voter mentality change relative to a financial collapse of the US Federal Government is still an open question. Greece and California will be interesting future shock examples of what this Nation can expect.

Romney personifies the denial of the RINO Party to recognize that the primary problem in America is the Entitlement mentality of the American voter. Our National Election of 2012 is all about the money, our money. The RINO Party continues to endorse their best Entitlement Liberal, as just business as usual.

Neither Romney or the GOP has definite plans to change anything of significance to the Entitlement expense that is essentially paid for by strangers who buy our Government Bonds.

Obama”care” not only is the fatal wound to America, it is also destructive to our Freedom of Religion, as well as Separation of Church and State.

Obama”care” is also the clearest definition, so far, of what the Democrat Party has stood for since FDR began to weave Marxism into the daily fabric of the United States of America, the home of the formerly Free and the formerly Brave.

To the best of my knowledge, since that time until now, not one Federal Politician has accepted responsibility for their actions, and inactions in this Federally-caused financial disaster, currently called “The Great Recession.”

Instead, two administrations, from “both” political parties, have successfully been able to convince the voting public, and their children, (especially the OWS), that the FHA/Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Bankruptcy was not the fault of Federal laws, regulations, regulators, or Congressional watchdog committee failures.

The CYA scapegoat was chosen to be only private business people who work on a highly Federally regulated industry on a street in New York City.


23 posted on 02/10/2012 6:57:46 AM PST by Graewoulf (( obama"care" violates the 1890 Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND is illegal by the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

You just about said it all in your post #23.


24 posted on 02/10/2012 7:54:31 AM PST by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson