Posted on 02/25/2012 11:40:31 AM PST by Dallas59
A secret Bible in which Jesus is believed to predict the coming of the Prophet Muhammad to Earth has sparked serious interest from the Vatican.
Pope Benedict XVI is claimed to want to see the 1,500-year-old book, which many say is the Gospel of Barnabas, that has been hidden by the Turkish state for the last 12 years.
The £14million handwritten gold lettered tome, penned in Jesus' native Aramaic language, is said to contain his early teachings and a prediction of the Prophet's coming.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Did a search, didn’t see anything on FR.
I believe Jesus DID predict the rise of the AntiChrist, and his Prophet.
Anything written in Gold purporting to be of God, is not.
Take a look at the clowns on TBN in their gold chairs.
Jesus came and humbled himself.
Only when he returns will he be glorified.
Anybody with ANY spiritual sense would not be taken in by this.
Exactly so.
Jesus predicts *fart...farrrrt* the coming of the *fart* Prophet Mohammed *fart...fart....fart*
Sounds like crap to me.
That said: Jesus was a Jew. He wouldn’t be allowed in Muslim states today. Furthermore, Christian beliefs are heresy to Islamic doctrine.
Give me a break.
Haha. Most people won’t know where you found inspiration.
|
|
|
| GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother & Ernest_at_the_Beach | |
|
|
Thanks Dallas59. |
|
|
|
|
HE sure did. Nothing new here, just another false teaching.
It’s a lie straight from the pit of Hell and the antichrist spirit.
Mad mo wrote an antichrist book. It’s quite plain in the reading.
Did they use a peep stone in a hat to interpret?
Does it have a picture of Jesus like mine does?
This is news that Jesus taught that the anti-christ would come?
Do a search of the Bible, you won't find mohammad in there either, except where it talks about false prophets such as J. Smith and mohammad.
ancient 12 year old hoax...
new wrinkle on the 1500 year old Syraic Bible. or perhaps pervision or fraud. or imagination/speculation running wild?
Can we apply the same standard to the throne of peter?
I know, I know, it's the know your enemy thing for some. This is just not for me, same as listening to gossip, don't want to hear it.
Even worse is who/what he wrote it about. (See tagline...)
I agree with the others... read Islamic Anti-christ. It is uber -enlightening. I do not think it is Muhammad He predicted as Antichrist, it is the Mahdi. The Islamic antichrist perfectly describes the return of Jesus. Muhammad was covered under the false prophet teachings..
The Church would be remiss to not investigate and conclusively dismiss this fraud.
rofl
looks like Schmidt has some competition. Bring out the hat.
Throne? Peter was a fisherman who died (crucified, according to tradition, upside down). Peter never had a throne.
What book/books have they been reading and teaching from? Oh my.
You wrote:
“Yet the POPE is entertaining it??? Unbelievable.”
No, he is not. Check the story. It’s a baseless rumor.
Investigating an alleged historical document doesn't in any way imply acceptance of the content.
Church investigations can take years or even centuries.
They don't presume to know it all a priori like some half-cocked protestants.
Yea, Jesus prophesied false prophets, that’s not new.
Yep - Satan is working his lies on billions of people now.
The world is being prepped for one of the biggest....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEoGV1yKjS4&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z3WWcNFgjf4
Under a pile of camal sh**.
Half cocked prostestants??? you are getting very rude with that one.
You did not see me say anything disparaging about the POPE/CHURCH. Only that by now they should know what they believe in and not entertain some false religion. That is truth, not disparaging.
Stop calling prostetants names, please. Prostetants don't know everything either, but we do have the BIBLE for truth and don't have the need to entertain others.
I was on the board of an Assemblies of God church one time and we had a picnic and bonfire out back of the church. We went inside and got the "thrones" of the stage and threw them on the fire. They went up real nice.
After that the hierarchy got to sit with their families and the rest of the folk where they belonged.
Barnabas was not one of Jesus’ personal contacts, so just another pretender. The poope will love it.
The Concise Encyclopedia of Islam, Harper & Row, 1989, p. 64
So, the claim is that the Turkish manuscript is an earlier version of a manuscript which has been judged by Christians and Muslims to be a medieval forgery. So either it will be found to be completely unrelated when it is studied, or it will be an old apocryphal manuscript which may have formed the basis of the medieval work.
Second paragraph above: Pope it is claimed would like to see it. Your right it does/could be just a rumor with the "it is claimed" part.

This is Muslim propaganda. The the 1500 year old Syraic Bible hasn’t been restored enough to read.
Follows in the same fraudulent Koranic legacy that is the Mohammedan lore.
You mean the chair of Peter? Or maybe the Ark of the Covenant?
It isn’t a new document. It has been around for a while and you can find translations of the text on the internet. What the news is is that it has been recovered from thieves, after having been missing for about 15 years. It reads like Muslim propaganda.
It isn’t a new document. It has been around for a while and you can find translations of the text on the internet. What the news is is that it has been recovered from thieves, after having been missing for about 15 years. It reads like Muslim propaganda.
The title was 1500 year-old 'Syriac' Bible found in Ankara, Turkey
Maybe its fools gold
Maybe this is the way the anti-Christ unites the RCC and Islam into his One World Religion.
Let me be clear, there are pretend Christians of all types.
Catholic, Protestant, etc.
There is no mediator between God and man, except Christ Jesus.
Likewise there are REAL Christians in most every denomination.
God is good about hiding his sheep all over, so the wolves can’t take them out all at once.
Gold-lettered, or did it mean written on gold plates?
Someone in the Vatican said that Pope said he'd like to SEE it. Doesn't mean the Pope believes there is any validity to it.
I just wonder if the scientists examining the artifact will bring as much skepticism to it as they did to the Shroud of Turin.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.