Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran defiant as U.N. nuclear talks fail
Reuters ^ | Wed Feb 22, 2012 5:42pm EST | Fredrik Dahl and Parisa Hafezi

Posted on 02/22/2012 10:02:49 PM PST by Olog-hai

The U.N. nuclear watchdog ended its latest mission to Iran after talks on Tehran's suspected secret atomic weapons research failed, a setback likely to increase the risk of confrontation with the West.

The United States criticized Iran on Wednesday over the failure of the International Atomic Energy Agency's latest mission, saying it again showed Tehran's refusal to abide by its international obligations over its nuclear program.

Expressing defiance, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Iran's nuclear policies would not change despite mounting international pressure against what the West says are Iran's plans to obtain nuclear bombs.

"With God's help, and without paying attention to propaganda, Iran's nuclear course should continue firmly and seriously," he said on state television. "Pressures, sanctions and assassinations will bear no fruit. No obstacles can stop Iran's nuclear work."

A team from the Vienna-based IAEA had hoped to inspect a site at Parchin, southeast of Tehran, where the agency believes there is a facility to test explosives. But the IAEA said Iran "did not grant permission."

The failure of the two-day visit by the IAEA could hamper any resumption of wider nuclear negotiations between Iran and six world powers—the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany—as the sense grows that Tehran feels it is being backed into a corner. …

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: apocalypse; iran; mahdi; nukes
Amazing how many news stories start with the words "Iran defiant"; and this is going back a decade or more. If the USA still had its moral compass, we should have seen articles where Iran expressed the opposite emotions due to decisive action by us . . .
1 posted on 02/22/2012 10:03:06 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

This is shamefull.


2 posted on 02/22/2012 10:06:48 PM PST by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unkus

They are defiant now, but they’ll come to their senses when they understand better that 0bama’s US means no harm to them, after all, we have or will soon have only a fraction of a fraction of the nuclear arsenal we once had. Once they see we can’t hurt them, they’ll back down. 0bama is Sure of IT!


3 posted on 02/22/2012 10:34:32 PM PST by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C210N

Yes. And they won’t ever want to do harm to the Continental United States.

It’s likely that the evil one called 0bama is going to get a lot of Americans dead.

I prefer Ronald Reagan’s “Peace through strength”.


4 posted on 02/22/2012 10:47:45 PM PST by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

It’s long past time for anyone with two brain cells to rub together to realize that Iran means to start World War III, a nuclear war, and, if something isn’t done - and very, very soon - this whole “Iran thing” is going to end very, very badly for everyone on the planet.


5 posted on 02/22/2012 10:50:04 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
The UN is as useless as teats on a boar hog and needs to go now and so does Valerie Jarrett.
6 posted on 02/22/2012 10:53:11 PM PST by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

0bama done nothing but bad in the Middle East. The world is about to change and not for the better.


7 posted on 02/22/2012 10:53:47 PM PST by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Irenic

The UN is as useless as teats on a boar hog and needs to go now and so does Valerie Jarrett.


You know that ain’t gonna happen.


8 posted on 02/22/2012 10:55:27 PM PST by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

This defiance would have caused any other President to launch a strike. It is time to call a show of cards.


9 posted on 02/22/2012 11:08:40 PM PST by jonrick46 (Countdown to 11-06-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
defiance

The definition nowadays is that Obama apology was not not accepted!!
10 posted on 02/23/2012 12:23:09 AM PST by crazyhorse691 (Obama is just the symptom of what is destroying the U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irenic

“Now” in my opinion should have been 1947, when the Arabs rejected the so-called “two-state solution” put forth by the then-nascent UN (which was really just a resurrection of Wilson’s moribund-from-day-one League of Nations). Instead, our resident leftists kept it alive to commit atrocity after atrocity, not least of which was the 1975 declaration of Zionism to be racism.


11 posted on 02/23/2012 7:10:51 AM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson