Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Itís time to return Holderís contempt
NY Post ^ | February 15, 2012 | MICHAEL A. WALSH

Posted on 02/16/2012 6:15:34 PM PST by neverdem

‘Contempt of Congress” is a pretty strong term, and one with tangible legal consequences, but how else to describe Attorney General Eric Holder’s continuing obstructionism in the burgeoning Fast and Furious scandal?

It’s been 14 months since news broke that a federal agent had been killed with weapons that Holder’s Justice Department intentionally allowed to cross the border into Mexico, with no plan on how to track them and without alerting Mexican officials. In all, the Obama administration sent thousands of guns south to the drug gangs under the misbegotten operation.

But since last May, Eric Holder has been stonewalling congressional attempts to get to the bottom of Fast and Furious — a mess hatched on his watch by Obama appointees at the office of the US attorney for Arizona and agents with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

On Tuesday, Rep. Darrell Issa (R.-Calif) — whose House Oversight Committee is leading the congressional investigation — sent Holder another in a series of stern letters, demanding that Justice comply with committee subpoenas that it’s been pretty much ignoring since Oct. 12.

The letter was prompted by Justice’s failure to meet a Feb. 9 deadline to make witnesses available and turn over hundreds, if not thousands, of pages of internal documents. Holder’s crew requested a further extension — while publicly decrying Issa’s probe as a political witch hunt.

Of course, as Issa writes, it’s Justice’s own “delay tactics” that “have extended this investigation into a presidential-election year.” Indeed, “had the department demonstrated willingness to cooperate with this investigation from the outset — instead of attempting to cover up its own internal mismanagement — this investigation likely would have concluded” last year.

“In reality,” Issa continues, “it is the department that is playing political gotcha games, instead of allowing a....”

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Mexico; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: atf; banglist; dea; dhs; doj; fastandfurious; fbi; gunrunner; gunwalker; holder; ice; obama

1 posted on 02/16/2012 6:15:37 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Lock the SOB up. Stop farting around with this guy.

make him crap or get up off the pot.


2 posted on 02/16/2012 6:18:41 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
I have heard that Holder has not ever, during the course of all the testimony he has had to give to this committee, been put under oath; meaning that he can lie like a rug with no consequences....

Anyone confirm this?

3 posted on 02/16/2012 6:20:32 PM PST by Jerrybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jerrybob

I think his being under oath is implied by virtue of him being AG.


4 posted on 02/16/2012 6:26:29 PM PST by BillyBonebrake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Holder has absolutely nothing to fear from Issa or this congress, they are impotent despite their occasional blasts of hot air. Charlie Rangel and Maxine Waters are still running around loose, cocky as ever. So will Holder be after this fizzles out, which it will.


5 posted on 02/16/2012 6:30:47 PM PST by Reddon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Photobucket
6 posted on 02/16/2012 6:34:03 PM PST by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jerrybob

I don’t have a link but Issa is on video, During a FNC interview, saying that Holder has been under oath, after Issa was asked a direct question if Holder was under oath!


7 posted on 02/16/2012 6:34:40 PM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jerrybob

He was put under oath multiple times.

They need to put his ass in jail and start threatening his underlings. Obama will be sweating bullets then.

Here’s to Boehner getting PRIMARIED!


8 posted on 02/16/2012 6:41:37 PM PST by struggle (http://killthegovernment.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Don’t have the link but there was an article a week or so ago saying Boehner would block any attempt to site Holder for contempt of Congress.

Agreed, primary Boehner. Ball-less, gutless, whiny, no-spine, POS. He carries much of the responsibility for the mess our country is in today. nobama depends on Boehner. Without him, much of Barry’s foolishness would have gone no where.


9 posted on 02/16/2012 7:23:46 PM PST by upchuck (Let's have the Revolution NOW before we get dumbed down to the point that we can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
If the Republican leadership, Congressman Issa and Speaker boner are serious about this issue there is a very simple approach.

When the next federal Budget makes its way through the house, as all spending bills must, color code the monies in every bill. Include language that restricts the monies in that particular bill to being spend only on the line items in the bill.

There are many things that bureaucrats will do but going to jail ain't one of them.

In short, financially starve DOJ until Holder et al fully comply with the Congressional summons. Do so in such a way that NO other source of Federal Funding is available. make it march.

What we are seeing is exactly why the democratically controlled Congress never passed a Federal Budget - money becomes untraceable and can be spent anywhere, by anyone, on any project with zero accountability.

Unfortunately to accomplish what I recommend requires some intestinal fortitude and ability to stand by your commitments. Neither attribute appear to be part of the republican make up these days.

10 posted on 02/16/2012 7:44:03 PM PST by Nip (TANSTAAFL and BOHICA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

So far that is nothing but a rumor.


11 posted on 02/16/2012 7:45:43 PM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: struggle

You are right. If enough pressure is put on enough underlings somebody will roll over and finger Holder. Maybe Barry if we get lucky.


12 posted on 02/16/2012 9:11:44 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: upchuck; TigersEye
Don’t have the link but there was an article a week or so ago saying Boehner would block any attempt to site Holder for contempt of Congress.

Agreed, primary Boehner.

Primary a sitting Speaker of the House? I could be wrong, but good luck with that. I'm hoping Boehner, Issa et al. are ready to play hardball, and that contempt of Congress charges are just a ruse. Holder and his top lieutenants should be impeached. Let the Senate have to deal with it. The rat conference has to defend 23 seats in the Senate next November, 7 of which are open due to retirements.

Obama's Anti-Constitutional Pattern

This administration has been a prolonged assault on the Constitution.

13 posted on 02/17/2012 1:46:03 AM PST by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks neverdem.


14 posted on 02/17/2012 3:48:54 AM PST by SunkenCiv (FReep this FReepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Irenic

You’ve nailed it. There is the real problem with dealing with Holder.


15 posted on 02/17/2012 3:52:33 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
So far that is nothing but a rumor.

Rumor? This doesn't sound like a rumor to me (from Feb 7):

Link to that. And here's another link.

However, I notice there are several articles since that claim Boehner is backing Issa. Perhaps Boehner backed off.

16 posted on 02/17/2012 4:20:14 AM PST by upchuck (Let's have the Revolution NOW before we get dumbed down to the point that we can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

>>You are right. If enough pressure is put on enough underlings somebody will roll over and finger Holder. Maybe Barry if we get lucky.

If they finger Barry, it’ll be more action than he gets from Michelle.


17 posted on 02/17/2012 7:06:40 AM PST by struggle (http://killthegovernment.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Contempt of Congress from Wikipedia

Following a contempt citation, the presiding officer of the chamber is instructed to refer the matter to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia; according to the law it is the "duty" of the U.S. Attorney to refer the matter to a grand jury for action.

The criminal offense of "contempt of Congress" sets the penalty at not less than one month nor more than twelve months in jail and a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $1,000.

While the law pronounces the duty of the U.S. Attorney is to impanel a grand jury for its action on the matter, some proponents of the unitary executive theory believe that the Congress cannot properly compel the U.S. Attorney to take this action against the Executive Branch, asserting that the U.S. Attorney is a member of the Executive Branch who ultimately reports only to the President and that compelling the Attorney amounts to compelling the President himself. They believe that to allow Congress to force the President to take action against a subordinate following his directives would be a violation of the separation of powers and infringe on the power of the Executive branch. The legal basis for this belief, they contend, can be found in Federalist 49, in which James Madison wrote "“The several departments being perfectly co-ordinate by the terms of their common commission, none of them, it is evident, can pretend to an exclusive or superior right of settling the boundaries between their respective powers.

18 posted on 02/17/2012 11:24:36 AM PST by Ouderkirk (Democrats...the party of Slavery, Segregation, Sodomy, and Sedition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
...is reportedly...

Reportedly? By who? An anonymous source is no source.

19 posted on 02/17/2012 3:07:53 PM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson