Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Staggering: Obama to Cut Nukes by 80%
Rushlimbaugh.com ^ | February 15, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 02/15/2012 1:31:07 PM PST by NYer

RUSH: There are some things happening today that are downright scary. The regime, led by Barack Hussein Obama, is weighing options for reducing our US nuclear force, including a reduction of up to 80% in the number of deployed warheads -- 80%. Folks, this is staggering. Meanwhile, the Iranians are nuking up. Iran announced today that they're gonna cut off oil to six countries that have opposed its nuclear program, and more importantly, Iran also announced that they have installed domestically made nuclear fuel rods in their Tehran reactor.

Now, if that's true, this is significant because the sanctions that are currently imposed on them are supposed to prevent them from getting the material that you need to make nuclear rods. And, also, if this is true, it puts Iran that much closer to being able to make a nuclear weapon. We're unilaterally disarming. We are not requiring the Russians to go along and, even if the Russians said they would match these reductions, they lie. That is the lesson of the Russians and nukes. What was our top moment? Our number of warheads peaked at 12,000 in the late eighties. And let me tell you something. That number of nuclear warheads is what helped us win the Cold War. That number of nuclear warheads sent a message to every other nation, particularly at that point in time, the Soviet Union, "You hit us, it doesn't matter. We've got enough left to wipe you out in retaliation." That many nuclear warheads was a deterrent.

So much is flashing back to me. You go back to the eighties and the seventies, the nuclear freeze movement, the peaceniks wanted to get rid of nukes, and there was an arms race going on. We were increasing our stockpile, as were the Russians. The numbers mattered only in terms of deterrent. We had to keep up, and we had to stay ahead. You build, for example, the B-2 bomber, hoping never to have to use it. The left has never understood this about military matters and defense. They never understood this about nukes. You build them so that you don't have to use them. That's the point. You don't build them because you want to. You don't build them because you can't wait to use them. You don't build them because you're warmongers. You build them so that you don't have to. It's what's behind practically every major weapon invention and manufacture.

The B-2 stealth bomber, you hope you never have to use it. Now, we have had to, obviously. But the hope is that the brute force and the ability to project power is enough to deter anybody from taking us on. It's a great strategy, it is how this stuff works, and now Barack Obama is reducing our stockpile unilaterally by 80%, back to 300 warheads. Now, you might say, "Well, that's good, Rush, it's making the world safer." It is not making the world safer. If the Russians still have 15,000 or 2,000, whatever the number is, folks, there's a balance of power here that has shifted away from us, and this -- I am here to tell you -- is by design.

The Associated Press is reporting that Obama could cut our nuclear weapons arsenal by 80%. That is just staggering. This would amount to unilateral disarmament. Three hundred nuclear weapons would take us back to levels not seen since 1950. If we cut our nuclear weapons down to 300, Russia will have five times, 1,550 nuclear warheads. If we reduce to 300, we will have fewer nuclear warheads than the ChiComs. The only thing you could say in response to this, "Well, Rush, we don't have anything to fear from the Russians or the Chinese or anybody in the Middle East." No, of course we don't. The last time we had 300 warheads was in the fifties and that's when we were making them as fast as our technology and materials would permit us to make 'em. We weren't stopping at 300. We kept going.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Now reducing nuclear weapons to 300 warheads.

We dug up, ladies and gentlemen... Let me see where it is here. Yes, here it is: Obama's 1983 nuclear freeze article. The New York Times had a story on July 4th, 2009. "Obama's Youth Shaped His Nuclear-Free Vision." When you read this, it becomes painfully clear that Obama's thinking has not advanced one inch in the last 29 years. He is now implementing the pacifist, anti-nuke ideas that the anti-nuke, "pro-peace" movement had way back in the 1980s, back during the days of Ronaldus Magnus. "Obama's Youth Shaped His Nuclear-Free Vision -- In the depths of the Cold War, in 1983, a senior at Columbia University wrote in a campus newsmagazine, Sundial, about the vision of 'a nuclear free world.' He railed against discussions of 'first- versus second-strike capabilities' that 'suit the military-industrial interests' with their 'billion-dollar erector sets,' and agitated for the elimination of global arsenals holding tens of thousands of deadly warheads."

Don't tell me, "We've got a nice guy," Mr. Romney, "who's in over his head."

Don't tell me, Mr. Romney, as Mr. Romney's been saying, "He's a good man. He's just out of his league."

By far and away he's not out of his league. The people "out of their league" are in the Republican Party trying to deal with this, getting skunked at every turn.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT
I need to correct myself on this nuclear warhead business. I erroneously stated at the beginning of the show that we peaked at 12,000 nuclear warheads. That was way wrong. In 1967, we peaked at 31,255 nuclear warheads. In 1989, we were down to 22,217 warheads. In 2010, we were at 5,113 nuclear warheads. And by 2017 we are scheduled to be at 1,500 warheads -- 1,550. It is that number Obama is suggesting be reduced to 300 warheads -- and before 2017. I had said we peaked at 12,000 warheads in the eighties, and I stand corrected. We had 31,000 warheads in 1967.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agenda21; bhofascism; bhotyranny; nationalsecurityfail; nuclear; obama; treason; weapons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-112 next last

1 posted on 02/15/2012 1:31:14 PM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NYer

This is Obama’s SECOND warheads reduction!!!!

Obama has already reduced deployed warheads by 70% with the New START Treaty. New START was signed on 8 April 2010 in Prague and entered into force on 5 February 2011.

So this new reduction is 80% of the remaining 30%. Reagan taught ‘Peace through strength’; Progressives/Obama practice ‘Peace through capitulation’.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_START


2 posted on 02/15/2012 1:36:46 PM PST by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Wouldn’t this need Congressional approval?


3 posted on 02/15/2012 1:40:46 PM PST by Java4Jay (The evils of government are directly proportional to the tolerance of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota; NYer
He won't be satisfied until we're 100% disarmed.
4 posted on 02/15/2012 1:42:05 PM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

He told us. Too bad most people were stuffing their faces with chips and watching sitcoms.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fU4sVQV3Lhk

Way to go dumb asses. Next time stay home and let the adults vote.


5 posted on 02/15/2012 1:42:24 PM PST by CommieCutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Where are the Republicans? All of you who keep ragging on Ron Paul as inimical to national defense, exactly what are we getting out of the current crew? This should be filibuster time to prevent unilateral disarmament.


6 posted on 02/15/2012 1:44:55 PM PST by Buchal ("Two wings of the same bird of prey . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

We're also going to try to replace some of our older servers and failing equipment this year so we're going to add a little extra to our FReepathon goals. John is estimating ten to fifteen thousand to do this and I'd like to get it all in place and working before the election cycle is fully heated up, so we'll try to bring in a little more now if we can and the rest next quarter.
Jim Robinson


Click The Server To Donate

Support Activist Free Republic

7 posted on 02/15/2012 1:46:24 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buchal

Who was it that coined the phrase “tread lightly and carry no stick”?


8 posted on 02/15/2012 1:48:28 PM PST by yank in the UK ( A liberal mocking Christianity. I asked "why don't you mock Islam?" he replied "Muslims are violent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NYer

No good can come from this.... For us.


9 posted on 02/15/2012 1:49:07 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommieCutter
Unless you are a Conservative and engage in what happening to our country, then you get your 5 minutes of news propaganda from some MSM organization and think life is full or rainbows and unicorns.
10 posted on 02/15/2012 1:51:00 PM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

If we were attacked today with nuclear weapons, I wonder if Obama would launch a counter attack ?????????????


11 posted on 02/15/2012 1:53:52 PM PST by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NYer

This should end well.

/s


12 posted on 02/15/2012 1:53:58 PM PST by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
"If we were attacked today with nuclear weapons, I wonder if Obama would launch a counter attack ?"

I've seriously wondered about that myself. A part of me really believes that he wouldn't. I wonder what the reaction to that would be. I wouldn't be a bit surprised if he were thrown out of office by the military if he refused to show up for a nuclear war, instead opting to 'vote present'.

13 posted on 02/15/2012 1:58:38 PM PST by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Why does this surprise anyone with enough intelligence to get in out of the rain?

Everyone who either voted for or against obama knew what he would do once he was in the White House. To wit: He would do everything in his power to destroy the United States of America.


14 posted on 02/15/2012 2:00:23 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
If we were attacked today with nuclear weapons, I wonder if Obama would launch a counter attack ?????????????

You know the answer.
There were democrats that were against striking back for 9/11.

So the answer is no he would not strike back he would be more worried about a "nuclear winter" than defending the people of the United States.

15 posted on 02/15/2012 2:02:48 PM PST by stig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
He won't be satisfied until we're 100% disarmed.

He won't even be satisfied then.

He'll be satisfied when this country's a smoking ruin, lit by the flickering fires of the wreckage, most of us dead, and the rest in chains.

16 posted on 02/15/2012 2:05:40 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay
Wouldn’t this need Congressional approval?

Obama treats the Congress as his servants. If no one challenges him, then there is nothing to stop him. Recess appointments when there's no recess? As Rush pointed out to one caller earlier today:

If the Senate is not gonna stand up for itself, he's going to keep doing it. If nobody from whom he is usurping power in the legislative branch is gonna stand up and stop it, he's gonna keep doing it. If nobody objects, in other words, in a way that has a force of law behind it, he's gonna keep doing it.

17 posted on 02/15/2012 2:10:20 PM PST by NYer ("Be kind to every person you meet. For every person is fighting a great battle." St. Ephraim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Obama is either a fool or is deliberately doing whatever he can to weaken America and/or strengthen our potential enemies. Now he and his Obamamite followers and fellow travelers are sending up this trial balloon of a proposal for near unilateral nuclear disarmament.

This president is the same one who turned down our military’s recommended options to destroy the stealth drone that was down (along with NUMEROUS highly sensitive military hardware and software secrets) in Iran. This president CHOSE to allow the Iranians to take and keep possession of the drone and to discover and share its secrets with other unfriendly countries.

He and his Democrat allies need to be soundly defeated in November.


18 posted on 02/15/2012 2:12:00 PM PST by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The destruction of this nation is proceeding at warp speed, and most of the citizens haven’t a clue. It’s as if a vast fog bank has descended on our land. The regime is wide awake and busy as can be, while the people slumber.


19 posted on 02/15/2012 2:13:11 PM PST by Deo volente (God willing, America will survive this Obamination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

20 posted on 02/15/2012 2:13:54 PM PST by houeto (Mitt Romney - A Whiter Shade of FAIL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii

No, he would chicken out, hesitate, then do nothing. Thank God our nuclear response isn’t totally in his hands.


21 posted on 02/15/2012 2:14:37 PM PST by CodeToad (NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cpdiii
"If we were attacked today with nuclear weapons, I wonder if Obama would launch a counter attack ?????????????"

I suspect he would be more likely to order a strike on those portions of our armed forces that refused to stand down in the face of the enemy.

22 posted on 02/15/2012 2:14:47 PM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

It’s deliberate. You can’t accidentally go wrong 100% of the time.


23 posted on 02/15/2012 2:15:07 PM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

and the converse.

In the meanwhile he is giving all the muslim nations hi tech secrets, technologies and money. This is both directly and indirectly. Muslims have already infiltrated every sensitive organization, technological institution, governmental organization and business in America. Then we have all the great gifts to the backwards muslim nations of technologies and cash.

Boy, I wonder what the upshot will be?


24 posted on 02/15/2012 2:16:52 PM PST by himno hero (Obamas theme...Death to America...The crusaders will pay!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Buchal

A vote for Ron Paul is a direct slap in the face to the sacrifices my son has made for this country in both Iraq and in the Far East.


25 posted on 02/15/2012 2:18:36 PM PST by navymom1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente




"Our enemies may be irrational, even outright insane, driven by nationalism, religion, ethnicity or ideology. They do not fear the United States for its diplomatic skills or the number of automobiles and software programs it produces. They respect only the firepower of our tanks, planes and helicopter gunships."

— Ronald Reagan


26 posted on 02/15/2012 2:19:24 PM PST by glock rocks (optimist, pessimist? I'm an awesomist - There's a dragon in that glass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Its not staggering, the asshole said flat out he wanted to get rid of our nukes back in 2008. People are now surprised that he is keeping his marxist promises?


27 posted on 02/15/2012 2:25:31 PM PST by Michael Barnes (Obamaa+ Downgrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota
New START was signed on 8 April 2010 in Prague and entered into force on 5 February 2011.

Senate approved this, right?..Right?? /s

28 posted on 02/15/2012 2:30:45 PM PST by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie

On 13 May, the agreement was submitted by U.S. President Barack Obama for ratification in the U.S. Senate. Ratification required 67 votes in favor (out of 100 Senators). On Tuesday, 16 September 2010 the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted 14–4 in favor of ratifying New START. The measure had support from three Senate Republicans: Richard Lugar of Indiana, Bob Corker of Tennessee, and Johnny Isakson of Georgia. Senator John Kerry and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have expressed optimism that a deal on ratification was near.

Republicans in the Senate generally deferred to Jon Kyl (R-AZ), a leading conservative on defense issues, who sought a strong commitment to modernize U.S. nuclear forces, and questioned whether there was time for ratification during the lame duck session, calling for an opening of the negotiation record before a vote is held. Senator Ben Nelson (D-NE) joined Kyl in expressing skepticism over the timing of ratification,and Senator Kit Bond (R-MO) has expressed opposition.

Obama made New START ratification a priority during the 2010 post-election lame duck session of Congress, and Senators John Kerry (D-MA) and Richard Lugar (R-IN), the Democratic Chairman and senior Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, were leading supporters of the treaty.

On 22 December 2010, the U.S. Senate gave its advice and consent to ratification of the treaty, by a vote of 71 to 26 on the resolution or ratification. Thirteen Republican Senators crossed party lines to vote in favor of the resolution, along with all 56 Democratic senators and both Independent senators.

Obama signed documents completing the U.S. ratification process on 2 February 2011.

-Wikipedia


29 posted on 02/15/2012 2:36:50 PM PST by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Deo volente; House Atreides
The destruction of this nation is proceeding at warp speed, and most of the citizens haven’t a clue. It’s as if a vast fog bank has descended on our land. The regime is wide awake and busy as can be, while the people slumber.

They're not slumbering. On the contrary, they are enjoying their government benefits. Consider the following:

Obama Thinks He Can Buy Enough Votes to Trump His Record and Continue His Mission to Weaken America February 15, 2012

In essence, Obama is banking on the votes of those who benefit from the give-away programs he has put in place.

30 posted on 02/15/2012 2:41:48 PM PST by NYer ("Be kind to every person you meet. For every person is fighting a great battle." St. Ephraim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Vinnie
Senate approved this, right?..Right?? /s

The Constitution specifies "two thirds of Senators PRESENT" (caps added). That means it takes only 34 Senators to ratify a treaty if there is a quorum.

Of course, pursuant to a treaty we never ratified, our Department of State specifies that "customary practice" is that a treaty needs only a signature of the President or an appointed representative in order to be effectively in force; IOW, it need not be ratified to be treated as law by our government.

Wanna know how all that happened?

31 posted on 02/15/2012 2:42:51 PM PST by Carry_Okie (There has not been a conservative American government for 90 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: navymom1
A vote for Ron Paul is a direct slap in the face to the sacrifices my son has made for this country in both Iraq and in the Far East.

Your statement is a direct slap to the truth, and a direct slap in the face of thousands of military people who support Ron Paul.

Ron Paul has NOT said he's against the military - he said he's against the use of the military AS POLICE. And he's pointed out that trying to do a job that they are Not trained for, is what is getting most of them killed.

So slap yourself, because there are a lot of dead US Military who got that way running around trying to play cop to a bunch of thugs, instead of destroying them or getting out.

Destroying them or getting out - that, VERBATIM, is Ron Paul's declared use of the military.

And anyone who doesn't agree with it, IMO, is slapping the face of every military person risking their lives RIGHT NOW who are forced to play footsie with a deadly enemy.

32 posted on 02/15/2012 2:44:15 PM PST by Talisker (He who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: All

To anyone who still think obama is stupid or in over his head - think again. This guy is doing a GREAT job to kill America for good. He is following his plan he was brought up to do and everything is working exactly how it was planned. And he KNOWS by now that nobody will stop him.


33 posted on 02/15/2012 2:49:15 PM PST by American Dream 246 (Open your eyes. Freedom is not a one day fight. Enemies of Freedom are legion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Cut by 80%, no missile defense, and we cannot get our own energy. He is not incompetent. He is destroying the country on purpose.


34 posted on 02/15/2012 2:50:04 PM PST by doug from upland (Just in case, it has been reserved: www.TheBitchIsBack2012.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
Obama is either a fool or ...

Maybe he's a fool, maybe he's not.

Doesn't matter.

His minders, the folks on the other end of the Blackberry pulling his strings, are very smart and evil to the very marrow of their bones.

They have been planning for this moment, the destruction of this country, for a century; they are not going to give up just because of some silly election.

35 posted on 02/15/2012 2:51:06 PM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
he were thrown out of office by the military

Really? The military? You mean the military who said PC is worth 15 death at Fort Hood and never used the word muslim? The military who is burning the Bible? And much more - the military who is following step by step what obama orders in what he is doing to his country and to our soldiers without complaining ever? That military??? Good luck!
36 posted on 02/15/2012 2:55:13 PM PST by American Dream 246 (Open your eyes. Freedom is not a one day fight. Enemies of Freedom are legion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Get ready those of you who live in on the West Coast. Don’t be surprised if you live under a Chinese flag in your lifetime.


37 posted on 02/15/2012 2:57:12 PM PST by Free Vulcan (Election 2012 - America stands or falls. No more excuses. Get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Does anyone even care? He is systematically deconstructing the country. At a very rapid pace. The media won’t report it. Former military brass won’t speak out on it. Republicans in congress are allowing it. Won’t even call a press conference to address it. What can we do about it?
All we do is hate on Romney, hate on Cain, hate on Perry, hate on Bachman. We are so destroying our chances to win the most important election of our time. All in our quest for the “perfect” conservative candidate who doesn’t even exist.


38 posted on 02/15/2012 3:05:43 PM PST by jersey117 (Perry 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommieCutter

Exactly. Obama was easily identified as a stone cold Alinsky Marxist in his world view. He was elected anyway.


39 posted on 02/15/2012 3:05:55 PM PST by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EEGator
Absolutely deliberate. The sooner people get rid of the idea that he's an amateur, a buffoon or an idiot, the better. Stanley Ann's Baby believes he's a transcendental figure whose destiny is the destruction of western civilization and the ushering in of a new age. The one Crowley called The Age of Horus.

Pop culture is currently saturated with clues about what they intend to bring about. The shock and awe assault on Roman Catholicism is a big tell that they believe their time has come.

40 posted on 02/15/2012 3:08:43 PM PST by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard (Some men just want to watch the world burn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
This president is the same one who turned down our military’s recommended options to destroy the stealth drone that was down (along with NUMEROUS highly sensitive military hardware and software secrets) in Iran. This president CHOSE to allow the Iranians to take and keep possession of the drone and to discover and share its secrets with other unfriendly countries.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

And...Mark Steyn calls Article 2, Section 1, of the Constitution a merely “technicality”.

There was a reason our Founding Fathers wanted only a natural born citizen, with sole allegiance to our nation, to be president.

41 posted on 02/15/2012 3:13:01 PM PST by wintertime (Reforming a government K-12 school is like reforming an abortion centers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Biden would be preferable.

just sayin'

42 posted on 02/15/2012 3:13:36 PM PST by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

FUBO


43 posted on 02/15/2012 3:14:54 PM PST by Danae (Anailnathrach ortha bhais beatha do cheal deanaimha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Please don’t hurt us....

....we’re unarmed.

FUBU (Despicable orifice ......)


44 posted on 02/15/2012 3:18:13 PM PST by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
RUSH: There are some things happening today that are downright scary. The regime, led by Barack Hussein Obama, is weighing options for reducing our US nuclear force, including a reduction of up to 80% in the number of deployed warheads — 80%.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Rush is the man who refused to discuss Obama’s natural born citizenship. He is the man who instructed his call screeners to refuse calls from listeners who were very concerned about Obama’s eligibility. Rush is the guy who refused to accept e-mails on the topic.

And,....It seems Rush is about to do the same in 2012. SHAME on him!

45 posted on 02/15/2012 3:25:08 PM PST by wintertime (Reforming a government K-12 school is like reforming an abortion center.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker; All

Ron Paul and his zombies here on FR can all KMA.

And that is nothing more than a reiteration of our Founder’s policy.

And, in conclusion: any sonuvabitch who calls Bradley Manning a ‘patriot’ can go eat sh*t and die.


46 posted on 02/15/2012 3:27:33 PM PST by mkjessup (Let's do to Mitt what his Irish Setter did to him while tied to the roof rack of his station wagon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
I wouldn't be a bit surprised if he were thrown out of office by the military
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Hm?...The same perfumed peacocks that made life a living hell for the lower level officers who dared to question Obama’s natural born citizenship. Those guys? Really?

47 posted on 02/15/2012 3:29:01 PM PST by wintertime (Reforming a government K-12 school is like reforming an abortion center.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NYer

The Obastard must be stopped. The Sec’y of Defense needs to ignore this proclamation, and to tell The Obastrad to pound sand.


48 posted on 02/15/2012 3:30:03 PM PST by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ought-six

Leon ‘Macho Man’ Panetta?!?!?

BWHAHHAAA!!! Hey, you’re funny!


49 posted on 02/15/2012 3:39:54 PM PST by mkjessup (Let's do to Mitt what his Irish Setter did to him while tied to the roof rack of his station wagon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: NYer

So, IOW, zero is floating a GIANT neon arrow over America that says “Aim Here”!!


50 posted on 02/15/2012 3:40:37 PM PST by DustyMoment (Congress - Another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson