Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Combat Drones Soon To Fly Over U.S. Airspace [Police State Coming]
JD Journal ^ | 2/14/2012

Posted on 02/15/2012 3:59:44 AM PST by SoFloFreeper

While combat drones are not allowed in the U.S. airspace without a special certificate from the FAA, the military is in a fix over the 7, 500 military drones deployed overseas, that need to be recalled home....

After returning home, the robotic aircraft would be stationed in military bases around the nation for use in emergencies...

Last week, Congress approved legislation requiring the FAA to create a plan for wide-scale integration of drones in the national airspace by 2015.

(Excerpt) Read more at jdjournal.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhoagenda; bhodod; freedom; military; nationalsecurity; skynet; uav
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Obama is going to be able, legally, to deploy combat drones against American citizens. Congress is stupid for passing this law.
1 posted on 02/15/2012 3:59:55 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Testing, testing.................Those who disagree.........


2 posted on 02/15/2012 4:09:14 AM PST by ronnie raygun (V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

You WILL obey!


3 posted on 02/15/2012 4:10:57 AM PST by hal ogen (1st Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Last week, Congress approved legislation requiring the FAA to create a plan for wide-scale integration of drones in the national airspace by 2015.

There is nothing more frustrating then when I read something like this.

Either the Lame Stream Media and "Journ-0-Lists" who write these stories are lazy, clueless or simply avoiding providing the facts.

WHO (SPECIFICALLY) in Congress introduced such legislation is what I want to know and who are the co-sponsors or others who support this potential infringement of our rights???

4 posted on 02/15/2012 4:18:53 AM PST by Conservative Vermont Vet (l)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I’ll bet they never see the border either.


5 posted on 02/15/2012 4:21:47 AM PST by RC one (the majority of republicans agree, anyone but Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Obama will give control to NATO who are now
the world’s SHARIA POLICE.


6 posted on 02/15/2012 4:27:20 AM PST by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

There are still people like me running around virtually unobserved and they can’t have that.

Heck, I might be building a nuke behind my garage. Worse yet, I might be growing a garden back there.


7 posted on 02/15/2012 4:34:43 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Surprise people. The drones are already here and have been for some time. I see them quite often as I live near a base where the drone operating crews are being trained. Simple enough to load them with whatever payload deemed to be needed and you have the tools to do what ever you want.
Sounds easy enough to me.


8 posted on 02/15/2012 4:43:21 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Hmm? I wonder what would happen is someone *accidentally* shot one of these drones down while .. uh ... 'bird hunting'?

yeah, so I 'bird hunt' with a .270, I'm a good shot ;-)

9 posted on 02/15/2012 4:44:19 AM PST by Condor51 (Yo Hoffa, so you want to 'take out conservatives'. Well okay Jr - I'm your Huckleberry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

I knew they were using drones, but I didn’t for the life of me think they had 7500 of these things flying around.


10 posted on 02/15/2012 5:03:47 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Pfl


11 posted on 02/15/2012 5:23:00 AM PST by Clump (the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Thwe first time one of these damn things has a mid-air with a family in their Bonanza, maybe then the thought will occur to these idiots that this is a bad idea.


12 posted on 02/15/2012 5:28:51 AM PST by grobdriver (Proud Member, Party Of No! No Socialism - No Fascism - Nobama - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

"I thought YOU donated!"
DON'T RELY ON THE OTHER GUY.



Click the Pic


Support Free Republic

13 posted on 02/15/2012 5:49:14 AM PST by deoetdoctrinae (Gun-free zones are playgrounds for felons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All

Seriously, as far as a “threat” to American citizens, how is this any different than manned US military aircraft flying over US soil? The administration; ANY administration, could just as easily fill a pilot’s seat with someone willing to launch an ATG at someone as they could a remote operator console.

Basic fact, these combat drones need to come back to the US, eventually. Provisions need to be made for that eventuality; unless you are proposing never letting them come back to US bases.


14 posted on 02/15/2012 5:49:19 AM PST by Turbo Pig (...to close with and destroy the enemy...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Better not be distributing unprocessed milk, either.


15 posted on 02/15/2012 5:55:10 AM PST by wolfcreek (Perry to Obama: Adios, MOFO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Turbo Pig

Maybe they should tap my phone too. After all they have the capability, no reason they shouldn’t use it.

Pathetic.


16 posted on 02/15/2012 5:57:41 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

Guess I’m gonna have to dig a tunnel to the neighbor’s house so we can smuggle heirloom seeds back and forth. After all, the FDA has already testified that there is no constitutional right to eat what I want. LOL


17 posted on 02/15/2012 6:02:05 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Legal Notice:

I hereby establish as of this date a half-mile no-fly zone around my house.

Aerial Interlopers and Flying Peeping Toms will interdicted and summarily prosecuted and punished with anti-drone countermeasures.

Those neighboring estates suffering Collateral Damage from such aforesaid actions may bring legal action against the federal government for littering on their respective properties.

Use of Flying drones violates New York State Law:

New York State's "Peeping Tom" laws only cover the use of a camera or other device to "peer" through a window. Signed into law on 23 June 2003.

www.notbored.org/stephanie.html

18 posted on 02/15/2012 6:02:35 AM PST by bunkerhill7 (UAV`s DOA`d?. = Who knew??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Turbo Pig

Turbo, thanks for at least one rational post on this thread. As you point out, the aircraft are flying now and could have been doing these missions all the time. No evidence of that. This fear of UAV’s is not unlike the black helicopter one.

This is simply a case of allowing UAV’s to operate in the National Airspace, which they can only do now after jumping through hoops to get a one time clearance to fly. It’s a severe restriction and hindrance.


19 posted on 02/15/2012 6:09:05 AM PST by 2nd Bn, 11th Mar (The "p" in Democrat stands for patriotism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

They have to acclimate Americans to this crap before they start herding them into re-education camps


20 posted on 02/15/2012 6:10:58 AM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson