Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kenneth L. Allen v Democratic Party; Barack Obama; et. al. AZ Ballot Challenge
Scribd.com ^ | Feb. 17, 2012 | Kenneth L. Allen

Posted on 02/21/2012 11:35:30 AM PST by SvenMagnussen

Complaint for Constitutional Violations of the Article II section I clause 5 and Ballot Challenge pursuant to ARS 16-351(B) and for declaratory and injunctive relief

1 thru 38 exclusive. Complaint and Ballot Challenge pursuant to ARS 16-351(B) with respect to Barack H Obama, Any elector may challenge a candidate for any reason relating to qualifications for the office sought as prescribed by law, including age, residency or professional requirements, if applicable. The Plaintiff [Kenneth Allen] as a legal voter in the state of Arizona herby challenges the Democratic Party and Barack H. Obama,. Mr Obama is not eligible and does not meet constitutional mandate pursuant to Article II section 1 of the United States Constitution.

(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: allen; az; constitution; eligibility; obama
Arizona Eligibility/Ballot Challenge
1 posted on 02/21/2012 11:35:42 AM PST by SvenMagnussen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

Electors may challenge. Is voter Allen also an elector?


2 posted on 02/21/2012 11:44:04 AM PST by Jacquerie (No court will save us from ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

Arpaio needs to come forward.


3 posted on 02/21/2012 11:45:49 AM PST by STJPII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

Seems like Obama could just submit an un-redacted PAPER copy of his long form birth certificate, with Hawaii state seal.

Is this a problem for him?

And then there is that NBC thingy ...


4 posted on 02/21/2012 11:50:54 AM PST by F15Eagle (1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, 5:13; John 3:17-18, 6:69, 11:25, 14:6, 20:31; Rom10:8-11; 1 Tim 2:5; Titus 3:4-5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

For better or worse, the courts will not touch this.

News from the future:

“It will be for future historians to decide whether or not BH0 was eligible to be elected in 2008, and it will further be for history to decide if his declaration of himself as emperor and president for life of the Islamic Republic of North America, in the year 2015, was a valid declaration.

“The point however, is moot, because His High Holiness Emperor Barack the First has control of the military and of the means of production, and of the currency, and has taken personal control of the gold stocks and all farmland in the land formerly known as the United States of America. Barack be praised”


5 posted on 02/21/2012 12:00:15 PM PST by tpmintx (Problem: The people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who VOTE for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

“Electors may challenge. Is voter Allen also an elector?”

Yes.

ARS 16-120. Eligibility to vote

No elector shall vote in an election called pursuant to the laws of this state unless the elector has been registered to vote as a resident within the boundaries or the proposed boundaries of the election district for which the election is being conducted and the registration has been received by the county recorder or his designee pursuant to section 16-134 prior to midnight of the twenty-ninth day preceding the date of the election.


6 posted on 02/21/2012 12:09:13 PM PST by SvenMagnussen (What would MacGyver do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tpmintx
News from the future:

Deja who?
News From the Future - Health Experts Demand Hot Dog Eating Contests Be Canceled

7 posted on 02/21/2012 2:16:14 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

Getting “ahead of the curve” I see.


8 posted on 02/21/2012 2:19:18 PM PST by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

Yes, the original BC was sealed by court Order when the Soetoro adoption was finalized. Sealed state records cannot be used as evidence. This is why AZ birther bill was vetoed by Gov Brewer. Obama cannot produce an original BC for evidence, only a COLB.


9 posted on 02/21/2012 2:47:30 PM PST by SvenMagnussen (What would MacGyver do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SvenMagnussen

Obama could request to open record. The original BC would be required under the best evidence rule.


10 posted on 02/21/2012 6:49:53 PM PST by STJPII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson