Skip to comments.Obama: Iíll veto bill that will provide water to Californiaís Central Valley
Posted on 02/29/2012 12:05:15 PM PST by SeekAndFind
I've called the judicially-imposed drought in California's Central Valley --- the Dust Bowl Congress created --- through its creation of the Endangered Species Act, invoked in this case by the Delta smelt, a fish that's not suitable for eating. Once a breadbasket for the nation, the cutoff of irrigation water to the Central Valley has destroyed agriculture and tens of thousands of jobs as a tradeoff for the endangered fish. Now, however, voices of sanity in Congress have begun to speak on the man-made economic and agricultural disaster, as Rep. Devin Nunes builds support for his Sacramento-San Joaquin Water Reliability Act:
Nunes’ Sacramento-San Joaquin Water Reliability Act goes to a vote in the House Wednesday and if it passes, it will guarantee that water the farmers paid for finally gets to the parched Central Valley. It will put an end to the sorry stream of shriveled vineyards, blackened almond groves and unemployed farm workers standing in alms lines for bagged carrots from China.
The insanity of the current policies against some of America’s most productive farmers in one of the world’s richest farm belts is largely the work leftist politicians from the wealthy enclaves of the San Francisco Bay Area. This group has exerted its political muscle on the less politically powerful region that produces more than half the fruits and vegetables consumed in the U.S. with $26 billion in annual sales.
“The bill restores the flow of water and establishes a framework for meaningful environmental improvements. It is a repudiation of the left’s assault on rural communities, which began with the decimation of the West’s timber industry and now is focused on Central Valley agriculture,” Nunes told IBD.
The stand-alone bill, H.R. 1837, marks the first time Central Valley water shortages and the federal role in creating them will be considered directly in Congress.
That in itself is a damning indictment of the federal government, whose laws have created the disaster in California. This first came to light more than two years ago, when Sean Hannity featured it on his national television show. The delay in addressing it makes the financial situation worse with each passing day for farmers in the Valley, and for workers who now have to subsist on government handouts rather than earnings from productive jobs.
If Barack Obama has his way, though, that situation will continue indefinitely. Late yesterday, the White House announced that Obama would veto Nunes’ bill because — I am not making this up — it would “unravel decades of work” on California water regulations … decades of work that brought California’s Central Valley to its current destruction:
The Administration strongly opposes H.R. 1837, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley Water Reliability Act because the bill would unravel decades of work to forge consensus, solutions, and settlements that equitably address some of California’s most complex water challenges.
H.R. 1837 would undermine five years of collaboration between local, State, and Federal stakeholders to develop the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan. It would codify 20-year old, outdated science as the basis for managing California’s water resources, resulting in inequitable treatment of one group of water users over another. And, contrary to 100 years of reclamation law that exhibits congressional deference to State water law, the bill would preempt California water law.
The bill also would reject the long-standing principle that beneficiaries should pay both the cost of developing water supplies and of mitigating any resulting development impacts, and would exacerbate current water shortages by repealing water pricing reforms that provide incentives for contractors to conserve water supplies.
Finally, H.R. 1837 would repeal the San Joaquin River Settlement Agreement, which the Congress enacted to resolve 18 years of contentious litigation. Repeal of the settlement agreement would likely result in the resumption of costly litigation, creating an uncertain future for river restoration and water delivery operations for all water users on the San Joaquin River.
The Administration strongly supports efforts to provide a more reliable water supply for California and to protect, restore, and enhance the overall quality of the Bay-Delta environment. The Administration has taken great strides toward achieving these co-equal goals through a coordinated Federal Action Plan, which has strengthened collaboration between Federal agencies and the State of California while achieving solid results. Unfortunately, H.R. 1837 would undermine these efforts and the progress that has been made. For this reason, were the Congress to pass H.R. 1837, the President’s senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill.
Well, let’s take a look at California’s Central Valley and see what “five years of collaboration between local, State, and Federal stakeholders to develop the Bay-Delta Conservation Plan” has produced:
As for Obama’s stirring defense of federalism, the courts have already ruled that federal law — the Endangered Species Act — trumps California water law. That’s the reason why a federal judge turned off the water spigots more than two years ago, and why California can’t get them turned back on. If Obama was really concerned about federalism, he’d propose a repeal of the Endangered Species Act, which would also resolve this disaster. Instead, Obama threatens to veto any attempt by Congress to fix what federal law has already broken.
Hopefully, Nunes’ bill gets clear sailing through Congress and Obama gets his bluff called. If he wants to run as the Dust Bowl President in November, I say let him do it.
The Central Valley hasn’t voted dim in ages...They know first hand what the heavy hand of the enviro-Feds does. Unfortunately, the rest of the state is just stupid
Too Many insulated people living too far from the direct consequences of their actions and placated on the federal teat.
Well hopefully, the legislation won't come about until after 0 has already been vetoed via the ballot box.......
This debauched pig fornicator has got to be removed from office. He’s the most despicable wretch ever to draw a breath in the Oval Office. Human waste. A walking turd.
He truly hates our country.
“Delta Smelt (2-inch minnows) are more important than the American People”
“Delta Smelt, is it really a threatened species?”
(makes fun of trailer parks, though)
We need some drought images, like this: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/82/California_Drought_Dry_Riverbed_2009.jpg
Who wants to own the San Joaquin Valley? Somebody does. Soros? The ChiComs? 0bama? Pelosi? Putin? The Saudis? Achmadinejad?
Bank on it. And Gov. Moonbeam will no doubt support Obama on this. I realize this causes great hardship for many farmers who also may be Conservatives, but there will be no change in California for ther forseeable future.
I can’t imagine Reid will ever let the Senate vote on this anyway.
He even hates California. Is it a coincidence that he is denying water to one of the remaining conservative-voting areas in the state?
Incredible, isn't it?
My state - The People's Republik of Connecticut - will as well. Mark my words.
That is correct. There is no down side to The Won.
I guess they’re teaching those silly Central Valley fellers a lesson.
Vote dimocRAT and get water. B*******
What we need is a war that we could lose. Would something as stupid as the protection of the Delta Smelt to the detriment of California agriculture happen in war time? The president would be impeached as a traitor.
Turn the water back on and tell the feds to piss off. If they have a problem with that, force Brown to send out the national guard to stop it.
Yeap! California loves their liberals and all the stupidity they bring to the table.
He wants to bankrupt farmers and business owners who might support republicans.
He, like your namesake, his ideological father, simply hates people.
The liberals have no problem building wind farms when it is proven they kill birds on the endangered species list, or the farm displaces an endangered fox.
Obama would still win California if he burned all the weed, imposed a burqua law on the beach, closed down all the In and Outs, and turned Dodger Stadium in to a mosque.
I’m sure you’re correct.
The good news about writing off Cal, Ill, and NY is that finance $$ becomes moot - there will be more than enough to drive every voter in Oh, Fl, Penn, NC and Va stark raving mad with commercials.
yup. Can’t argue with that insight
If you got rid of L.A. and S.F., California would vote very differently.
I’m sure we could say the same for Chicago/Illinois and NYC/NYS.
But it ain’t gonna happen in my lifetime.
That is why Obama’s passive/aggressive personality is coming out in full force against central California. Believe me, Obama is the epitome of passive/aggressive.
RE: If you got rid of L.A. and S.F., California would vote very differently.
Why didn’t you include Sacramento?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.