Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

$2.50-Gallon Gasoline and Energy Independence.
Human Events ^ | February 15, 2012 | Newt Gingrich

Posted on 02/15/2012 8:17:39 PM PST by true believer forever

The fact that Americans must cope with ballooning gas prices and energy vulnerability while living in a country with some of the richest untapped energy resources on the planet is an absurdity that can only be accomplished by bad government. By unleashing the American people from regulations and bureaucracy designed to promote the agenda of radical environmentalists, we can tap our enormous oil and natural gas supplies to drive fuel prices down.

Most Americans have no idea that the United States is sitting on enough technically recoverable oil to power us at current rates of consumption for over 250 years. We are estimated to have 1.4 trillion barrels of oil—or 1.7 trillion, adding in the resources of Canada and Mexico.

That amount of oil, as a report from the Institute for Energy Research recently explained, is “more than the world has used since the first oil well was drilled over 150 years ago in Titusville, Pennsylvania” and 6 ½ times the proved oil reserves of Saudi Arabia.

(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; energy; gasoline; gingrich; newt; newtgingrich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last
Newt's campaign has made national phone banks available for contacting voters and volunteers in several states. It includes an online call access center, and a simple script to follow.   This is an effective way to offset Romney and Santorum, and Paul's ground game.  If you do not have unlimited long distance (the campaign is not able to pay for the calls), there are several excellent unlimited long distance cards available at Wal-Mart and other such retailers.  

If you are a Newt supporter, please consider doing national calls for Newt.  He has been hit big time from all sides, but we know he will endure.  Thank you very much.

http://www.newt.org/activism/pb

Newt-calls-home

p.s. if you didn't know, Newt writes a new article every week for Human Events, and they have a special "Newt" tab that has lots of Newt stuff...

1 posted on 02/15/2012 8:17:53 PM PST by true believer forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Easy, The Fischer–Tropsch process


2 posted on 02/15/2012 8:20:09 PM PST by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
Go Newt Go!

Drill here...drill now. Frack here...frack now!

3 posted on 02/15/2012 8:21:39 PM PST by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: U-238

Would increased fracking for natural gas lower gasoline prices?


4 posted on 02/15/2012 8:26:37 PM PST by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

I would say the combination of both.Gassification would be expensive at first, but it would pay off over time and the technology is already there. Now you have many coal mines now looking for business. South Africa oil and gasoline supply is made from coal.


5 posted on 02/15/2012 8:29:40 PM PST by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex; U-238; true believer forever

“...By unleashing the American people...”

I said something similiar three years ago, only it was about the Capitalist economy. Unhindered and unleashed, the American economy would take off like a rocket. We have incredible abilities and creativity - we just need the obstacles, such as communists in the Obama administration, out of the way.


6 posted on 02/15/2012 8:30:16 PM PST by SatinDoll (NO FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR U.S.A. PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Unhindered and unleashed, the American economy would take off like a rocket.

That was the whole idea with the moon base.

7 posted on 02/15/2012 8:36:54 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

I agree.


8 posted on 02/15/2012 8:38:09 PM PST by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

And the economy was pretty damn good during most of Bush's (Republican controll of house, senate, presidency) time. It got bad when DEMONcrats started taking control.

9 posted on 02/15/2012 8:41:00 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (Liberty and Justice for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
Newt's moonbase proposal wasn't as farfetched as a lot of people think, and really had a lot to do with national security, as Russia, and China, both have plans for their own bases:

"Russia is talking with the US and Europe on plans to create a manned research base on the moon, the head of the Russian space agency Roscosmos said Thursday.

Roscosmos is discussing the possibilities for a permanent moon base with officials from NASA and the European Space Agency, the agency's chief, Vladimir Popovkin said. "We don't want man to just step on the moon," Popovkin told Vesti FM radio station, according to the Ria Novosti news agency. "Today, we know enough about it, we know that there is water in its polar areas ... we are now discussing how to begin [the moon's] exploration with NASA and the European Space Agency."

He said the plan was either to set up a base on the moon or launch a station to orbit around it. Russia also is planning to send two unmanned mission to the moon by 2020, Popovkin said."

http://www.myfoxdc.com/dpps/news/russia-us-moon-base-nasa-dpgonc-20110119-to-_17194074

**

Chinese moon base 2002

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2002/5/22/181737.shtml

**

Of course, Sanctimonium, ever the class act, called it crass politics:

POLITICO's Robin Bravender reports from Tallahassee, Fla.:

Santorum was asked at Florida State University about whether he'd expand NASA programs after Newt Gingrich's pledge for a new moon base.

"I go back to trying to be very up front and honest with the people of Florida, the people of the country," he said. But given a potential explosion of inflation, he said, "the idea that anybody's going out and talking about grand, new, very expensive schemes to spend more money at a time when we do not have our fiscal house in order, in my opinion, is plain, crass politics."

http://www.freerepublic.com/%5Ehttp://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/01/santorum-moon-base-idea-is-crass-politics-112383.html

10 posted on 02/15/2012 8:48:30 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

NOBODY, absolutely NOBODY makes more sense than NEWT GINGRICH.


11 posted on 02/15/2012 8:55:42 PM PST by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

And we could reduce current levels of gasoline consumption if we took the corn out of it, without reducing our miles driven.

It takes a higher volume of gasoline, plus the added ethanol, for me to drive a thousand miles with gas-a-hol than if it were pure gas. How this lowers pollution is beyond me, what it does is increase demand for the oil companies, which in turn increases their profits... oh wait, I think I am beginning to understand something here.


12 posted on 02/15/2012 8:57:06 PM PST by Apogee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VideoDoctor
"he RS)said, "the idea that anybody's going out and talking about grand, new, very expensive schemes to spend more money at a time when we do not have our fiscal house in order, in my opinion, is plain, crass politics." It just occurred to me that Sanctorum's quote might be applied very effectively against A LOT of the votes he's made in the past... NOBODY NOBODY NOBODY NOBODY DOES IT LIKE NEWT!!! :)
13 posted on 02/15/2012 8:59:23 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Apogee

I’m not :) but if it means you agree with Newt’s ideas, then I agree with YOU!


14 posted on 02/15/2012 9:01:39 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: VideoDoctor; true believer forever

The problem is that obama (pee on his name) and the other treasonous democrats seem to be deliberately getting our nation into so much debt that we will not be able to have another moon mission, or even build another aircraft carrier.

Our worse enemies could not have hoped for more damage than what these political hacks are doing to our great nation.

They are bringing her to her knees.


15 posted on 02/15/2012 9:04:17 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (Liberty and Justice for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

When Newt explained this at his Cocoa speech in Florida, he said he would like to unleash the private sector with all their resources and creativity to handle the job - paying 90% of the cost - with incentives, prizes, tax breaks etc - and the govt shouldering the last 10%...

You are absolutely right, though, and when you take into consideration what he is doing to the military, bit by bit, most of it unknown, barack’s agenda is even clearer.

I don’t even think Barack wants America with the strength to fall to her knees, I think he wants it dead, and kicked to the global curb... WE can fight this off with Newt in the Presidency, he’s the bastard who will tell them all to go to hell... sorry, feeling feisty tonight.


16 posted on 02/15/2012 9:11:54 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tbw2
"Would increased fracking for natural gas lower gasoline prices?"

It would ultimately if we would commit to converting heavy trucks to run on nat gas instead of diesel. That would allow refineries to make more gasoline, increasing supply and lowering prices.

17 posted on 02/15/2012 9:16:24 PM PST by Josh Painter ("We intend to change Washington, not accomodate it." - Newt Gingrich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

BINGO!


18 posted on 02/15/2012 9:17:33 PM PST by A. Morgan (Ayn Rand: "You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

House Bill 1380.


19 posted on 02/15/2012 9:19:13 PM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All

Reading this piece makes me hopeful. I am currently reading Armageddon, Oil, and Terror...a bit unnerving. I am glad Gingrich offers solutions and not just talk, that is what I want—a map, no more wandering around aimlessly.

Then reading Maxine Waters comments today...UGH!

“She also noted that if Democrats re-take the majority, she would become the chairman of the House Committee on Financial Services, the committee that regulates Wall Street.”

The lady who said/did this:

The Shell exec said paying $5 at the pump “will look like a very low price in the years to come if we are prohibited from finding new reserves, new opportunities to increase supplies.”

Waters responded, in part, “And guess what this liberal would be all about. This liberal will be about socializing … uh, um. …”

The congresswoman paused to collect her thoughts.

“Would be about, basically, taking over, and the government running all of your companies. …”

The oil executives responded, according to Fox News, by saying they’ve seen this before, in Hugo Chavez’s Venezuela.
http://www.wnd.com/2008/05/65111/

Then recently there was this:

The former president of Shell Oil, John Hofmeister, says Americans could be paying $5 for a gallon of gasoline by 2012.
http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/27/markets/oil_commodities/index.htm

We really need to work hard to hold the house and gain the senate and I think we need Gingrich as our president. He has a plan and he has been working on some of these problems for years and he has solutions. That is what I want, solutions! Cheap gas would be a nice added benefit... :)

Though right now I’m pretty much only concerned with trying to save this country from going under, because it sure feels like that is where we are headed unless we turn this around fast.

Go Gingrich! I’m counting on you!


20 posted on 02/15/2012 9:21:13 PM PST by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex

And frack 0bama.


21 posted on 02/15/2012 9:23:15 PM PST by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Irenic

I remember that. She let the cat out of the bag.


22 posted on 02/15/2012 9:25:13 PM PST by kalee (The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we engrave in marble. J Huett 1658)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Irenic

I remember that. She let the cat out of the bag.


23 posted on 02/15/2012 9:26:10 PM PST by kalee (The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we engrave in marble. J Huett 1658)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

There’s a reason trucks run on diesel carry up to 300 gallons in their fuel tanks. Diesel is the highest BTU content fuel available. You don’t have enough room to store the natural gas BTU equivalent on a truck to make it from one refueling point to another or make deliveries to out of the way places and get back.

The hours of service fiasco are also a limitation on converting to natural gas for large trucks. There’s a shortage of parking places for truckers to get their rest now. I’m not saying you’d have to double up on truck stops but there would have to be more. You can’t pull a bunch of those rigs into the local 7/11 to refuel.

A better idea is to start building mutifuel cars and light trucks like Ford did once. That would sharply cut into the demand for gasoline and imported oil to produce it. That would kill worldwide support for high oil prices.

Check out House Bill 1380.


24 posted on 02/15/2012 9:29:45 PM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Irenic
Irenic, is this fast enough for you? :)

"Newt, Explain Your First 30 Days as President"

I will ask the Congress to stay in session on the third of January. I will ask them to repeal Obamacare, Dodd-Frank, and Sarbanes-Oxley. My request will be to have all three repeals ready so that on the day that I am sworn in, I can sign all three repeals that day. That's a real start. I will then on the first day.... -- Newt Gingrich

Watch the video to find out what else Newt Gingrich will do in the first thirty days as president to turn this economy around.

Learn more at http://www.newt.org

Originally broadcast on FOX News, January 30, 2012

Newt day one

25 posted on 02/15/2012 9:32:02 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Irenic

oops, here’s the utube link

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlAIPosvNP0&feature=youtu.be

“Newt, Explain Your First 30 Days as President.”


26 posted on 02/15/2012 9:36:54 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Perpetual motion


27 posted on 02/15/2012 9:37:50 PM PST by wastedyears (Signature for sale.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Well...mmmm...I would like it all done yesterday but I suppose 30 days is acceptable. ha! :p

Go Newt!


28 posted on 02/15/2012 9:39:28 PM PST by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta

thanks for posting this, it really makes the comparison a little more understandable... I like visuals... I think they impact more.


29 posted on 02/15/2012 9:51:26 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
We can only hope for the best, good article.

Here's another interesting article:

Be prepared because sky-high gas prices are coming!

The price of gas could soon soar to $4 a gallon or more, according to ABC News. The average price of gas, across the country, is $3.52 per gallon. The country came close to $4 gas last Spring but gas prices haven’t actually surpassed $4 since the summer of 2008.

Tom Kloza, of the Oil Price Information Service, believes that “it’s going to be a chaotic spring.” And, Andrew Lipow, president of Lipow Oil Associates, in Houston, opines that where the price of gas peaks “depends if the Middle East blows up in a war or not. That’s really the big headline out there: Whether or not geopolitical events disrupt supply. We see that affect already.”

Regarding this month’s crude oil prices, Kloza said that, “early February crude oil prices are higher than they’ve ever been on similar calendar dates through the years, and the price of crude sets the standard for gasoline prices.”

As reported by ABC News, while demand is falling (people are not driving as much), U.S. inventories are rising and prices aren’t declining because of increased uncertainty.

Underscoring the situation is the fact that Sunoco, Lipow points out, has begun closing refineries because of the decrease in demand. But, they have also been impacted by the switch from gasoline to renewable fuels and by competition from foreign imported gas. One third of Sunoco’s Northeast refineries have been closed in the past two years. Lipow notes that once a refinery is closed, it is not likely to reopen.

