Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jerry Sandusky Can Pretty Much Do Whatever He Wants While He Awaits Trial
Deadspin ^ | February 13, 2012 | Dom Cosentino

Posted on 02/13/2012 10:37:05 AM PST by John W

Centre County (Pa.) Judge John M. Cleland ruled this morning on a number of pretrial motions from Friday's hearing in the Jerry Sandusky case. And the big winner was Jerry Sandusky, whose trial can begin as early as May. From the Patriot-News of Harrisburg:

• Sandusky can see most of his grandchildren at home, provided a parent is present. He can also have contact with most of his grandchildren via computer. There is a custody battle involving three of his grandchildren, and whether Sandusky can contact those grandchildren is in the hands of another judge.

• Adult visitors may also come to Sandusky's home, though he must provide a list of 12 non-family members he intends to have over, and there are additional conditions.

• Sandusky can travel to help assist his defense team, though authorities must be given 36 hours' notice and a precise itinterary of his plans.

• Sandusky can go onto his back porch, from which he likes to throw biscuits to his dog. This despite neighbors' complaints that he had bee watching children from a nearby elementary school from there.

• Sandusky's request to have the transcripts of all grand jury witness testimony released was denied, but only because Cleland said the judge who had oversight of the grand jury could authorize that.

• The jury for Sandusky's upcoming trial will come from Centre County. Prosecutors had asked to have them come from somewhere else because, well, everyone in Centre County seems to have a connection to Penn State and The Second Mile, including some Centre County judges.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: pedophile; pervert; sandusky

1 posted on 02/13/2012 10:37:07 AM PST by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: John W

Famous football coach gets preferential treatment. No surprises here. He gets cut a break because Penn State made points under his watch and a few touchdowns are obviously far more important than some unimportant boys getting messed up for life by a rapist.


2 posted on 02/13/2012 10:40:13 AM PST by MeganC (No way in Hell am I voting for Mitt Romney. Not now, not ever. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
Jerry Sandusky Can Pretty Much Do Whatever He Wants While He Awaits Trial

And unless you want to live in more of a police state it had better be that way. He hasn't been convicted of anything ... yet.

3 posted on 02/13/2012 10:40:20 AM PST by from occupied ga (It'S a plot device like his self awre computer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W
There should be a zero tolerance policy against any contact between an accused child molestor and young people. The safety of the children should trump the 'rights' of the accused. Wait until he's found innocent before allowing an accused molester access.
4 posted on 02/13/2012 10:44:23 AM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John W

The prosecutor overreached with this “keep him inside the house because he can see a schoolyard three football fields away from the back porch” business. Presumption of innocence says you can’t just slap on layer after layer after layer of restrictions if you haven’t been convicted.

The judge may have done us all a favor. By warning the prosecutor not to get too cute he may help ensure this guy gets a solid conviction.


5 posted on 02/13/2012 10:46:00 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

Correct. But, believe we have all heard of other cases of varying severity where the accused is treated somewhat differently before and during the trial than this person has been by the presiding judge.


6 posted on 02/13/2012 10:57:36 AM PST by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All
.... find some little sexy kids somewhere?.. /s

(The whole thing is just revolting...)

7 posted on 02/13/2012 11:04:56 AM PST by ElPatriota (The SILENCE of the Catholic Church in protecting our culture from perversion is ** DEAFENING **)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MeganC
Well consider if he was a black man who bleached his skin white and sang Beat it, he would get off entirely even if admitted he slept with boys on national TV.


8 posted on 02/13/2012 11:08:04 AM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (How ironic that Ann Coulter should write a book called Treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John W; MeganC

I would hardly call these restrictions, “being able to do whatever one wants.” I wouldn’t want to live under those restrictions. He’ll be spending most his time in a small cell soon enough. Sure, it’s better than he deserves, but that’s our system. If everyone is doing there job, it should be impossible for him to do anything.


9 posted on 02/13/2012 11:19:34 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
...an accused child molestor...safety of the children should trump the 'rights' of the accused.

J'accuse Ciexyz de sympathies royalistes. Qu'on lui coupe la tête

10 posted on 02/13/2012 11:36:11 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

Yep. And the defense wants the jury to be locals, because they know the locals care more for Penn State than they do about some stupid kids who got in the way of a potential Penn State dynasty.


11 posted on 02/13/2012 11:44:45 AM PST by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John W
He can also have contact with most of his grandchildren via computer.

Hopefully any computers he had at the time of his first arrest were impounded under a search warrant.

12 posted on 02/13/2012 11:49:39 AM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
The safety of the children should trump the 'rights' of the accused. Wait until he's found innocent before allowing an accused molester access.

Oooooh. Let's do it for "the children."

We have much more to fear from the access the Obamas are given to "the children" than whatever access Sandusky is allowed. People know who Sandusky is and if they want to keep their children away from him they will.

And we don't find anyone innocent in a criminal trial. We find them "not guilty." There's a difference.

ML/NJ

13 posted on 02/13/2012 11:51:45 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: John W

That fool should never have posted bail. I wouldn’t care if they shut the whole school. For as much as the govt. wants to make everything about the children, they certainly do not care about past or potential victims of that evil freak.


14 posted on 02/13/2012 12:05:18 PM PST by formosa (Formosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
The safety of the children should trump the 'rights' of the accused.

This would be fine, if only the Fifth Amendment had been written as follows:

nor shall any person ..... be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, except accused child molesters.

15 posted on 02/13/2012 12:10:57 PM PST by Notary Sojac (Liberalism: Ideas so good, they have to be mandatory!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga

Neither have a lot of other people, spending time in jail or highly restricted, while they await trial. He should have been held without bail, just due to the number of victims, IMHO.


16 posted on 02/13/2012 12:18:59 PM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: John W

If you want to waive his presumption-of-innocence, then I take it you wish to waive your own if you are ever ACCUSED of something?


17 posted on 02/13/2012 1:01:32 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of fascists and their parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Never said that. Have, as others here have noted, seen folks with no bail allowed or much more restrictive bail conditions awaiting or during trails for varying levels of accusations. Don’t know if his has went the way it has because it is appropriate, because of the territory and and the interaction between so many of the folks involved, or most scarily if the homosexual pedophile mafia has begun to take over the country. Some times it just feels that way.


18 posted on 02/13/2012 1:06:36 PM PST by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: John W
If, as has been speculated, Sandusky was the point man, collecting and making kids available for a ring of the wealthy and powerful, such 'restrictions' would certainly make it much easier for Sandusky to have an *accident* before he ever gets to trial.
19 posted on 02/13/2012 1:08:43 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF
He should have been held without bail, just due to the number of victims, IMHO.

I'm sure he's guilty, but you can't make exceptions to the legal presumption of innocence without destroying the whole rights thing that the government has been working on destroying for decades.

20 posted on 02/13/2012 7:13:21 PM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MeganC

I don’t know about “famous”....I never heard of the guy before this...


21 posted on 02/13/2012 10:15:52 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

“keep him inside the house because he can see a schoolyard three football fields away from the back porch”

Hey, just wanted to let you know that Sandusky’s back porch is only thirty (30) feet from the schoolyard playground, not 300 yards, as described in your post.


22 posted on 02/15/2012 2:36:46 PM PST by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson