Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

...claims of voter fraud at the polls.

Noooooo...

1 posted on 02/19/2012 2:30:17 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Libloather

2 posted on 02/19/2012 2:34:53 PM PST by I see my hands (The old sod ne'er shall be forgot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

3 posted on 02/19/2012 2:36:36 PM PST by Colonial Warrior (Help us OB/GYN! You are our only hope!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

VOTER FRAUD DISINFRANCHISES EVERYONE!

And what the left (intentionally) fails to acknowledge is that it is far more prevalent among Democrats.


4 posted on 02/19/2012 2:41:39 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Hmmm. Interesting. Politico has launched a pre-emptive strike against those evil Southerners who chafe against this anachronism of Reconstruction.

Read the whole article and you will find Josh Gerstein’s concluding sentence is the racism accusation. So predictable.


5 posted on 02/19/2012 2:45:46 PM PST by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

A very legitimate argument can be made that the SCOTUS should selectively trim the part of the law that just applies to some of the states, and parts of some states, unless strong evidence that they, and just them, have for any length of time especially violated minority rights.

That there is no legitimate reason to prosecute a law just against *some*, in perpetuity. As reconstruction ended, and the federal law again was applied to everyone equally, so too should this *part* of the Voting Rights Act end.


7 posted on 02/19/2012 3:01:39 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

The Voting Rights Act targeted Democrat states for preclearance. The Democrats, the party of the KKK and Jim Crow, went underground with the disappearance of the Democrats and the emergence of Republican majorities in those states.

In other words, in the Southern states, real Hope and Change succeeded. The keeping of preclearance against those states is an afront to all of us who live here and we continue to pay for the past and present acts of the racist Democrat Party.


8 posted on 02/19/2012 3:07:47 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (Obama's War on Prosperity is killing me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Without imagined victims the rat party would disappear. It is essential to their power to continue to divide and conquer.

I checked my online White Guilt Account this morning.

Balance: $0.


9 posted on 02/19/2012 3:10:51 PM PST by Jacquerie (No court will save us from ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

There is a difference between guaranteeing access to the ballot box and guaranteeing access to election fraud.


10 posted on 02/19/2012 3:31:30 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the fascists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
...the Voting Rights Act has stood for several decades as a rare point of bipartisan consensus.

ROTFL! I guess you don't have to be very bright to write crap for Politico.

11 posted on 02/19/2012 3:57:31 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (This time, the alien invaders are bringing the viruses with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

Oh, me, oh, my! You might actually have to prove you’re a citizen and have a right to cast a vote...

Heavens forfend!

What is the world coming to when Democrats can’t stuff ballot boxes with the votes of the dead and of illegal aliens!!!!


12 posted on 02/19/2012 3:57:54 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

There’s a simple solution to this whole mess and it’s one the Democrats pioneered so they can’t say a thing about it.

Every time a person votes, a 4473 style form should be filled out, a NICS check run and upon approval, the person can vote. This is what is used to exercise RKBA... if it’s good enough for exercising one Civil Right, it’s damn good enough to use for the Civil Right to Vote.

This would guarantee one vote per person, it would allow better tracking for voter fraud investigations, and it would eliminate unknown and questionable ballots. Anyone that doesn’t support such a system cannot in good faith support such a system to purchase a firearm and they obviously support voter fraud.


13 posted on 02/19/2012 4:01:36 PM PST by BCR #226 (02/07 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Voting Rights Act Fraud under siege (RATS don't like 'intensifying conservative legal assault')

There.
Fixed it for them.

14 posted on 02/19/2012 4:49:44 PM PST by Publius6961 (My world was lovely, until it was taken over by parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

The Democrats use this subject matter to scare blacks into thinking that if this particular law is repealed, then the right of blacks to vote would be repealed. A few years ago, I worked with a young black woman who firmly believed that. It was an election year and that was what she was told by some Democrats. She was very upset and angry that those terrible Republicans would try to take away the voting rights of blacks. I tried to explain it to her, but not sure I got through.


15 posted on 02/19/2012 4:51:29 PM PST by rimtop56 (I sought the Lord, and he answered me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather; I see my hands; GreatOne; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; Red Steel; David; theothercheek; ...
The unmentioned "800 pound gorilla" in the discussion about this Voting Rights Act provision which mandates US DOJ pre-approval of changes in state election laws is the overt politicization of the Obama DOJ. That in effect means that, under the Voting Rights Act as currently written, the Obama Administration has veto power over all state election laws in the states covered in the Act; in other words, it can frustrate well-intentioned state legislative acts aimed at minimizing election fraud. (Surprisingly, there are apparently some states overseen by the DOJ which have no history of Jim Crow - e.g., Arizona.)

Those of us who wish to get rid of that section of the Voting Rights Act should argue that any party claiming that a state election change is racially or ethnically discriminatory would have every right to bring such a challenge in federal court under the Fourteenth Amendment's "equal protection" clause, which in this instance is the more just alternative to mandatory review of every relevant state statute by the DOJ.

16 posted on 02/19/2012 5:03:28 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

the current issue of “Jet” magazine is trying to scare Black voters by posting this article. The issue is illegal voting, not suppression of minority votes. But to reactionary types this must be an assault on Black. They are unable to realize that illegal votes take away their legitimate votes.

Critical thinking should be taught and honed.


17 posted on 02/19/2012 5:14:13 PM PST by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

the current issue of “Jet” magazine is trying to scare Black voters by posting this article. The issue is illegal voting, not suppression of minority votes. But to reactionary types this must be an assault on Black. They are unable to realize that illegal votes take away their legitimate votes.

Critical thinking should be taught and honed.


18 posted on 02/19/2012 5:16:28 PM PST by oneamericanvoice (Support freedom! Support the troops! Surrender is not an option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather

The VRA has outlived its usefulness.

What we need is an act that prevents states from leaving dead and illegal voters on the rolls. Voter registration lists need to be renewed as often as every 4 years. I would prefer that a person have to register for each and every election separately and in person.


24 posted on 02/19/2012 7:35:50 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Libloather
Voting Rights Act under siege (RATS don't like 'intensifying conservative legal assault')...only problem is, the "assault" is an attempt to have more enforcement of the Act - in an even-handed way. Holder's DOJ has abandoned any pretense of going after any but minority victims under the Act, and deliberately ignores any violations which adversely affect white citizens - the get-even mentality. Christian Adams' book "Injustice" details how bad the situation is, but it takes a strong stomach to read through it.......
26 posted on 02/19/2012 9:37:51 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson