Skip to comments.Fox Chicago News Anchor Echoes Curry's Concern for Caroline Kennedy
Posted on 02/10/2012 12:53:06 PM PST by ExTxMarine
Yesterday, NewsBuster Kyle Drennen detailed how NBC Today co-host Ann Curry fretted about the latest Kennedy scandal's impact on Caroline Kennedy. "What about Caroline, who is still alive?" she asked John F. Kennedy mistress Mimi Alford.
Last night on Fox Chicago News, anchor Bob Sirott picked up on the same theme in his "One More Thing" opinion segment:
"I wonder if she (Alford) feels guilty now about how President Kennedy's only living child Caroline might feel about her story?"
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
If not for DOUBLE standards, the liberals and Democrats (but I repeat myself) would have NO standards!
The old media - accessories to crimes, enablers, cowards, bought-off whores.
Not to mention how the Palin kids must have felt (still feel) about seeing their mother heaped upon with relentless hate and vitriol.
Well, this recent revelation is more evidence that Kennedy played his close associates as suckers.
Probably about the same as Chelsea Clinton felt about her mother’s HINO’s philandering.
Did the Kennedy family have and concern for Mary Jo?
Yes I know Ted was Mary Jo, yet................
Exactly. Newt’s children are alive. Where is the concern for them?
The left will use any flimsy excuse to try to stifle information about their people. But it is open season on conservatives and their families when it is politically expedient.
Where was the father's guilt for sleeping around, committing adultery, etc.? Since the father is a Liberal Icon (of course...he was a Democrat), they are concerned that DECENT COMMON SENSE PEOPLE won't vote for her when she runs for Public Office, due to "Sins of the father"???
Just as in Clinton's case, "it was only sex", in Gingrich's case, it's BLASPHEMOUS and SHOCKING!
No double standard in Lib's world....
Seems to me Caroline should know by now her father was a womanizer, so this revelation shouldn’t be shocking.
All this constant fawning and fretting over the Kennedys is ridiculous. Despite media assertions, they are not gods or saints. Time for them to buck up on their own without protection from the leftist media.
Bob Sirott and his sidekick Robin Robinson show their liberal bias every newscast. No different from all the other Chicago news readers....
Dems do have NO STANDARDS(for themselves) Remember when they attacked Trig Palin? A helpless little infant(with Downs).....Democrats are ruthless horrible people only concerned with their needs.
As long as we are living in a world where rumor and gossip replace fact.
When Caroline Kennedy was a young girl - the media adored protected her and John-John. Everything she endured was brought about by the Kennedys themselves. Now that this ‘third party’ book comes out Caroline is grown woman.
The Palin children were innocents, and still are young and impressionable. They were not spared from a vicious lying media which is probably why Sarah decided not to run for POTUS. The Palin children have been through the fires of hell - not of their own choosing.
JFK himself didn’t seem to care much about the impact of the affair on Alford or Caroline, otherwise he would’ve kept it in his pants, so why should I care how Caroline feels?
Similarly, I wonder if Mary Jo Kopechne’s family feel guilty that she ruined Fat Ted’s presidential aspirations.
Camelot Kennedy was a fantasy than never existed.
“I wonder if she (Alford) feels guilty now about how President Kennedy’s only living child Caroline might feel about her story?”
Why? JFK did that crap ... “you can not be shamed by someone else’s behavior”...Stuart Smalley.
Caroline “you know” Kennedy, nuff said.
Who cares what Caroline Kennedy thinks about this or anything else?
It's diificult to discern among the "ahhh..errrs you know, well you know errs...like you know"
Who gives a tinker’s dam?
She must really need the money. Her grandchildren must be so proud :-(
I would actually be very interested in Caroline Kennedy’s reaction and feelings... about this revelation about her father (when she was a toddler romping around the Oval Office) taking a young girl’s virginity and having that same young girl service one of his staffers... about her Uncle Teddy ending the life of another young intern with nary a qualm, nor a blip in his “public service life”... about her cousin who raped that girl down in Florida with Uncle Teddy running around the apartment... We’ve been living with these sainted Kennedys for 60 years and I’m frankly sick of them.
Yes its amazing to lister to her speak---she sounds rather uneducated. I didn't expect this from a Kennedy. Then again I cut Caroline a lot of slack--her family was torn apart by tragedy. As long as she stays out of politics I'm cool with her dumbed down speech and wish her well.
Nice how they are all concerned about a woman of a fify-ish age. Too bad these slime weren’t a bit more concerned about the abuse of power by JFK on a minor child (in those days 19 was still a minor). In fact it would have been considered rape in those days....but not to worry, he is our hero. Un-friggin-believable
For what it’s worth, the woman was challenged by Barbara Walters on The View today. Did she think of Caroline Kennedy? Why did she put into print a story that did not need to be told?
The JFK intern said she needed to free herself from the burdens of living with a secret for so long, and is hopeful her story is helpful to others who are suffering from keeping a secret.
Also, she was outed in a previously published book, and wanted to be in control of her own story, rather than let someone else define her.
No Problem...She already knows her father was a womanizing POS!!!
So where was Kennedy’s concern for his daughter when he was banging everything that moved.
Ha hahahahaha !!!!!
Hope I’m still alive when the sh*t hits the fan with the Obama’s.
This is the old left-wing game “Blame the Victim”. Look what that nasty woman is doing to poor Caroline! Does she have no DECENCY?
We should have anticipated that the “original” Monica would get the same treatment as the actual one!
The difference is Clinton ran as a 'Third Way' candidate. He didn't run as a conservative, especially social conservative, as Newt does now. People are judged according to what they say and do. It is us who apply double standard in this case. We talk about family values, morality, fidelity in marriage, etc., and yet we look the other way since we think Newt would beat 0bama.
I'm not talking about the FACT that Newt is compromised due to his OWN actions; I'm talking about the double standard when these issues go public.
In the case of Klintoon, there was NO OUTRAGE on the Lib side, no finger-pointing and chastising, and he had sex with a subordinate on MY DIME, then LIED ABOUT IT (waving his finger at me), and was NOT PROSECUTED FOR PERJURY.
Whereas, notwithstanding the illegal phone intercepted call that was SOLD TO THE MEDIA to bring Gingrich to an Ethics Complaint, which is TRUMPETED IN THE STATE-RUN-MEDIA, the Arkancides, Juanita Broderick, Katy Mahoney, Kathleen Willey, Jennifer Flowers, etc., etc., were all NO REASON TO ATTACK Klintoon, in the eyes of the Left.
The double standard is my complaint, and I don't condone the activities of Gingrich, either.
Thanks for the clarification. I agree that they didn’t attack Clinton as much as they did to Newt. While it indeed shows their double standard, I must say part of it is what the men represent, respectively. Newt supposedly represents social conservatism, so it’s not surprising that he was attacked viciously on that area for his actions. To be fair, some of the liberals, like feminist Naomi Wolf, saw what Clinton did. My tag line below is a a play of what she said regarding Clinton.
Excuuuuuse me! Where was Newt's concern for his children?
BS.So it's all about "herself" and her "burden" - no concern for the embarrassment for her own children and grandchildren? Did they need to know that Grandma was the president's slut?
Most families have secrets. Most of the time, these things are better left secret.
Carolyn doesn't remember much about her father since she was only 7 or so when he died. Most of the stuff she knows about her father came to her 2nd and 3rd hand and with a lot of filters. Time she hears the rest of the story.
Caroline’s a grown woman. She can handle it.
That was not my point. Where was JFK’s concern for his children.
(BJ really did pattern himself after his idol JFK didn't he....)