Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lentulusgracchus
"No, I saw that Rush comment, and I saw it as a call to other conservatives to start calling Obama what he is, a Communist. But Rush hasn't reiterated that language.."

I agree with what you wrote, but I was only responding to correct your statement wherein you flatly said that "...he can't say "Communist", as if he had never used that word to describe Obama and his policies. To wit:

"He and his friends are authentic Stalinist Communists, and nobody sees it except Rush, and even he can't say "Communist"."

As I showed you --(with links in my previous post)-- Rush spent two days in a row referring to Obama and his policies as "Communist", because Obama's speech was "the news of the day", and provided direct proof. IE: His own words indicted him as such.

44 posted on 02/11/2012 9:29:38 AM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Matchett-PI
I wasn't aware Rush had teed Obama up as a Stalinist Communist two days in a row. That suggests he's trying to give the idea currency, which will be a hard slog as my last post indicated, the LSM having done their best to inoculate all the Communists in American society against reprobation by patriots.

Let's see how far he gets. Like I said, I haven't heard any takers so far, although Gingrich came close at CPAC.

But it still needs to be said, to be put out there, that Obozo is a doctrinaire, party-line Stalinist of the old CPUSA, Earl Browder-and-Angela-Davis stripe.

45 posted on 02/11/2012 9:54:02 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson