Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum Doesn't Fall For Gregory's Bait On Banning Working Mothers From His Administration
NewsBusters ^ | Mark Finkelstein

Posted on 02/12/2012 10:13:02 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

On today's Meet The Press, "moderator" David Gregory gave a good preview of how the MSM/Obama industrial complex will try to cariacture and demonize Rick Santorum should he become the Republican presidential candidate.

Gregory asked Santorum whether, if elected president, he would only permit single women without children to work in his administration. That's right: Gregory was actually wondering whether Santorum would prohibit mothers from serving. Santorum didn't rise to Gregory's absurd bait, giving a smiling and good-natured response to the effect all women would be welcome in a Santorum administration.

View the video here.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: davidgregory; feminism; msm; ricksantorum; santorum4romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-69 next last

1 posted on 02/12/2012 10:13:04 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Gregory asked Santorum whether, if elected president, he would only permit single women without children to work in his administration.

That's a hell of a thing to ask, Gregory is married and working isn't she?

2 posted on 02/12/2012 10:18:25 AM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; Diogenesis; MEG33; PGalt; ...

Ping to Today show list.


3 posted on 02/12/2012 10:18:56 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (FReepmail or ping me to be put on my ping list for criticism of liberal media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Santorum will spend far more time answering these types of questions in a General Election than he would all others combined.

They're going easy on him now as they would love to see a decades-long culture warrior as the GOP nominee.

Unfortunately, there's a real good chance they'll get their wish.

Santorum will NOT be vetted on cultural issues in a GOP primary. Everyone is afraid of his fellow Social Conservatives...30-40% of the GOP electorate who often votes as a bloc.

Only Social Conservatives are empowered to look at this man's positions and judge how they will play in the General Election. This cannot be an emotional evaluation. It must be a severe, intellectual examination.

Because, once the G3eneral Campaign starts you can bet your sweet bippy the left will go after Santorum as viciously as they can on what are certainly winning issues.

If Santorum is the nominee, Obama will win at least 45 states and at least 58% of the vote.

Easy.

4 posted on 02/12/2012 10:32:03 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

This is just more evidence that the GOP debates should not be moderated by anyone with a connection to mainstream news. The official talking heads have but one mission: destroy Republicans.


5 posted on 02/12/2012 10:37:06 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (I am pro-Jesus, anti-abortion, pro-limited government, anti-GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
From your intellectual standpoint, what questions would you ask Santorum?
6 posted on 02/12/2012 10:40:13 AM PST by Jacquerie (No court will save us from ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

If Santorum is the nominee, Obama will win at least 45 states and at least 58% of the vote.

Oh for goodness sakes. 45 states? Right now he is the one who is tied with Obama in the general. What happened to everyone saying that you could put up a monkey and they would win. Are we seriously thinking that Obama would win with any of our candidates? Are you sure you are not an Obama supporter? Anybody who is saying Obama is going to win in November with Santorum is obviously working for Obama.


7 posted on 02/12/2012 10:45:03 AM PST by napscoordinator (A moral principled Christian with character is the frontrunner! Congrats Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
I would advise him as follows:

State that all GOP candidates espouse the same moral philosophy. Even though there is some variation in what they say...and outright divergence in their past...all candidates support the same platform planks.

He should also make a HARD SHIFT in his leading themes to the Size and Scope of the Federal Government and the corruption of the DC/Wall Street cabal.

He must put SPECIFIC proposals on the table to balance the budget by REDUCING the size and scope of government and he must promise to root out corruption in Congress.

Those two things will win the election.

Note: For those who will retort that the congress is essentially immune from investigation by the executive...the investigations start on Wall Street, Fannie and Freddie. If those folks implicate office holders, you can pursue with ZEAL.

8 posted on 02/12/2012 10:47:51 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
"Gregory asked Santorum whether, if elected president, he would only permit single women without children to work in his administration."

Of course I would permit single women without children to work in my administration said Santorum. But I would ban single men without children from working in my administration.

9 posted on 02/12/2012 10:51:59 AM PST by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

If Santorum is the nominee, Obama will win at least 45 states and at least 58% of the vote.

That won't ever happen, regardless of who the GOP candidate might be. Obama, with his typical arrogance with requiring religious organizations to fund abortions and birth control, has created the seeds of the greatest crushing defeat of all time in American politics. The last thing Obama wants to face in November is a genuine pro-life candidate. There never has been a mandate from the people for abortions in this country and now with this latest example of religious bigotry, it seals the fate of those who embrace the culture of death.

10 posted on 02/12/2012 10:52:04 AM PST by garybob (More sweat in training, less blood in combat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
"Anybody who is saying Obama is going to win in November with Santorum is obviously working for Obama."

Your zeal has blinded you.

I stick by my prediction and hope we don't have the opportunity to see if it's true.

Now, as for your attack on me, personally, apologize.

11 posted on 02/12/2012 10:52:11 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Yep. They’re holding some stuff back too, to no-doubt use if he becomes the nominee. For example, one of my “friends” on FaceBook posted a video of him talking with constituents in which he says “I don’t want to make black people’s lives better by giving them somebody else’s money”. You can bet they’ll be playing that 24x7 if he wins.


12 posted on 02/12/2012 10:53:25 AM PST by Scutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Yep. They’re holding some stuff back too, to no-doubt use if he becomes the nominee. For example, one of my “friends” on FaceBook posted a video of him talking with constituents in which he says “I don’t want to make black people’s lives better by giving them somebody else’s money”. You can bet they’ll be playing that 24x7 if he wins.


13 posted on 02/12/2012 10:53:34 AM PST by Scutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Santorum made Gregory look like an ass. He actually laughed at him.


14 posted on 02/12/2012 10:57:17 AM PST by Sudetenland (Anybody but Obama!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
"That's a hell of a thing to ask, Gregory is married and working isn't she?"

It could be that David's husband just stays home and takes care of the house.

15 posted on 02/12/2012 11:01:53 AM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
. It must be a severe, intellectual examination.

Santorum's religiosity, which is in step with our Framers, never accepted abortion.

In IL, Senator Hussein voted to let babies who were supposed to be aborted, but oops, were born alive, to be set aside to die. What is the body count since 1973? 40 million?

Does that count as an intellectual comparison to you or is it just emotional? Is 40 million a tragedy or just a statistic?

16 posted on 02/12/2012 11:02:22 AM PST by Jacquerie (No court will save us from ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

I stick by my prediction and hope we don't have the opportunity to see if it's true.

So, what is this "prediction" based on?

17 posted on 02/12/2012 11:04:31 AM PST by garybob (More sweat in training, less blood in combat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
If Santorum is the nominee, Obama will win at least 45 states and at least 58% of the vote.

Would you like to put some big money where you big mouth is on this?

18 posted on 02/12/2012 11:09:25 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

The response for every socially conservative candidate should be as follows:

1. I am a Constitutionalist. This means whatever you do in your private life is your business. It is NOT the Government’s Business. Period.

2. Whatever you do in your private life is your responsibility so DO NOT make your fellow citizens pay for your actions.

Enough Said.


19 posted on 02/12/2012 11:09:58 AM PST by Chgogal (WSJ, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

The response for every socially conservative candidate should be as follows:

1. I am a Constitutionalist. This means whatever you do in your private life is your business. It is NOT the Government’s Business. Period.

2. Whatever you do in your private life is your responsibility so DO NOT make your fellow citizens pay for your actions.

Enough Said.


20 posted on 02/12/2012 11:10:10 AM PST by Chgogal (WSJ, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

The response for every socially conservative candidate should be as follows:

1. I am a Constitutionalist. This means whatever you do in your private life is your business. It is NOT the Government’s Business. Period.

2. Whatever you do in your private life is your responsibility so DO NOT make your fellow citizens pay for your actions.

Enough Said.


21 posted on 02/12/2012 11:10:25 AM PST by Chgogal (WSJ, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Sorry about the triple posts. : (


22 posted on 02/12/2012 11:13:14 AM PST by Chgogal (WSJ, Kristol, Krauthammer, Rove et al., STFU. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

They will do the same sort of thing to whatever candidate we put up - they even did it to McCain.


23 posted on 02/12/2012 11:16:42 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
Non sequitor.

All Republicans are opposed to abortion, with the possible exception of Romney who would likely fold under political pressure.

My references were to what themes a candidate should lead with if they want to win a general election.

If you believe a candidate can lead with the Social Conservative mainstays and get elected in a national election, you're entitled to your opinion on that.

I just happen to disagree. And yes, I am pro life, pro marriage too...contrary to somebody who accused me of working for Obama on this thread.

Remember, Santorum lost PA...a Catholic rust-belt state...by over 18% on virtually the same platform he espouses today.

Do you think there's a majority of voters nationwide that will see otherwise?

24 posted on 02/12/2012 11:17:36 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
voted to let babies who were supposed to be aborted, but oops, were born alive, to be set aside to die.

Yes...it's difficult to get any more extreme than Obama just with that vote in his history alone, and should be brought up and argued as such anytime someone in the media or the left calls Santorum or anyone else and extremist by comparison.

25 posted on 02/12/2012 11:20:00 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
"They will do the same sort of thing to whatever candidate we put up"

Each candidate has their weakness. Some of the weaknesses can turn an election, some not.

Romney is toast in a general election even if every member of the GOP votes for him (extremely unlikely). They will go after Romney on Bain/1% AND the tenets of Mormonism. There will be specials on NBC/ABC/CBS talking about magic underwear and how little girls are forced to become wives. Truth or reason will have nothing to do with this...only focus-tested emotional responses. By the time they are done Romney will be a space alien from Wall Street who advocates the enslavement and rape of little girls, his own included.

I have already opined on Santorum's weaknesses.

Paul will do well until it comes to Foreign Policy. For the first time in our lifetimes the Democrat Party will be able to run to the right of a GOP POTUS candidate on Foreign Policy and Defense. Disastrous.

Newt has issues too: Moon Colony. 3 Wives. The Pelosi couch/Global Warming.

But Gingrich could also do what none of these other candidates has demonstrated the ability to do: CHANGE THE ARGUMENT to the Size and Scope of the Federal Government and the systemic corruption of the Wall Street/DC Cabal.

26 posted on 02/12/2012 11:27:22 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Non sequitor.


27 posted on 02/12/2012 11:33:33 AM PST by Jacquerie (No court will save us from ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
If Santorum is the nominee, Obama will win at least 45 states and at least 58% of the vote.

I think you're a bit high with those numbers, but you're on the right track. If it's Obama vs. Santorum, Obama will win handily. And yes, I'd bet on that. I wonder if Vegas accepts those kind of bets.

The problem is that if it's not Santorum as nominee, then must it be Mittens? Ugh.

By the way, I'm afraid you're going to be a victim of a kill-the-messenger routine.

28 posted on 02/12/2012 11:49:47 AM PST by Leaning Right (Why am I carrying this lantern? you ask. I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Well its going to be he or Romney so you better choose.


29 posted on 02/12/2012 12:01:21 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Santorum is a lot smarter than the media gives him credit for and attempting to beat up on a perceived nice guy will be disastrous for them.

The question ranks right up there with Chris Wallace asking Michele Bachmann whether she would be subservient to her husband if she were elected president.

I’ve seen him debate democrats and he’s no pushover.


30 posted on 02/12/2012 12:08:47 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Rick Santorum opposed TARP and did not follow the GOP bail-out crowd. He opposed the healthcare individual mandate as far back as 1994. He is big on border/national security and defense. He did not use socialist rhetoric against Romney for his behavior at Bain nor did he goose and tickle Nancy Pelosi in a love seat while making horny eyes at each other over the global warming hoax. Rick voted against Cap and Trade and for drilling in ANWR PLUS his Christian Conservative bona fides are the very best.

I voted for him here in South Carolina because he is the most consistant conservative, warts and all, with the least baggage and the best chance at beating Obama.

Others may disagree but that’s ok because even if we leave out the arguments, just disagreeing with me makes you wrong and if you continue to do so, stupid;)


31 posted on 02/12/2012 12:12:27 PM PST by Happy Rain ("If you're shiftless and in doubt-find a liberal whine and pout-pretty soon you're making out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Santorum is a far better general election candidate then you think unlike Mitt who is going to get railed he was born with a silver spoon in his mouth and Newt who is an automatic 20 point gender gap and that is being intellectually honest Santorum actually appeals to the blue dog Reagan democrats of the midwest with his working class backround and love he has of his original wife kinda need a few of those to win the swing states


32 posted on 02/12/2012 12:19:30 PM PST by Leclair10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
"By the way, I'm afraid you're going to be a victim of a kill-the-messenger routine."

I'm used to it.

One of the things I like about FR is that I have an opportunity to engage my SoCon brethren in lively debate. I have learned over the years I often get a vicious emotional response, not by advocating against the positions that I myself hold, but by espousing my opinion that they don't win national elections.

I believe if the GOP is not talking about the Size and Scope of the Federal Government, Rule of Law, National Security and the corrupt Beltway/Wall Street cabal...with every spoken breath...we lose and we lose big.

I accept that others hold a different opinion than me.

I just don't think we have a majority mindshare on Social Issues and I think we've crossed the POLITICAL threshold of acquiring that mindshare.

Only if the culture itself changes will our views prevail.

It's either that, or replacing the existing government with a classic monarchy, or Federal Empire not unlike the Holy Roman Empire of old.

That bears consideration.

33 posted on 02/12/2012 12:24:33 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Leclair10
"Santorum actually appeals to the blue dog Reagan democrats of the midwest with his working class backround and love he has of his original wife kinda need a few of those to win the swing states"

Santorum lost PA, similar to what you describe above, by over 18% in his last state-wide election. It's close to one of the worst defeats suffered by a sitting Senator in the history of the US.

Think about it.

There are reasons for it.

34 posted on 02/12/2012 12:28:11 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Yes, Senator!!!

That is the way to do it!!!

LAUGH AT THEIR STUPID QUESTIONS!!!!

Alinsky their butts right back!!! Excellent job!! Their idiot gotcha questions deserve the quiet polite mocking at that you gave them!

FINALLY someone on our side gets it right!


35 posted on 02/12/2012 12:28:37 PM PST by Yaelle (Go Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Yes, Senator!!!

That is the way to do it!!!

LAUGH AT THEIR STUPID QUESTIONS!!!!

Alinsky their butts right back!!! Excellent job!! Their idiot gotcha questions deserve the quiet polite mocking at that you gave them!

FINALLY someone on our side gets it right!


36 posted on 02/12/2012 12:28:47 PM PST by Yaelle (Go Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Yes, Senator!!!

That is the way to do it!!!

LAUGH AT THEIR STUPID QUESTIONS!!!!

Alinsky their butts right back!!! Excellent job!! Their idiot gotcha questions deserve the quiet polite mocking at that you gave them!

FINALLY someone on our side gets it right!


37 posted on 02/12/2012 12:28:53 PM PST by Yaelle (Go Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle

I would apologize for multiple posts but I keep getting the service temporarily unavailable screen so there’s nothing I can do.


38 posted on 02/12/2012 12:32:22 PM PST by Yaelle (Go Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

What Santorum should answer back: in HIS government, women who have children will not be forced to desert them and HAVE to work, because government will allow them to do what their conscience tells them to do and will allow a “choice”.

With the tax code and all the govt. restrictions on businesses and and intrusion into healthcare and insurance co., it forces women out of the home at a time when they are shaping the worldview and emotional security of their children. Many women don’t want to go back to work after having a baby but with “government” health care rules and regulations they are forced back, and many who feel bad about leaving young children to strangers—have to.

Children’s IQ was a lot higher and there was a lot less abuse of children, prior to government interference in the two family house and women staying home in the formative years of the lives of children-—forming the trust in young children which is needed for cohesive societies.

It is about time parents learn a little child psychology-—Santorum should develop a lot of one-liners on the destruction of the family by a Marxist pushed government which loathes the natural family——because of the individualism and emotionally healthy and high IQ this system creates-—The natural family with the mother being the nurturer-—leads to a type of child whose can never be a “useful idiots”. They run on intellectual reasons rather than emotionalism—which all the stupid Marxist people run on because they can’t reason after years of stranger indoctrination into a worldview foreign to their parents.


39 posted on 02/12/2012 12:38:44 PM PST by savagesusie (Right Reason According to Nature = Just Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

Remember four years ago when Gregory asked Obama “Will you only appoint communists and other fellow-travelers to your administration?”

Nope. Neither do I. And this would have been a far, far more important question to ask.


40 posted on 02/12/2012 12:42:26 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
It's a legitimate question.

Santorum's own book attacks working women as using a fiscal argument as an "excuse" (his word!) not to be a stay-at-home mom.

All facets of Santorum need to be exposed before conservatives follow him down the proverbial rabbit hole. Unfortunately there's been some push back here against mainstream reporting on Santorum's record.

He needs to be vetted.

41 posted on 02/12/2012 1:00:38 PM PST by newzjunkey (Maybe 2016 will be better?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

Really, why does David want us to think he cares about single young women anyway.


42 posted on 02/12/2012 1:40:45 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

Really, why does David want us to think he cares about single young women anyway.


43 posted on 02/12/2012 1:41:45 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

Really, why does David want us to think he cares about single young women anyway.


44 posted on 02/12/2012 1:41:55 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey; ProtectOurFreedom

Did you see the post right before yours, #40?? Do you really think that a STUPID question about whether a man whose wife has had two high powered jobs would hire working moms in his admin was “vetting”?? It was simply GOTCHA BS.

However, P.O.F. before you hits on the perfect point. Why wasn’t Obama ever asked if he would only hire fellow socialists and commies in HIS future admin? He sure hired a lot of them... That was also “fact” from his book, but legitimate.


45 posted on 02/12/2012 1:45:33 PM PST by Yaelle (.Go Santorum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
If Santorum is the nominee, Obama will win at least 45 states and at least 58% of the vote.

The spread is right the candidate is wrong.

46 posted on 02/12/2012 2:25:37 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Romney just makes me tired all over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
If Santorum is the nominee, Obama will win at least 45 states and at least 58% of the vote.

The spread is right the candidate is wrong.

47 posted on 02/12/2012 2:25:47 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Romney just makes me tired all over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Do you think there's a majority of voters nationwide that will see otherwise?

So what States do you see Santorum winning.

48 posted on 02/12/2012 2:31:28 PM PST by Mike Darancette (Romney just makes me tired all over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

Remember, Santorum lost PA...a Catholic rust-belt state...by over 18% on virtually the same platform he espouses today.
___________________________________________________________

That is irrelevant today...or did you miss this: http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/poll-santorum-takes-1st-national-lead/


49 posted on 02/12/2012 2:34:37 PM PST by garybob (More sweat in training, less blood in combat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

“30-40% of the GOP electorate who often votes as a bloc”

Really? And who did they vote for, as a block, in South Carolina?

Why is it that social liberals in the GOP get to vote for who they want - and they are going big time for Mitt - while social conservatives are expected to bow down and work for anyone ‘our’ Establishment wants without question?


50 posted on 02/12/2012 2:38:05 PM PST by Mr Rogers ("they found themselves made strangers in their own country")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson