Posted on 03/03/2012 1:57:58 PM PST by mnehring
Ron Paul became the latest presidential hopeful to weight in on controversial and incendiary language used by radio commentator Rush Limbaugh to describe a college student, telling reporters Friday the remarks were in poor taste.
"It sounded a little crude the way it came across to me," Paul said. "I don't know why it has to be such a political football like this, so you have to ask him about his crudeness."
(Excerpt) Read more at politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com ...
Yep, it was crude.
But not as crude as the slut who was trying to get the rest of us to protect her from the consequences of her sluttiness.
Ron Paul joins the rest of the sluts. Hmmmm.....who were they again?
Ron Paul is a jerk without principles.
I don’t think Rush meant to be polite... :p
Not to mention the violation of the 1st Amendment to foist her government mandate on a Jesuit Institution.
Of course Paul has to say this considering his sluts in Nev. campaigned for him. Vote for Paul and get a freebie.
I call Paul's comments retarded. But I repeat myself...
These idiots don’t realize that the Left wants to keep this going so the focus will not be on the economy and rising gas prices.
Ron Paul is a cranky old coot.
The only crude that Paul should be concerned with is the kind we pump out of the ground.
crude but accurate
I thought he was a libertarian, how come he expects people to have standards?
Only Newt pointed out about our religious liberties; Paul
should have passed that test easily. The girl is a dem activist and she is trashy. The libs think she is a role model. Our country is so messed up due to Clintons and the Obamas, and from the radical women in power and those aligned groups of theirs who are trying to impose their choices on us as being given special rights/ those special rights protected by making new laws. (For acceptance-not happening-you cannot tell someone how to think, to accept behavior on the issue of marriage)
What I haven’t heard, and maybe it’s out there (there are only so many posts I can read), is that if the slut chose abstinance the cost was free.
Sometimes crude is the only language that engages people.
Sandra Fluke is a big girl, she has chosen to become a public figure, and playing the wounded innocent is a little specious when the wounds are self-inflicted and there is no innocence.
Liberal activists are a devious lot. They are without shame, yet they try to induce shame in others as a weapon of personal destruction.
Raining down on Rush is lobbing firecrackers at a hardened bunker designed to resist nuclear weaponry.
Paul needs to go back to his hibit of loading up bills with earmarks and voting against them. He is part of the problem and he can’t say his voting record prooves he is against earmarks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.