Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Genetically Engineered Bacteria Could Help Fight Climate Change (barf alert!)
ScienceNOW ^ | 26 February 2012 | Kim Krieger

Posted on 02/29/2012 8:17:44 PM PST by neverdem

Enlarge Image
sn-microbes.jpg
Crystalline. Calcium carbonate forming in sterile solutions tends to be amorphous and black (left), but the presence of bacteria coaxes it to form calcite crystals.
Credit: Jenny Cappuccio/Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

As humans warm the planet by releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, some researchers believe that capturing CO2 and trapping it in buried rocks could lower the risk of catastrophic climate change. Now a team of researchers has shown that bacteria can help the process along. They can even be genetically modified to trap CO2 faster, keeping it underground for millions of years.

When CO2 is pumped into underground porous rocks, it combines with metal ions in the salty water that fills the rock pores and mineralizes into mineral carbonates, such as calcium carbonate (CaCO3). The process can take thousands of years. To see if they could speed things up, biochemist Jenny Cappuccio and colleagues at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's Center for Nanoscale Control of Geologic CO2 put a diverse mix of common bacterial species in a calcium chloride solution in the lab and then pumped in CO2. They found that calcium carbonate formed faster in areas where the bacteria were living than it did in sterile solutions. The CaCO3 also had a different mineral structure when the bacteria were around. It tended to grow into crystals of white calcite instead of amorphous black lumps (see picture). The bacteria enhanced the formation of calcite even when they were just lying around, not growing or multiplying.

Intrigued, the team guessed that the surfaces of the bacteria were somehow helping the CO2 hook up with calcium ions. To test that idea, they decided to modify one of the bacterial species, Caulobacter vibrioides, shaping its surface to attract calcium ions, and see what happened.

Cappuccio and colleagues inserted a short DNA sequence that coded for a loop of six glutamic acids—a type of amino acid—into C. vibrioides. The loop sticks out of the bacteria's surface protein and is repeated over the entire surface of the bacteria in a hexagonal pattern. Each six-acid loop contains six negative charges. The team reasoned that this "negative loop" could fit neatly around positively charged calcium ions in water, attracting them to the surface of the bacteria and coaxing them to form CaCO3.

It worked. When the researchers pumped CO2 into the tanks where the modified bacteria were living, even more CaCO3 solidified than in tanks with unmodified bacteria. Better yet, more of it was in the crystalline calcite form, which is more stable—and likely to sequester CO2 over geological time—than amorphous CaCO3. Cappuccio reports the team's results today at a meeting of the Biophysical Society in San Diego, California.

Robin Gerlach, a biological engineer at Montana State University in Bozeman, who was not involved with the study, calls the work "very fundamental." He anticipates broad applications, including stabilizing soil in flood zones, isolating radioactive isotopes, and identifying early life in the fossil record by tracking changes in carbonate mineralization.

But Cappuccio is the first to admit that the results need to be demonstrated in conditions closer to real life. She wants to test her modified bacteria at higher pressures, higher temperatures, and lower pH, conditions closer to those that might be found underground. Eventually, her team wants to modify hard-to-grow extremophiles—bacteria that grow in very hot, high-pressure environments—that are more like the microorganisms that colonize the underground rock formations where CO2 would be sequestered.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Testing
KEYWORDS: agw; climatechange; genetics; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; microbiology
Politicize science, and waste money while we're broke!
1 posted on 02/29/2012 8:17:50 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

This is gonna end up screwing up the environment more than we ever will.


2 posted on 02/29/2012 8:20:34 PM PST by struggle (http://killthegovernment.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Oh the strange bedfellows of liberalism.

I mean, “genetic engineering” is evil anathema to commies.


3 posted on 02/29/2012 8:21:48 PM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The other day it was fairly nice here but today it snowed...sort of. So they’re saying Obama could stop this....with bacteria?

Does this mean the trees won’t know when to be dormant and when to bloom...not to mention all the other cycles as designed by God?

These people will do and say anything for a buck. These “scientists” are no different from common thieves.


4 posted on 02/29/2012 8:24:19 PM PST by Aria ( "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Genetically modified bacteria for climate hoax good, genetically modified corn for food bad.


5 posted on 02/29/2012 8:28:26 PM PST by depressed in 06 (6 November, 2012, the day our embarrassment is sent back to Kenya.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

God, sometimes I really appreciate the left. The satire writes itself.

The left is against genetically engineered food - that is, engineered in the modern method, not by Mendel and those before him, all the way back to Sumer and Native Americans messing with corn. But... genetically engineered bacteria could fight climate change! But it’s not natural. But neither is that genetically engineered wheat. But... but... but....

One of my favorite games to play with these idiots is to listen politely and ask them to describe and define the climate that they hope to establish. What temperatures would exist in what place, how much ice cover should there be at the poles, at what date should the last frost occur in Manitoba? If we are fighting climate change, describe what it looks like to win. What would that climate look like? It’s cool watching their lips flap like goldfish out of water.

Same thing applies here, too. We’re dealing with emotionally retarded adults. Too bad some of them have significant power.


6 posted on 02/29/2012 8:28:42 PM PST by redpoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

And I’m sure the Food Stamp President has a company all lined up to subsidize to the tune of trillions of dollars to get-er-done, not cheaply, not effectively, not even completely, but sort of done possibly.


7 posted on 02/29/2012 8:34:21 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet (There's a pill for just about everything ... except stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

They could do some serious damage in their zeal as well. They don’t mind curing the earth by accidently knocking off a couple of billion people.


8 posted on 02/29/2012 8:35:13 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Andromeda???


9 posted on 02/29/2012 8:37:51 PM PST by evad (STOP SPENDING, STOP SPENDING, STOP SPENDING. It's the SPENDING Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Golleee gee whiz!! What if these super brainy folk could sequester so much carbon in a form not available for photosynthesis that plant life would be severely diminished? Surely that would make global warming one of the least of our concerns. Oh, happy day.


10 posted on 02/29/2012 8:46:21 PM PST by Elsiejay (in)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle

CACO3 tells me we will be locking up a bunch of oxygen as well which isn’t what we really want to do. Trees, moss, and algae is more the ticket.


11 posted on 02/29/2012 8:50:28 PM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I hate to break it to these “scientists”, but nature has already invented trees, corals, and a few other things to efficiently capture excess Carbon Dioxide and store it away in a harmless form.


12 posted on 02/29/2012 8:55:47 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson