Posted on 02/21/2012 2:29:30 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
TAPPER: How can you say you have an all-of-the-above approach if the president turned down the Keystone pipeline? And you blame the Republicans for making a political –
CARNEY: But the president didn’t turn down the Keystone pipeline. There was a process in place, with long precedent, run out of the State Department because of the issue of a pipeline crossing an international boundary, that required an amount of time for proper review after an alternate route was deemed necessary through Nebraska at the request of the Republican governor of Nebraska and other stakeholders in Nebraska and the region that needed to take it’s — that needed to play out, to be done appropriately. You can’t review and approve a pipeline the route for which doesn’t even exist.
The Republicans were the ones, unfortunately, who decided — because they were looking for scalps, I guess, or looking for wins in a situation where somehow they found themselves on the wrong side of cutting taxes for 160 million Americans last December — they decided to play politics with this decision and attach it to the payroll tax cut extension.
TAPPER: I don’t want to relitigate the whole thing, but Republicans say that the president was playing politics first by delaying a decision until after the election.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
And thats a real hard thing to be.
Isn’t it about time for the Democrats to drag out the old it-will-take-ten-years-to-get-any-oil-from-it shibboleth?
“Breathless Ann”
I want somebody to ask the wealthy old hag why she doesn’t retire and let them hire a couple of 99 percenters with $100 grand in student debt from Columbia journo school.
Same thing with 75 yr old Bob Schieffer on SeeBS.
Pettifoggery.
This is just a cover for trying to kill something by procrastination. You would not tolerate this sort of rationalization from your kid for ten seconds when the school bus is out there waiting.
I like this. It shows they are trying to run away from this.
2+2=4.
Give Newt the nomination and he will grab Hussein by his muzzie neck and never stop squeezing.
I’m still not sure that the Keystone XL pipeline would have done anything but raise fuel prices in the PADD II market by alleviating the glut of Canadian crude oil available there for refining. The stated purpose of this pipeline is to move Canadian oil to the Gulf for Export to Europe. If someone has links that refute this, please post them, I’d love to read them.
Memo to Jake Tapper: Don’t go for any late night walks in Fort Marcy Park
The pipeline would deliver 700,000 barrels a day of crude from Alberta's oil sands to Texas refineries. But environmentalists strongly oppose the project, because of concerns about spills and carbon emissions from production of oil sands crude
thackney may have an opinion.
I would say it is very short-sighted to judge something like a crude oil pipeline based on immediate market conditions. Bottom line, the Canadians are going to find a way to sell their oil. They are not going to just sit on it so drivers in the upper midwest get a bit of price relief. It’s far better for the US for that oil to go to US refiners than to the Chinese. Sure the US Gulf Coast exports refined products to Europe but it also feeds a vast network of product pipelines in the US. The fuel will go where it is most needed, which might be the UK one day but Arkansas the next.
The first is many if the refineries in Texas handle the,.... less than sweet light crude than comes from Venezuela so they can more easily accommodate the oil from the tar sands.
The second is that oil refined in Texas is shipped to most of the country through existing pipelines, MANY existing pipelines, they have already been built.
I would have no doubt some of this may be exported, but I think the majority would be used here.
Finally, I think the pipeline from the Dakotas on ought to be built since quite a bit of oil is being produced there and since no international boundary is involved the State Department should have no role to play. You can always add on the bit to Canada later if say administrations change.
Keep a watch on this, too, as fracking ‘rules’ are coming out. This is gonna be an 0bot Eviroreligionist two-fer.
http://fuelfix.com/blog/2012/02/14/salazar-says-fracking-rules-coming-in-a-few-weeks/
Economic development. Who knew that 0bama’s quest to redistribute wealth was actually the plan to give (the rest of) America’s wealth and know-how away?
He should have just answered, “Forget it Jake. It’s Chinatown”
Obama bought the high cost of gas.It is his and his alone.
Slime balls! As if everybody didn't know that already.
"Carney Barker" says more in what he doesn't finish than in what he actually says.
You can get an MSDS for oil from numerous places on the Net!
Did somebody "get paid" to make a stink?
So what addition refining do you think we will bring on to increase our refining output to create additional gasoline and diesel for export.
I see the Keystone XL as feeding our existing refineries feeding products to our consumption. It will only replace oil brought in from overseas
We currently produce slightly more refined product than we use, leaving a bit for export. But that can be directly associated with our demand. Eventually that demand is going to increase when we get our economy out of the toliet.
You can try to blame the Keystone XL expansion for the eventual equalization of prices between light sweet in Cushing/ Midwest deliveries and the same quality oil on the coast. But regardless of what happens with that pipeline, other transportation projects are going to equalize that difference. The producers investing money in Central and Plains states are not going to continue to accept a lower price for their product. Already other projects are started to reduce this glut and bring that oil to higher demanding market. For example, the Seaway pipeline from Cushing to Gulf Coast is in the process of being reversed to flow oil south instead of north. Other projects will continue to do the same, including rail already. That price gas has been closing for a while already.
I call BS on this one!
@Texans Weigh In as EPA Considers New Air Pollution Regs for Oil and Gas Industry
"A lot of people agree that natural gas is a clean bridge fuel," said Dallas resident Rita Beving, an environmental consultant for Public Citizen, in comments to the panel.
A picture is slowly emerging...
@Keystone Pipeline Finds New Opponents Feb. 15, 2012
“Crippling someone’s water supply knows no party line,” said Rita Beving, consultant to the bipartisan East Texas Sub-Regional Planning Commission.
This says it all “Rita Beving of the Dallas Sierra Club”, an envirowacko. Anyone that lies down with her is going to get up with fleas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.