Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'To Stop the Multiplication of the Unfit'
Townhall.com ^ | February 10, 2012 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 02/10/2012 4:20:12 AM PST by Kaslin

If you aren't creeped out by the No Birth Control Left Behind rhetoric of the White House and Planned Parenthood, you aren't listening closely enough. The anesthetic of progressive benevolence always dulls the senses. Wake up.

When a bunch of wealthy white women and elite Washington bureaucrats defend the trampling of religious liberties in the name of "increased access" to "reproductive services" for "poor" women, the ghost of Margaret Sanger is cackling.

As she wrote in her autobiography, Sanger founded Planned Parenthood in 1916 "to stop the multiplication of the unfit." This, she boasted, would be "the most important and greatest step towards race betterment." While she oversaw the mass murder of black babies, Sanger cynically recruited minority activists to front her death racket. She conspired with eugenics financier and businessman Clarence Gamble to "hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities" to sell their genocidal policies as community health and welfare services.

Outright murder wouldn't sell. But wrapping it under the egalitarian cloak of "women's health" -- and adorning it with the moral authority of black churches -- would. Sanger and Gamble called their deadly campaign "The Negro Project."

In other writings, historian Mike Perry found, Sanger attacked programs that provided "medical and nursing facilities to slum mothers" because they "facilitate the function of maternity" when "the absolute necessity is to discourage it." In an essay included in her writing collection held by the Library of Congress, Sanger urged her abortion clinic colleagues to "breed a race of thoroughbreds." Nationwide "birth control bureaus" would propagate the proper "science of breeding" to stop impoverished, non-white women from "breeding like weeds."

Speaking with CBS veteran journalist Mike Wallace in 1957, long after her racist views had supposedly mellowed, Sanger again revealed her true colors: "I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world -- that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically. Delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just marked when they're born. That to me is the greatest sin -- that people can -- can commit."

Sanger also elaborated on her anti-Catholic animus, telling one of Wallace's reporters that New York Catholics had no right to protest the use of their tax dollars for birth city birth-control programs: "(I)t's not only wrong, it should be made illegal for any religious group to prohibit dissemination of birth control -- even among its own members." When Wallace pressed her ("In other words, you would like to see the government legislate religious beliefs in a certain sense?"), Sanger laughed nervously and disavowed the remarks.

Fast forward: Five decades and 16 million aborted black babies later, Planned Parenthood's insidious agenda has migrated from inner-city "birth control bureaus" to public school-based health clinics to the White House -- forcibly funded with taxpayer dollars just as Sanger championed.

Several undercover stings by Live Action, pro-life documentarians, have exposed Planned Parenthood staff accepting donations over the years from callers posing as eugenics cheerleaders who wanted to earmark their contributions for the cause of aborting minority babies. "We can definitely designate it for an African-American," a Tulsa, Okla., Planned Parenthood employee eagerly promised.

What has cheap, easy and unmonitored "choice" for poor women in inner cities wrought? Nightmares like the Philadelphia Horror, where serial baby-killer Dr. Kermit Gosnell and his abortion clinic death squad oversaw the systematic execution of hundreds of healthy, living, breathing, squirming, viable black and Hispanic babies over 40 decades -- along with several minority mothers who may have lost their lives in his grimy birth control bureau.

City and state authorities looked the other way while jars of baby parts and reports of botched abortions and infanticides piled up. Beltway Democrats who now bray about their concern for "women's health" were silent about the Gosnell massacre and countless others like it in America's ghettos. Why?

The Obama administration is crawling with the modern-day heirs of the eugenics movement, from Planned Parenthood golden girl Kathleen Sebelius at the Department of Health and Human Services to the president's prestigious science czar John Holdren -- an outspoken proponent of forced abortions and mass sterilizations and a self-proclaimed protege of eugenics guru Harrison Brown, whom he credits with inspiring him to become a scientist.

Brown envisioned a government regime in which the "number of abortions and artificial inseminations permitted in a given year would be determined completely by the difference between the number of deaths and the number of births in the year previous." He urged readers to "reconcile ourselves to the fact that artificial means must be applied to limit birth rates." He likened the global population to a "pulsating mass of maggots."

Listen carefully as this White House dresses its Obamacare abortion mandate in the white lab coat of "reproductive services" for all. The language of "access to birth control" is the duplicitous code of Sanger's ideological grim reapers.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: abortion; deatheaters; eugenics; lifehate; obamacare; plannedparenthood; populationcontrol; sanger

1 posted on 02/10/2012 4:20:15 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

THIS IS NOT ABOUT WOMEN! It is about Leftism and the complete control of the public by the Government. And the daily beatdowns will continue until morale improves.


2 posted on 02/10/2012 4:26:03 AM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

Exactly


3 posted on 02/10/2012 4:37:55 AM PST by Kaslin (Acronym for OBAMA: One Big Ass Mistake America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Listen carefully as this White House dresses its Obamacare abortion mandate in the white lab coat of "reproductive services" for all. The language of "access to birth control" is the duplicitous code of Sanger's ideological grim reapers.

Indeed it is! Right on Michele.

4 posted on 02/10/2012 4:39:12 AM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Is seems ironically fitting, that the “unfit” overwhelmingly vote for those who seek to minimize the number of the “unfit”.


5 posted on 02/10/2012 5:06:23 AM PST by Common Sense 101 (Hey libs... If your theories fly in the face of reality, it's not reality that's wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Thank you Michelle.


6 posted on 02/10/2012 5:34:52 AM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: Kaslin
serial baby-killer Dr. Kermit Gosnell and his abortion clinic death squad oversaw the systematic execution of hundreds of healthy, living, breathing, squirming, viable black and Hispanic babies over 40 decades

Say what?

8 posted on 02/10/2012 5:43:10 AM PST by Graybeard58 (Eccl 10 v. 19 A feast is made for laughter, and wine maketh merry: but money answereth all things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Sense 101
Is seems ironically fitting, that the “unfit” overwhelmingly vote for those who seek to minimize the number of the “unfit”.

They're still slaves on the plantation - they just don't know it. Welfare/big government is the Master today.

9 posted on 02/10/2012 5:47:54 AM PST by 2nd amendment mama ( www.2asisters.org | Self defense is a basic human right!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
But what if these minority women actually do want access to birth control? Is it any less arrogant of conservatives to tell them, "No, honey, God doesn't want that. I know."
10 posted on 02/10/2012 5:55:14 AM PST by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

What’s stopping them?


11 posted on 02/10/2012 5:58:40 AM PST by GVnana (Newt 2012 - He Speaks for Us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Darth Vader Ginsberg stated that she thought abortion would only apply to certain people. Who could she have been referring to? The unfit perhaps?


12 posted on 02/10/2012 6:12:07 AM PST by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

All women have access to birth control now. And guess what - so does the OTHER party in every conception.


13 posted on 02/10/2012 6:14:10 AM PST by Tax-chick (Email your grandmother!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

Why should we “the taxpayer”, and any/or Christian church, be required to help them MURDER their babies!? Why should any taxpayers or any Christian church violate their conscience by having to provide birth control if they believe it is wrong? Why don’t those women exert some self control, or pay for their birth control themselves? That thinking makes my blood boil!


14 posted on 02/10/2012 6:26:21 AM PST by boxlunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Old Margaret, like all liberals/progressives, just knew she was smarter than everyone else.


15 posted on 02/10/2012 6:33:00 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

Well, I know God does not want us to permit abortion, the murder of the innocent.

I am a Catholic, and my church has policies about the use of contraception, but those policies do not include preventing women of other faiths from using contraceptives.

I don’t know of any conservatives who are telling people they can’t use contraceptives. Do you consider abortion an acceptable form of birth control?


16 posted on 02/10/2012 6:33:30 AM PST by Bigg Red (PI will for our republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

L

17 posted on 02/10/2012 6:36:14 AM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
I don’t know of any conservatives who are telling people they can’t use contraceptives.

Do you know any conservatives who are saying taxpayers should be forced to pay for it or that religious organizations who have moral objections should be forced, at the point of a Government gun by the way, to pay for it?

18 posted on 02/10/2012 6:38:55 AM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
I don’t know of any conservatives who are telling people they can’t use contraceptives.

Do you know any conservatives who are saying taxpayers should be forced to pay for it or that religious organizations who have moral objections should be forced, at the point of a Government gun by the way, to pay for it?

19 posted on 02/10/2012 6:40:23 AM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
*** But what if these minority women actually do want access to birth control? Is it any less arrogant of conservatives to tell them, "No, honey, God doesn't want that. I know." ***

Well if she's determined to kill her baby and live with the consequences then the answer should be: Okay 'honey', then pay for it out of your own pocket.

There's evil people who will do evil things and nobody can stop them. But I shouldn't be forced to help them in their deed. And that's what is happening. The gubmint is forcing people to aid and abet criminality or immorality through tax money.

Recall after Katrina when FEMA handed out those $2000 'credit cards' and it was found many of the 'needy' bought fancy top-notch handguns. Well how many of those 'free guns' were used to commit a crime or kill someone. A good percentage I'd wager. So again by gubmint actions I was aiding and abetting in some crime through use of my tax dollars.

The whole welfare system needs to be scrapped and started over with VERY limited benefits and for a VERY limited time. Now we're even paying for FREE cell phones for the 'poor'. That's insane!

20 posted on 02/10/2012 6:56:25 AM PST by Condor51 (Yo Hoffa, so you want to 'take out conservatives'. Well okay Jr - I'm your Huckleberry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"to stop the multiplication of the unfit."

Well, it is not working. Otherwise, Scary Reid, Nancy Peloser, Kohn Kerry, Coward Dean, Barbra Boxer, Mikhail Moore, George Sores, and more would be stopped.
21 posted on 02/10/2012 7:16:18 AM PST by do the dhue (WARNING: this site is not liable for the things I say)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Sense 101
Is seems ironically fitting, that the “unfit” overwhelmingly vote for those who seek to minimize the number of the “unfit”.

And only those who were NOT ABORTED get to vote on ABORTION.

22 posted on 02/10/2012 8:33:24 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Thanks to both Malkin for shining a light on the "hidden" goals of the "controllers," and Kaslin for posting!

Writers have been exposing socialism's tyrannical principles and goals for a century now. Those who have understood it best declared that its policies lead to tyranny and oppression.

Yet, we have arrogant Americans, born in liberty, and viewing themselves as "intellectuals" and "progressives," who have embraced socialist ideas over the ideas of liberty and are determined to impose its deadly limitations on a once-free people. Note the writer's warning that the "scheme of socialism is wholly incomplete unless it includes the power of restraining the increase of population."

Earlier this week, my post included the following:

From the Liberty Fund Library is "A Plea for Liberty: An Argument Against Socialism and Socialistic Legislation," edited by Thomas Mackay (1849 - 1912), originally published in 1891, Chapter 1, excerpted final paragraphs from Edward Stanley Robertson's essay:

"I have suggested that the scheme of Socialism is wholly incomplete unless it includes a power of restraining the increase of population, which power is so unwelcome to Englishmen that the very mention of it seems to require an apology. I have showed that in France, where restraints on multiplication have been adopted into the popular code of morals, there is discontent on the one hand at the slow rate of increase, while on the other, there is still a 'proletariat,' and Socialism is still a power in politics.
I.44
"I have put the question, how Socialism would treat the residuum of the working class and of all classes—the class, not specially vicious, nor even necessarily idle, but below the average in power of will and in steadiness of purpose. I have intimated that such persons, if they belong to the upper or middle classes, are kept straight by the fear of falling out of class, and in the working class by positive fear of want. But since Socialism purposes to eliminate the fear of want, and since under Socialism the hierarchy of classes will either not exist at all or be wholly transformed, there remains for such persons no motive at all except physical coercion. Are we to imprison or flog all the 'ne'er-do-wells'?
I.45
"I began this paper by pointing out that there are inequalities and anomalies in the material world, some of which, like the obliquity of the ecliptic and the consequent inequality of the day's length, cannot be redressed at all. Others, like the caprices of sunshine and rainfall in different climates, can be mitigated, but must on the whole be endured. I am very far from asserting that the inequalities and anomalies of human society are strictly parallel with those of material nature. I fully admit that we are under an obligation to control nature so far as we can. But I think I have shown that the Socialist scheme cannot be relied upon to control nature, because it refuses to obey her. Socialism attempts to vanquish nature by a front attack. Individualism, on the contrary, is the recognition, in social politics, that nature has a beneficent as well as a malignant side. The struggle for life provides for the various wants of the human race, in somewhat the same way as the climatic struggle of the elements provides for vegetable and animal life—imperfectly, that is, and in a manner strongly marked by inequalities and anomalies. By taking advantage of prevalent tendencies, it is possible to mitigate these anomalies and inequalities, but all experience shows that it is impossible to do away with them. All history, moreover, is the record of the triumph of Individualism over something which was virtually Socialism or Collectivism, though not called by that name. In early days, and even at this day under archaic civilisations, the note of social life is the absence of freedom. But under every progressive civilisation, freedom has made decisive strides—broadened down, as the poet says, from precedent to precedent. And it has been rightly and naturally so.
I.46
"Freedom is the most valuable of all human possessions, next after life itself. It is more valuable, in a manner, than even health. No human agency can secure health; but good laws, justly administered, can and do secure freedom. Freedom, indeed, is almost the only thing that law can secure. Law cannot secure equality, nor can it secure prosperity. In the direction of equality, all that law can do is to secure fair play, which is equality of rights but is not equality of conditions. In the direction of prosperity, all that law can do is to keep the road open. That is the Quintessence of Individualism, and it may fairly challenge comparison with that Quintessence of Socialism we have been discussing. Socialism, disguise it how we may, is the negation of Freedom. That it is so, and that it is also a scheme not capable of producing even material comfort in exchange for the abnegations of Freedom, I think the foregoing considerations amply prove."
EDWARD STANLEY ROBERTSON

Read the entire collection at the link provided.

23 posted on 02/10/2012 9:09:07 AM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

No, I do not.

And I am not sure what your line of questioning is implying about my comments.

I am pretty sure that what I said in my earlier post can be summed up with:

1) I oppose abortion because it is murder, and
2) Although I personally do not believe in the use of contraceptives, I don’t believe it is my business to forbid anyone else the use of contraceptives.

To your point, I also don’t believe that I should be forced by the government to provide anything for anyone — including food and shelter. My religious beliefs compel me to help those less fortunate, and I would be inclined to help them a lot more if the government would get the heck out of the picture.


24 posted on 02/10/2012 12:24:47 PM PST by Bigg Red (Pray for our republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red

You and I think a lot alike. I’m pleased to make your acquaintance.


25 posted on 02/10/2012 4:25:26 PM PST by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye; Kaslin
It is about Leftism and the complete control of the public by the Government. And the daily beatdowns will continue until morale improves.

Bump.

And how do these ogres continue to get away with this stuff? Liberal control of the media.

Thank God for Michelle. She writes it like it is.

26 posted on 02/10/2012 7:48:11 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
See it for what it is, Neo. See them for who they are, Mr. Anderson:
27 posted on 02/10/2012 7:55:15 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Look at the Hahavahd smirk on your poster's Nazi "health care worker" ..... oh, but he has a white coat on, so it's okay. Wonder if he's rolling him down to the crematorium?

All in a day's work, for the Ubermensch Left.

28 posted on 02/10/2012 7:55:30 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
The gubmint is forcing people to aid and abet criminality or immorality through tax money.

More of The Pretender's Third-World politics: "I am a river to my people!" </Anthony Quinn, in Lawrence of Arabia>

Or as the Pretender put it himself, "We've got to GET people some HE'P!!"

29 posted on 02/10/2012 8:10:02 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Click

30 posted on 02/12/2012 1:04:04 PM PST by RedMDer (Forward With Confidence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson