I’d much prefer a state by state approach where the Federal government simply offers to support the states that choose to be tough on illegal immigration. IMO, this would:
* respect state’s rights
* focus on the states that want to change vs. imposing it on the states that do not want to change
* push illegals to migrate to the states that choose to be sanctuaries
* and, most importantly, FORCE liberals to actually live with the consequence (cost, crime, higher unemployment, ...) of their decisions
It would be much to our benefit if states/people came to their own conclusion that illegal immigration is a mess and unsustainable.
As far as reflexive anti-Romneyism here on FR, they seem to not be able to help themselves. If God himself came down and vouched for Romney, 1/2 of FR would jump into the pit of hell just to prove a point.
Do you really think God would vouch for a habitually lying sodomite-panderer and abortion lover?
Immigration to America as a state issue?
Defending Romney and attacking his critics?
Pretty interesting stuff, read the article on Romney (the determined supporter of illegals at his own “Sanctuary Mansion”) and immigration that is linked to in post 16.