Skip to comments.Grapevine: Arpaio takes aim at Obama's birth certificate
Posted on 03/02/2012 7:40:26 AM PST by Brown Deer
Conservative lawman claims document is a forgery
(Excerpt) Read more at video.foxnews.com ...
“Conservative lawman claims document is a forgery.”
Liberal Lawmen claim the fraudulent Kenyan is legitimate.
I believe Joe is a Libertarian. Or at least he use to be.
Anyone who is self-reliant and doesn’t depend on the collective will inherently be small “l” liberatarian.
They always have to reference party or conservative when its something on our side. Being conservative has nothing to do with story. Fu fox
Yeah, the Grapevine didn’t mention how in the Arpaio news conference that Jerome Corsi arranged a meeting at 5:00 p.m. between Sheriff Joe and Breitbart the same day Andrew died...
Bookmark for later
“They always have to reference party or conservative when its something on our side. Being conservative has nothing to do with story. Fu fox”
Yep. Double Standard.
Hence my rejoinder above.
2. Mailman meets Obama near Ayer's parents' home in the 1980s: The sheriff, as I understand it,said during the press conference that he has found a former Illinois mailman who says that he accidentally ran into and talked briefly to a very young looking Obama as Obama was walking towards Ayers' parents' home in Chicago in the 1980s.
(To me, this sheriff announcement about the Illinois mailman is an important but overlooked piece of information that the sheriff presented at the news conference.)
3. The mailman has told the sheriff that Ayers' mother told him that Obama was a foreign student, or something like that.
4. If the mailman is telling the truth---he says that he was the regular mailman on the route and knew Ayers' parents' residence well---then it contradicts Obama's 2008 campaign statement that he first met Ayers in the middle 1990s and that Ayers was just a person who happened to live in the neighborhood.
I’m not sure if the mailman that from a couple years ago, is the same person that they interviewed. They called him a retired government employee and also stated that this incident occurred around 1980/81.
the other incident was after the mid ‘80s.
at 58 minutes:
The IRS is working to rectify this as we speak.
The circumstances of the birth of Barack Hussein Obama are shrouded in LOTS of secrecy.
There is no certainty at all that the person now occupying the Oval Office is, in fact a genetic relative of the native of Kenya, Barack Hussein Obama Senior. To further confuse the issue, there was also born, about the same time, and in Kenya, a child bearing the name “Barack Hussein Obama, Junior”. The child supposedly born in Hawaii, named “Barack Hussein Obama II”, is definitely a genetic descendent of Stanley Dunham, but the popular supposition is that Stanley was this Barack’s grandfather.
My contention is that Stanley Ann Dunham, supposedly the mother of the current occupant of the White Hut, was in fact his older half-sister, and that “Barack Hussein Obama II” was the illegitimate child of Stanley Dunham and an unknow female of African American origin.
I wnt to see some DNA evidence.
The obfuscation is intentional.
“Kenyan” or not, it is AT LEAST unlikely, that he is Constitutionally qualified to be President.
Can you imagine someone suing Soros over a meger 2m apartment! Geesh
Just a passing thought(s). I do think about this a lot. Too much as a matter of fact. My thought process starts with the assumption that Zippo is a plant. He is a puppet. So in rationalizing this thought I asked myself how would one find someone that would be willing to destroy this nation. And I know you have about 100 names in your mind right away and 50 of them work at MSNBC, but seriously there is a difference between political debate and political philosophy and actually taking action to destroy America. But what are the chances of finding an natural born Citizen to carry out the deed? And isn’t that the point of the safeguard...?