Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California legislators show their hypocrisy over hunting issue
Sacramento Bee ^ | 2/29/12 | Dan Walters

Posted on 02/29/2012 10:05:01 AM PST by SmithL

Dan Richards, who chairs the California Fish and Game Commission, is under fire in the Capitol because he killed a mountain lion in Idaho and posed with his trophy for a picture that was later published on a hunting publication website.

Forty Democratic legislators signed a letter to Richards saying he should resign. "Your actions raise serious questions about whether you respect the laws of the people of California and whether you are fit to adequately enforce those laws," the lawmakers told Richards. Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom later joined the chorus.

So let's get this straight....

Mountain lion hunting is illegal in California, thanks to a ballot measure approved by voters in 1990. It is, however, not illegal for mountain lions to hunt human beings, as several attacks attest.

Nor is it illegal to hunt mountain lions in Idaho, and Richards' trophy was perfectly legal. "I'm glad it's legal in Idaho," he told the Western Outdoor News website.

So Richards appears to be guilty only of offending the sensibilities of the Legislature, whatever they may be.

This is the same Legislature that offends the sensibilities of most Californians, according to a recent Field Poll, because lawmakers habitually ignore important issues, carry bills of self-serving trivia, help special interests, and manipulate their schedules to maximize their incomes.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: Idaho
KEYWORDS: cougar; danrichards; fishandgame; hunting

1 posted on 02/29/2012 10:05:05 AM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Either Richards is a very small man or that is one big pussy.


2 posted on 02/29/2012 10:06:37 AM PST by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: ansel12; org.whodat

Maybe this is clearer than the other article.


4 posted on 02/29/2012 10:07:36 AM PST by SmithL (If you reward certain behavior, don't be surprised when you see more of that behavior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Liberalism:

If you do not agree with us, you cannot be part of the ruling class.


5 posted on 02/29/2012 10:12:12 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This is typical of California. I used to feel sorry for Californians. But as my wife pointed out, “They voted the clowns in. If they don’t like the way their neighbors vote, they can move. That’s what we did.”

That’s right. We left the SF Bay area in 2000 because the insanity starts to make a person stupid. You can’t spend too much time out there or you end up just like them.


6 posted on 02/29/2012 10:18:24 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (With regards to the GOP: I am prodisestablishmentarianistic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Here is what all this is about.

“Escalating a battle between hunters and animal welfare groups — a conflict that could result in major changes to California’s endangered species and hunting policies — 40 Democratic state Assembly members Friday sent a letter to Dan Richards, president of the California Fish and Game Commission, demanding that he resign.”
(snip)
The controversy has prompted an outpouring of support for Richards from hunting and fishing groups, many of which see Richards as the most reliable vote for their issues.
(snip)
The stakes are high. The five-member commission not only decides which species to list as endangered, it also sets policies on everything from hunting to California’s new system of “marine protected areas,” which ban fishing in areas off the coast.
If Richards, who was appointed to the five-member commission by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, resigns or is removed from the panel, his replacement would be named by Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown. And that’s a move that for the first time could give the commission a majority of members who tend to support the priorities of environmental groups.
(snip)
“There’s a lot at stake,” said Jennifer Fearing, state director of the Humane Society of the United States.
Gaines, the hunting advocate, agreed.
“We’re very well aware that this is a key seat, as are the animal rights groups,” he said. “There’s only five votes, so if you get three, you win.”

http://www.mercurynews.com/science/ci_20041625?source=pkg


7 posted on 02/29/2012 10:23:48 AM PST by ansel12 (Romney is unquestionably the weakest party front-runner in contemporary political history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I’m guessing that the guy under attack is a non-leftist, appointed by Arnold Taxenhiker, and “thus” (to leftists) already was going to be attacked on ANY slight pretext.

To leftists like the letter-signers, fish and game are to be looked at from afar, never fished or hunted. No matter what.

S, S, S.


8 posted on 02/29/2012 10:25:50 AM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
40 Democratic state Assembly members Friday sent a letter to Dan Richards, president of the California Fish and Game Commission, demanding that he resign.

I think we need to send letters to the 40, demanding a balanced budget or get the heck out.
9 posted on 02/29/2012 10:56:08 AM PST by Foolsgold (L I B Lacking in Brains)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

What is crazy is that cops kill mountain lions in California. Every once in a while, these cats come out of the hills into suburban neighborhoods. The cops come out and shoot and kill them. This has happened frequently on the San Francisco peninsula. People wonder why they can’t be tranquilized but the cops say they’re a danger. So it’s okay for cops to hunt them in California, but not regular folks. This commission president did nothing wrong.


10 posted on 02/29/2012 11:07:24 AM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1
We Californians are not all utopian idiots but unfortunately the bay area, LA and Sacramento have the lions share. When I visit those areas, just in case, I take my own water or drink beer.
11 posted on 02/29/2012 11:07:42 AM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

“Cat’s just resting...pinin’ for the fjords...”


12 posted on 02/29/2012 11:08:49 AM PST by Moltke (Always retaliate first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
I began hunting as a child with my father and grandfather. At first I was not allowed to carry a gun, but graduated to a 4-10 single shot shotgun and eventually hunting deer with a 30-30 rifle around 14. I am not against hunting whatsoever.

I don't really see the point in hunting mountain lions. I can understand shooting predators on your property and I understanding culling. I am just not a fan of killing animals for reasons other than for food.

On the other hand, I think that any family that is poor enough to receive food stamps should be given open, year-round hunting and fishing licenses. Perhaps a reasonable limit such as a daily bag limit for birds and fish and maybe 6 deer per year per household.

13 posted on 02/29/2012 11:20:43 AM PST by douginthearmy (Obamagebra: 1 job + 1 hope + 1 change = 0 jobs + 0 hope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drypowder
Yes. Indeed. My apologies for the generalization of all Californians. It's the population centers that run your state. It's where the liberal kumbaya crowd whistles past the graveyard and tries to punish defectors in the name of the common good.

We moved after CA (with some Fed $$$) spent $900 Million to forcibly purchase a red wood logging company's land to save the trees the company had cultivated and processed for 200 years. In 1999, following the purchase, CA had a referendum on the ballots that would raise taxes ($1 Billion) for education. I told the wife to pack her crap, we're leaving. PS - That was following the MTBE scam and the "gross polluters" tax for out of state vehicle registrations.

14 posted on 02/29/2012 11:31:53 AM PST by Tenacious 1 (With regards to the GOP: I am prodisestablishmentarianistic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

I’m sure you’re right, but it’s only a matter of time. Arnold was probably the very last Republican Governor of California. And although he was a terrible disappointment, he was better than Gray Davis, Cruz Bustamante, or Jerry Brown.

There are no Republicans in any statewide office, and by the next election, Democrats may well have their 2/3 majority in both the Assembly and State Senate. Once that happens, there will be no restraints whatsoever on the liberal lunacy.

I can’t speak for others, but leaving the so-called Golden State was the right choice for me.


15 posted on 02/29/2012 11:37:15 AM PST by SmithL (If you reward certain behavior, don't be surprised when you see more of that behavior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tenacious 1

I moved out of California in 1979, and never looked back.


16 posted on 02/29/2012 3:54:20 PM PST by ought-six ( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson