Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RUSH: WHY SANTORUM SCARES THE LEFT
www.RushLimbaugh.com ^ | February 28, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 02/29/2012 6:58:18 AM PST by Yosemitest



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012gopprimary; antichrist; arethafranklin; catholic; clinton; eugenerobinson; faith; fearfuldems; hescaresustoo; joescarborough; kennedy; markhalperin; mikabrzezinski; morningjoe; obama; operationchaos; religion; richardcohen; rickscaresustoo; romney; rush; rushknowsbest; rushtranscripts; santorum; santorumknowsbest; willard

Thanks again, Rush.
All this hard sell BS that Fox News and the LAME Stream Media is doing for WILLARD Mitt Romney ... is making me sick.
Didn't the "Establishment Republicans" learn anything with Bob Dole losing to Clinton, and with McCain losing to Obama?
A great man said Don't Fear Social Issues and he was right!

'

The only way we, the conservatives, will lose to the Kenyan Turd is IF the "Establishment Republicans" REFUSE to support the Republican Nominee.
Now the "Republican Establishment's" hatred for conservatives is well known.
Jon Bershad wrote about Rush's analysis of their PANIC.


How many times has the "Republican Establishment" treated us to one lecture after the other on the need for “compromise” and “patience.”?
After we elect and RE-elect the "Republican Establishment", they conduct themselves with none of the confidence and enthusiasm with which they expressed themselves on the campaign trail.
It may be worth it for the GOP to lose some elections - if it means that conservatives—and the country—will ultimately win.

If we didn’t know it before, WE ... the Tea Partiers, now knows that accepting short-term loss in exchange for long-term gain is the essence of compromise, the essence of politics.

Ironically, we can thank the "Republican Establishment" for impressing this so indelibly upon us!!!
I'm fresh out of "patience", and I'm not in the mood for "compromise".
"COMPROMISE" to me is a dirty word.
Let the RINO's compromise their values, with the conservatives, for a change.

My dislike for the Democratic Party is second to none.
But my ... LOATHING ... for the "Establishment Republicans" ... is even stronger!
The "Establishment Republicans" can go to hell!

1 posted on 02/29/2012 6:58:25 AM PST by Yosemitest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Krauthammer, who I think is not anti-Santorum said something on FOX about Rick losing votes because of the “three something” things? I think one was the JFK so-called comment by Rick?

Krauthammer’s take on the cardboard man is:

“Story line is Romney, slow, steady, unspectacular,” said conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer.”


2 posted on 02/29/2012 7:12:52 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

He doesn’t scare the left, because his ideas are indistinguishable from those of Romney, which are all big government all the time.

I think the GOP establishment thinks they’re even less likely to win with him than with Romney for personal reasons, however, although the truth is that the GOP wouldn’t win with either one of them.

But I guess since Santorum adopted Rush’s idiotic Operation Chaos strategy of trying to get people from the other party (Santorum robo-calls to Dems) to vote for him, he’s Rush’s kinda guy.


3 posted on 02/29/2012 7:20:49 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

It’s simple, the democrats fear the sweater vest!!!!


4 posted on 02/29/2012 7:20:57 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Santorum scares a lot of people. I am a conservative woman who is an anti-abortion, practicing Catholic and Santorm just does not sit well with me.


5 posted on 02/29/2012 7:23:54 AM PST by AngieGOP (I never met a woman who became a stripper because she played with Barbie dolls as a kid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
Map from HuffPo. Commentary at the site is typical but the interactive comparison is interesting.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Michigan Primary 2012 Results: Election Reporting By County (MAP, REAL-TIME DATA)

My opinion is a lifelong Michigander is that this was a loss for Romney and the media is now trying to use it to prove that "conservatives" prefer Romney. As far as union members voting for Santorum, I think its a good thing. In a forced union state, you have a lot of conservative union members.
6 posted on 02/29/2012 7:24:44 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

If he doesn’t scare the left then why are they trying to kill him now?

Rush is spot on here. This is why they attacked him over the Kennedy speech - saying that he believes his faith is an integral part of him and that he’s not going to coat-check his faith at the door.

Haven’t we been wanting a Catholic to say just that for 50 years now? Say that his faith was more important to him than his politics and that even if he were elected president would stick by his faith instead of what Kennedy did?

Or am I mistaken?


7 posted on 02/29/2012 7:27:27 AM PST by LeopoldvonRanke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Good news - Santorums up in 8 congressional districts vs 6 for Romney. They are still counting the votes and it’s very close. If he stays up, he wins the delegate count in Michigan, meaning that Romney lost his home state.

I’m a bit shocked that Michigan stuck with Romney. It was close but the Detroit suburbs is what put Romney over - and it was enough to carry him through. 30k votes in Oakland county alone.

Why is Michigan so liberal? If Santorum won in Minnesota - Michigan should have gone for him too.


8 posted on 02/29/2012 7:31:03 AM PST by LeopoldvonRanke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Santorum cannot defeat Obama. Romney, not being that different from Obama, has a better chance than Santorum. Newt’s my choice, but I’m not sure he could defeat Obama.

God, how did we get into this mess?


9 posted on 02/29/2012 7:34:26 AM PST by Clara Lou (Deliver us from Obama (and Obama Lite). GO NEWT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

bookmark


10 posted on 02/29/2012 7:37:49 AM PST by conservativebabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

“He doesn’t scare the left, because his ideas are indistinguishable from those of Romney, which are all big government all the time.”

That’s a flat out lie. Who are you pulling for, Newt? Santorum has a career scorecard from the National Taxpayer’s Union of 76%. Gingrich’s score is 61%. The NTU is not about big governement.

I could support both. Both have inconsistencies in their careers. Newt is a better at communicating. Santorum has a better moral compass which is also important. Both can beat Obama.


11 posted on 02/29/2012 7:38:12 AM PST by mongrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

It is a mess indeed. Romney will win this nomination. I will have to hold my nose and vote for him, just because a second term Obama will be incredibly dangerous to the survival of our great Republic.
It may be depressing to many in here, but Romney is going to win the primary. Stay away from the election if you must, but I cannot risk another 4 years of Obama. Very troubling indeed, from both parties. sigh.


12 posted on 02/29/2012 7:44:39 AM PST by Matt Hatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
Rush, please address "Freedom of Worship" vs. "Freedom of Religion".
Also look at 'Glenn Beck': Republic vs. Democracy: What Did Our Founders Truly Intend? and David Barton's input.
Read David Barton's Jan 2001 article "The Separation of Church and State". Check out Original Intent: The Courts the Constitution & Religion and the Treaty of Tripoli.

And reference Scarborough's comment I'd suggest he read Daniel 11:40 thru Daniel 12:3.
The word anti-Christ isn't hard to figure out. It's those who are against Jesus Christ, His works, and His people.
It's just that simple.
13 posted on 02/29/2012 7:45:58 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
I can't for one moment believe that Santorum scares the left. It's illogical. If Santorum wins the election, his brand of social conservatism will not play well to the masses. Obama would crush Santorum, especially among independents.
14 posted on 02/29/2012 7:46:56 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeopoldvonRanke
Why is Michigan so liberal? If Santorum won in Minnesota - Michigan should have gone for him too.

Its really not. Romney's big numbers came from the most liberal cities in the state. Detroit, Ann Arbor, and Kalamazoo.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
15 posted on 02/29/2012 7:50:10 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LeopoldvonRanke
If he doesn’t scare the left then why are they trying to kill him now?

I'd submit that they're not. For the left, picking on a guy like Santorum is like shooting fish in a barrel. They probably have a template column ripping on social conservatives for things like this . . . all they did was insert Santorum's name into the template and presto.

16 posted on 02/29/2012 7:50:30 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LeopoldvonRanke

There are anti Santorum attack ads still running in Michigan this morning. He scares someone.


17 posted on 02/29/2012 7:52:25 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Santorum scare the left?

He scares me more!

Rush, I hope you enjoy your shark surfing.


18 posted on 02/29/2012 7:53:08 AM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Now There's a laugh! I like Newt, also.

For more on Santorum's success, read:
Let me add this article:



The only way we, the conservatives, will lose to the Kenyan Turd is IF the "Establishment Republicans" REFUSE to support the Republican Nominee.
Now the "Republican Establishment's" hatred for conservatives is well known.
Jon Bershad wrote about Rush's analysis of their PANIC.


How many times has the "Republican Establishment" treated us to one lecture after the other on the need for “compromise” and “patience.”?
After we elect and RE-elect the "Republican Establishment", they conduct themselves with none of the confidence and enthusiasm with which they expressed themselves on the campaign trail.
It may be worth it for the GOP to lose some elections - if it means that conservatives—and the country—will ultimately win.

If we didn’t know it before, WE ... the Tea Partiers, now knows that accepting short-term loss in exchange for long-term gain is the essence of compromise, the essence of politics.

Ironically, we can thank the "Republican Establishment" for impressing this so indelibly upon us!!!
I'm fresh out of "patience", and I'm not in the mood for "compromise".
"COMPROMISE" to me is a dirty word.
Let the RINO's compromise their values, with the conservatives, for a change.

My dislike for the Democratic Party is second to none.
But my ... LOATHING ... for the "Establishment Republicans" ... is even stronger!
The "Establishment Republicans" can go to hell!
19 posted on 02/29/2012 7:54:02 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost

And puddin hearted “conservatives” like yourself are so terrified of what the democrats might do that your first response is to try and please them.

Moderates are nothing but cowering dogs slinking along behind the democrats begging for crumbs.


20 posted on 02/29/2012 7:55:27 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: LeopoldvonRanke

Nobody’s trying to kill Santorum. He can take care of that himself.

The problem is that he is exactly as establishment and big-government as Romney, and the social conservative thing was the only thing that he had going for him. But now that’s beginning to wear thin and he simply is not offering an alternative to Romney - because he can’t.


21 posted on 02/29/2012 7:56:06 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
Ease off the vest!

He has to wear the sweaters because he suffers from chronic pneumonia/pleurisy

22 posted on 02/29/2012 7:56:26 AM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Limbaugh and Levin have spent the last month extracting Santorum's foot from his mouth and telling us what Rick really meant to say.

It is unfortunate that someone with so much education could come off as an inarticulate buffoon as often as he does.

23 posted on 02/29/2012 7:56:26 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Santorum says he isn't a visionary. Sorry Rick, without a vision the people perish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou

>> “God, how did we get into this mess?” <<

.
Palin got cold feet! - (I might have too, if I were her)
.


24 posted on 02/29/2012 7:59:54 AM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

Hey, I’m a supporter, I like him! I’m just trying to have a little fun, that’s all.


25 posted on 02/29/2012 8:00:56 AM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
CORRECTION for you:
26 posted on 02/29/2012 8:00:59 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
And puddin hearted “conservatives” like yourself are so terrified of what the democrats might do that your first response is to try and please them.

Um, what?

Moderates are nothing but cowering dogs slinking along behind the democrats begging for crumbs.

I was talking about independents, not moderates. Why make this leap? Are you trying to be insulting?

27 posted on 02/29/2012 8:01:28 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost

-——I can’t for one moment believe that Santorum scares the left. It’s illogical. If Santorum wins the election, his brand of social conservatism will not play well to the masses. Obama would crush Santorum, especially among independents.——

Believe what you want, but the nation is conservative by a good margin, socially as well as fiscally. The cities and coasts are libertine, but Republicans will never get those votes.


28 posted on 02/29/2012 8:02:55 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas (Viva Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

The part that surprised me was Northern Michigan. The only think I can think of there would be absentee voters which broke heavily against Santorum statewide. I was a little surprised at Jackson and Livingston County as well because of the social conservatives there. Could be the absentees there too.


29 posted on 02/29/2012 8:03:32 AM PST by Darren McCarty (Time for brokered convention)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

I was actually surprised to see Santorum win Kent county. That’s Dick DeVos territory and I would have expected that one to go to Romney.


30 posted on 02/29/2012 8:04:49 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Darren McCarty

Most of our state political operatives have second homes up north. I’m sure they make sure someone lives there to vote and it only takes a few votes to move those elections one way or another due to the sparse population.

Some years back I learned that Debbie Stabenow owned the house next door to me but had likely never laid eyes on the place. I asked a realtor who was selling the place about it. She wouldn’t say who owned it but did say that the owner wasn’t making any money so there was probably a political reason for owning it.


31 posted on 02/29/2012 8:14:23 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: St_Thomas_Aquinas
Believe what you want, but the nation is conservative by a good margin, socially as well as fiscally. The cities and coasts are libertine, but Republicans will never get those votes.

Say Santorum gets the nomination. Okay, great. Social conservatives can be proud. But then Obama goes on the attack, and the big front, of course, will be the Culture Wars. When that happens, anything the media is throwing at Santorum today will sound complimentary in comparison. You Google Santorum yet? That's just a warm-up.

Santorum will get slaughtered among independents. You remark that the cities and coasts are libertine; perhaps, but even among independents on the cities and coasts, there will be more than enough independents demographically to overwhelm whatever social conservative-leaning independents might reside in the rest of the country . . . and come out for Santorum.

The math just isn't there.

32 posted on 02/29/2012 8:16:18 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Could still come out of this with more MI delegates. Heh. That would really suck for Mitt.

I thought Rick Santorum was supposed to just fold from all the spending directed at him.


33 posted on 02/29/2012 8:25:56 AM PST by LeopoldvonRanke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

He was up big in Kent too, but fell off a little towards the end.


34 posted on 02/29/2012 8:27:32 AM PST by LeopoldvonRanke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Read how desperate the "Establishment Republicans" are: Look at the winners the "Establishment Republicans" have picked before:
The "Establishment Republicans" rate a


35 posted on 02/29/2012 8:29:07 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost

I think we can fight the culture wars and win.

As has been said, the majority of the country is conservative and has clamored for a conservative for a long time. Running Romney vs Obama isn’t going to help us. If we win - we lose because Romney is going to push Romneycare.

Newt - 14 states will have gone by, more than a third - with him winning just one - South Carolina. He’s too far behind to catch up.

So who does that leave? Santorum’s our best chance of beating Obama in 2012 and getting some semblence of a conservative. Santorum has been outpolling Obama in the head to head - and has a chance in the swing states like PA, OH, WI and IA, that are going to be crucial in a presidential election.


36 posted on 02/29/2012 8:32:54 AM PST by LeopoldvonRanke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: mongrel
So you can't actually argue about Santorum's IDEAS not being big gov't, the point of the post you replied to, so you plead some score from a think tank.

Nice dodge there.

Tinkering with the tax code, sabre-rattling at Iran, pandering to Labor ... Are people excited for his proposals or is it all "moral me and family?"

Can't explain his vote for Obama's first Supreme Court pick, Sonya Sotomayor, when Clinton appointed her to the 2nd Circuit--McCain voted NO. With a vote like that, how can Santorum be trusted on judges?

Can't explain how his mighty moral compass allowed him to live in Virginia and use $72,000 in local Pennsylvania school board funds to "home school" his kids. He got into Congress by attacking a Dem who had taken up residency in Virginia. (Oh but the Senate is different he claims.)

Introducing and voting for $550 million extra for Amtrak on top of the $900 million budget? Not just that but he cut a TV ad that he was middle-of-the-road, not fiscally conservative enough for the Bush White House on the issue because you put Pennsylvanian's first.

Can't explain his heading The K Street Project as a Senate leader, with Tom DeLay in the House, to build GOP ties with lobbyists--part of that crony capitalist swamp the Tea Party hates, which is how he landed on his feet after PA voters fired him.

Can't explain why his "Good Neighbor" "charity" spent its money on aides, fundraisers and lobbyists rather than grants. Can't explain why his Leadership PAC gave so little money to candidates. Can't explain the half million dollar mortgage he got from a private bank run by a major contributor while apparently not qualified for their program.

Can't explain Santorum's 18-point loss, the biggest loss for an incumbent Senator in over 25 years.

Is he electable? 18 points is very serious; he lost 61% of women. When reelected in 2000 he still didn't win among women. He won because of a strong turn out with men, mirroring W nationally. Santorum even got into the Senate, and just barely, during Newt's 1994 "Republican Revolution."

When on his own, rather than part of a surge, it's unclear he can win and very clear Democrats know how to clean his clock despite the power of incumbency.

Santorum supporters are very much "see no evil, speak no evil, hear no evil" with their guy just because of the "moral me and family" push. He's also a lawyer and career politician.

This is the worst primary I can remember.

37 posted on 02/29/2012 8:57:31 AM PST by newzjunkey (Santorum: 18-point loss, voted for Sotomayor, proposed $550M on top of $900M Amtrak budget...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
"He has to wear the sweaters because he suffers from chronic pneumonia/pleurisy "

Do you have a source for that? I seem to remember him giving a different account to Laura Ingraham.

38 posted on 02/29/2012 11:43:33 AM PST by Mila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mila

The source was his own mouth, in 1996, at a fundraiser in Pleasanton, California.


39 posted on 02/29/2012 12:12:59 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: All

“Santorum: What an absolutely great night!”

http://www.therightscoop.com/santorum-what-an-absolutely-great-night/

VIDEO


40 posted on 02/29/2012 2:03:42 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: livius; All

Obviously you never compared Rick with Mitt. Kindly do some research. This will get you started:

MITT ROMNEY

“In 2003 the Governor refused to endorse the Bush tax cuts, earning the praise of Massachusetts liberal congressman Barney Frank and was even open to a federal gas tax hike.
In 2007, Romney continued to oppose the flat tax with harsh language, calling the tax “unfair.”
http://www.clubforgrowth.org/whitepapers/?subsec=137&id=905
==

“If Mitt Romney becomes president, we may actually have “cap and trade” shoved down our throats. While campaigning for president in 2007, Mitt Romney said that he would support a “cap and trade” carbon tax scheme for the entire world....

“I support Cap-and-Trade on a global basis but not the USA going alone. I want to do it with other nations involved and on a global scale.”
snip

more http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/16-reasons-why-mitt-romney-would-be-a-really-really-bad-president

RICK SANTORUM

“Santorum has consistently supported broad-based tax cuts and opposed tax increases either by sponsoring key legislation or by casting votes on relevant bills. Some high profile votes include:

•Voted NO on the Clinton tax hike in 1993
•Voted YES on the capital gains tax cut in 1997
•Voted NO on a cigarette tax hike in 1998
•Voted YES on repeal of the Alternative Minimum Tax in 1999
•Voted YES on the 2001 Bush tax cuts
•Voted YES to repeal the Death Tax in 2002
•Voted YES to the 2003 Bush tax cuts
•Voted YES to extend the Bush tax cuts in 2006”

excerpt http://www.clubforgrowth.org/whitepapers/?subsec=137&id=902


41 posted on 02/29/2012 2:14:11 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Santorum is a wuss and voted all along with the GOP establishment. Also, he has no ideas about how to handle anything. Maybe he’ll throw his sweater-vest at the mullahs?

That said, I think the GOP establishment would rather have Romney because they think he wouldn’t alienate Dems with his social policies. However, the fact that Santorum was making robo-calls urging Dems to go out and vote for him indicates to me that Santorum doesn’t plan to do anything that would alienate Dems, either.


42 posted on 02/29/2012 2:21:40 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: livius

Mark Levin said Rick Santorum was one of the most conservative senators in the last 50 years.

Here’s proof that Levin is correct:

http://votesmart.org/candidate/evaluations/27054/rick-santorum

“2005 Republican Liberty Caucus – Economic Liberties Score 90%
2004 Republican Liberty Caucus – Positions 87%
2003-2004 Campaign for Working Families – Positions 100%
2003-2004 Concerned Women for America – Positions 100%
2005 American Conservative Union – Positions 92%
2003 Concerned Women for America – Positions 100%
2003 Eagle Forum – Positions 87%
2003 National Journal – Conservative on Economic Policy Score 82%
2003 American Conservative Union – Positions 90%”

More importantly perhaps, is that Rick Santorum is a FIGHTER, who gets things done!

Here’s one of many examples:

“On abortion, he is one of many senators who vote pro-life. The difference is that he is personally responsible for making sure a lot of these votes occur in the first place: He was an architect of the effort to ban partial-birth abortion, a strategy that energized the pro-life movement and allowed it to go on the political offensive.”

http://www.heymiller.com/2010/08/the-fate-of-rick/

The two front runners are Rick and Mitt - time to make a decision.


43 posted on 02/29/2012 3:16:35 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Good list, and go Rick! I can’t wait to vote for him Tuesday!


44 posted on 02/29/2012 3:45:20 PM PST by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Santorum and Romney are front-runners because they’re both big-government and that seems to be what most people, Dem or GOP, want. This is a sad fact, and it will take a lot to shake people loose from their adoring trust in government.

Santorum never did a thing that was not approved by the GOP establishment, and women like him because he comes across as weak and liberal (”compassionate conservative”) in the Jimmy Carter mode. Carter is exactly who Ricky reminds me of, because Carter also ran on his humble sweater, his “peanut farmer” persona, his Evangelical credentials, etc. Carter managed to completely skip the part about being governor of his state, and Santorum has managed to completely skip the thing about being a two-term Senator who was overwhelmingly rejected by his district.

He is also about at the Biden level for inarticulateness.


45 posted on 02/29/2012 4:22:23 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
The only way we, the conservatives, will lose to the Kenyan Turd is IF the "Establishment Republicans" REFUSE to support the Republican Nominee.

They did exactly that, quite notoriously, in 1964.

If the rich guys couldn't run the train, if Rocky couldn't get the nod (it was "his turn" -- he'd been up for it in 1960 and threw his support to Nixon instead, in a backroom deal called "the compact of Seventh Avenue"), if he and the Cabots and Lodges couldn't flip the nomination to their backup boy Scranton or an acceptable dark horse (two or three names were bruited in the late going), then they'd just flip off the entire Main Street Republican Party, let them have their nominee, and tell them all to ride the short bus to hell.

Rockefeller berated Goldwater delegates at the Cow Palace during a prime-time "minority report" speech (on national gavel-to-gavel TV coverage) offered him as a courtesy, to lambaste all the Goldwater people, conservatives generally, and the Goldwater delegates in particular as "fascists" and compare them to "Nazis".

...........

"Santorum cannot defeat Obama."

Yeah, I like that one, too. You know, I'll bet Ronald Reagan couldn't beat Obama. Abraham Lincoln couldn't beat Obama, or Teddy Roosevelt, nor George Washington. Just ask the ghost of Eric Sevareid.

46 posted on 02/29/2012 7:40:27 PM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
Like a caller to Rush said:
Romney? Don't be a dupe, buying the "Establishment Republicans" crap!
Yep, the "Establishment Republicans" will claim that we can NOT win without them.
Look at their track record. They chose 3 candidates and look what it brought us,"Establishment Republicans" ALWAYS set us up for a loss.
Read how desperate the "Establishment Republicans" are: Look at the "winners" the "Establishment Republicans" have picked before:
The "Establishment Republicans" rate a


47 posted on 03/01/2012 12:51:36 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

“I can’t wait to vote for him Tuesday!”

And bring your friends!


48 posted on 03/02/2012 12:32:15 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Sun

My family members are all going to vote for him! :)


49 posted on 03/02/2012 1:10:35 PM PST by Pinkbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson