Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Do Democrats Have Against Guns and Gun Rights?
Ammoland ^ | 1 March, 2012 | AWR Hawkins

Posted on 03/01/2012 3:49:25 AM PST by marktwain

Washington DC - -(Ammoland.com)- When news broke that Democrat legislators in Iowa had stormed out in protest over pro-Second Amendment bills which Republicans in the Republican-controlled legislature had brought up for a vote, I wasn’t too surprised.

After all, since when do Democrats approve of guns or support gun rights?

But as I read Iowa House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (D-Des Moines) try to justify avoiding a vote for two bills that would have given Iowans a state-constitutional right to keep and bear arms and broadened their grounds for using deadly force to protect life and property, the whole event seemed to go beyond simple Democrat-politics-as-usual and approach instead an example of an ongoing problem with Democrats in general—they hate our guns.

While some individual Democrats politicians and Democrat voters may cringe at that assertion (even Democrats in Iowa), it’s easily borne out by the facts.

Just think back to the 1990s, and even the example of southern Democrats like Bill Clinton prove my point. For it was he who implemented the Assault Weapons Ban in 1994, and he too called for gun control in 1999 in response to the Columbine school shootings. And once the Assault Weapons Ban ended in 2004, who was it that kept begging President Bush to re-institute it if not the Democrats in congress and the senate?

One of those Democrat was a previous Illinois state senator named Barack Obama.

As a state senator he supported a one-gun-a-month limit on gun purchases, supported laws making it illegal to use a gun for self-defense, and opposed laws that allowed law-abiding citizens to get permits to carry guns on their persons. As a U.S. senator, he supported bans on high-capacity magazines and he supported the Assault Weapons Ban. (For the record, when gun bans failed to be instituted Obama teamed up with fellow gun-grabber Senator Ted Kennedy, another Democrat, to try to ban certain types of ammo.)

Or think of what the Democrats have tried to do since coming back into power in 2008. As Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi went on ABC’s Good Morning America in April 2009 and talked of how the combination of Democrats having the White House and the Congress should enable them to reinstate the Assault Weapons Ban. Always careful, of course, to assuage our concerns that she wanted to take our guns, she added: “We don’t want to take…guns away. We want them registered.”

Why do Democrats talk about registering guns unless they want to take them? Historically speaking, Canada registered guns and now where are those guns? Hitler registered guns, and afterward, did the Jews (and others) have guns with which to protect themselves when the Nazi’s came? The answer every time is no. It’s an NRA maxim that should be axiomatic to all thinking people: “Gun registration leads to confiscation.”

Anyway, back to my point. After the Tucson shooting in which Congresswoman Gabby Giffords was injured in January 2011, Carolyn Comitta, the Democrat mayor of West Chester, PA, said the shooting was because there was a “lack of common sense gun laws.” (For those of you who don’t know it yet, when a Democrat says “common sense gun laws” they’re using leftist-jargon that means gun bans, more paper work for gun purchases, higher taxes on guns, registration of weapons, limits on magazine capacity, etc.) And on top of all this President Obama (a Democrat) is working “under the radar” to pass more gun control.

Now, going back again to Iowa House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy and his gang of fellow Democrats stomping out of the building rather than voting on pro-gun measures, it seems fair to ask: What do Democrats have against guns (and gun rights)? Do they hate freedom or do they simply want more power over our lives?

AWR Hawkins

AWR Hawkins

About: AWR Hawkins writes for all the BIG sites, for Pajamas Media, for RedCounty.com, for Townhall.com and now AmmoLand Shooting Sports News.

His southern drawl is frequently heard discussing his take on current events on radio shows like America’s Morning News, the G. Gordon Liddy Show, the Ken Pittman Show, and the NRA’s Cam & Company, among others. He was a Visiting Fellow at the Russell Kirk Center for Cultural Renewal (summer 2010), and he holds a PhD in military history from Texas Tech University.

If you have questions or comments, email him at awr@awrhawkins.com. You can find him on facebook at www.facebook.com/awr.hawkins.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: banglist; constitution; gun; ia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: marktwain

If you were the guy coming to take things you worked for away from you in order to give it to somebody else, it would be better if the people you were going to take things from to be unarmed.


21 posted on 03/01/2012 11:38:26 AM PST by RinaseaofDs (Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Mostly, I think it is because Democrats hate the idea of someone shooting one of their constituents while he’s busy “sharing the wealth” or “getting some pie” or whatever Democrats call pillage and rapine.


22 posted on 03/01/2012 11:38:52 AM PST by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

To be an “elite” you must have a subservient class.

The self-proclaimed Patrician class, currently in the form of talentless Commies, fears the freedom of those they would rule.

Personal ownership of firearms is a tremendous tool of liberty.


23 posted on 03/01/2012 11:41:44 AM PST by EyeGuy (2012: When the Levee Breaks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasRepublic

Anyone who wants to remove your ability to resist violent oppression

plans to, at some time in the future, use violence to oppress you.


24 posted on 03/01/2012 11:42:27 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Excellent prose and exposition.

As to why the Dems hate guns...

in their world guns are only good for stealing other’s welfare benefits. After they’ve decided what everyone gets everyone should be happy with it. So no one has any need for a gun.


25 posted on 03/01/2012 11:51:28 AM PST by mrsmith (So... how's the Tea Party nominee for your House seat doing?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Anyone who wants to remove your ability to resist violent oppression plans to, at some time in the future, use violence to oppress you.

Bingo.

26 posted on 03/01/2012 4:12:16 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson