Skip to comments.Shocked and Surprised (Oliver North)
Posted on 02/16/2012 2:19:59 PM PST by jazusamo
WASHINGTON Twenty-three years ago this week, Iran's self-appointed supreme leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, broadcast a religious edict declaring that author Salman Rushdie and his publishers were "hereby sentenced to death." The fatwa also called for "all the intrepid Muslims in the world" to "execute them quickly, wherever they find them." The U.S. State Department acknowledged the proclamation and issued a statement "condemning this threat in the strongest possible terms." Rushdie, then living in London, did the sensible thing; he went into hiding and rarely has been seen in public since.
Since 1979, when Khomeini returned to Tehran from exile and organized the Islamic Revolution and the hagiocracy that still rules the Persian people, the depth and breadth of Iranian malevolence has consistently shocked and surprised official Washington. President Jimmy Carter believed that "we can find common ground with them." Four hundred forty-four days of Americans being held hostage in Tehran proved otherwise.
In the early 1980s, we could put wire diagrams of every major international terror organization up on a screen in the White House Situation Room. But we missed the explosive growth and cohesion of radical Islamists on a global scale. We were shocked and surprised when the U.S. Embassy in Beirut was bombed twice, when the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut were destroyed and when more than a dozen Americans were taken hostage. Some including CIA officer William Buckley and Marine Col. Rich Higgins were brutally tortured and then murdered.
And all Americans not just officials in Washington were stunned by the hijacking and bombing of dozens of commercial airliners and the murder of Americans. In 1985 when U.S. Navy diver Robert Stethem. a passenger on TWA Flight 847, was shot in the head and his body dumped on a Beirut tarmac there were some in our government who tied the perpetrators to Tehran, but not enough to make a difference.
The imposition of diplomatic and economic sanctions on the regime in Tehran dating back to 1980 has done little to ameliorate or deter the pernicious effectiveness of Iranian terror masterminded by Shiite theocrats. Worse, it served as an exemplar for Sunni radicals and thugs such as Moammar Gadhafi. When the Libyan dictator ordered a bomb placed aboard Pan Am Flight 103, killing 259 passengers and crew when it plummeted to earth in Lockerbie, Scotland, on Dec. 21, 1988, he was congratulated by the Iranian regime. So, too, were the 19 Sunni "jihadis" from al-Qaida who carried out the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, killing nearly 3,000 on U.S. soil in the world's most horrific terror attack to date.
In the aftermath of all of these attacks, American officials testifying before congressional and other "blue-ribbon" panels professed "shock and surprise" that such acts could occur. They wouldn't have been surprised if they had bothered to read what the radical Islamists in Tehran had said and written about how they would do whatever it would take to destroy the "Great Satan" and Israel dubbed the "Zionist entity" and the "Little Satan." Yet the willful suspension of disbelief continues today.
For months, we have been told by the Obama administration that a "new round of severe sanctions" is going to finally stop Iran's quest to acquire nuclear weapons and the means of delivering them. We're told we finally are going to be joined in this effort by the rest of the "world community." But reality says otherwise. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper testified two weeks ago, "The sanctions as imposed so far have not caused them to change their behavior or their policy." Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has been saying for weeks that Iran "could have a nuclear weapon within a year." But then he told reporters that there is a "strong likelihood" that Israel will act militarily against Iranian nuclear sites between April and June. Was he trying to prevent the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps from being shocked and surprised?
Neither Barack Obama's Nobel Peace Prize nor the threat of "new sanctions" matters a whit to Tehran. His inaugural "open hand" to Iranian leaders has been rebuffed. And when it comes to "sanctions," the Chinese and the Russians won't even go along with a "strongly worded U.N. resolution" against Iran's client state, Syria much less support the "international community" in doing something that might bring about regime change in Tehran.
Salman Rushdie knows his enemy. When he went into hiding 23 years ago this week, he did the only sensible thing he could do to prevent being shocked and surprised by an adversary intent on taking his life. It begs the question, Where will America hide when we're shocked and surprised that the Iranians have the bomb?
Thanks for the ping jaz. Seems to me the Iranian regime under ayatollah whozzit declared war on the United States at one point. I’d say that’s sufficient in itself to take them out, and should have. I’ve never understood why we are still screwing around with them.
I couldn’t agree more with you on that. The turkeys are going to have to be dealt with thanks to inaction on our part in the past and if they get nukes it’ll make very much harder.
Nothing to worry about, according to Ron Paul.
Iran, a gift by Jimmy Carter that keeps on giving and gives more and more as time goes by ! All just to throw the Shah under the bus !
Thanks for the ping. Anyone who is shocked is either in denial or the enemy...plain and simple.
An enemy would not be surprised. A twit would, maybe.
I think Obama is trying to implement a "Mr. Rogers" foreign policy, and make it too expensive for the Republicans to build back up the arsenal he's tearing down.
It's always easier to tear down than to build up, and the Communist Left and their allies have had as their "A-Number-One" operational goal for 60 years now, the deprivation of the United States of its nuclear arsenal.