Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Will Be Obama’s Next Supreme Court Pick? Blog Points to California AG Kamala Harris
ABA Journal ^ | 2/15/2012 | Debra Cassens Weiss

Posted on 02/19/2012 4:17:48 PM PST by RummyChick

Who will be the next justice to retire, and who will be nominated to replace that person?

SCOTUSblog does some prognosticating and says California Attorney General Kamala Harris could be the next nominee tapped for the U.S. Supreme Court, replacing Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. There's one big problem, though: Harris may not want the job.

“In the lists of names, only one truly stands out as checking every box: Kamala Harris,” Goldstein writes. Like the president, she is biracial, and she will be 50 years old in 2015. She is liberal, but she has a law enforcement background.

The only problem is that Harris could pass up a Supreme Court nomination because she would be early in her second term as attorney general at that point.

Another “serious possibility” is Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan, who knows the president from their service together in the Illinois legislature. Goldstein names seven other contenders, including former Michigan Attorney General Jennifer Granholm and two women with pending nominations to federal appeals courts: former New York solicitor general Caitlin Halligan and U.S. District Judge Jacqueline Nguyen.

Hat tip to the Wall Street Journal Law Blog.

(Excerpt) Read more at abajournal.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: affirmativeaction; antideathpenalty; california; gigabarfbuckets; homosexualagenda; kamalaharris; libertarians; medicalmarijuana; obama; prop8; rongold; rosebirdclone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last
Now why is this important?

Yes, there are the surface problems with those two women -Harris and Madigan.

But for those of you that read the White House Insider - Kamala Harris is a name you will recognize.

http://theulstermanreport.com/2012/01/22/the-death-of-a-political-operative-the-troubling-timeline/

http://theulstermanreport.com/2012/02/16/better-sit-down-for-this-one-folks/

I just may have to have to vote for Romney to keep the Chicago thug politics out of SCOTUS. I said I would NEVER NEVER vote for Romney. I just don't know if I can do it.

1 posted on 02/19/2012 4:18:01 PM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Please LORD GOD do not let the Marxist Jack-Wagon in the White House get another Supreme Court pick...... Sadly I still don’t know if I could vote for Romney as he has a habit of picking liberal judges also!(That leaves Newt or Santorum)


2 posted on 02/19/2012 4:22:07 PM PST by jakerobins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

What is important is that the people see to it that he doesn’t get a next pick!


3 posted on 02/19/2012 4:23:02 PM PST by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Who Will Be Obama’s Next Supreme Court Pick?

Hey thats easy to answer:

Anjem Choudary

Photobucket ( could we now have a difficult question?)

4 posted on 02/19/2012 4:25:06 PM PST by Candor7 (Obama fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

The Ugandan Giant???


5 posted on 02/19/2012 4:25:10 PM PST by GISax (Still waiting for the Iron Chef electric eel battle...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Kumala the cannibal Ugandan warrior?


6 posted on 02/19/2012 4:27:36 PM PST by rawcatslyentist (BO Stinks! So does Mitts magic underwear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jakerobins

People should reject the notion that every Scotus pick has to be some sort of victim group.


7 posted on 02/19/2012 4:28:15 PM PST by omega4179 (Internet ID:FU░&#BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

FR Needs New Servers
Please Donate Toward The Purchase And Keep FR Up And Running!


Click The Servers To Donate

8 posted on 02/19/2012 4:30:14 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Who Will Be Obama’s Next Supreme Court Pick?

Why do you think he retired from the House?


9 posted on 02/19/2012 4:31:06 PM PST by COBOL2Java (Mitt Romney is SEVERELY conservative - so severe, it hurts him to be conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: omega4179
The brother in law of Harris is on the short list to replace Holder
https://dancingczars.wordpress.com/tag/tony-west-short-list-to-replace-holder/
That's Tony in the pic
10 posted on 02/19/2012 4:32:39 PM PST by RummyChick (It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
He might have been persuaded to retire so that a Kennedy could run.

But a flaming queen is probably next on the agenda for SCOTUS.
11 posted on 02/19/2012 4:34:53 PM PST by RummyChick (It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Obama will not get another Supreme Court nominee. His replacement will get three in rapid succession through the deaths of Ruth Bader Ginsburg who will die of cancer, Stephen Breyer who will die of old age, and Sonia Sotomayer who will die of a seizure induced by her poor management of her diabetes.


12 posted on 02/19/2012 4:36:09 PM PST by MIchaelTArchangel (Romney ruined Massachusetts. Now he wants to ruin the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

It is interesting to me that Ginsburg doesn’t retire before Obama could be out. Of course,she still has time .


13 posted on 02/19/2012 4:38:01 PM PST by RummyChick (It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Combine WHI and WSI with the amputated fingers of the staffer in the WH last week, and......

Diane Feinstein will smile and say nothing.

This is bad juju. Ulsterman may not be liked around here, but my hair, or what’s left of it, stands on end these days every time there’s a new piece out.


14 posted on 02/19/2012 4:39:50 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Betcha Sen. Linda Graham (RINO-SC) is drooling just thinking what a privilege it will be to vote a Moslem onto the high court.


15 posted on 02/19/2012 4:40:04 PM PST by upchuck (Let's have the Revolution NOW before we get dumbed down to the point that we can't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

It will boil down to replacing one fetid America-hating marxist who never should have been confirmed with another.


16 posted on 02/19/2012 4:40:16 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

These people infected with Washington DC long to hold on to power and will hold it until they can’t anymore.


17 posted on 02/19/2012 4:42:18 PM PST by omega4179 (Internet ID:FU░&#BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

Just noticed that Tony West was on the defense team of John Taliban Walker.


18 posted on 02/19/2012 4:44:41 PM PST by RummyChick (It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I think that Ruth Bader Ginsburg will be around to annoy us for another decade or two. I know that she previously had a battle with cancer, but she strikes me as one of these skinny folks who can hang on for decades without seeming to age any further (my grandmother was like that).


19 posted on 02/19/2012 4:44:48 PM PST by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Whoever he wants because there are no real patriots in Washington who give a darn to fight Obama on anything. And if Santos is the candidate, expect Obama to certainly pick more justices.
20 posted on 02/19/2012 4:45:16 PM PST by Christie at the beach (I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides

Sonia Sotomayor was not at the State of the Union address. Anyone know why?

Ginsburg will probably die right on the bench while hearing a case but everyone will just think she is taking another one of her naps.


21 posted on 02/19/2012 4:48:52 PM PST by RummyChick (It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

FReepers who say “I refuse to vote for ______ if he is the nominee” should read this scary article to realize how idiotic that is.


22 posted on 02/19/2012 4:49:16 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

There were rumors for a while that the left-wing socialist governor of Massachusetts, Deval “tax ‘em all” Patrick, was on Obama’s list for SCOTUS.

I think if Obama got three choices in a (please no) second term, he’d nominate the supposedly reverend Jeremiah Wright, Sean Penn and Van Jones.

If it is this year, and he is sure he will lose the election, I wouldn’t put it past him to nominate himself and drop his campaign. The dems would agree because they’d get Hillary a Lifestyle Lift and a haircut and nominate her for POTUS...they’d be glad to vote for Zero in the Senate and I’m sure he could find a RINO or two (hiya, McCain) to put him over the threshold. After all, he taught Constitutional law, someone said once.


23 posted on 02/19/2012 4:50:37 PM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

You’re quite the optimist!


24 posted on 02/19/2012 4:50:48 PM PST by Apollo5600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Apollo5600

Are people in the kitchen known as Residence Staff? I want to know who got their fingers cut off. Sometimes things happen in the kitchen but how the heck did a life threatening injury involving amputation of fingers happen???


25 posted on 02/19/2012 4:53:57 PM PST by RummyChick (It's a Satan Sandwich with Satan Fries on the side - perfect for Obama 666)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
It is interesting to me that Ginsburg doesn’t retire before Obama could be out. Of course,she still has time .

Even the milquetoast GOP won't permit Obama another SCOTUS pick before the election.

26 posted on 02/19/2012 4:54:37 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Well, remember that this is an election year. If she retired now, or in the summer after this year’s Supreme Court session is done, there would be a huge confirmation battle. And that confirmation battle would be a major campaign issue this year.

Let’s all remember, that of 33 Senate seats up for election this year, 23 are Democrats, a number of whom are vulnerable for re-election. It’s possible that Republicans will control the Senate come next January. Then, if Obama is re-elected, and Ginsburg retires, Obama will have a much tougher time appointing a strong liberal.

Or I should say, he will have a tough time appointing that liberal, unless he continues to make recess appointments to positions and not be challenged on doing so.


27 posted on 02/19/2012 4:55:24 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I don’t think Ruthie has any intention of retiring. My fondest wish is that she lives 15 minutes past Newt’s inaugeration.


28 posted on 02/19/2012 5:02:45 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg

My guess is:

Louis Farrakhan (semi sarc)


29 posted on 02/19/2012 5:20:32 PM PST by Know et al (The greatest argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with a voter: Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Yah, that’s great. We need a flaming communist, there seems to be a shortage of those on the SC.


30 posted on 02/19/2012 5:21:48 PM PST by Attention Surplus Disorder (The only economic certainty: When it all blows up, Krugman will say we didn't spend enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

I agree with you.

And furthermore, I have heard that conservatives in the Senate will stonewall this one, until past the election.


31 posted on 02/19/2012 5:23:33 PM PST by Nabber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

One thing about the Kenyan guy, you don’t have to know jack about anything and can have a single digit I.Q. With Barry, a “compelling life story” is all you need to be able to sit on the court and trump the will of the American people.


32 posted on 02/19/2012 5:31:02 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (This time, the alien invaders are bringing the viruses with them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Yes.

Just what we need. An AG who defends Taliban.


33 posted on 02/19/2012 5:38:53 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
Kamala Harris is a loony lefty (California's and Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown's Attorney General Kamala Harris, and previously the choice of "moonbats" of San Francisco for District Attorney).

The ultra-radical values she would bring to the SCOTUS, can be foreseen by her below statement:

"Let's also talk about creating a campaign around reducing not the crime but the fear of crime...Let's talk about that. If we, as a goal, decide that we want more people to just stop being afraid, because they're perhaps afraid of much more than they have reason to be afraid of, perhaps we can start to change the discussion about what we need to do about fear because we won't have so many people worried about the bogeyman."

Source/Link

Yes, San Francisco's DA and California's AG thinks that Law Enforcement should be directed to reduce not crime but the fear of crime. How's that for an Obamatista transformation for the SCOTUS and the nation?
34 posted on 02/19/2012 5:45:18 PM PST by drpix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

You cannot appoint that cop hating, cherry picking enforcing, Lebanese on the SC.


35 posted on 02/19/2012 5:49:18 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

See, this is my point. We have a fighting chance with a
Republican’s SCOTUS picks. Some suck, some are great.

Reagan: great job w/Scalia, sucked when he picked O’Connor.
Bush I: awesome w/Thomas, sucked at Souter

None of the Democrat Presidents have picked a good SCOUTS. We have got to elect a Republican, even if they are not our first choice.


36 posted on 02/19/2012 6:02:13 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Cozy.

Too cozy.


37 posted on 02/19/2012 6:08:52 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LostInBayport

Maybe Obama will nominate his illegal uncle.

He was arrested for DUI a while back while driving with an illegally obtained license. Surprise, he got a top law firm to represent him and they’re going after the driving records of the LEO who arrested him.

He’s still living on the dole and apparently employed at - are you ready for this - a liquor store! A Muslim working at a liquor store?

Anyway, he’s going to need a better job, so why not?

Politicians are scum.


38 posted on 02/19/2012 6:09:17 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Yes, Lindsey is looking forward to seeing Sharia law incorporated into our system of justice. He seems to like fudge packing Muslims.

Photobucket

Barney Frank: No comment on rumor Lindsey Graham is gay

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2847896/posts

39 posted on 02/19/2012 6:26:30 PM PST by Candor7 (Obama fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

Obozo has painted Ginsburg into a corner. He needs her on the Supreme Court to cast her vote to uphold ObozoCare. That decision is not likely to be handed down until August or September so she cannot retire until after that case. As soon as that case is decided, the Congress will be in recess to compaign for themselves and their friends. That means the Senate will not take up any nominee until the current Congress returns. Harry Reid may try to hold hearings and schedule a vote during the lame duck session, but I doubt he would be successful. My prediction that Justice Ginsburg will succumb to her cancer while sitting on the bench in last Spring of 2013 still stands.


40 posted on 02/19/2012 6:31:51 PM PST by MIchaelTArchangel (Romney ruined Massachusetts. Now he wants to ruin the nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick
It's starting to be like Clinton and the Attorney General...only women can be considered for the position. Remember, Janet Reno was his third choice--and the previous two were women.

Kamala Harris is a two-fer: black and Asian at the same time. Since he has a large pool of extreme leftist lawyers to choose from, considerations like that will probably play a major role in his decision.

If Obama looks likely to win (and the MSM seems to have decided he is a virtual shoo-in), then Ginsburg has no reason to retire now. Thurgood Marshall made the mistake of assuming G. H. W. Bush would be unbeatable in 1992 so he retired--if he had stayed on the Court until his death Clinton would have picked his replacement. Instead we have Clarence Thomas.

41 posted on 02/19/2012 6:40:35 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
He’s still living on the dole and apparently employed at - are you ready for this - a liquor store! A Muslim working at a liquor store? Anyway, he’s going to need a better job, so why not

His nickname at the liquor store he worked at before his arrest was "Stinky". Based on what Moochelle has said about her husband, it must be a family trait.
42 posted on 02/19/2012 6:52:36 PM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

A radical leftist politician??


43 posted on 02/19/2012 7:19:31 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LostInBayport

No way. His nick was Stinky? LOL

BTW I thought Bayport was in Long Island, not MA.


44 posted on 02/19/2012 7:26:21 PM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Or I should say, he will have a tough time appointing that liberal

It'll be a marxist

45 posted on 02/19/2012 7:27:04 PM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

KSM


46 posted on 02/19/2012 7:34:22 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Most Conservative in the Primary, the Republican Nominee in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
BTW I thought Bayport was in Long Island, not MA.

It is! A long story...suffice it to say I wish I had thought long-term in picking an FR name. LOL
47 posted on 02/19/2012 8:01:18 PM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
You're kidding, right?

Santorum voted to confirm Sotomayor to the 2nd Circuit knowing it would fast track her to the Supreme Court where she now sits. (Thanks, Rick!)

Obama will pick some invincible "minority" and the GOP will rubber stamp no matter how disturbing the choice. The establishment are gutless.

The vile Kamala Harris is precisely the sort he might pick. She's the future of this nation's Democrat politics.

48 posted on 02/20/2012 12:06:18 AM PST by newzjunkey (Santorum has baggage! Demand an inspection! Eyes Wide Open!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: montag813
FReepers who say “I refuse to vote for ______ if he is the nominee” should read this scary article to realize how idiotic that is.

Unless you look at who Romney nominated to the courts in Massachusetts and who his top campaign man John Sununu recommended Bush, Sr. nominate, David Souter. What's the difference between the next David Souter and Obama's next affirmative action pick to the courts?

49 posted on 02/20/2012 12:14:50 AM PST by JediJones (Just say NO to the MittRick system! Disenfranchise the establishment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris#Early_life_and_education

Harris created a special Hate Crimes Unit as San Francisco District Attorney. She focused on hate crimes against LGBT children and teens in schools. She convened a national conference to confront the “gay-transgender panic defense”, which has been used to justify violent hate crimes.[40] Harris supports same-sex marriage in California and opposed both Proposition 22 and Proposition 8.[41]

In her campaign for California Attorney General, she has received the endorsements of numerous groups, including the abortion rights EMILY’s List...

Harris is opposed to the death penalty but has said that she would review each case individually.[27] Her position was tested in April 2004, when SFPD Officer Isaac Espinoza was murdered in the Bayview district. Harris announced that she would not seek the death penalty for the man accused of his killing. The decision evoked protests from the San Francisco Police Officers Association, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, and others.

Harris’s position against the death penalty was tested again in the case of Edwin Ramos, an illegal immigrant and alleged MS-13 gang member who was accused of murdering Tony Bologna and his sons Michael and Matthew.[21] On September 10, 2009, Harris announced she would seek life in prison without the possibility of parole rather than the death penalty in the Ramos case.[30]

Harris has expressed the belief that life without possibility of parole is a better, and more cost-effective, punishment.[31]


50 posted on 02/20/2012 12:22:34 AM PST by JediJones (Just say NO to the MittRick system! Disenfranchise the establishment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson