Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Venturer

If they got to the judge, why did he offer the plaintiffs a default judgement that would have take Obama off the ballot?

He offered them everything they wanted and they rejected the deal.


6 posted on 02/21/2012 1:51:23 PM PST by Harlan1196
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Harlan1196

Can you point to and link any proof that that happened?


8 posted on 02/21/2012 2:00:48 PM PST by AmericanVictory (Should we be more like them or they more like we used to be?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Harlan1196
If you review their reasoning, you'll see it was actually a sound decision. If they had accepted the default, there would have been a decision with no evidence to support it, other than the default - a decision that the SOS would have been free to ignore.

By rejecting the default, they were able to introduce their evidence and make it part of the legal record - and, therefore, a sound basis for an appeal.

10 posted on 02/21/2012 2:04:33 PM PST by NJ_Tom (I don't worship the State; I don't worship the Environment - I only worship God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Harlan1196

Then neither Obama , nor his lawyer showed up, and instead of forcing the subpoena, he just makes a ruling agains those who did show up.

Doesn’t make sense.


22 posted on 02/21/2012 5:09:33 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson