Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

What an amazingly information free article. It tells nothing about why the clerk was indicted. Was he just defending himself and the prosecutor has gone rogue? Or did the clerk put a couple of extra rounds into the robber after he was down and he’s lucky to not be up on a first degree murder charge? We’ll never know from this article.


4 posted on 02/25/2012 6:03:21 AM PST by KarlInOhio (You only have three billion heartbeats in a lifetime.How many does the government claim as its own?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio

I was thinking the same thing, until the article mentioned that the prosecutor declined to describe what was done that was alleged to be not self-defense.

So the article only has half the story. What makes it even odder is that the article says both that the clerk was shot, and that he was lucky because he was not shot, or something like that.


17 posted on 02/25/2012 7:22:49 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson