Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Trouble With Mitt
Ricochet ^ | Febrauary 17, 2012 | Ben Domenech

Posted on 02/20/2012 1:19:49 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
>>>>"Having the only real machine in the 2012 cycle and as an experienced candidate, he absolutely should have been able to stand on his own right as soon as this race came down to the far more flawed and less politically capable efforts of Santorum, Gingrich, and Paul. By all rights, he should be running circles around them all."<<<<

Mitt does not represent the base. PERIOD. The very idea that he could run rings around the other candidates is laughable. He has to destroy them or co-opt them. He is not better than them.

1 posted on 02/20/2012 1:19:56 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

It still amazes me that for the past 4 years, the ASSUMED Republican candidate for 2012 was Romney. I just don’t know how or why this happened. I mean, the guy couldn’t even beat freaking John McCain in 2008. The stupidity of the GOP establishment elite goes beyond disappointment - - it is downright discouraging.


2 posted on 02/20/2012 1:38:34 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I agree. Mitt Romney’s failure to rally the base is due to an undeniable fact, he’s not one of us. He can’t run on his own record, so his campaign is based on #1 destroying the competition, and #2 deceiving voters with a carefully crafted media image.


3 posted on 02/20/2012 1:48:27 AM PST by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Now Republican faithful are complaining to GOP establishment leadership that someone other than Mitt should have been selected as the Party’s choice. And I’m reading a multiplying number of “Quick! Do this Mitt” OpEds in well known journals, along with OpEds in those same places calling for “Newt to Get Out!!”.

It would seem the establishment has nurtured Romney’s well-groomed Wall Street ties/donars and K-Street understanding/endorsements and has “discouraged” any others from entering the race (or face the “fate” of being “against” the GOP establishment).

Cries of regret are growing louder along with fingers of blame being directed at the conservative base for not getting in line. It looks like they underestimated 2010.


4 posted on 02/20/2012 1:52:33 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
The stupidity of the GOP establishment elite goes beyond disappointment - - it is downright discouraging.

They keep sending me those stupid survey forms....its hardly worth the spit to seal the envelope and send them back marked .....

GOP = Dole McCain Romney = stupid looser

5 posted on 02/20/2012 1:55:29 AM PST by spokeshave (Mitt will release his tax returns when 0bambi releases his Birth Certificate and grades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

The Party leaders just plowed ahead, certain that their money and organization (and our loathing of Obama’s policies) was the winning formula.

They forgot to pick a leader. I guess they wanted a man they could handle.


6 posted on 02/20/2012 2:12:38 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave
They keep sending me those stupid survey forms.

Those envelopes hit the recycle bin and never make it into the house. I mean, really!? Do they really believe anyone is still falling for that BS?

7 posted on 02/20/2012 2:15:12 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: spokeshave
Give them a thorough filling out. Let them know that you donate to “individuals” who push forward true conservative values. Let them know you give 1000’s whether you can or not. These people are all about money. To them money talks so use their shallow belief against them.
8 posted on 02/20/2012 2:19:39 AM PST by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Mittens is NOT a leader. Mittens has no ideas — just a bunch of platitudes and glittering generalities. Mittens is Obama-lite and status quo. America cannot afford Romney or Obama. And no, Mini-Mittens Rick isn't the answer either.
9 posted on 02/20/2012 2:39:48 AM PST by MasterGunner01 (11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Romney kind of reminds me of those kids who used to run for class president in high school. They weren't inspired by any real ideas. They were popular, but had no ability to change anything really, and didn't want to. It was all done for purely selfish reasons, to accomplish this thing in front of them, put a plaque on the wall, brag about it someday. I hope American voters have matured a little since high school.

Gotta hammer home the message: This is real life, kiddies. Wake up. Your very life depends on the outcome.

10 posted on 02/20/2012 2:40:26 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I send them back in their prepaid envelopes, devoid of any comments or money. Sometimes I just send the envelope empty. When I received the same from the Party and the RNSC during the 2010 cycle, I just printed off several copies of my Rubio bumper sticker and sent that back to them, on their dime mind you.


11 posted on 02/20/2012 2:48:19 AM PST by mazda77 (and I am a Native Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mazda77

Mitt for Brains, as someone else here said!


12 posted on 02/20/2012 2:58:07 AM PST by aviator (Armored Pest Control)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
Fire-people-12
13 posted on 02/20/2012 2:59:10 AM PST by BobP (The piss-stream media - Never to be watched again in my house)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife; All
The GOP-E is already laying the ground work for blaming the Conservative base (rather than itself) for an election loss. Remember that it all started right here:

Next for GOP leaders: Stopping Sarah Palin

14 posted on 02/20/2012 3:54:43 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/02/im-ok-youre-ok.php

...........”I understand the resistance, but I am lukewarm on the non-Romneys as well. If I had to choose a candidate among them, I would choose Romney. I think he is the least bad of the lot.

The resistance to Romney among a large part of the base of the Republican Party, however, suggests to me that Romney himself would be less than a stellar candidate against Obama. He’s got problems that the non-Romneys have successfully exploited. Romney’s defense of Romneycare in the debates has been a recurrent thumb in the eye to the not inconsiderable number of Republicans for whom repeal of Obamacare is a priority along with with fiscal and economic issues.

Romney himself must know he is not long on passionate supporters. His claim has been to superior electability against Obama among a weak field of GOP candidates. But the failure to inspire affection if not passion itself reflects a weakness in a candidate for high elective office.

There are other weaknesses in Mitt’s candidacy; Ben Domenech explores them in “The trouble with Mitt.” The attack by Romney and his surrogates on Santorum for having voted to increase the debt limit when he was in the Senate reflects some of these other weaknesses. Mitt must think we’re really, really stupid.

The inclination of Republican primary voters and caucus goers to support Gingrich or Santorum is not the sign of a character flaw or mental defect on their part. It is a sign that Romney is a problematic candidate for the party whose standard bearer he seeks to be. Decrying the failure of Republican voters for failing to fall in line behind him seems to me something less than a winning argument.”

_______________________________________________________

So will Romney’s backers now join with conservatives? I wonder.


15 posted on 02/20/2012 4:54:20 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Thanks for finding and posting this, C’sW.

I always enjoy your postings.


16 posted on 02/20/2012 5:11:31 AM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

A lot of Republican fat cats will get skinned if Romney wins the nomination because he will not win in November. Genuine conservatives will not vote for Democrat-Lite again, after being asked to swallow McCain last time.


17 posted on 02/20/2012 5:13:43 AM PST by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: octex

Thank you. As Barney Fife said, it’s a “compelsion.”


18 posted on 02/20/2012 5:15:07 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

Mitt Romney’s failure to rally the base is due to an undeniable fact, he’s not one of us. He can’t run on his own record, so his campaign is based on #1 destroying the competition, and #2 deceiving voters with a carefully crafted media image.
***********************
Hmmm.... Sounds exactly like how Obama was able to get elected in IL and later to the US Senate and POTUS.

Problem Mitt has is that Conservatives don’t buy his BS. Conservatives don’t bow down to the GOP-e anymore.


19 posted on 02/20/2012 5:17:28 AM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

I heard the Bill Cunningham radio show last night...a snippet...waaay back, I stopped listening to him when his hatred of Perry and Newt became clear. He had Santorum on in a short interview, then said he would also interview Romney, and Santorum again in a longer form, before Super Tuesday.

Then made clear he didn’t think any of the current candidates should be selected.

He announced his support for a Mitch Daniels-Marco Rubio ticket at a deadlocked (brokered) convention.

He then had Mike Pence on, and the two of them sang Mitch’s praises at some length.

Cunningham was never for Romney, but neither will he back a red meat conservative (such as, “we like to carry guns and we like to carry them in our trucks” and “you can’t put a gun rack in a Chevy Volt”).

Go figure.

Mitch Daniels has been an effective governor of Indiana, by all accounts. I’m not here to deny that.

But as a candidate? As a president of the United States?

I don’t see it.

For a radio talker who became far more famous for calling Obama “Barack HUSSEIN Obama” in a warm up act for McCain in 2008, he seems strange to end up backing Mitch Daniels.

I have seen that SOME actual ROMNEY backers are thinking a Romney Santorum deal would save Mitt. They are thinking that although they want Mitt for prez, if forced they would even accept him as VP with Santorum for prez.

If you’ll note, what all of these seemingling disperate points have in common is the meme...ANYONE BUT NEWT.


20 posted on 02/20/2012 5:26:14 AM PST by txrangerette ("HOLD TO THE TRUTH...SPEAK WITHOUT FEAR" - Glenn Beck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson