Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is It Possible to Criticize Some Aspects of Capitalism, Without Being Labelled a Socialist?

Posted on 02/17/2012 8:05:14 AM PST by pinochet

The leader of the Russian Communist Revolution, Vladmir Lenin, once declared that: "The capitalists will give us the rope, which we shall use to hang them".

For most of American history, capitalism has been a force for good, because most of America's leading capitalists were patriotic citizens, who were also devout Christians. So long as American capitalism is in the hands of patriotic Christians, the forces of capitalism can be harnessed to do a lot of good for America and the world. J. D. Rockefeller's fortune built the University of Chicago and other useful projects during his lifetime. American capitalist funds converted Harvard, Princeton, and Yale - which were founded as Christian seminaries to train clergymen, into world class universities. But the Rockefeller Foundation, Harvard, Yale, and Princeton, have been hijacked by anti-Christian forces, and been used as tools to undermine American culture.

But we have to consider the possibility that a capitalist system can be very dangerous, if it is in the hands of people who hate America and hate Christianity. Do you remember when the Clinton administration was bribed by defence contractors, into permitting the transfer of US missile technology to China? China may attack America one day, with American missile technology. I am also opposed to selling US arms technology to Islamic regimes such as Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Egypt. These regimes have turned virulently anti-Israel, and may one day attack Israel using American technology. Israel is the only Middle Eastern nation, that should receive advanced weapons from America, because they are America's only true ally. American national security depends on putting the interests of Americans first, ahead of the corporate profits of defence contractors, who are notorious for bribing administration officials and congressmen.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Philosophy; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: capitalism; christianity; patriotism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: donna

There is nothing evil about multi-national corporations or capitalism. There is however something evil about any institution big or small using it’s wealth and influence to bribe politicians to force/prevent/incentivise/discourage/etc... free people from purchasing one product or service over another. The evil is not in the capitalism (freedom). It is in the government interference(force).


41 posted on 02/17/2012 9:07:41 AM PST by nitzy (A just law does not punish virtue nor reward vice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: eclecticEel

I think ‘capitalism’ is an evolving word, the same as ‘conservative’ is. When the left tries to demonize something, it often is given a boost in peoples’ minds. Weird, huh?


42 posted on 02/17/2012 9:09:09 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (George Washington: [Government] is a dangerous servant and a terrible master.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Sounds like a god excuse to have as small a government as possible. It'd be a lot easier to keep an eye on.

You know, like a Republic with Democratically elected representation that is limited by some form of written codex or constitution. Maybe tack on a list of basic Rights that that Countries citizens could use as a protected "starter set" of privileges and immunities.

If only we knew of a Country that still ran under such a system...

43 posted on 02/17/2012 9:13:13 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Anyone participating in a Ponzi scheme deserves to get bilked. Do your research, invest wisely.

If you want to throw your money away, then may God have mercy on you.

44 posted on 02/17/2012 9:20:44 AM PST by Dead Corpse (Steampunk- Yesterday's Tomorrow, Today)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

Please wake up. The Rockefellers were evil personified, in bed with the Reds from the getgo. Hello, the UN is built on Rockefeller property.


45 posted on 02/17/2012 9:20:59 AM PST by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Crony capitalism is MONOPOLY capitalism is FASCISM. Any company too big to fail or big enough to sway the market and cause manipulated profit or collude with or extort agreement from competitors to form raw materials and price fixing cartels, should be dismantled. The Federal Reserve, a non governmental banking monopoly needs to be deconstructed ASAP. Capitalism is about COMPETITION where bad ideas get weeded out before they can destroy the economy.


46 posted on 02/17/2012 9:22:51 AM PST by Yollopoliuhqui
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nitzy
Multi-nationals force social change that destroys traditional values, they have no loyalty to the USA or any local community. They fund the Democrats and the Washington elites. They are the reason we cannot get honorable men elected. Multi-nationals are evil and do no good.

Read this:

The Price of “Capitalism”
http://balintvazsonyi.org/shns/shns100202.html

What is American Corporatism?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1036236/posts

47 posted on 02/17/2012 9:25:20 AM PST by donna (I want to live in a Judeo/Christian country where we know that, before God, men & women are equal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

“Husbands are like fires. They go out if unattended.” — Zsa Zsa Gabor

Much the same rule applies to capitalists. They are in continual competition with circumstances as well as each other, so if allowed to operate without regulation, they will tend to run amok. Importantly, even they realize this, so if they are not regulated, they will automatically seek to gain political power, both for themselves, but also to prevent other capitalists from running amok.

They crave order. Not chaos and anarchy, and not micromanagement. But the healthy middle between those extremes.

The 20th Century demonstrated this very well. First, the communists tried to nationalize everything, thinking that government could run things better than capitalists. And this was an *organizational* catastrophe.

Then Fascist economists created the idea of “public-private partnerships”, which had great appeal, and many examples of which still exist. It amounted to government telling corporations what to produce, but then leaving it up to them to figure out *how* to produce it. But this is still too far on the micromanagement side.

The US is still afflicted with examples of both of these models, as well as the extremes of micromanagement and the extreme of chaotic, anarchic capitalism.

The reason that the law affords human rights to corporations goes back to the pre-war Lincoln administration, when states tried to exploit national companies, especially the railroads, that did business through them. Today, however, it has become the fundamental core of business law.

Eventually, it will probably need a constitutional amendment to create corporate rights as “separate and distinct” from human rights and the Bill of Rights.

By the turn of the Century, capitalist competition had become so fierce that monopolization (the ‘Trusts’) had become a major problem, so government had to intervene to bust up such cartels. But it took from almost the start of the 19th Century for things to get this bad.

Today it is still a problem, with “oligopolies”, like big media, exploiting their cartel position to foul up the marketplace.

It is ironic, I suppose, that Al Gore has come out to proclaim that corporations should not report on a quarterly basis, as it makes it too easy for investors to figure out and dump when they are scams. Such as the scams he generates.

Yeah, just another evil capitalist hypocrite.


48 posted on 02/17/2012 9:38:39 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

Capitalism is the economic system that is compatible with natural rights. When a country is a threat to the natural rights of America (China), or a group has declared war against America (Moslems), America has the perfect right to use force to protect its natural rights by limiting the economic freedom of companies that do business with its enemies. Also, when an American company does business with America’s enemies, it forfeits its economic freedom.


49 posted on 02/17/2012 9:38:50 AM PST by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet
What became the United States (The original 13 colonies) was founded on capitalism. In the Spanish and French systems of colonization, the Crown basically funded the explorations and colonies, but the British Crown did it differently by issuing Charters to "Companies of Gentlemen and Adventurers" who in turn funded the expeditions themselves.

By the way, bribery and corruption can be and are rife in almost all systems and have to do with corrupt people not something inherently bad about our capitalist system.

In fact, IMO, many of the government controls put on our system have made it more susceptible to bribery and corruption.

50 posted on 02/17/2012 9:41:42 AM PST by metesky (Brethren, leave us go amongst them! - Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond, The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donna
Multi-nationals force social change that destroys traditional values

Which corporation does this? How do they force it? I missed the news coverage where the Coca Cola SWAT team dressed in red kicked in the door of some unsuspecting family and made them consume the Coke. For a corporation to use force they need a partner with a gun (govt). The American people are to blame when force is used because we have provided the gun to the multi-national corporation.

they have no loyalty to the USA or any local community

Nor should they. They should have loyalty to their share holders and board of directors who should in turn have loyalty to the USA or their local community. If they don't they should be publicly held to account for the actions of the organization they are profiting from.

They fund the Democrats and the Washington elites. They are the reason we cannot get honorable men elected.

The INDIVIDUAL within the organization responsible for doing this has done something against the tenets of liberty and free markets. The POLITICIAN accepting the bribe has done something immoral. The PEOPLE who elected the POLITICIAN did something unwise.

Multi-nationals are evil and do no good

There are many multi-national corporations which have done wonderful things ranging from curing diseases, advances in science, advances in agriculture, advances in communications, etc...There are also those INDIVIDUALS who run multi-national corporations who immorally use the power of the organization to exert force over free men. These people, the politicians who provide the guns and the fools that vote them into office are the bad guys.

51 posted on 02/17/2012 9:58:59 AM PST by nitzy (A just law does not punish virtue nor reward vice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
Nice argument, but it is not true, the law allowing bank activity you describe, was in the credit modernizing act, written by ken lays attorney and slipped into a bill by Phil Gramm. Bill never had one house are senate hearing.
52 posted on 02/17/2012 10:03:57 AM PST by org.whodat (Sorry bill, I should never have made all those jokes about you and Lewinsky, have fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: nitzy

Well, ignorance and a blind eye to what’s going on is Rush’s position, too.


53 posted on 02/17/2012 10:05:42 AM PST by donna (I want to live in a Judeo/Christian country where we know that, before God, men & women are equal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Yollopoliuhqui

Damned straight.

LLS


54 posted on 02/17/2012 10:09:48 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Hey repubic elite scumbags... jam mitt up your collective arses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: pinochet
"But we have to consider the possibility that a capitalist system can be very dangerous..."

Nope "capitalism" isn't dangerous.

What is dangerous is when Government tries to make "Capitalism" "fair"!

55 posted on 02/17/2012 10:09:52 AM PST by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donna

You know what, I never thought of it like that before. Good point. Never mind what I said before.


56 posted on 02/17/2012 10:12:32 AM PST by nitzy (A just law does not punish virtue nor reward vice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: donna

“one class possesses the means of production”

Problem with that concept is that ANYONE can owns means of production. Sure, class distinctions seem apparent when talking very large scale production, but the distinction is position on a continuous spectrum and not an either/or. Any prole can start producing with his bare hands, leveraging his work to acquire more, and so produce more. Many a prole has, as a result of hard work, unexpectedly found himself “The Man” while railing against “The Man” along the way.

Those who object to capitalism as class warfare do not understand this.


57 posted on 02/17/2012 10:59:28 AM PST by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: pinochet
American capitalist funds converted Harvard, Princeton, and Yale - which were founded as Christian seminaries to train clergymen, into world class universities.

Yale was founded using the money plundered from innocent people. It is named after the plunderer who was also a criminal and who donated plundered wealth in order to get the university named after him.

58 posted on 02/17/2012 11:23:57 AM PST by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

That’s why the author says:

America never had a proletariat.

In that case, America could not have been a capitalist country.


59 posted on 02/17/2012 11:25:15 AM PST by donna (I want to live in a Judeo/Christian country where we know that, before God, men & women are equal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Communism, in reality, is just another variation of Capitalism, in which Capital is centralized in the hands of the State.

I remember the quote from Arthur Jensen in the movie, “Network”, when he dressed down Howard Beale...

“What do you think the Russians talk about in their Councils of State? Karl Marx? They pull out their linear programming charts, statistical decision theories, and minimax solutions and compute the price-cost probabilities of their transactions and investments just like we do.”


60 posted on 02/17/2012 11:27:22 AM PST by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson