Posted on 02/13/2012 3:44:27 PM PST by NYer
The churches need to fight this in the courts as well.
[[Perhaps we will have to distinguish between secular marriage, or government marriage, and biblical Christian marriage.]]
Liberalas are hell bent on declaring the church and Christians hatemongeurers for preachign God’s word that states homosexuality is an abomination- IF we were to seperate church marriage andf state marriage, then the liberals would have a broader brush to paint the Christians with declaring them intolorant and hateful- the state will get to stand up and say “See, we don’t ‘discriminate’ agaisnty anyone and allow everyoen to be married BUT the church doesn’t allow everyone to get married, therefore they are itnoloraqnt and discriminaatory’ (of course the state won’t oncider their own discrimination agaisnt hte church-)
[[We have been warning and warning and warning about this, and our liberal friends mock these concerns as “ridiculous” and “unfounded.” ]]
Exactly- they blatantly violate the constitution, and then accuse ANYONE who tries to sound the alarm of being alarmists- ridiculing those who see the writing o nthe wall-
It’s like barak who could deficate onstage, throw it at the audience, and convince them he is doing it for their own good, and soem would defend his actions by ridiculing those who might try to say “Do you think we’re stupid or something? You just crapped all over us and you want us to be thankful for it?”
The abortion provision issue was just a toe in the water to see IF they could get away with violating our consitutional rights- This Washington state gay marriage issue was and action by liberals who were emboldened by barak’s blatant ignoring of the consituton- now homosexuals WILL be goign after the churches just like you said and just likemany of us had been warnign for a long time now
This is what happens when you let a detestable liberal steal an election.
[[but belief in Darwin and the hoax of evolution is science?]]
Oh- absolutely, after all, they found a rat sized aquatic animal’s bones, and a hippo sized land dweller, and concluded that this was ‘transitional evidence’ that animals emerged from the sea- (of course they haveabsolutely no fossil evidence showing the myriad of transitions that woukld have had to take place between such a small animal and a large hippo sized land dweller- but meh- don’t pay any attention to the voice behind the curtains, Evolution is a fact based on this ‘excellent’ fossil evidnece
Who elected THAT dummy?
There is only one response for any pastor who believes in God’s laws: “We will not comply”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.