U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has been quoted as saying that there is a “strong possibility” that Israel will strike Iran’s nuclear facilities this coming spring. Analysis performed by NBC News indicates that any military aggression in the Middle East will result in an accession in crude oil prices:

“But if crude were to spike to $200, and we’re at $100 per barrel now, the industry consensus generally holds that for every $10 increase in crude we typically see about a 25-cent increase in the price at the pump. So if you’re seeing $3.50 a gallon in your local market and Israel attacked today, add $2.50 to that and now we’re looking at $6 gasoline. “

To read the complete NBC report, click here

Countering NBC’s analysis, are a few Israeli and American experts. According to an article by Michael Hirsh, in National Journal, they argue that an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities will have less of a negative impact than originally thought. The following points are offered in support of this position:

  • Iran’s governmental disorganization and infighting. The military is also disorganized and lacks strength.
  • Iran is dealing with a poor economy
  • Hezbollah and Hamas are reluctant to launch a counter attack on Israel
  • Iran’s primary ally, Syria, is engulfed in civil war
  • A “deterrent threat” from the U.S. could keep the Strait of Hormuz open
  • Iran desperately needs oil sales in order to keep its gutted economy going, so it is unlikely to halt the petroleum trade.

Either way–regardless of whether a Middle East war is on the agenda, it appears that gas prices will accelerate.

-Candice Lanier

It wasn't that long ago that refineries were full to capacity, and that kept the price up as no more could be refined to meet the demand.

Now the Obama/Soros/leftist/Marxist plan is in full swing.

Refineries closed never to reopen again.

If they try (under an Obama regime), regulations and red tape will prevent them from doing it.

30 posted on 02/15/2012 9:59:18 PM PST by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Newt was on Greta tonight, I don’t think the vid is posted yet, but he said that the future prices are what is keeping prices high, and if the Hormuz situation was defused, the futures market would feel a little more certainty about the situation. And that is one of the things that would effect prices most quickly... he said a lot of other things, also.

I was busy and only half listening, but that does make sense to me... actually, I don’t understand it all that much...


31 posted on 02/15/2012 10:12:08 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Thanks for putting up that chart!!

:)


32 posted on 02/15/2012 10:19:43 PM PST by U-238
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Well, they want to keep it as confusing as possible so we will be in the dark.

The main thing is that politics is what keeps the price up.

We’ve got all the oil we need and the left hates that.

Clear out all the politics (EPA, Dept of Energy, all the czar types and Obama suckups) and the price will go down.

Drill, baby, drill.

Pump, baby, pump.

Refine, baby, refine!


33 posted on 02/15/2012 10:24:06 PM PST by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
"Clear out all the politics (EPA, Dept of Energy, all the czar types and Obama suckups) and the price will go down."

Clear 'em out and GET NEWT IN!!

34 posted on 02/15/2012 10:33:26 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

It’s semi off topic, I suppose. I would love to see Gingrich, or Santorum (or Mickey Mouse) address the ethanol mandate and subsidy issue.

The math says I am using a good percent more gasoline to drive the same distance, plus the added corn alcohol.
Using more gas, plus more corn, seems to be a win only for certain industries, and OPEC.

Try this (actual mileage will vary with vehicle and driving conditions, but this has been observed):
1000 miles at 18 miles per gallon = 55.56 gallons of “gas with up to 10% ethanol added”
1000 miles at 22 miles per gallon = 45.45 gallons of pure gas

if the full 10% ethanol is added, example one requires 50 gallons of gasoline, plus 5 gallons of ethanol, to drive the same 1000 miles that 45.45 gallons of gasoline plus NO ethanol will take me.
In 20,000 miles (I drive a lot), that is an extra 90 gallons per year of gasoline, plus 100 gallons of ethanol, to go the same distance.
Our actual gas consumption has gone up thanks to mandate as much as to more driving on our part. But it is environmentally friendly, big oil gets to sell more, big agra gets to sell more, opec gets to sell more. I get to spend more and pay more for it due to increased demand (and put 90 more gallons’ worth of burnt petroleum pollutants into the air).

There are a lot of variables that are hard to control - driving conditions, maintenance conditions - but the 18% reduction reported above seems to be within the typical range, and no politician seems inclined to address the issue that stupid policies are driving up demand and prices, or say that we ought not only do away with the corn subsidy, but the requirement that it be added even unsubsidized (so to speak). So I wonder if they are influenced by big oil and big agra to ignore it, since these groups gain from over use.

Of course, I could be utterly wrong in how I am looking at this, but no one has shown me the error of my thinking yet (please do, if it is there). So it would be better if someone could come up with harder, more statistically valid numbers on actual mileage figures before making a case.


35 posted on 02/15/2012 10:46:49 PM PST by Apogee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
Clear out all the politics (EPA, Dept of Energy, all the czar types and Obama suckups) and the price will go down.

Here in the Dallas area, I was paying 77 cents a gallon for regular grade unleaded when Newt Gingrich and his Conservative Patriots were in power back in the 90's. Clinton was merely a figurehead then since, under Gingrich's brave leadership, American got back on track undoing the damage inflicted by the Democrats.

I'm all in for Newt Gingrich and can't wait for him to be sworn in as President in January 2013. His long coattails along with dissatisfaction with Obama will start the process of restoring America. With government held in check and regulation reduced, we'll again see plentiful, cheap energy.

36 posted on 02/15/2012 10:49:07 PM PST by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Your first sentence said it all.

Everyone in disparaging Newt for trying to keep up with the times.

He said it would be mostly funded by private enterprise.


37 posted on 02/15/2012 10:58:01 PM PST by berdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Apogee
I would love to see Gingrich, or Santorum (or Mickey Mouse) address the ethanol mandate and subsidy issue.

In spite of the good-natured rivalry between Texas and our neighbors to the north, Oklahoma, one of the things I enjoy when driving across the Red River are numerous signs like this at gas stations:

I think they have it right. 100% pure gasoline yields better mileage and doesn't damage the engine as does an ethanol mix.

38 posted on 02/15/2012 10:59:09 PM PST by re_nortex (DP...that's what I like about Texas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Apogee; re_nortex

Okay. Between your simplification, and nortex’s pic, I understand it... Pure gas is better and more efficient... and to be truthful, when Newt was in Iowa, I think he did say he supported subsidies, though at the time, I didn’t really know what that meant.

Try this (actual mileage will vary with vehicle and driving conditions, but this has been observed):
1000 miles at 18 miles per gallon = 55.56 gallons of “gas with up to 10% ethanol added”
1000 miles at 22 miles per gallon = 45.45 gallons of pure gas


39 posted on 02/15/2012 11:11:53 PM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
MY MAN NEWTZILLA!

Photobucket

40 posted on 02/16/2012 12:39:31 AM PST by GVnana (Newt 2012 - He Speaks for Us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Obama bows down to Saudi King | American Thinker | April 02, 2009 | Clarice Feldman | Posted on 04/02/2009 8:19:47 AM PDT by rdb3
Obama bows down to Saudi King | American Thinker | April 02, 2009 | Clarice Feldman | Posted on 04/02/2009 8:19:47 AM PDT by rdb3

41 posted on 02/16/2012 4:17:46 AM PST by SunkenCiv (FReep this FReepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks true believer forever.


42 posted on 02/16/2012 4:18:09 AM PST by SunkenCiv (FReep this FReepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: true believer forever

Your link

http://www.newt.org/activism/pb

doesn’t go anywhere.

Is there really a way to act on this?

Thanks


43 posted on 02/16/2012 8:32:14 AM PST by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Sorry, that is the old one that was being used while Newt’s Network was being set up... this will get you in for just about every contact you might want, as well as phone calls, and other grassroots activities... sorry..

http://newtsnetwork.com/


44 posted on 02/16/2012 8:40:47 AM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
That is a sign up page.

This thread needs a link to where people can act on this.

The fact that it doesn't have a link to do so is probably why the mods took it out of activism.

Ping me if there is a direct link as the article implies.

It's a great idea, thanks for posting.

45 posted on 02/16/2012 8:54:42 AM PST by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

If you go to that sign-up page, there is at the top right an icon that says “Make The Call” - but you have to sign up first, with just a minimum of information, so they can assign you an onscreen name, etc...


46 posted on 02/16/2012 9:09:41 AM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
Well hopefully they will make activism on Newt's ideas a little more user friendly in the future.

Many people won't sign in to do something like that.

Perhaps someone that has signed up can post the information on this thread.

47 posted on 02/16/2012 9:22:52 AM PST by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

I’m not sure what you are talking about... no one has ever complained before... they ask for a user name and your email... most people want to register with the campaign, if they are supportive enough of Newt to want to make phone calls for him...


48 posted on 02/16/2012 9:27:19 AM PST by true believer forever (Save the Irish Setters - Vote Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

Probably not, as natural gas isn’t much of a transportation fuel. But the same fracking drilling technology being used so successfully for natural gas is also being used for oil, so over time, that will tend to help gasoline prices.


49 posted on 02/16/2012 9:42:01 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: true believer forever
I’m not sure what you are talking about.

Perhaps you missed this sentence in my post:

Perhaps someone that has signed up can post the information on this thread.
"Most" people would make the information available to posters here at Free Republic if they signed up and got the info.

You know, do everything they can to get as many people as possible working on this very worthty cause.

You must be signed up.

Post the activism stuff here, OK?
If you " are supportive enough of Newt" to get this really rolling...

(I'm sure the Gingrich campaign staff won't mind.)

: > )

50 posted on 02/16/2012 10:31:41 AM PST by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson