Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CPAC 2012: Newt Gingrich hits the reset button.
Human Events ^ | February 11, 2012 | John Hayward

Posted on 02/11/2012 10:49:12 PM PST by true believer forever

No one can say they don’t know what Newt Gingrich will do after his inauguration. He’s got big plans…

He pledged to have a full list of his proposed executive orders and presidential findings published online by October, so that every voter will know exactly what they’re getting. He wants every Republican candidate to campaign with him on a pledge to hit the next Congress in a monster jam session that repeals the job-killing centralized corruption of ObamaCare, Dodd-Frank, and Sarbanes-Oxley by the time he’s sworn in…

… and that’s just an appetizer.

Within two hours of plopping his Dilbert calendar and family photographs on the Resolute Desk, he’ll have signed an executive order to cashier every one of the Obama czars. Then he’ll sign one to approve the oil pipeline from Canada to Houston. By lunch, he’ll have moved the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. Next up would be re-instituting Ronald Reagan’s Mexico City policy, to forbid spending money to subsidize abortion overseas…

By the time ex-President Obama “lands in Chicago,” he aims to have repealed “40 percent of Obama’s government.”

(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cpac; cpac2012; election; nasty; newt; newt2012; sarcasm; smirky; speech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-144 next last
To: Marguerite

Thank you!

Here’s to Newt’s comfortable wilderness. He’s fearless.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/290490/why-newt-fights-robert-costa


51 posted on 02/12/2012 1:08:55 AM PST by b9 (NEWT is SUBSTANCE. The others are talking points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
Many people say : "Anybody is better than Obama."

Not being Obama is not enogh.

It happens that among the actual panel, I think that the best qualified to beat Obama is Newt Gingrich.

He has the fighting spirit to trash Obama and tear any of his arguments to pieces, he has the experience how to reform the government and administration, he has the best economic plan to redress America, and he is probably the only one he isn't running for personal glory, but because he profoundly thinks that the Republic is in lethal danger. This is Reagan's legacy in Newt's mind.

As he himself said, he was driven back to politics by the Supreme Court decision that "In God we trust" is "unconstitutional". He counts to fight against anyone who tries to pervert the Constitution.

He made mistakes in his 50-year-long presence in American politics, but WHO hasn't? However, there is a chasm between Newt and the other contenders. No one can hold him a candle as far as intelligence, knowledge and experience are concerned. I've made a through research into his acts, writings and "Contract for America 21st century" before I came to this conclusion.

52 posted on 02/12/2012 1:10:53 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: All
WHERE were the other presidential candidates during the electoral campaign fight to retake the Congress in 2010?

Newt was criss-crossing the country, supporting the Republican candidates and inflaming the enthusiasm of Republican base, explaining the importance to stop Obama destroying America.

http://youtu.be/ESG9IrOjX7c

In 2009 already: NEWT GINGRICH - Clueless Obama "Dangerously Confused" About America's Enemies

http://youtu.be/E8Z5MOa5YmA

53 posted on 02/12/2012 1:18:44 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm gohttp://youtu.be/E8Z5MOa5YmAod, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite
However, there is a chasm between Newt and the other contenders. yes, and above that chasm America hangs in the balance.
54 posted on 02/12/2012 1:32:26 AM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite

You’re mining some mighty precious Newt gems!

Obama is “The Most Radical President in American History”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESG9IrOjX7c&feature=youtu.be

Clueless Obama “Dangerously Confused” About America’s Enemies
http://youtu.be/E8Z5MOa5YmA


55 posted on 02/12/2012 1:43:13 AM PST by b9 (NEWT is SUBSTANCE. The others are talking points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever; b9; onyx
How Conservative is Newt's Actual Voting Record in the House (1979-1999) ? (his voting record is 91% conservative over a period of 20 years)

Voted YES on the Reagan tax cut of 1981

Voted YES on the Reagan tax reform bill of 1986

Voted NO on the George H.W. Bush "Read My Lips" tax hike in 1990.

Voted NO on the Clinton tax hike in 1993.

Voted YES on the capital gains tax cut in 1997.

Voted NO on the Chrysler bailout in 1979

Voted YES on the Gramm-Rudman balanced budget bill in 1985

Voted YES on a balanced budget amendment (as part of the "Contract for America" effort that he led) in 1995

Led the effort and voted YES to cut $16.4 billion from the budget in 1995.

Voted YES on welfare reform in 1996

How much federal spending increased while Gingrich was Speaker of the House (1995-1999)?

Federal spending rose an average of 3.1% a year while he was Speaker - this is the lowest rate of spending growth over the last 30 years. Federal spending as a % of GDP fell from 21% to 18.5%, a whopping decline in 4 short years

Under Obama, a whopping 8.6% a year.

56 posted on 02/12/2012 1:56:40 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm gohttp://youtu.be/E8Z5MOa5YmAod, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: b9
If you want more, I've got more :)

2009, Newt Rips Gore's ' End of Fossil Energy Facts' To Pieces

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7VUg7nG3lw&feature=player_embedded

2009 Newt Gingrich Slams Nancy Pelosi As "Despicable, Dishonest And Vicious"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACek8xwMpJs&feature=player_embedded

57 posted on 02/12/2012 2:04:27 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm gohttp://youtu.be/E8Z5MOa5YmAod, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite

OOps, I s..d my tagline


58 posted on 02/12/2012 2:05:43 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: All
Mswalnut replies to R.Costa's article at National Review, 02/09/12:

"Whatever one might say about Newt, there is no denying the fact that he is the only candidate who had demonstrated with actual past accomplishments the attributes that our country gravely needs now.

And that is my main consideration in choosing our leader, not some nebulous idea like electability which implies voting according to how we think others will vote, which is ridiculous.

Some had pointed to the fact that Newt didn’t get on the ballot of some states as evidence he was ill-prepared to be president. But one can also argue that it shows his superior motive of wanting to do something only after seeing the dangerous course the nation is on, by jumping into the race even without a lot of resources. Compare that to Romney who for years wants to be president but who does not even see the problems the country is facing.

I hope Newt will do well in the rest of the primaries and become our nominee. If not, I can take great solace in my long-held belief that for better or worse (from our perspective), the outcomes of the primaries, as well as the general election, are not going to be decided by man. And until that final outcome is revealed, all man could/should do is work steadfastly toward his goal.

God bless you Newt and thank you for the courage in stepping up to the challenge when others aren’t."

59 posted on 02/12/2012 2:11:16 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite

Thank you VERY much!!!


60 posted on 02/12/2012 2:28:03 AM PST by b9 (NEWT is SUBSTANCE. The others are talking points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite

Thank you, thank you, thank you!


61 posted on 02/12/2012 2:29:52 AM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite; Windflier

I want Windflier to read this!
Thank you so much for finding and posting it


62 posted on 02/12/2012 2:32:42 AM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite

When in that Timeline did he join Pelosi for a cuddle on the couch?
When in that timeline did he support DEde Scozafawa?
When in that Timeline did he do work for Fannie and Freddie?

And just to see your head explode,What will he do after Santorum is sworn in as President?


63 posted on 02/12/2012 2:51:22 AM PST by Craftmore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

“The left is not made up of friends and allies. It’s made up of competing parasites.”
~Grover Norquist

Sounds like just what I would call the Republican Establishment.


64 posted on 02/12/2012 3:56:13 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Craftmore

That’s pretty weak. One wonders when in your timeline you’ll post Santorum’s platform and explain how it’s better. Let me guess, Saint Rick’s platform is that he promises to kiss all the little babies, publish more family photos, and tell us over and over again that he’s the true conservative? LOL


65 posted on 02/12/2012 3:56:30 AM PST by Apollo5600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever; onyx; All
This is great! This is the way to campaign. It takes all the guess work out of what will the candidates do when they are elected.

Everyone's biggest fear is that of the big three still running,Newt,Mitt and Santorum they won't do the right thing. All this is based on past performance.Campaigning like this spells it out and it will fly everywhere.

66 posted on 02/12/2012 3:59:03 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Apollo5600

Its not weak,I seem to remember when Newt endorsed Dede everyone of FreeRepublic wanted to lynch him and run him out of town on a rail,,Same with the couch incident,,How soon we forget...


67 posted on 02/12/2012 4:02:35 AM PST by Craftmore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Craftmore

And I believe I asked you to reply with something substantial. It seems the supporters of Saint Rick and Rick himself are only good at insulting the other candidates... not at offering solutions. How about you tell me how Saint Rick’s platform is better? Maybe you could start with explaining why Saint Rick voted against a flat tax, refuses to promote one now, and also bashed the fair tax? Maybe you could explain to me why your boy Rick doesn’t support a flat, fair corporate tax favoring ALL business, as opposed to just certain FAVORED businesses of his?

The vapid nature of “conservatives” these days continues to shock me, over and over again. Keep this s*** up and we’ll lose Newt the same way we lost Cain, and then we’ll be stuck with Saint Rick whose best quality is that he smiles real good and hugs his family a lot.


68 posted on 02/12/2012 4:13:55 AM PST by Apollo5600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite

Thanks so much for mentioning this guy! He is supremely brilliant! Here’s a quick look at his take on what ozero is trying to do to the insurance compaines.

http://www.thomas-purcell.com/


69 posted on 02/12/2012 4:19:04 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: b9

bttt


70 posted on 02/12/2012 4:27:05 AM PST by petercooper (The one difference between Obama & Romney: Obama is only half white.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Craftmore

I seem to remember when Newt endorsed Dede everyone of FreeRepublic wanted to lynch him and run him out of town on a rail,,Same with the couch incident,,How soon we forget...

Not sure how you came up with “everyone” wanted to... Newt was a civilian, and he gave his reasons for what he was doing. A lot of people might have thought what he did was different from what they wanted, or would do under the same circumstances, but lynch? Over the top, and jumping the shark. One could have done a /sarc or a JMHO.

My only comment would be, I hope “everyone” is going to be willing to support the nominee, (fill in the blank) once the incendiary primary is over.


71 posted on 02/12/2012 4:33:59 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite

Good catch here. When Santorum’s voting record comes up its abysmal compared to Newt and Mitt is all too well known starting with Mittcare and it only gets worse.


72 posted on 02/12/2012 4:35:18 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: wita
The left is not made up of friends and allies. It’s made up of competing parasites.” ~Grover Norquist Sounds like just what I would call the Republican Establishment.

Just which party did you want to govern the nation,since there but two choices.

73 posted on 02/12/2012 4:38:19 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite

BTTT..... Thank you for finding and posting. That needs to be disseminated far and wide.


74 posted on 02/12/2012 4:39:11 AM PST by TruthFactor (The Death of Nations: Pornography, Homosexuality, Abortion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Apollo5600
we’ll be stuck with Saint Rick whose best quality is that he smiles real good and hugs his family a lot.

He's an 'umble man, is Mr. Rick.

I haven't liked him from the start because I thought he reminded me of Jimmy Carter, sort of smug and condescending in his little blue sweater. Then I realized he really reminded me of Uriah Heep. I think he's a very ambitious man, not because of any ideas he may have, but because he really wants to be president and frankly, he'll do anything to get it.

Like Romney, Santorum appears to have been doing nothing recently but run for president. He virtually moved to Iowa and spent most of the year before the vote traveling around the state, for example. He has no positions that would distinguish him in any way, but ran on being a "good family man" and dragging his long-suffering family around with him to prove it.

75 posted on 02/12/2012 4:59:07 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

See, THIS is the Newt who should have been campaigning since before Iowa! I knew he was there, but was hiding. I hope there’s enough time to make a difference!


76 posted on 02/12/2012 5:05:31 AM PST by Yashcheritsiy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
That was not the base of the party and CPAC is no longer Conservative... and neither is the republican party... but when we are finished with this Conservative revolution... it will be Conservative.

LLS

77 posted on 02/12/2012 5:08:13 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Hey repubic elite scumbags... jam mitt up your collective arses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer
That was not the base of the party and CPAC is no longer Conservative... and neither is the republican party... but when we are finished with this Conservative revolution... it will be Conservative.

Exactly. CPAC, Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, and the rest are now part of the problem, rather than part of the solution.

78 posted on 02/12/2012 5:09:44 AM PST by Yashcheritsiy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

If you haven’t already, see my 71.


79 posted on 02/12/2012 5:29:21 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: wita
I have always been an "anyone but obama type."

Right now however we have the chance to put in the best of the big three.

Your point about Newt only accentuates that he remains what I have been saying for 5 years here on this board hes still 80/20.

80% of the time he's brilliant the rest he's obviously not. Out of 300 million citizens these are our choices. These three. We have to live with that.

80 posted on 02/12/2012 6:23:53 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: b9

While I have plenty of issues with Grover, THAT is a keeper!


81 posted on 02/12/2012 6:43:47 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: onyx
His ideas and solutions are all written out and posted at Newt.org but the vast majority of folks won’t take the time to go there to read it for themselves.

How true.

The biggest obstacle in the way of electing good leaders is greed and ignorance.

Either they are on the dole or they are too lazy to educate themselves.

82 posted on 02/12/2012 6:48:45 AM PST by USS Alaska (Nuke The Terrorist Savages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wita
My only comment would be, I hope “everyone” is going to be willing to support the nominee, (fill in the blank) once the incendiary primary is over.


Maybe by the close of Super Tuesday the perspective will become more clear.

Super Tuesday Delegates

Alaska         27
Georgia        76
Idaho          32
Massachusetts  41
North Dakota   28
Ohio           66
Oklahoma       43
Tennessee      58
Vermont        17
Virginia       49
Wyoming        29
 
Total         466
To Nominate  1144
 

83 posted on 02/12/2012 6:51:45 AM PST by deport (..............God Bless Texas............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Thanks for the post. It neatly sums up exactly why we should support Newt. Newt not only has a vision of what America should be but has a laid out a specific plan to get us there.

No other candidate has done that.


84 posted on 02/12/2012 7:09:41 AM PST by FerociousRabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Craftmore

When in his timeline did he join Arlen Specter TWICE on his campaign trail, pretending that Arlen was “only” a “soft” pro-abortion?
When in that timeline he did meet the lobbyists on K Street, who gave him a payback in sonorous $$$$, after he lost his seat in the Senate?
When in that timeline did he strongly rally in support to Mitt Romney, calling him the “only true conservative”, even if that happened only two years after pro-life Romney signed Ted Kennedy’s healthcare mandate, known as Romneycare ?
When in that timeline did he cheat the Penn. taxpayers’ of $100,000?
When in that timeline did he support the idea that the government “has the obligation” to control the internet?
When in that timeline did he say that “The Pursuit of Happiness Harms America”, disavowing the Declaration of Independence?

No, I don’t want THAT flip-flopper Rick as president.


85 posted on 02/12/2012 7:14:45 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever; b9; onyx; All

They all say: Newt - The only Reagan Conservative candidate in the race

http://youtu.be/KwMfGC18tgc


86 posted on 02/12/2012 7:22:59 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: livius

Oh Hes an egotistical man is mr Newt,With his gold diggin cheatin wife by his side.Every time I lissen to em,Iffin I close me eyes,he sounds like an old woman with a bad cases of the ooopsies he does,,Mayhaps he should cozy up on the couch with that other old woman miss Pelosi and take a bit of rest.


87 posted on 02/12/2012 7:30:01 AM PST by Craftmore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: All

WHO was with the Tea Party people from the very beginning?

http://youtu.be/Ca3VLOvkAMc


88 posted on 02/12/2012 7:30:17 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: onyx
I want Windflier to read this!

Morning, Onyx. I'm here - coffee in hand. Starting at the top.

89 posted on 02/12/2012 7:31:01 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
"This is the year to reset this country in a decisive, bold way. We need to teach the Republican establishment a lesson. We are determined to rebuild America not to manage its decay." --Newt Gingrich, CPAC, February 10, 2012

“I’m ready to describe my 15 percent flat tax as the "Mitt Romney" flat tax,” Gingrich declared. “I’d like to bring everybody else down to Mitt’s rate, not try to bring him up to some other rate.”

"I have proposed an alternative flat tax that people could fill out where you could either keep the current system — this is what they do in Hong Kong — . . . with all of its deductions and all its paperwork, or you’d have a single page: ‘I earned this amount. I have this number of dependents. Here is 15 percent.’ My goal is to shrink the government to fit the revenue, not to raise the revenue to catch up with the government (overspending)."

At 15 percent, the rich will pay more than those less rich. Someone who earns $100,000 would pay $15,000 in taxes, and someone who makes $100 million would pay $15 million. Doing simple math confirms that $15 million is much more than $15,000. That IS “fair share.”

Deroy Murdock wrote, "Republican primary voters now face mixed messengers: Gingrich possesses a luggage carousel worth of personal baggage, a visionary tax plan, and the courage of Godzilla. Romney presents a mere tote bag of quirks, a tepid tax proposal, and the bravery of a hummingbird."

90 posted on 02/12/2012 7:49:05 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: onyx
"Whatever one might say about Newt, there is no denying the fact that he is the only candidate who had demonstrated with actual past accomplishments the attributes that our country gravely needs now.

And that is my main consideration in choosing our leader, not some nebulous idea like electability..."

Exactly what I've been saying about Newt for months and months. He's not just talk. He has walked the walk. None of the other candidates can hold a candle to his record of accomplishment.

I don't know about others, but I've got a lot more trust in the promises of someone who's actually got a record of getting things done, than someone who doesn't.

91 posted on 02/12/2012 7:53:25 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom
"This is the year to reset this country in a decisive, bold way. We need to teach the Republican establishment a lesson. We are determined to rebuild America not to manage its decay." --Newt Gingrich, CPAC, February 10, 2012

“I’m ready to describe my 15 percent flat tax as the "Mitt Romney" flat tax,” Gingrich declared. “I’d like to bring everybody else down to Mitt’s rate, not try to bring him up to some other rate.”

"I have proposed an alternative flat tax that people could fill out where you could either keep the current system — this is what they do in Hong Kong — . . . with all of its deductions and all its paperwork, or you’d have a single page: ‘I earned this amount. I have this number of dependents. Here is 15 percent.’ My goal is to shrink the government to fit the revenue, not to raise the revenue to catch up with the government (overspending)."

At 15 percent, the rich will pay more than those less rich. Someone who earns $100,000 would pay $15,000 in taxes, and someone who makes $100 million would pay $15 million. Doing simple math confirms that $15 million is much more than $15,000. That IS “fair share.”

Deroy Murdock wrote, "Republican primary voters now face mixed messengers: Gingrich possesses a luggage carousel worth of personal baggage, a visionary tax plan, and the courage of Godzilla. Romney presents a mere tote bag of quirks, a tepid tax proposal, and the bravery of a hummingbird."

92 posted on 02/12/2012 8:04:39 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wita; All

“when Newt endorsed Dede...”

Newt has admitted it was a mistake to back Dede Scozzafava, the Republican nominee in the 2009 NY-23 special election.

Hoffman, the Conservative Party candidate whom Scozzafava was running against, Doug Hoffman, recently remarked about Newt’s endorsement of his rival, “I would advise other conservative Republicans: Don’t hold this against him....Newt apologized to me for not endorsing me, and that’s water over the dam, I think.”

“He was very sincere in his apology,” said Hoffman. “He was given misinformation as to what this race was all about, and what the other candidate was all about. The people in this district, the sort of local leaders who had endorsed Scozzafava, fed him the wrong information.”

http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2011/11/18/the_tea_party_candidate_that_newt_screwed_over_has_no_hard_feelings.html


93 posted on 02/12/2012 8:19:28 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite

6 1/2 minutes of goosebumps, right there!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwMfGC18tgc&feature=youtu.be

God Bless You, Marguerite!


94 posted on 02/12/2012 8:58:23 AM PST by b9 (NEWT is SUBSTANCE. The others are talking points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite

6 1/2 minutes of goosebumps, right there!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KwMfGC18tgc&feature=youtu.be

God Bless You, Marguerite!


95 posted on 02/12/2012 8:58:36 AM PST by b9 (NEWT is SUBSTANCE. The others are talking points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: TruthFactor; true believer forever; b9; onyx; All

WHO among the Republican candidates strongly defends the Law of the Land, the Declaration of Independence, the Federal Papers and the REPUBLIC, as the Founders Fathers created, and swears to restore it after years of liberals’ damage to it?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=lInT1DgqByI

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.” - Ronald Reagan


96 posted on 02/12/2012 10:15:47 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: TruthFactor; true believer forever; b9; onyx; All

WHO among the Republican candidates strongly defends the Law of the Land, the Declaration of Independence, the Federal Papers and the REPUBLIC, as the Founders Fathers created, and swears to restore it after years of liberals’ damage to it?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=lInT1DgqByI

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.” - Ronald Reagan


97 posted on 02/12/2012 10:17:51 AM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

There’s so much misinformation flying around,a lot of stuff to sort through. Exactly how many delegates are needed to determine which candidate gets into the general election?


98 posted on 02/12/2012 10:25:54 AM PST by gimme1ibertee ("Criticism......brings attention to an unhealthy state of things"-Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

I thought of your straight away because you could have written those very words!


99 posted on 02/12/2012 10:31:12 AM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite

Newt Gingrich on judges and the courts! Thank you!


100 posted on 02/12/2012 10:32:33 AM PST by onyx (SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC, DONATE MONTHLY. If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson