California now prying into bedroom sex activity

America's unique brand of identity politics is simply 21^st century cultural Marxism. Karl would be elated that race, ethnicity, and sexual orientation are leveraged in yet another struggle against the white bourgeoisie's relentless "accumulation of wealth in private hands, [and] the formation and increase of capital."

From the Weekly Standard we read:

In order to make sure gays and lesbians are adequately represented on the judicial bench, the state of California is requiring all judges and justices to reveal their sexual orientation. The announcement was made in an internal memo sent to all California judges and justices.
"[The Administrative Office of the Courts] is contacting all judges and justices to gather data on race/ethnicity, gender identification, and sexual orientation," reads an email sent by Romunda Price of the Administrative Office of the Courts.
"Providing complete and accurate aggregate demographic data is crucial to garnering continuing legislative support for securing critically needed judgeships," Price writes.
Philip R. Carrizosa of the executive office of communications at the Judicial Council of California, the Administrative Office of the Courts, confirmed the authenticity of Price's email regarding gender identification and sexual orientation to THE WEEKLY STANDARD.
"The original bill, which simply provided for 50 new judgeships, was amended in the Assembly in August 2006, to address concerns that Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger was not appointing enough women and minorities to the bench. In 2011, Senator Ellen Corbett [the Democratic majority leader in the California State Senate] expanded the reporting requirement to include gender identification and sexual orientation."

So now there is a requirement that, to remain a judge in the Golden State, our appointed and elected jurists must declare their sexual orientation. Pretty damn intrusive, don’t you think? What you do in the privacy of your home has become the domain of the State of California.

Where are the progressive civil libertarians on this issue? Their silence speaks volumes about their real agendas, which have little to with civil rights, and everything to do with expanding the government’s control over every aspect of our lives.

I think this is a way to get the few remaining conservatives off the bench. Essentially, they have to either declare that they’re straight - which would then call into question their ability to rule ‘impartially’ on any gay-related case (per gay reasoning), or they will lie and say they’re gay - which then destroys them with the base (and yes, there is still a very conservative base in CA, albeit shrinking by the day).

I hope there is a category for “Tri-sexual”.

You know - animal, vegetable, mineral. Or perhaps “I’ll tri anything for sex.”

Fascist morons. I will never set foot in that state again and I applaud everyone who leaves to find freedom in another state. Just don’t bring those kooky ideas with you.

I think that, according to politically correct ideology, that you are “hetero-normative” if you think that there are only two sexes, male and female. We’re supposed to think outside the box on these issues.

And that’s where “gender identification” comes into the picture. You can identify as some other gender, regardless of what you see when naked.

Remember the recent Girl Scout story, in which the Girl Scouts were taking anybody “who identifies as a girl”, and took a 7 year old boy as a member? That line of thinking is part of this trend to think creatively about gender.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.