Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is a great take on her speech by the author. No compromise with the statist elites, no Mitt, the door is open!
1 posted on 02/12/2012 3:21:25 PM PST by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: onyx; Windflier; Norm Lenhart; Sarah Barracuda; rintense

A worthwhile read.


2 posted on 02/12/2012 3:22:32 PM PST by Lakeshark (NbIttoalbl,cRwIdtaa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

3 posted on 02/12/2012 3:29:15 PM PST by I see my hands (The old sod ne'er shall be forgot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark
Why isn’t Sarah running?

She's scared and nobody will pay her enough.

4 posted on 02/12/2012 3:30:01 PM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

A brokered convention means a reset, and Sarah could step right in.


7 posted on 02/12/2012 3:35:37 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (FOREIGN AID: A transfer of money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

” She’s dead Gibbs”


9 posted on 02/12/2012 3:37:25 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 ..... Crucifixion is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

Because people wanted somebody who was smarter, more articulate, better prepared, had less baggage and was better able to hold up under the pressure of the media and the Chicago Way. Well, that’s what they said, anyway. Based on what I’ve seen out of this field, I’m not sure they actually meant it. Or they have their own private definitions of those qualities to none of which the rest of us happen to be privy.


10 posted on 02/12/2012 3:37:39 PM PST by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

“Why isn’t Sarah running?”

Harder to hit a moving target.


11 posted on 02/12/2012 3:38:28 PM PST by APatientMan (Pick a side)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

I dunno.


13 posted on 02/12/2012 3:45:34 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

She

Can’t

Win.

She knows it. You all should too.


19 posted on 02/12/2012 3:53:27 PM PST by Adder (Da bro has GOT to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

Maybe she doesn’t want to.


20 posted on 02/12/2012 3:55:15 PM PST by Fresh Wind ('People have got to know whether or not their president is a crook.' Richard M. Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

Dontcha’know, she’s “irrelvant.” Right,you betcha’ /sarc. Just wait, patience is a virtue. Yes indeed,the door IS open!


25 posted on 02/12/2012 3:59:17 PM PST by sjneuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark
Why isn’t Sarah running?

Because she's dancing.

26 posted on 02/12/2012 4:00:25 PM PST by Talisker (He who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark
The reason Sarah isn't running is that she has a life beyond politics.

I know that it is hard for people to imagine that, but she has her own life and family, is young yet and people do not realize the rigors of running for office or executing that office once elected.

Look for her to run 2 cycles down the road.

29 posted on 02/12/2012 4:06:11 PM PST by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

She already said why. She isn’t running because she didn’t want to.


31 posted on 02/12/2012 4:07:12 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

I’m not precisely sure myself, but I am really starting to wonder if she hasn’t been planning on running all along.

Or, at least, she has to be wondering if there is a way for her to get back in now. Possibly through a brokered convention.

Consider:

Mitt is really not taking off. He says the right things, but nobody really believes he means them because his flip-flops are too numerous to give him any credibility.

Newt can work a crowd and he’s great in debates, but he has all those past character issues, Dede Scozzafava, global warming pics with SanFanNan — and there is the nagging suspicion that we haven’t seen all the nasty stuff on him.

Rick is awesome and I totally love the man, but I just don’t know if he has the sand or the moxie to take the hardscrabble fight to the Bamster.

As for Paul, he should be running as the candidate of the Monster Raving Loony Party.

But what if Sarah were to show up at the convention and say “OK, I wasn’t going to do this, but since you people can’t get your collective heads out of your ass, I’m willing to step in.”

Half the delegates would have screaming orgasms on the spot and the other half would be so divided behind their particular candidates they wouldn’t be able to form a credible front against her.

I’ve always known that woman is smart. I was bitterly and intensely disappointed and more than a little confused when she said she wasn’t going to run. I don’t believe she’s about money.

Could it be that she’s right where she planned to be at this stage of the game?

One thing for sure, her CPAC speech does prove one thing — her star power is undiminished and if anyone could throw a million volt charge into the Conservative base, it’s Sarah.


34 posted on 02/12/2012 4:08:04 PM PST by Ronin (VOTE NEWT! He's Not Romney! Huh? He did?? Scratch that! GO SANTORUM!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark
Why isn't any of the A-team running? Face it, no matter who of the four you like the best, none of these were on our want list this time last year, or even a few months ago when the biggest decision was Cain or Perry. And none of the four remaining is the conservative we were looking four. All we can hope for is whoever does win selects one helluva VP running mate.
38 posted on 02/12/2012 4:13:09 PM PST by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

I think she would have liked to run but I would imagine the special needs child she has has to be a very time consuming thing. And she just made a calculation it just wasn’t possible and keep her ultimate priority. As for the tired “Sarah is just in it for the money” crowd. You’ve all really have become a tired act. An odd comment for people who are allededly in favor of a free market economy.


44 posted on 02/12/2012 4:20:34 PM PST by fkabuckeyesrule (Lets institute SARAH-ia law in America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark; Impy; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; GOPsterinMA; randita; Sun; JulieRNR21

The answer to that question is obvious. Sarah Palin’s name and image was assassinated by the Drive By Liberal Media. If you mention Sarah Palin, many people will think of Tina Fey. It’s happened before to people like Dan Quayle and Katherine Harris. Meanwhile, liberals like Joe Biden say things that boggle the mind and the Washington Press Corps covers it up.


45 posted on 02/12/2012 4:20:53 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark

Because there will never be an American President elected whose “fans” (supporters) refer to said person by their first name.


46 posted on 02/12/2012 4:26:01 PM PST by Bruinator ("For socialism is not merely the labour question, it is before all things an atheistic question")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark
Why isn’t Sarah running?

Same reason Rush isn't running?

48 posted on 02/12/2012 4:30:23 PM PST by Former War Criminal (...and proud Hobbit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson