Skip to comments.Kenneth L. Allen v Democratic Party; Barack Obama; et. al. AZ Ballot Challenge
Posted on 02/21/2012 11:35:30 AM PST by SvenMagnussen
Complaint for Constitutional Violations of the Article II section I clause 5 and Ballot Challenge pursuant to ARS 16-351(B) and for declaratory and injunctive relief
1 thru 38 exclusive. Complaint and Ballot Challenge pursuant to ARS 16-351(B) with respect to Barack H Obama, Any elector may challenge a candidate for any reason relating to qualifications for the office sought as prescribed by law, including age, residency or professional requirements, if applicable. The Plaintiff [Kenneth Allen] as a legal voter in the state of Arizona herby challenges the Democratic Party and Barack H. Obama,. Mr Obama is not eligible and does not meet constitutional mandate pursuant to Article II section 1 of the United States Constitution.
(Excerpt) Read more at scribd.com ...
Electors may challenge. Is voter Allen also an elector?
Arpaio needs to come forward.
For better or worse, the courts will not touch this.
News from the future:
“It will be for future historians to decide whether or not BH0 was eligible to be elected in 2008, and it will further be for history to decide if his declaration of himself as emperor and president for life of the Islamic Republic of North America, in the year 2015, was a valid declaration.
“The point however, is moot, because His High Holiness Emperor Barack the First has control of the military and of the means of production, and of the currency, and has taken personal control of the gold stocks and all farmland in the land formerly known as the United States of America. Barack be praised”
“Electors may challenge. Is voter Allen also an elector?”
ARS 16-120. Eligibility to vote
No elector shall vote in an election called pursuant to the laws of this state unless the elector has been registered to vote as a resident within the boundaries or the proposed boundaries of the election district for which the election is being conducted and the registration has been received by the county recorder or his designee pursuant to section 16-134 prior to midnight of the twenty-ninth day preceding the date of the election.
Getting “ahead of the curve” I see.
Yes, the original BC was sealed by court Order when the Soetoro adoption was finalized. Sealed state records cannot be used as evidence. This is why AZ birther bill was vetoed by Gov Brewer. Obama cannot produce an original BC for evidence, only a COLB.
Obama could request to open record. The original BC would be required under the best evidence rule.