Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Levin to CNN, MSNBC, and other leftist media: You can go to hell (audio/video)
TheRightScoop.com ^ | March 2, 2012 | Mark R. Levin

Posted on 03/02/2012 7:42:29 PM PST by servo1969

Levin took to the airwaves today to expose Sandra Fluke and defend Rush Limbaugh over these attacks from Democrats and the leftist media. One thing among many, that I loved about this monologue is that when talking about Obama calling Sandra Fluke, Levin wonders if Brian Terry’s parents ever got a call from Obama. Awesome. He goes on to tell Brian Terry’s story.

But the end is where he really takes to calling the media out and defending Rush:

"I want the leftists at MSNBC, CNN, and the other so-called news outlets who are dressed up as journalists but are nothing of the sort, I want you to understand something. You don’t get to decide who the rest of us listen to. You don’t get to decide who the rest of us admire. You’re not going to succeed in driving Rush Limbaugh from the airwaves. I don’t care how many cowardly Republicans you speak to. I don’t care how many inside-the-beltway pseudo-conservatives you speak to and so forth."

(Excerpt) Read more at therightscoop.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: breitbart; fluke; levin; rush; sandytheslut; talkradio
"Our nation is teetering. Everything we believe in is being undermined. The future for our children and grandchildren is perilous. And you in the media do the bidding of the very politicians who have brought us to this dire state. You don’t get to dictate to us. You don’t even get to influence us, try as you might.

Rush isn’t going anywhere because there’s tens of millions of us standing by his side. And we’re not going anywhere either.

You say nothing about the unconstitutional acts of this president. You say nothing of the policies that are bankrupting our nation. You do nothing to expose the lies and deceit of this administration. In fact, if you’re not covering it up, you’re cheering it on. This is why we have no respect for you, why your audience and readership are plummeting and will continue to.

No we will not let you take down Rush or anyone else. In fact, I think I speak for tens of millions of Americans when I say you can go to hell."

1 posted on 03/02/2012 7:42:34 PM PST by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Excellent. Even that dip-stick holder can’t even say his name.


2 posted on 03/02/2012 7:47:25 PM PST by Qwackertoo (Gingrich/West 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qwackertoo

Excellent. Rush never picks a fight he won’t win. he threw gas on this for a reason!


3 posted on 03/02/2012 7:50:23 PM PST by omega4179 (Internet ID:FU░&#BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

You definitely speak for me Mark Levin.


4 posted on 03/02/2012 7:59:19 PM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

did he call the families of the murdered soldiers in Afghanistan after the nut jobs rioted? no. he was to busy calling the nut jobs to apologize for burning their code passing materials

scumbag

if you’re active duty... realize, the administration is not really on your side. don’t trust blindly, you could be walked into a meat grinder on purpose (ask seal team 6)


5 posted on 03/02/2012 8:01:15 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

God Bless you Mark Levin, you keep fighting the good fight. We will fight these bastards on the left til the bitter end. We will NEVER surrender!


6 posted on 03/02/2012 8:01:29 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

He knew exactly what he was doing. When it happened my two female employees who are fans said “he’s gonna get in trouble for that”. I said NO! Rush is doing what he always does, “shines the light of truth on the liars with their own tactics”. They’ve been calling Palin, Bachmann etc... sluts, whores and much worse and they gift wrapped a way to shove it back at them. Now the scum msm will have to address it or shut up.


7 posted on 03/02/2012 8:04:34 PM PST by liberty or death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I am absolutely LIVID that a spoiled liberal brat complains about her birth control pill cost while going to Georgetown.

My husband and I are struggling to send our child to a state school, he’s working while in school AND if he wants condoms, he’s buying them.

Obama and the rest of the socialists in this country have convinced the mush brains to look for the government for EVERYTHING.

If we want to win this election, ALL of us better get a thick skin AND have each other’s backs.

And I Love Mark Levin. and Rush.


8 posted on 03/02/2012 8:06:55 PM PST by swpa_mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I’m sad for the direction this nation is heading. :(:(:(:(:(


9 posted on 03/02/2012 8:12:17 PM PST by Tzimisce (Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Sluts get very angry when you point out to them that they are sluts- and the followingverse throws them into a positive Hissy Fit

Psalm 101:2 I will be careful to live a blameless life. When will you come to me? I will walk within my house with a blameless heart.

This crap may all backfire on the left and the administration- people are getting REALY fed up with the crap fro mthe left- and this latest whining over priviledged slut just shows the public exactly WHY the left is losing-


10 posted on 03/02/2012 8:14:08 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Qwackertoo

Folks saying “Social Issues” don’t matter, this is where they do. The left is trying to play a game with us knowing some will flinch and scurry away. It is about time we challenge these stooge activists testifying in front of congress. Thank you Rush for making this front page news and making this an issue. It is about time to shut the Left down on this BS. No one outside the beltway wants to shell out $1000 a year for some dumb activist whore to get laid. This slut should get a real job like the rest of us if she wants a luxury. I don’t see the Regime helping me with gas prices for my full frame V8 wagon to keep my un-aborted kid safe.


11 posted on 03/02/2012 8:20:26 PM PST by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: swpa_mom

Touche’ swpa_mom! I could have stated all that as well. And while our sons and daughters work, go to school, sacrifice along with their parents, just t get through, all this chick can talk about, before Congress no less, is her birth control????????? I would be horrified if that were my daughter.

I LOVE Mark!! And Rush, we know we can count on them for common sense, and tell it like it is. Where would we be without them.


12 posted on 03/02/2012 8:21:18 PM PST by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

In a few minutes:

Lili von Fluke http://youtu.be/RojSCeafFoM


13 posted on 03/02/2012 8:23:03 PM PST by preacher (Communism has only killed 100 million people: Let's give it another chance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swpa_mom

God bless you ‘’mom’’. Not to worry though. This young woman’s face is birth control all in itself.


14 posted on 03/02/2012 8:26:21 PM PST by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gidget7

It’s amazing how so many liberal brats can end up testifying before congress.

The first thing liberals do if something doesn’t go their way is send a letter to the President?

Obama and his socialist buddies will do anything to distract us. Focus. Focus.


15 posted on 03/02/2012 8:34:31 PM PST by swpa_mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I heard that portion of Mark’s show tonight. HOORAY Mark! Staged socialism with a whiney socialist. Pay for your own crap, crybaby.

“Everything about socialism is sham and affectation.” - 23.11 Ch23 Evil; Economic Harmonies; Frederic Bastiat 1801-1850

“Socialism is legal plunder.” - The Law; Frederic Bastiat 1801-1850


16 posted on 03/02/2012 8:38:16 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

Thanks, jmacusa. I’m concerned that some on our side haven’t developed the thick skin that’s needed this election cycle.


17 posted on 03/02/2012 8:38:18 PM PST by swpa_mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: swpa_mom

You’re welcome dear. As a former liberal I can tell you that I know how they think and how they will re-act/act in any political situation. I have younger two sisters and younger two brothers who are liberals as well as my father, who proudly states he is a fascist . I once told my Dad, “Dad you’ve got all the historical perspective and political intelligence God gave a curbstone’’. We didn’t talk at all for a long time after that. Only my two older brothers are conservatives so needless to say politics isn’t something we can really discuss. Yes, we need thick skins. We need to have our facts straight, our arguments ready and we must be ready to deliver them with a good verbal left hook. Or a real one, if need be because I can tell you first-hand liberals are moral cowards. Not me though. I’ll floor a lib/leftie in a heartbeat.


18 posted on 03/02/2012 8:56:31 PM PST by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Thanks for posting. Mark's show is the best on radio. I HAVE got to get a copy of Ameritopia. Rush was sticking his neck out the other day but that's why we have the 1st amendment- for just such occasions. And the reason for liberals is what? To try to destroy it? I can think of no other reason.

If I could get an example of creeping utopianism to Mark it would be this:

"Imagine driving to the scene of an accident in 1950 where bodies were thrown through the windshield, including children, and asking if seat belts should be 'required' on all cars? The consensus is 'yes' and they are mandated.

Imagine being first responder to an accident in 1970 where the seat belt wasn't worn, people went through the windshield- and those that did wear them smashed into the dashboard? Should shoulder-harnesses be 'required' in all cars? The consensus says 'yes' and they are mandated.

Imagine driving to an accident to find injured passengers who bounced off the steering wheel and dash- some who died from the impact? Should air-bags be required? The consensus says 'yes' and they are mandated.

Imagine arriving at an accident scene to find the airbags deployed, but the child in the passenger was dead because his neck was broken by the force of an airbag snapping his head back and killing him instantly? Would you not want a switch to turn the airbag off for children riding in the front seat to protect them? The consensus says 'yes' and switches are 'mandated' on all vehicles with airbags.

If you wanted to do something to stem the carnage from such accidents, you're guilty of being human. If you supported legislation 'mandating' these remedies, you're a liberal- because a conservative would have made these safety changes available as an option to consumers instead.

As this example shows, the 'mandated' changes introduced problems of their own which failed to 'protect' as envisioned. The masterminds and utopians actually worsened the problem in ways not anticipated because they may have inflated their mastermindedness.

But, they were successful in destroying Free Will. My brothers and sisters (seven of us) climbed all over the seats of my Dad's Chrysler as he drove with the 392 cubic inch Hemi engine, and we survived. None of us ever spent one minute in a child car seat, not one.

I've wondered about the lingering effects of strapping children from birth to 90lbs. in what is essentially a 'restraint' device. Could it have unforseen consequences as some of the other improvements in safety forced on people, and children, in particular? [recall that most intrusions on liberty are for "the children" which, upon closer examination translates into "screw the non-children" quaint, huh?]

This is but one example of the gazillion ways government has taken it upon itself to inject it's 'values' into our lives while taking a liberty away each and every time in exchange for doing us a 'favor'. I won't go into light bulbs, toilets, coal mines, schools, airlines, or businesses in general because no one could live long enough to read it all.

Suffice to say we've been hijacked onto the road to Utopia and have nothing to say about what it'll cost or where it ends. But, at least we're still free cough,cough and so too, will our children be. After they pay off the debt, that is. "Free at last, free at last. Thank God-almighty we're...........splat!"

19 posted on 03/02/2012 9:01:33 PM PST by budwiesest (It's that girl from Alaska, again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberty or death

I am saying its not so much what they called Palin and Bachmann but what his own researchers found out about this plant.


20 posted on 03/02/2012 9:13:48 PM PST by omega4179 (Internet ID:FU░&#BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
Bill O’Reilly definitely lit a fire under MS (sounds like) “Fluck” this evening. Without specifically referring to Rush or the big “controversy”, he endorsed the view that we the people (or any insurance company) should not have to pay for Fluke's lifestyle choices. O’Reilly may not always be “looking out for you” (or us), but I would say he had Rush's back on this issue.
21 posted on 03/02/2012 10:07:11 PM PST by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: omega4179

One of several definitions of the word fluke, and I believe the appropriate one:

1. (Life Sciences & Allied Applications / Animals) any parasitic flatworm, such as the blood fluke and liver fluke, of the classes Monogenea and Digenea (formerly united in a single class Trematoda)


22 posted on 03/03/2012 6:36:47 AM PST by Bob Buchholz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: swpa_mom

the republicans wouldn’t let her testify before congress. This was a democrat only meeting that brought her up....


23 posted on 03/03/2012 9:22:26 AM PST by goat granny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Sandra, your rights do not extend to anything that someone else has to pay for. The vast majority of us will gladly keep our hands out of your uterus if you keep your hands out of our wallets.


24 posted on 03/04/2012 8:38:26 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.~Admiral Yamamoto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson