Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OK Rush: You Own Santorum Surge (Whether Limbaugh wants the credit or not)
American Thinker ^ | 02/13/2012 | C. Edmund Wright

Posted on 02/13/2012 7:00:54 AM PST by SeekAndFind

A strong case could be made that Rick Santorum owes much of the credit for his recent surge to Rush Limbaugh -- whether Rush wants that credit or not. Events of this past week seem to indicate that Senator Santorum would concur. In the past few days his campaign has wisely exploited some of Rush's words and they are proudly featuring them everywhere.

The implication -- if not the explicit language -- is that Rush prefers Santorum to either Newt or Mitt.

And beyond doubt, there are a couple of show segments which could fairly be interpreted just that way. And it may be true for all I know.

Which begs the question, if Rush is not endorsing Santorum, will he sit by and allow Santorum to use snippets of his show to lend that impression? It also begs the question about how thoroughly Rush has checked Santorum out -- given the unusual disparity between the reality of Santorum and what Rush has said about the former Senator.

I submit that upon further review, Rush might not really want ownership of this fast rolling train.

Now to be clear, Rush has not overtly endorsed Santorum or anyone and has expressly said many times that he will not do so. A review of his show will verify that he has had various segments that were friendly to Newt Gingrich and at times to Mitt Romney as well as his positivity for Santorum. Meanwhile, Rush has been -- consistent with Limbaugh doctrine of many years -- critical of both Newt and Mitt on numerous occasions. In fact he has criticized Mitt's moderate moments for many months.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: limbaugh; rush; rushlimbaugh; santorum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-92 next last

1 posted on 02/13/2012 7:00:59 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If Santorum wins it, Rush will take full credit. If he doesn’t, Rush will say he never endorsed anyone.


2 posted on 02/13/2012 7:03:13 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Limbaugh may be popular among Freepers, he probably isn’t listened to by all that many folks who were thinking of voting for Romney but switched to Santorum instead.


3 posted on 02/13/2012 7:03:50 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’ll take the credit for it.


4 posted on 02/13/2012 7:04:05 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Anyone else hear Rush say “Darwin’s full of crap” on Friday?

I didn’t think he’d venture there.


5 posted on 02/13/2012 7:05:12 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

Santorum was always on my short list of candidates after Bachmann and Cain.

In a sense, nobody deserves credit more than those who went down the line and accused every other candidate of secretly working for Romney. LOL


6 posted on 02/13/2012 7:06:23 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

For those who don’t bother to read the story, the gist is that Rush will have buyer’s remorse big time once he realizes how far from being a true conservative Santorum is and how off putting Santorum will come across to the nation at large.


7 posted on 02/13/2012 7:07:25 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

RE: Anyone else hear Rush say “Darwin’s full of crap” on Friday?

What does a man who has been dead for over a hundred years got to do with this?


8 posted on 02/13/2012 7:09:33 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Then what are we waiting for? Lets get it on!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wjfrexe61XI


9 posted on 02/13/2012 7:10:43 AM PST by TheCause ("that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Oh, goodie! More fodder for Rush’s “I don’t really like to talk about myself while spending hours talking about people talking about me” segments.


10 posted on 02/13/2012 7:12:04 AM PST by raybbr (People who still support Obama are either a Marxist or a moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Silly article. Santorum cut out of Florida 2 days before its primary and skipped Nevada. He blanketed those three states a week before Mitt even arrived. It was a big gamble and it paid off. To pawn it off on what Limbauh said is unfair to Santorum and his staff for a brilliant tactic. Whether he can keep it going is another matter. I can see Rick fading and Newt making a comeback soon. that is the nature of this campaign and a LIKE it. Let them all slug it out and prove their mettle, rather than 2008 where the despicable McCain was chosen by party and media and shoved down our throats.


11 posted on 02/13/2012 7:12:15 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When Cain got his fingers caught where they should not have been, it left me with no one I cared to vote for.

I would have had Rep. Allen West from the start.

We know Romney is just a step below the Marxist we have now.

Newt has a freight train of baggage 0 can drop 1 by 1 on the public.

It dose not take a rocket scientist to know 0 has a huge FBI file on each candidate, even if it is illegal.

Never looked at Santorum, he was so far behind.


12 posted on 02/13/2012 7:14:30 AM PST by GailA (Any congress critter or president who FAILS to keep faith with the Military, WON'T keep faith with U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IMissPresidentReagan

I thought you might find this interesting.


13 posted on 02/13/2012 7:14:39 AM PST by Ingtar ("But it is hard to maintain an aura of invincibility after you have been vinced..." Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

These GOP elitists HATE Limbaugh. Hate him worse than any democrat.


14 posted on 02/13/2012 7:15:23 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

hahahahaha!


15 posted on 02/13/2012 7:19:17 AM PST by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

You have to be joshing. Rush has a huge audience most of whom have never heard of Free Republic.


16 posted on 02/13/2012 7:21:11 AM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Perhaps it wouldn’t be so silly if you would open your mind to the notion that perhaps Santorum’s strategy was brilliant AND that Rush’s nudge was a big factor. The two are not mutually exclusive.

Besides, the idea that Rush might have to do a mea culpa is far more interesting of an article than talking about Santorum’s strategy, though both may be totally valid points.


17 posted on 02/13/2012 7:21:21 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Except for possibly Bachmann, Santorum had the next best credential to attack Obama on Obamacare. Now that Obama has brought his signature legislation back to center stage, Santorum is ideally positioned to lead the assault against it. The stars have aligned for one chance to remove Obama and his health care bear trap. I pray that this can be undone now. If it isn't, we're done.
18 posted on 02/13/2012 7:30:03 AM PST by throwback ( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky

I don’t listen regularly; there’s diminishing returns for the time and attention brought to it.

Santorum was the last anti-romney panic door in the building, and his strategy and timing converged with the three winning states.

He’ll make an excellent vice-president, if the ticket wins...and that’s a tremendous IF. :(


19 posted on 02/13/2012 7:30:37 AM PST by Lady Lucky ( Exposure to the Son may prevent burning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He owes the surge to Bella being in the hospital. Sympathy vote, ... Period.


20 posted on 02/13/2012 7:33:37 AM PST by Reagan69 (I supported Sarah Palin and all I got was a lousy DVD !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

PS - He’s still boring and he’s still a big government, liberal (although a social conservative).


21 posted on 02/13/2012 7:35:46 AM PST by Reagan69 (I supported Sarah Palin and all I got was a lousy DVD !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
My two issues with the article are this:

Rush said Santorum has wandered off the conservative reservation less than the other candidates. By citing a few examples of these times, you did nothing to counter Rush's point that Santorum's wanderings have been less frequent and significant than the other remaining candidates. Rush already noted that these transgressions occured.

Additionally, if you're going to write an article trying to make the point that there is a more conservative candidate in the race, you should name that candidate. One can presume you'd say Newt, but really, then you'd have to try to argue that Newt's many many wanderings off the reservation have been less offensive to conservatives. You did spend a sentence trying to minimize Newt's slaps in the face, but it wasn't much of a defense.

I really don't see much difference in the overall weight of transgressions towards conservatism between the two candidates and would vote for either over Romney.

If they are both in the running when my primary rolls around, I'll probably go with Santorum. For me, Newt has less in the way of honesty and integrity. He seems far more likely to give conservatives the shiv in the future, with some mumblings about pragmatism and a smirk on his face.

22 posted on 02/13/2012 7:36:18 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Towards the end of this article there is a connection made between Mike Huckabee and Rick Santorum. I think that is a valid connection.

I think Newt is the only conservative now in the race, and I’m afraid Newt’s chances aren’t very good. His one strong trait — debate performance — and that somehow failed him leading up to Florida. He needed that to be 100% for him to get the nomination. Somehow he stumbled, because of that stumble, he’s probably not going to get the nomination.

And that means either Romney or Santorum, which is a lot like the choice between McCain and Huckabee.

I’ll take Huckabee over McCain, and I’ll take Santorum over Romney... but things are not looking good for us right now.


23 posted on 02/13/2012 7:40:55 AM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

RE: He owes the surge to Bella being in the hospital. Sympathy vote, ... Period.

You think the voters in CO, MO and MN are that shallow?

If Bella was in the hospital, I would think that would be good reason to NOT vote for Santorum so that he can continue helping with the care of his daughter instead of carrying the burdens of the campaign and the presidency.


24 posted on 02/13/2012 7:42:11 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Santorum plans aggressive strategy against Romney

Posted 2/13/12 7:29 a.m.

PORTLAND, Maine (WLS) - A day after Mitt Romney regained some momentum in the Republican presidential contest, his rival Rick Santorum went on the attack, calling the front-runner “desperate” while promising to compete aggressively to win the state where Romney grew up.

Santorum said Sunday he could do “exceptionally well” in Michigan, where Romney’s father served as governor. The Midwestern state and Arizona host Republican presidential nominating contests on Feb. 28.

“We’re going to spend a lot of time in Michigan and Arizona, and those are up next. And that’s where we’ve really been focusing on,” Santorum told ABC’s “This Week.” He suggested that a strong showing in those contests would make the presidential contest “a two-man race,” dismissing current rivals Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul.

Santorum shrugged off his third-place finish Saturday in caucuses in Maine, where he didn’t actively compete, as well as his second-place finish in a straw poll of conservative activists.

Romney has been painting Santorum as a long-time Washington insider who pursued home-state projects. Santorum on Sunday described Romney’s recent criticism as “desperate.”

“You reach a point where desperate people do desperate things,” said Santorum, who represented Pennsylvania during his 16 years in Congress, first in the House and then in the Senate............

http://www.wlsam.com/Article.asp?id=2393423&spid=


25 posted on 02/13/2012 7:43:54 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
"Buyer's Remorse"--the trouble is, the model we want may be on our shopping list, but it isn't at the market.

Santorum is a lawyer, and that lose a lot of points for him with me...but Rush comes from a family of lawyers and may not see it that way.

26 posted on 02/13/2012 7:46:21 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69

Wow.


27 posted on 02/13/2012 7:47:04 AM PST by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (..................go Giants!!!.....heh-heh (Champs!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DManA

February 13, 2012 4:00 A.M.
Santorum’s Turn

By The Editors

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/290895/santorum-s-turn-editors


28 posted on 02/13/2012 7:51:14 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Santorum is a George W. Bush/Mike Huckabee compassionate conservative without Dubya’s likeability and without Huck’s apparent lack of a mean streak.

He’s a big government, big spending Republican who is only conservative on social issues.


29 posted on 02/13/2012 8:03:38 AM PST by Josh Painter ("We intend to change Washington, not accomodate it." - Newt Gingrich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Rush is for Romney- period.


30 posted on 02/13/2012 8:12:22 AM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinL

RE: Rush is for Romney- period.

Can you cite any evidence for that? Let’s start with what he wrote or said...


31 posted on 02/13/2012 8:14:41 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL

RE: He owes the surge to Bella being in the hospital. Sympathy vote, ... Period.

You think the voters in CO, MO and MN are that shallow?

If Bella was in the hospital, I would think that would be good reason to NOT vote for Santorum so that he can continue helping with the care of his daughter instead of carrying the burdens of the campaign and the presidency.


32 posted on 02/13/2012 8:15:56 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

I have a few concerns about Santorum. Instead of asking stupid irrevalent questions why not ask, “I know you represented a liberal state,now that you will represent the entire country will any of your support of issues change? e.g. Right to work, Global warming, education, health care, I know there are many more. I hate having other tell me where he stands.


33 posted on 02/13/2012 8:23:35 AM PST by RightLady (Liberty above all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightLady

This should be done during the debates.


34 posted on 02/13/2012 8:25:24 AM PST by RightLady (Liberty above all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Easy. Rush ALWAYS says a Rino can’t win- only a Reagan conservative wins. So, why hasn’t he wholly dispatched Romney, and urged the candidacies of Rick and/or Newt from Day One?


35 posted on 02/13/2012 8:30:22 AM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: VinL

RE: So, why hasn’t he wholly dispatched Romney, and urged the candidacies of Rick and/or Newt from Day One?

He’s between a rock and a hard place ( just like many conservatives are ).

I am NOT going to vote for Romney in the primaries, but if he were the official candidate, HECK, between him and Obama, I’d go for Romney. Easy choice.

Rush doesn’t want to give the Obama campaign any CAMPAIGN AMMO IN CASE Romney is the candidate.


36 posted on 02/13/2012 8:35:17 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Rush doesn’t want to give the Obama campaign any CAMPAIGN AMMO IN CASE Romney is the candidate.
************

That’s Rush’s cover. If he merely said that Mitt’s a Rino moderate, and he prefers the genuine conservatives- that would give absolutely no ammunition to the Dems. In fact, it would help Romney in the general in having been declared a moderate by Rush.

Rush is for Romney, period.


37 posted on 02/13/2012 8:42:48 AM PST by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, than to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Santorum is surging because he’s a good candidate and conservatives are uncomfortable with Romney and Gingrich, even though the latter is light-years better than the signer of Romneycare. The conservative voter, and nobody else owns this surge. Time will tell if was only a coincidence of lucky circumstances or a solid growth.

If El Rushbo owns this surge, then so does the Great One Mark Levin who’s been supporting Santorum since before it was popular to do so. And they both had the same favorable attitude towards Michele Bachmann, whose campaign never really took of instead (unfortunately, I might add). This all pure, undiluted BS. And Rush is right, as usual: when things go a certain way, he is the putative leader of the GOP, when they don’t go the same way, he’s only an entertainer. In every case he’s a sellout and/or shill for somebody else, depending if the smearer is a lib or a “real conservative”.

I think this is all hysteria by self-appointed guardians of “pure conservatism” who hate Santorum and cannot accept to see him prevail over their preferred candidate. Let the campaign go on, let them compete, let voters decide.


38 posted on 02/13/2012 8:43:44 AM PST by fabrizio (Restore the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
And beyond doubt, there are a couple of show segments which could fairly be interpreted just that way.

_______________________________

If it is beyond doubt then please give exact details.

39 posted on 02/13/2012 8:44:29 AM PST by wtc911 (Amigo - you've been had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]




Click the Pelts

Support Our Viking Kitties
Donate to Free Republic


Sign up to donate monthly
Sponsors will contribute $10
For each new monthly donor


40 posted on 02/13/2012 8:54:02 AM PST by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Rush doesn’t want to give the Obama campaign any CAMPAIGN AMMO IN CASE Romney is the candidate.

Rush didn't play that game in 2008, the whole world knew that he supported Romney and despised his challengers.

41 posted on 02/13/2012 9:05:03 AM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
For those who don’t bother to read the story, the gist is that Rush will have buyer’s remorse big time once he realizes how far from being a true conservative Santorum is and how off putting Santorum will come across to the nation at large.

All of which is *entirely* your projection, not based in reality. If Santorum becomes president, I don't think Rush will have buyer's remorse any more than he had buyer's remorse with Bush (and he did have some with Bush but he'd LOVE that today over where the country is with Obama). We do not know if Santorum was genuinely as conservative as a Northeastern Republican senator from a heavily unionized state can be and whether that projects to how he would govern the entire country rather than representing the people of Pennsylvania. Only winning the election would tell us how he would govern as president. And I'm still amazed that Newtbots think Santorum will be hugely unpopular with the general electorate while pimping a candidate who is demonstrably already hugely unpopular with the general electorate and already at war with the mainstream media. Or do you not look at Newt's high negatives because they instantly thwart most of your theories on getting Newt elected?

42 posted on 02/13/2012 9:13:45 AM PST by OrangeHoof (Obama: The Dr. Kevorkian of the American economy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

I agree with your piece. For those who isten to Rush with a practiced ear, honed over many years or decades of regular listening, he is now fully on board with Santorum. He played his cards a little closer to the vest as long as Bachmann and Perry were still in the race, making frequent proclamations that they, plus Santorum, were the “true” conservatives in the race.

Rush was warming up to Newt a little bit after a few of Newt’s better debate performances. It was when Newt started the attack on Romney about his role at Bain that Newt completely lost whatever chance Rush was willing to give him.

For Rush to look more deeply into the supposed conservatism he imparts to Santorum, and his wholesale write-off of Newt’s candidacy, would require time and effort that I don’t believe Rush is willing to expend. Rush has acknowledged for the most part that he didn’t even bother to watch hardly any of the debates. He’s just not that into it.

These days, unless it’s about marketing tea, playing golf, or watching football, I’m unconvinced that Rush has much interest or passion in anything else, including politics. As a Rush fan of nearly twenty years, it’s been sad to observe. I still listen every day, mostly out of habit and out of a genuine affection for the guy. But it’s been several years since I felt like Rush knew a lot more about the issues and the players than I do.

I look for Rush to wait until the contest is down to Romney and Santorum (if it keeps going the way it appears to be going), at which time he will formally endorse Santorum. As a Newt supporter, saying this brings me no joy.


43 posted on 02/13/2012 9:20:06 AM PST by lonevoice (Klepto Baracka Marxo, impeach we much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

I agree that the attacks on Bain soured Rush on both Newt and Perry. He felt that was an affront to capitalism and capitalism is probably as close to his heart as any other issue.


44 posted on 02/13/2012 9:26:47 AM PST by OrangeHoof (Obama: The Dr. Kevorkian of the American economy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Well, you oughta know cause it looks like you’re the author of this irrational essay.


45 posted on 02/13/2012 9:30:19 AM PST by SierraWasp (I'm done being disappointed by "He/She is the only one who can win" and being embarrassed later!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie
If Santorum wins it, Rush will take full credit. If he doesn’t, Rush will say he never endorsed anyone.

Give a link, please, referencing any time Rush EVER took credit for the results of an election.

Otherwise, you have outed yourself as an imbecilic liar.

46 posted on 02/13/2012 9:35:01 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (FOREIGN AID: A transfer of money from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice

Rush does not endorse; he only tries to keep the appearance of his own effectiveness as high as he can.


47 posted on 02/13/2012 9:39:22 AM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

*


48 posted on 02/13/2012 9:40:21 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of fascists and their parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

>> “What does a man who has been dead for over a hundred years got to do with this?” <<

.
One third of this country is stupid enough to worship that dead idiot.


49 posted on 02/13/2012 9:42:22 AM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OrangeHoof

I think Rush was more forgiving of Perry and his attacks on “vulture capitalism” because Perry started out as a candidate that Rush felt he could support. As far as Newt was concerned, he had to earn Rush’s good will from the get-go. Rush was disinclined to be forgiving about the couch time with Pelosi. Particularly after the Juan Williams debate, Rush was in the early stages of thinking he might trust Newt again. Then Newt started the Bain bashing (which Perry subsequently joined in on). IMO, when both candidates knocked that off, in Rush’s eyes it might be forgiven in Perry’s instance, but not in Newt’s. I could be completely wrong about all of this, but I don’t think so.


50 posted on 02/13/2012 9:43:18 AM PST by lonevoice (Klepto Baracka Marxo, impeach we much.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson