Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Newt Gingrich Now Helps Mitt Romney Win
Guardian (UK) ^ | February 19, 2012 | Harry J Enten

Posted on 02/25/2012 8:57:05 PM PST by Steelfish

How Newt Gingrich Now Helps Mitt Romney Win The arithmetic of Super Tuesday delegate allocation means that Gingrich's presence splits off vital voters from Rick Santorum

Harry J Enten guardian.co.uk, Sunday 19 February 2012

A Romney campaign negative ad ahead of January's Florida primary; Gingrich's presence in the GOP race, bankrolled by Sheldon Adelson, now helps Romney against his main challenger, Rick Santorum.

Billionaire Sheldon Adelson has decided to donate an additional $10m to Newt Gingrich's Super Pac. The move is expected to boost Gingrich in the lead-up to the 6 March "Super Tuesday" primaries. Gingrich has taken a back seat to the Mitt Romney-Rick Santorum showdown in Michigan, and he needs ads on the air if there is any way of overcoming the press's new two-man race narrative.

But Sheldon Adelson has ulterior motives at work. He is not a fan of Rick Santorum, and he understands that boosting Gingrich has the side-effect of helping Mitt Romney.

(snip) Poll upon poll in the last week has indicated that Gingrich supporters are more likely to support Rick Santorum than Mitt Romney in a one-on-one match-up. Consider the state of Arizona, where polling finds Santorum rising, but Romney with a comfortable high single-digit lead. If Gingrich were to exit the race, however, Santorum would pull into a tie with Mitt Romney.

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; freeperheadsexplode; gingrich; kenyanbornmuzzie; mittromney; newtgingrich; rick4romney; ricksantorum; santorum; santorum4romney; spoiler
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last

1 posted on 02/25/2012 8:57:07 PM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

This is stupid, even for you.


2 posted on 02/25/2012 8:58:25 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Since by inference you aren’t stupid, why don’t you read the article and try making an intelligent rebuttal.


3 posted on 02/25/2012 9:00:21 PM PST by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Adelson has supported Gingrich from the start. Saying that he`s now supporting Gingrich to help Romney is stupid.


4 posted on 02/25/2012 9:04:20 PM PST by freemarketsfreeminds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I strongly suggest you google ‘Santorum and Leo Gerard’.

Santorum is now in the crosshairs of the international labor unions, who are pulling out all the stops in Pennsylvania and other big labor union states to crush whatever support Rick Santorum has in those states.

By the way, this article you posted from a British rag is nonsense. The word is out that the Democrats are planting this garbage to sow divisions among Republicans.


5 posted on 02/25/2012 9:05:28 PM PST by SatinDoll (No Foreign Naionals as our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freemarketsfreeminds

The part about supporting Gingrich to help Romney is unsupported, but if you read the actual article regarding the likely delegate outcomes on Super Tuesday (with detailed analysis of each states voting rules) it’s clear that Gingrich’s main role in the race is to cripple Santorum and help Romney, if if that isn’t the intention.


6 posted on 02/25/2012 9:10:12 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Likely delegate outcomes according to polls. Too bad polls are just snapshots, and can`t be frozen in place. Nobody knows what will happen. I didn`t agree with Newt supporters that Rick should get out (at least I don`t remember calling for Rick to get out, I`ll have to check my history), and I don`t think it`s right to pressure Newt to get out.


7 posted on 02/25/2012 9:24:27 PM PST by freemarketsfreeminds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All
For sure, for sure.

We will see polls and editorials DAILY that proclaim Santorum or Gingrich can't beat OBozo, or that ONLY OBomney can beat OBozo.

Please, don't be disheartened by this lamestream BS...cause the OBozo will be beaten - IF he's allowed to run in the end.

8 posted on 02/25/2012 9:27:23 PM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
The part about supporting Gingrich to help Romney is unsupported, but if you read the actual article regarding the likely delegate outcomes on Super Tuesday (with detailed analysis of each states voting rules) it’s clear that Gingrich’s main role in the race is to cripple Santorum and help Romney, if if that isn’t the intention.

Total and utter garbage.

The inescapable conclusion that Newt's main role is to help Romney win based on "detailed analysis" based on polls that have swung wildly this Primary season is just plain uninformed.
9 posted on 02/25/2012 9:38:11 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
"it’s clear that Gingrich’s main role in the race is to cripple Santorum and help Romney, if if (sic) that isn’t the intention. "

Total and utter garbage.

Completely.

10 posted on 02/25/2012 9:44:47 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Well for starters, no matter how much the Newt supporters are in denial about it, Newt's big money man gave Newt some more big money for the sole purpose to go after Rick Santorum.

I guess they were giving us a heads up when they warned us " Wait until Rick get's the attacks " ....
Well, well, well, they might have known it all along if anyone were to take a good guess at this.

That would be just a good guess.


WAKE UP NEWT SUPPORTERS ! you have been had, and lied to.


Adelson himself said that his very purpose to give Newt some more money was to go directly after Rick Santorum and to peal away Evangelicals, Christians, support away from Rick to help Mitt Romney.

LOOK WHO'S TRICKING WHO !


Also ? Are the Newt supporters true to their words ?

As in " ANYONE BUT ROMNEY " ?
or is it just a bunch of empty rhetoric ?

The ball is in your court now Newt supporters,
either do what you say and mean it, or it was all empty rhetoric.


Yeah, the Newt supporters latest talking point is that they are being tricked by the Santorum supporters and won't help support Rick in Arizona and Michigan.

Yeah Newt supporters, believe that lie you been told by the campaign.
Remember ? it was Adelson who gave money to Newt to peal away support from Rick Santorum to help Mitt Romney... you have been HAD ! Bamboozled, lied to.

Yeah Newt supporters, go ahead and hand this over to Mitt Romney on Tuesday,
because we already know your words: " ANYONE BUT ROMNEY " was all a lie and empty rhetoric.

Go ahead Newt supporters and let Romney win this Tuesday, because ?
You will be the ones to blame for the Mitt Romney GOP nomination...


11 posted on 02/25/2012 9:56:53 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist; SoConPubbie; Red Steel; SatinDoll; Lazlo in PA; American Constitutionalist

But rather than calling it “garbage” which is name-calling, why don’t you show where Strategerist is wrong. Indeed, his analysis is spot-on and fair if you examine the delegate rules for the Super Tuesday states. This is a 2-man race by all accounts except for the die-hard Gingrich fans. Gingrich has fallen of Romney’s radar as well as Obama and not even the left wing media are talking about him. Gingrich needs to save himself more humiliation and quit now.

After next Tuesday, the momentum will be with either Romney or Santorum, and even GA may go up in flames for Gingrich. Instead, as the article points out, he is helping Romney by staying in the race and Adelson is using Gingrich to derail Santorum because of his strong social conservative views that the $b Casino mogul abhors. Adelson is acting like a fifth columnist.


12 posted on 02/25/2012 9:58:52 PM PST by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Sometimes we get better news than our own news from overseas.
At least they have woke up and see what's at stake here.
They can see what is going on here with Adelson's money to go after Rick to help Romney.

But, the Newt supporters are in denial... deny deny deny.
13 posted on 02/25/2012 9:59:15 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
" But rather than calling it “garbage” which is name-calling "

Even if this were Sarah Palin saying this, the Newt supporters would be all over it condemning her.

If this same " Euro Rag " were to have some good things to say about Newt they would be all over it too hooting and yelling NEWT ! NEWT ! YEAH !
We see the hypocritical sanctimonious pattern going on here.... people can see right through them.
14 posted on 02/25/2012 10:05:55 PM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

It is along haul until the convention. None of the four are going to quit.

As for “garbage”, that was a referral to a planted news piece the media is using as bait to distract Republicans from the real issue - voting Obama out of office and the issues with which he is weak.

You are more and more beginning to sound like a Democrat plant, trying to drive wedges between folks here at Free Republic.

Newt Gingrich scares the Hell out of the Democrats. And now, using their usual tricks, the Dems are going after Santorum, trying to demoralize conservatives. And you? You’re going along with their game.


15 posted on 02/25/2012 10:09:01 PM PST by SatinDoll (No Foreign Naionals as our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

There you go again “Democratic plant” when the same thing or worse could be said about you. If you cannot rebut with reason and intelligence then these threads are above your pay grade.


16 posted on 02/25/2012 10:13:07 PM PST by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

There’s nothing Romney wants more than to have a one-on-one race where he can focus all his negative attacks on one man and also be much more likely to get over 50% in conditional winner-take-all states and 50% of the delegates. If either Newt or Rick dropped out now, Romney’s intrade for the nomination would probably hit 99%.

Georgia is the biggest prize of Super Tuesday in terms of delegates, and Newt is #1 there. So do you agree Rick should drop out to help Newt do better there?

The guy is assuming that in GA, OK and TN that Romney will come in second. If Newt dropped out, that GUARANTEES Romney will. So how would it hurt Romney to guarantee he wins the extra delegates given to the second-place person?

Santorum is 9 delegates in the hole in Ohio due to his ballot screwups, so again he should drop out there since Newt is better positioned.

Vermont is conditional on 50% of the vote, which Romney is more likely to get with less opponents. So both staying in hurts Romney there.

Taxachusetts? Are you serious? Romney is going to win it in a landslide no matter who else is in the race. They won’t even compete there.

The major winner-take-all states happen AFTER March, so that’s when either Newt or Rick ought to drop out to avoid letting Romney win any of those with a mere plurality.


17 posted on 02/25/2012 10:35:15 PM PST by JediJones (Watch "Gingrich to Michigan: Change or Die" on YouTube. Best Speech Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish; Strategerist; SoConPubbie; Red Steel; SatinDoll; Lazlo in PA; ...
Strategerist; SoConPubbie; Red Steel; SatinDoll; Lazlo in PA; American Constitutionalist

Re-read my original post SteelFish.

I quite clearly posted that the so-called "Detailed analysis" was based on nothing more than the current polling data.

Polling data that has swung wildly this whole election season.

Polling data in election seasons past that have also swung wildly, for instance, in 1980, in October, Carter was ahead of Reagan by 13 or 14 points and Yet Carter only ended up with 49 electoral votes and Reagan won with 51 percent of the vote.

Furthermore, Strategerist making this point:

"it’s clear that Gingrich’s main role in the race is to cripple Santorum and help Romney, if if that isn’t the intention. "

With no supporting evidence, and last I checked, Strategerist was not God and does not have the ability to read the minds or hearts of men.

Like I said before, pure and utter garbage!
18 posted on 02/25/2012 10:49:36 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
Even if this were Sarah Palin saying this, the Newt supporters would be all over it condemning her.

If this same " Euro Rag " were to have some good things to say about Newt they would be all over it too hooting and yelling NEWT ! NEWT ! YEAH ! We see the hypocritical sanctimonious pattern going on here.... people can see right through them.


You poor Santorum supporters, you really are picked on aren't you?

I have seen just as bad behavior, if not worse from Santorum supporters.

Your hands are not clean in this matter.
19 posted on 02/25/2012 10:54:06 PM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: freemarketsfreeminds

I prefer if Paul and Romney get out; then we can have a spirited discussion on the two remaining.


20 posted on 02/25/2012 11:23:19 PM PST by Ingtar ("But it is hard to maintain an aura of invincibility after you have been vinced..." Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
You poor Santorum supporters, you really are picked on aren't you?

Not really. Our guy is in contention and kicking the s#!t out of Mittens. Where is your guy?


21 posted on 02/25/2012 11:23:34 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Ingtar

That would be fine with me.


22 posted on 02/25/2012 11:24:42 PM PST by freemarketsfreeminds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

The only way Romney could possibly win the primarys is IF republicans want to elect Ted Kennedy and Barney Franks good friend.. you know Romney..

If they do.. its good we find this out NOW once and for all..
Meaning the republican party is dead as a cork..


23 posted on 02/25/2012 11:26:32 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Why the heck are you posting articles from the UK most commie rag?


24 posted on 02/25/2012 11:28:56 PM PST by Marguerite (When I'm good, I am very, very good. But! When I'm bad, I'm even better)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
Georgia is the biggest prize of Super Tuesday in terms of delegates, and Newt is #1 there. So do you agree Rick should drop out to help Newt do better there?

In the latest polls I have seen, if Santorum drops out in Georgia, Romney's delegates go up. If Newt drops out in Tennessee, Romney's delegates go up. Leave Rick and Gingrich in the race. I do give Gingrich credit for dropping out of sight in Michigan where his presence was hurting.

25 posted on 02/25/2012 11:33:08 PM PST by Ingtar ("But it is hard to maintain an aura of invincibility after you have been vinced..." Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
You do you realize that the Guardian is so far left it makes the New York Times look like FreeRepublic or WorldNetDaily don't you? They have avowed communists on their payroll. Is that a newspaper that cares about American conservatism?
26 posted on 02/25/2012 11:44:55 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.~Admiral Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
So you would rather for the Santorum supporters to get back at the bus, shut up and sit down ?
Right, of course that is how you would rather want it, us sit by and watch attack after attack on Rick Santorum, but, some how expect us not to defend him.

27 posted on 02/26/2012 3:01:35 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (The fool has said in his heart, " there is no GOD " ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

I didn’t think it was right for Newt to infer that Rick should resign and I’ll say the same of anyone asking Newt to resign.


28 posted on 02/26/2012 4:54:56 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

“Right, of course that is how you would rather want it, us sit by and watch attack after attack on Rick Santorum”

Gee, what ads did I miss about Newt attacking Rick? I’ve only noticed the ads attacking Newt. I’m starting to feel that Rick is as slimey as mittens. And Rick was my 2nd choice.


29 posted on 02/26/2012 4:58:16 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Since by inference you aren’t stupid, why don’t you read the article and try making an intelligent rebuttal.

Don't you find it the least bit interesting on how it focuses on Newt as the spoiler, but never addresses what might happen if Rick were to get out instead?

Pure one-sided hit piece that conveniently only provides one side of the info - I agree with the first guy - stupid even for you.

30 posted on 02/26/2012 5:04:25 AM PST by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
Where is your guy?

Team Newt is strong and growing ... the MSM just isn't covering much ... for now ...

31 posted on 02/26/2012 5:05:29 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
... and even GA may go up in flames for Gingrich.

Gingrich holds commanding lead in Georgia

Let's see. Posting from a UK commie rag. After being called on it, supporting same UK commie rag. Thirdly, making a wildly inaccurate projection on GA.

I'd call that 'strike three'.

32 posted on 02/26/2012 5:12:08 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

More BS. Sure, Adelson probably would pick Romney over Santorum, but he was backing Gingrich before Santorum possibly looked like a legitimate threat. Gingrich has more delegates than Santorum, and one could make the argument just as well—especially back when it more looked the case—that Santorum should get out rather than be a spoiler to Newt’s chances.

Anyone with more than a bit of a clue to national politics meanwhile knows that Santorum’s social crusading is not going to fly with independents and moderates once they hear more about it.


33 posted on 02/26/2012 5:18:06 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
The inescapable conclusion that Newt's main role is to help Romney win based on "detailed analysis" based on polls that have swung wildly this Primary season is just plain uninformed.

Uninformed is a nice word for it. Newt Gingrich IS the right man, in the right place, at the right time.

Victory or Death Speech by Newt Gingrich

34 posted on 02/26/2012 5:30:46 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Using the ultra-left wing Guardian to try to make your case only demonstrates that you don’t have one.


35 posted on 02/26/2012 5:31:51 AM PST by Josh Painter ("We intend to change Washington, not accomodate it." - Newt Gingrich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Newt ping.


36 posted on 02/26/2012 5:33:11 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

All these perceived intrigues...

Crap

IMO, Gingrich is the only candidate with steel in his spine and brass in his “gentleman’s area.” (Thanks, Top Gear, UK)


37 posted on 02/26/2012 5:35:04 AM PST by Peter W. Kessler (Dirt is for racing... asphalt is for getting there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist
.


I categorically reject that "nonsense" ...


Now ... it seems like "Little Rickie" is supposed to be "off-limits" to criticism ...

WHY ?

Because he's a Catholic Pro-Life Christian and (presuambly) great father and husband ?

Those are admirable traits ...

However, his gaffes, misstatements, cowardice and lack of "genuine" GREAT ideas (such as Newt's) have paralyzed Santorum's campaign ...

IT IS INDEED A PAPER TIGER CAMPAIGN ... much like Huckabees campaign after his 2008 Iowa win ... all "wink-winks" with the Christian crowd ... "no" Presidential substance ...

NO INTELLECTUAL FOUNDATION ... NO "real" plan ...



CLEARLY ... if Rush Limbaugh wasn't going to bat for Ricky "every single day" ... explaining aay gaffes (etc) ...

Santorum would be FINISHED ...



The only reason that Newt is where he is (today, momentarily) in the polls is that Willard ran a horriffic "scorched earth" campaign against Newt in Florida ...

Let's see how Ricky does when Willard turns his "Mormom Evil" against Santorum ...



. .
38 posted on 02/26/2012 5:40:54 AM PST by Patton@Bastogne (Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Realistically, where Santorum leads Newt by a primary, we need to support Santorum. Where Newt leads by a primary, we need to throw support to Newt. We have GOT TO ELIMINATE ROMNEY from contention. Our nation depends on this victory before the big game.

I support Newt, but I support our nations future moreso.

Then let Newt and Rick work it out. If it's contention, Newt will prevail. If it's a join effort, we see a long future for both candidates.

39 posted on 02/26/2012 5:45:48 AM PST by Caipirabob (I say we take off and Newt the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Yeah, I perused this one late last night.


40 posted on 02/26/2012 5:46:53 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
.

Lazlo ...


Repeated again ... just for you ...


CLEARLY ... if Rush Limbaugh wasn't going to bat for Ricky "every SINGLE day" ... explaining away gaffes (etc) ...

Santorum would be FINISHED ...


Maybe Rush Limbaugh can invite Guest Host (Mark Stein) ... the English Guy ...

and Mark Stein can stomp on Santorum like he did against Newt Gingrich for days and days before the Florida Primary ...

That won't happen however, because Limbaugh is in the tank for Santorum ....



.
41 posted on 02/26/2012 5:48:26 AM PST by Patton@Bastogne (Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

The problem with that scenario is that Newt and Rick both want to win. They do not live in the FR universe where the first priority, before breathing and eating, is to defeat Mitt. They just don’t live there. Nor do most Americans and not even most conservatives (though the number of conservatives who believe that is growing).


42 posted on 02/26/2012 5:48:54 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter
Using the ultra-left wing Guardian to try to make your case only demonstrates that you don’t have one.

Lots of Santorum folks around here post articles from the lefties that are pro-Santorum articles - as if that's a good thing. They don't have a clue what is going on and what drives liberal rags at this point in the game to support Santorum (or in this case, go after Newt to help Santorum).

43 posted on 02/26/2012 5:52:52 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

I agree, Rush is (shockingly to me) become a sweater vest guy.

Yes, I know, he’s had segments that were pro Newt and pro Romney at times as well. But those were simply when Rush being Rush dictated it.

He has had segments that were devastating to Newt and to Mitt as well, and most of those were deserved - again - reacting to events, etc.

What he has NOT done is have negative segments about Rick. He has also let it be known that his brother David supports Rick and that his personal email list of friends support Rick.

And he’s defended some of Rick’s bad comments on this culture war stuff, which is simply NOT the issue of 2012.

But the dead give away? Rush has refused to analyze Rick’s entire career with respects to conservative principles. Never seen him miss something so big for so long. Never, and I’ve listened for 23 years.

On the whole, reading the tea leaves, it is easy to figure out that Rush supports Rick. Very disappointing.


44 posted on 02/26/2012 5:56:52 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

So Newt helps Romney? It appears to me, it has been Santorum helping Romney from the get go


45 posted on 02/26/2012 5:57:19 AM PST by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA
.

Lazlo ...


Two additional points ...


First, Santorum appears to be be a genuinely good man ... albeit way in over his head ...

Second ... just as a thought ... has ANYONE been able to make the (below) "new vision and policy" speeches that Newt has made ?

Romney ? Absolutely not ...

Santorum ? Not to my knowledge, and if so, Santorum's political vision is measured in terms of short "sound bites" ... as opposed to the SOLID plans proposed by Newt Gingrich ...


I really admire Michelle Bachman ... but like Santorum ... she's not ready for "national" prime time ...

and to quote another FreeRepublic poster (from the other day) ...

"Rick Santorum is just Michelle Bachman with a sweater" ... and without a dress ...




====== NEWT GINGRICH'S GREAT 2012 CAMPAIGN SPEECHES ======



CPAC 2012 Speech -- Newt Gingrich, U.S. President Elect


CPAC 2012 Speech -- Sarah Palin, U.S. Vice President Elect




Nancy Reagan (1995) : Ronnie turned that Torch over to Newt



NRA Second Amendent Speech -- Newt Gingrich


U.S. Energy Independence in 2012 -- Newt Gingrich




"America's Space Renaissance" in Florida !


Newt Gingrich -- Vision for America in Space Again




Why is Newt Gingrich So Angry ?


Newt Gingrich : South Carolina Victory Speech (2012-01-21)


Newt Gingrich : Christmas Day in 1776 George Washington's "Victory or Death"




Newt Stoutly Defends the Second Amendment (Right to Bear Arms)


Newt Gingrich – Constitutional Removal of Radial-Liberal Federal Judges




Newt Slams an "Increasingly Radical" EPA




Newt Defends Israel and Shows how the Palestinians are an "Invented" people !


Newt Warns against the Proposed 9-11 NYC Islamic Mosque and Islamic Sharia Law


Gingrich Compares Radical-Isalmics Muslims To Nazis


Newt Gingrich On The Threat Of Radical Islam


Newt Gingrich – America’s Defense of Judea-Christian Ideals and Defense against Islamic Fascism


Gingrich: Aggressive Prosecution of Radical-Militant U.S. Muslim Groups




Newt Gingrich: Response to CNN’s John King “Divorce Question”


Newt Gingrich to Juan Williams: Americans Want Paychecks, Not Food Stamps


Gingrich BLASTS Chris Wallace for his "Gotcha" Questions at Iowa Debate




Newt Destroys Ron Paul's Foreign Policy Vis-à-Vis Killing Osama bin Laden




Gingrich: My Credential Is 4.2% Unemployment


Newt Slams Obama's Stupidity on the Keystone Pipeline


Gingrich attacks Federal Reserve (Bernanke and Geitner) Deception and Corruption


Newt Discusses Job Creation and Dismantling Federal (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac)




Newt: No American President Should Bow to a Saudi King


Newt Gingrich: Super PAC Committee Is Washington's Dumbest Idea





=============================================




46 posted on 02/26/2012 5:58:04 AM PST by Patton@Bastogne (Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin in 2012 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
Santorum is another George W. Bush; Social CONservative, Big Spender, will cater to the Left so everybody can get along, etc,,,. We tried that for 2 terms, it almost ruined us.

Santorum has absolutely NO Executive experience and he is most well known for bragging about his ability to be a “CONservative” in a highly Liberal/Leftist/Democrat state and still be able to be elected. (In my book, that is nothing to be proud of.)

If Santorum gets it, and the impossible happens and he wins the White House, he will revert back to his moderate, to left, Mega spending behavior as he did his entire Legislative career.

I will guarantee it! And because of his ridiculous Puritan social agenda, he will have to fight the Left in everything he tries to do in that regard, so he will not have time to fix much of anything, nor the ability to figure out what needs to be fixed.

(Since all the Santorum worshipers here, are so busy projecting how and what he WILL win, I can do the same.)

47 posted on 02/26/2012 6:20:10 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

You are right. People wonder sometimes why I am so against Santorum? It’s for the reasons you just mentioned.

Best case with a Santorum nomination is that he wins against a weak Obama and then becomes a one term GWB - socially conservative and moderate to liberal otherwise - with no Texas charm. Government will grow. Our congressional delegations will shrink. He’ll hire some beltway consultant who will tell him he can fool the conservatives by stressing a bunch of irrelevant social issues and he can get the moderates by throwing some more bones to unions. Both will fail, but will result in bad policy.

In four years we get then next Obama. That is the BEST case of a RS nomination IMO.

Worst case: Obama and the Dems sweep in 2012 and America is over.

So does a RS nomination make me a tad upset? Damned right it does.


48 posted on 02/26/2012 7:02:48 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter; 9YearLurker; Servant of the Cross; American Constitutionalist

Gingrich’s continued presence in this race is going to give us Romney. He’s utterly un-electable at this point in time. Stop blaming the Guardian or the bearer of bad news. Wake up and smell the coffee.

Here an excerpt from the independent PPP that says the same thing:
_________________________________________________________________________
February 21, 2012

Santorum leads in Washington

Wedged between the Michigan/Arizona primaries and Super Tuesday the Washington state GOP caucus hasn’t received a lot of attention. At least for now it looks like it could give Rick Santorum some momentum headed into the critical March 6th contests. He leads there with 38% to 27% for Mitt Romney, 15% for Ron Paul, and 12% for Newt Gingrich.

Santorum is by far the most popular of the Republican candidates with 69% viewing him favorably to only 18% with a negative opinion.

Romney is the only other one who even has a positive favorability rating. He’s at 47/42. The disparity between Santorum and Romney’s numbers in Washington resembles what we found for the contests two weeks ago in Missouri and Minnesota, both of which Santorum ended up winning by a healthy margin.

Next week looks like it could be disastrous for Gingrich. He’s in 4th place in both Washington and Michigan, and in 3rd place in Arizona. He’s not remotely close to finishing in the top 2 in any of those states.

It’s not just that Republican voters aren’t planning to vote for Gingrich, they don’t even like him any more. In Washington his favorability is upside down at 39/46 and the same is true in Michigan (39/50) and Arizona (43/48) as well.

Gingrich’s continued presence in the state is a boost to Romney.

If he pulled out before Washington 59% of his supporters say they’d move to Santorum, compared to only 13% who would go to Romney. That would make the overall standings Santorum 49, Romney 28, Paul 16- as long as Gingrich stays in and keeps splitting the conservative vote it’s keeping Romney competitive.
_________________________________________________________________________

This is the reality, my friends.


49 posted on 02/26/2012 9:19:36 AM PST by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Polls are of little value when most of those polled aren’t particularly familiar with those they’re being polled about.

Once Santorum’s dour Puritanism gets out, he’ll be less popular with the American voters than horn-dog Gingrich, the GOP’s version of Bill Clinton.


50 posted on 02/26/2012 9:31:40 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-61 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson