Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Harlan1196
And that’ the issue in a nut shell - no one out side of the eligibility crowd thinks that the natural born citizen = two citizen parents is a legally valid argument.

The Indiana Appeals Court affirmed that it is indeed legally valid. It was the ONLY question that it directly acknowledged was answered in Minor v. Happersett. Of course, they failed to understand that Minor also answered the question about the children of aliens and split parentage, by showing they could only become citizens through naturalization or Constitutional amendment.

15 posted on 02/21/2012 2:27:48 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

I should have worded it to say:

“no one out side of the eligibility crowd thinks that the natural born citizen = two citizen parents is the only legally valid definition.”

Because that is what WKA did - address those other circumstances that Minor v. Happersett deliberately did not address.


21 posted on 02/21/2012 4:32:58 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson