Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt vs. the Three Wimps
Minn Conservative Examiner ^ | 2-16-12 | G.Gross

Posted on 02/16/2012 10:10:29 PM PST by VinL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last
To: ansel12
You area person and you are stupid and I pointed that out. So I guess that could be called personal.

You go out of your way to attack Santorum because you are too stupid to make effective arguments for your preferred candidate. To me that calls for a response.

You are stupid and I pointed that out. That isn't so much an attack as an observation.

101 posted on 02/18/2012 6:57:46 AM PST by GulfBreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze; moder_ator

Rambling is one thing, but to just be making personal attack after personal attack for no reason, unrelated to any discussion or argument, is way out of bounds.


102 posted on 02/18/2012 12:06:49 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; moder_ator

Dear ansel

Don’t start attacking other people and candidates and then start whining when it comes back your way.

Don’t distort and lie about what other people have said and then cry when they say you are too stupid to comprehend.


103 posted on 02/18/2012 12:13:03 PM PST by GulfBreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze

That never happened, this is the initial post.

To: GulfBreeze
“”“3 Wimps?” Maybe they just didn’t want to waste their time on a beat candidate.”””

I think that you forget that they are supposed to be three candidates at each other’s throats and wanting to do battle in debating each other. Interesting that you merely see them as a single team against Newt.
41 posted on Thu Feb 16 2012 23:09:03 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time) by ansel12

This is my second post.

To: GulfBreeze
Then you should have written a different post, you made them sound like a team of three.
You did not explain why they all chickened out and avoided a chance to debate each other and argue their candidacy’s view on the issues.
85 posted on Fri Feb 17 2012 10:13:21 GMT-0800 (Pacific Standard Time) by ansel12

After that you just abandoned the discussion and merely started with the attacks and name calling.

You need to avoid doing that.


104 posted on 02/18/2012 12:21:33 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

You need to avoid distorting what people say and avoid calling fine conservative patriotic candidate wimps if you are too wimpy to get hit back. In your case you should also avoid fast moving machinery and sharp objects.


105 posted on 02/18/2012 12:30:08 PM PST by GulfBreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze

There was no distortion in post 41, and the very fact that you think that calling three candidates wimps when they chicken out of a debate means that you are supposed to respond by launching into a personal attack and a barrage of name calling against a freeper is what the problem is.

If you want to challenge my ideas or my correction of your post, then do so, but lay off the name calling and personal attacks.


106 posted on 02/18/2012 12:53:18 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

You are an idiot who damages the whole conservative cause and worse you damage Gingrich’s chances who you are supposed to be supporting. For one thing the candidates are going to debate in very soon in Mesa, Arizona.

You are also a wimp who can’t take what they dish out.

Freeper? You need to be hanging out at DU. You are moving their causes along just fine. Or maybe Romney’s campaign has a chair for you because you are doing wonders for him as well.


107 posted on 02/18/2012 1:02:26 PM PST by GulfBreeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: GulfBreeze

I give up, there is nothing adult in there to speak to.


108 posted on 02/18/2012 1:13:25 PM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

So you are buying into Santorum’s social issue campaign, which from now I shall refer to as “Brother Loves Traveling Salvation Show.”


109 posted on 02/18/2012 1:27:22 PM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Toespi
No, his conservative voting record and his edge in consistency.
110 posted on 02/18/2012 11:12:00 PM PST by Ingtar ("But it is hard to maintain an aura of invincibility after you have been vinced..." Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson