Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Jeff Sessions: Kagan Must Recuse Herself from Obamacare Case
National Review ^ | 02/24/2012 | Sen. Jeff Sessions

Posted on 02/24/2012 6:05:23 AM PST by SeekAndFind

As solicitor general of the United States, Justice Elena Kagan served as the head of an office responsible for formulating the Obama administration’s legal defense of its domestic agenda priority — Obamacare. It could be no surprise to President Obama who appointed her to the Supreme Court that any former solicitor general would have many conflicts for years to come. Now, the Court will soon hear a constitutional challenge to the health-care law. Despite mounting evidence of her substantial participation in the administration’s legal defense of that law, she still has not announced whether she will recuse herself from presiding over the case as a justice.

According to Section 455(b)(3) of Title 28 of the U.S. Code, justices must disqualify themselves in cases where they have “served in governmental employment and in such capacity participated as counsel, adviser, or material witness concerning the proceeding or expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case or controversy.” In United States v. Gipson, the Tenth Circuit held that judges must recuse themselves if they have “previously taken a part, albeit small, in the investigation, preparation, or prosecution of a case.” Other courts have suggested that, merely by virtue of a lawyer’s position as the head of an office during the preparation of a case, he or she is disqualified to sit as a judge on that case. For example, several U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal have held that U.S. attorneys who later become judges must recuse themselves from any proceeding that had been pending in any way in their offices, even if they were not substantively involved.

Previously undisclosed e-mails that the Justice Department has released pursuant to court order demonstrate Kagan’s direct involvement in the administration’s defense of the president’s health law from the very beginning. In January 2010, she assigned her chief and only political deputy, Neal Katyal, to the matter — the legal equivalent of a firm’s senior partner delegating work to a junior associate. That same month Katyal wrote in an e-mail to the associate attorney general’s office that “Elena would definitely like OSG [Office of Solicitor General] to be involved in this set of issues.” These actions alone constitute personal participation in the preparation of the case, and that is all §455(b)(3) requires to trigger mandatory recusal.

Kagan herself has admitted that she attended “at least one meeting” in which the case now before the Court was mentioned, but the e-mails show that she also was privy to discussions of the administration’s litigation strategy at least up until the announcement of her nomination on May 10, 2010. On March 18, Katyal e-mailed Deputy Attorney General Tom Perrelli and copied Kagan, discussing in detail and providing an Internet link to a draft complaint in potential litigation. He wrote: “For what it is worth, my advice (I haven’t discussed this with Elena, but am cc’ing her here) would be that we start assembling a response, [material redacted] so that we have it ready to go.” And at least one e-mail suggests that discussions of litigation strategy were deliberately not conducted in written form. On March 21, Katyal e-mailed Kagan to ask whether she would attend a key White House meeting on health-care litigation strategy. Kagan responded: “What’s your phone number?” These actions further support the need for her recusal.

It appears that Kagan and Katyal were cognizant of the recusal issue. On May 17, Katyal forwarded Kagan an e-mail he had just sent to Justice Department spokesperson Tracy Schmaler, in which he falsely asserted (as the previous e-mails show) that Kagan “has never been involved in any of it [health-care litigation]. I’ve run it for the Office, and have never discussed the issues with her one bit.” Ironically, Kagan responded minutes later to both Katyal and Schmaler: “This needs to be coordinated. Tracy, you should not say anything about this before talking to me.”

Some have attempted to manipulate this legal analysis by seeking to equate the facts surrounding Kagan’s prior involvement in the health-care case with an entirely different set of facts regarding Justice Thomas’ wife’s former employer, which took a position on the constitutionality of Obamacare after she left the organization. But those allegations bear no relationship to any legal standard for recusal, and are so specious that they have been rejected by scholars and legal commentators across the ideological spectrum. Justice Breyer summarily dismissed this as a “false issue.”

Recusal due to previous participation in a case is not an admission of wrongdoing, but rather an expected consequence when a government lawyer accedes to the bench. Indeed, Justice Thurgood Marshall — the last solicitor general to become a justice, and the justice for whom Kagan clerked — recused himself from 98 of the 171 cases decided by the Court in his first year, and most of them were cases in which the federal government was a party.

Justice Kagan has recognized that her involvement as solicitor general in the preparation of the government’s challenge to Arizona’s immigration law prohibits her involvement in that case as a judge — even though the lawsuit was not filed until two months after she ceased performing the duties of her office due to her nomination, and even though she testified that she was not asked to express an opinion on the Arizona law. In contrast, Justice Kagan’s involvement in the preparation of the government’s defense of the health-care law began at least as early as January 2010, four months before her nomination and two months before the bill became law. That she would not follow the same course in the health-care case is dubious. These facts require recusal.

— Senator Jeff Sessions is a senior member of the Judiciary Committee.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: kagan; obamacare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 02/24/2012 6:05:26 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It is always safe to posture when you are sure you will have no effect on the outcome. Jeff’s conservative credentials are a bit tarnished lately so he has to make noise, again.


2 posted on 02/24/2012 6:08:58 AM PST by Steamburg (The contents of your wallet is the only language Politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Jeff Sessions is one of the very few Republicans with balls....Kagan was SPECIFICALLY put on the USSC (as was Sotomayor), with an Agenda.

She will NOT recuse from Obamacare, nor will Roberts take a position to have her removed from it. Likewise, all Illegal Alien cases will be heard by Sotomayor, and she will rule ALWAYS in favor of the Illegals, however she has to contort her response.

3 posted on 02/24/2012 6:09:56 AM PST by traditional1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

She won’t.

Who is going to make her?

Leftists are “above suspicion” don’t you know.

/sarc


4 posted on 02/24/2012 6:19:40 AM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg

Like Issa on Holder, he wasn’t going to actually do anything


5 posted on 02/24/2012 6:20:35 AM PST by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg

“It is always safe to posture when you are sure you will have no effect on the outcome. Jeff’s conservative credentials are a bit tarnished lately so he has to make noise, again.”

LOL. Sen. Sessions was basically the only Senator consistently hammering the dims for a lack of budget while McConnell and Boehner did their lily-livered tip toe routine. FRiend, Sen. Sessions is not the problem.


6 posted on 02/24/2012 6:21:29 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All

You idiot Freepers are forgetting ... Kagan may have attended a few meetings but she doesn't recall anything that was said ... so the dictatorial lunk-headed fire plug is completely in the clear.

7 posted on 02/24/2012 6:24:15 AM PST by Zakeet (The idiot Obozo is to competent leadership as an Etch-A-Sketch is to art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

Here’s my prediction:

I already know who will vote FOR Obamacare and I know who will vote against it.

FOR: Kagan, Sotomayor, Breyer, Ginsberg

AGAINST: Thomas, Scalia, Roberts, Alito

In the end, it will all IN EFFECT, boil down to the decision of one person: Anthony Kennedy.

And it will all depend on which side of the bed he wakes up on that day.

So, to those of you who decide to stay home because your favorite POUTS candidate isn’t running or won’t be the candidate, THINK ABOUT THE IMPLICATIONS OF ANOTHER OBAMA TERM and MORE JUSTICES HE WILL APPOINT.


8 posted on 02/24/2012 6:27:11 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

she should absolutely recuse herself, but she just another obama crook from Chi-town who has no morals or shame


9 posted on 02/24/2012 6:34:07 AM PST by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The woman is a glittering jewel of collosal ignorance.

Were there any standards in the world, she would be required to recuse herself from anything save for the most simple street cleaning work.


10 posted on 02/24/2012 6:37:19 AM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

11 posted on 02/24/2012 6:38:54 AM PST by Old Sarge (RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Chief Justice explicitly poo-pooh’d any talk of a Kagan recusal a month ago, more or less.


12 posted on 02/24/2012 6:44:28 AM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg

I was thinking the same exact thing... election year and all of that. He started as a staunch conservative but trent lott infected him.

LLS


13 posted on 02/24/2012 6:53:55 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Hey repubic elite scumbags... jam mitt up your collective arses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

mitt would appoint the same damn people.

LLS


14 posted on 02/24/2012 6:55:20 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Hey repubic elite scumbags... jam mitt up your collective arses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Republicans should start moving bills requiring the American people to buy Moon Pies or Chevy Volts or something. Rub it under their noses before the hearings start.


15 posted on 02/24/2012 7:06:47 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
So, to those of you who decide to stay home because your favorite POUTS candidate isn’t running or won’t be the candidate, THINK ABOUT THE IMPLICATIONS OF ANOTHER OBAMA TERM and MORE JUSTICES HE WILL APPOINT.

Your advice, sadly is wasted on most Freepers.

16 posted on 02/24/2012 7:16:57 AM PST by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Dream on Jeff.


17 posted on 02/24/2012 7:25:53 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So Jeffy-boy, whatd’ya gonna do about it when doesn’t recuse herself?

What was that? You said, “Nothing.”?

That’s what I thought you said.


18 posted on 02/24/2012 7:27:03 AM PST by bkopto (Obama is merely a symptom of a more profound, systemic disease in American body politic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Never gonna happen. She’s an Obama lackey, thru and thru.

.


19 posted on 02/24/2012 7:37:38 AM PST by flatfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
OBAMACARE NEXT EXIT, OBAMACARE NEXT EXIT
20 posted on 02/24/2012 7:54:49 AM PST by FrankR (You are only enslaved to the extent of the entitlements you receive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson