Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pixels Don't Lie
March 4, 2012 | Linda Jordan

Posted on 03/04/2012 11:50:20 AM PST by ethical

To prove that the birth document Obama posted on the White House website on April 27, 2011 is a fraudulent document, all you need to determine is whether or not it is a computer created document or a scanned photocopy.

It is a computer created document. Even the obots can not deny that.

You do not need to ask the Hawaii DOH for a "waiver" in order to get a computer created birth document. Obama asked for special permission from Hawaii DOH to get photocopies of his original birth certificate. Loretta Fuddy granted that request and gave Obama, she says, photocopies of his original birth certificate.

Scanning a photocopy, in order to post it on a website, does not turn it in to a computer created document with multiple layers and movable text. Although interesting, it isn't all the details of the forgery that first reveal that it's a fake; different fonts, the halos, the weird bent page, the strange behavior of the security paper. It is the fact that it IS a computer created document and NOT a scanned photocopy.

But let's look at one of those fun forgery details. I included the web addresses for the quote and images I describe.

Here is what Chiyome Fukino [Former Director of Hawaii Public Health Department] had to say about how the “birthers” would respond to the release of Obama’s birth certificate.

“They’re going to question the ink on which it was written or say it was fabricated.” Said Fukino. “The whole thing is silly.”1

Let’s start with the ink, shall we?

From Hawaii Public Health Regulations Title: Vital Statistics, Registration & Records. Chapter 8, Certificates of Vital Statistics Events, Section 1. Preparation. Certificates of vital statistics events are to be filled in by typewriter or in ink. If ink is used only permanent ink will be acceptable. All signatures are to be made with permanent ink. In all other respects, the certificates shall comply with provisions of Section 57-14, R.L.H. 1955.”

On April 27, 2011 Barack Obama revealed what he said was a photo copy of his original long form ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ from Hawaii (it was posted on the White House website). The signatures on this ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ are required to be made in permanent ink.

Pixels Don’t Lie

Download the BC document off the White House website and open it in Adobe Illustrator. Now zoom in on the signature of Obama’s mother. The pixels reveal that only a portion of the signature is in ink as required by Hawaii Public Health Regulations Chapter 8.

The Ann and the D in Dunham are in ink. The pixels are a variety of gradations in greys and blacks, like ink signature pixels are. But what’s really interesting is that the rest of the signature, ‘unham and Obama’, are not in ink.

The letters are a solid greenish–black color with no gradation in color at all. This lack of gradation reveals that this part of the signature was created in the computer and is not even penmanship.

And what’s it called when you forge a signature on a “Certificate of Live Birth” from Hawaii? FORGERY! Well that would be my top pick but hey they also violated Hawaii Public Health Regulations by not using permanent ink in their forgery! Maybe that’ll tick someone off.

If you ignore the fact that this document was computer created and that fact, in and of itself, makes it a forgery, you can't deny what the pixels are telling us.

The Stanley Ann Dunham Obama signature on this document is a forged signature and that makes the whole document a forgery.

Figure 1. The Dunham part of the signature of Obama’s mother on the alleged long form original ‘Certificate of Live Birth’, posted on the White House website. Here it has been downloaded into Adobe Illustrator.

Figure 2. Zooming in on the top part of the ‘D’ in Dunham. You can see the variation in color pixels—variations of grays to black tones. This is how pixels of a signature will appear when it is applied with ink and scanned.

Figure 3. Focusing now on the start of the ‘u’ next to the D in Dunham. You can see there is no gradation of color at all. A solid dark greenish-black color displays no evidence of the gradation in color for these pixels which implies that this “signature” was created with image editing software and not with ink.

Figure 4. The last image focuses on the O in ‘Obama’ and part of the b. You can see there is no color change in the pixels. The solid pixel color again suggests the signature was not scanned or representative of ink. The ‘Obama’ portion of the signature was computer generated.

1. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42519951/ns/politics-more_politics/t/ex-hawaii-official-denounces-ludicrous-birther-claims/ 2. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

3. Albert Renshaw Obama BC Fake http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsFllY


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2manycrooks; 2manyingovernment; 2muchisfixed; birftards; birthcertificate; birther; certifigate; fake; forged; hopespringseternal; lucyhazfootball; naturalborncitizen; obama; thefixisin; thistimeforsure; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-140 next last

1 posted on 03/04/2012 11:50:30 AM PST by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ethical

Ya but . . . who’s going to do anything about it? That judge in Georgia just passed on his duties and I suspect that will be the case going forward.


2 posted on 03/04/2012 11:57:18 AM PST by jakota (jakota)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical

Evidence abounds, but few media outlets are touching this story. Even the conservative media ignores it.


3 posted on 03/04/2012 11:57:41 AM PST by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical
You won't ever get any Obamabots to admit that the BC is forged, even after they've seen proof.

Chances are that some congressional republicans will ignore proof as well, they don't want impeachment and the ensuing chaos on their watch. They simply don't have the cajones to uphold the law.

4 posted on 03/04/2012 11:58:37 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (The Second Amendment, a Matter of Fact, Not a Matter of Opinion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical
what’s it called when you forge a signature on a “Certificate of Live Birth”

Apparently Acceptable.
Relax comrade. Don't be ridiculous.

Hey look at the new war that just started!!!!!

5 posted on 03/04/2012 12:07:54 PM PST by rawcatslyentist (BO Stinks! Like Mitts magic underwear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Notice how long time Clintonista Trump is now in bed with Romney?


Mitt's daddy was a Mexican. He isn't eligible either!

6 posted on 03/04/2012 12:10:22 PM PST by rawcatslyentist (BO Stinks! Like Mitts magic underwear!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ethical

7 posted on 03/04/2012 12:11:11 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical

It has always been my opinion that 1) Obama was born in Hawaii and 2) he cannot prove it.


8 posted on 03/04/2012 12:20:40 PM PST by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical

It has always been my opinion that 1) Obama was born in Hawaii and 2) he cannot prove it.


9 posted on 03/04/2012 12:20:51 PM PST by RobbyS (Christus rex.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical

“Pixels Don’t Lie “

However, obama does LIE


10 posted on 03/04/2012 12:24:21 PM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical

Someone on our side needs to do a serious review of mid-’80s electronic document processing - before we get seriously embarrassed by the ignorant rhetoric being thrown around by the “multiple layers + multiple resolutions = fake” crowd. Please trust me guys: you’re building yourselves a trap and walking into it.


11 posted on 03/04/2012 12:34:36 PM PST by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

I am no Mitt fan, but Mitt’s father was an American citizen when Mitt was born.


12 posted on 03/04/2012 12:50:39 PM PST by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2; ethical
Yes, it is idiotic to parse a PDF which breaks a document scan into layers. 30 minutes of research, or a simple download of Adobe acrobat would explain all these issue. Plus it ignores the other image released the same day that wasn't layered. It is trailer park analysis of a computer document - embarrassing for conservatives, and helping Obama.


13 posted on 03/04/2012 12:55:03 PM PST by MrShoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ethical
You should submit the document and all those photoshopped high school pictures of Obama's basketball teammates, sitting on the bench with grandma and grandpa, etc. to Photoshop Disasters.
14 posted on 03/04/2012 1:04:35 PM PST by rabidralph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keats5

And we must not forget the GOP congresscritters who are all silent on this matter and who are, most likely, co-conspirators with the rest of them.


15 posted on 03/04/2012 1:16:29 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: keats5

And Dan Rather still claims the Bush Memos are fake but accurate.

The media didn’t like that exposure either.


16 posted on 03/04/2012 1:21:52 PM PST by a fool in paradise (If Obama brings troops home from Japan and Germany he can claim he won WWII finally as well as Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

Signature of Local Registrar: ‘U K Li Lee’

They’re playing the American public like a miniature guitar.

This is an ‘In Your Face’ challenge.


17 posted on 03/04/2012 1:25:10 PM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS

He was born to a bigamist father, his marriage was a sham.

Did Barry ever become an Indonesian citizen when his mom remarried?


18 posted on 03/04/2012 1:30:14 PM PST by a fool in paradise (If Obama brings troops home from Japan and Germany he can claim he won WWII finally as well as Iraq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
" they don't want impeachment and the ensuing chaos . . . . . "

You cannot impeach a "president" that was never legal and therefore legally elected. Impeachment is a 'political' mater. His transgression is a felony and should be handled by the legal system.

19 posted on 03/04/2012 1:41:51 PM PST by Freeper (Obama - Please STOP representing MY country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
" they don't want impeachment and the ensuing chaos . . . . . "

You cannot impeach a "president" that was never legal and therefore legally elected. Impeachment is a 'political' mater. His transgression is a felony and should be handled by the legal system.

20 posted on 03/04/2012 1:42:03 PM PST by Freeper (Obama - Please STOP representing MY country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

That’s nonsense. The unlayered version was flattened and issued after they had realized their stupid blunder in not flattening the first version before releasing it. A layered document, due to pasting add-ons to an original document, can easily be flattened, but the layering only occurs if the document has been edited — and editing screams ‘FORGERY’.


21 posted on 03/04/2012 2:09:07 PM PST by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

No trap as far as computer created documents versus a scanned photocopy. Hawaii did not start to computer generate birth records until 2001. Until then they were done on forms with type, date stamps and permanent ink for signatures. Photo copied when people wanted a certified copy. And he was born in 1961, we are told, not the mid 80’s.


22 posted on 03/04/2012 2:17:20 PM PST by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ethical

Another ride on the Birther roller coaster!

Back up the hill we go...


23 posted on 03/04/2012 2:19:42 PM PST by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG; Fred Nerks
Signature of Local Registrar: ‘U K Li Lee’

It's V. K. L. Lee, a real registrar. I believe Fred Nerks came up with this info. (If not, maybe he knows who did.)

I think the V stands for Verna, or something close to it.
24 posted on 03/04/2012 2:22:29 PM PST by HoneysuckleTN (Where the woodbine twineth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

Nothing explains the disturbing images on Obamas posted document. Nothing except that the document was electronically created. That explains everything. He posted a computer created document and NOT the scanned photocopy he says he posted. You know a scanned photocopy does not turn in to a computer generated created document simply by the scanning process?


25 posted on 03/04/2012 2:25:43 PM PST by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ethical

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/265767/pdf-layers-obamas-birth-certificate-nathan-goulding


26 posted on 03/04/2012 2:35:42 PM PST by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: HoneysuckleTN; Fred Nerks

My apologies if this is a double ping, but I’m not sure if I pinged your name correctly in my previous post.

Please see #24. Thanks!


27 posted on 03/04/2012 2:37:43 PM PST by HoneysuckleTN (Where the woodbine twineth...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HoneysuckleTN

“An EXTRAORDINARY crack researcher/commenter at WTPOTUS who has solved the riddle and discovered the identity of the registrar who allegedly signed Barack Hussein Obama II’s “long-form birth certificate.””

“The reveal:”

“An entry in the 1961/62 Polk directory reads:”

“LEE Verna K L Mrs. clk State Dept of Health r1228 a 16th av”

“There you have it, boys and girls. Mrs. Verna K. L. Lee, and NOT Mr. Ukulele!”

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2751301/posts


28 posted on 03/04/2012 2:48:22 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
Signature of Local Registrar: ‘U K Li Lee’

Which is different from the local registrar, the hospital official charged with certifying the birth certificate information, is different than the name on the Nordyke twins certificates, who were born in the same hospital, less than 24 hours after when Obama's BC says he was born.

29 posted on 03/04/2012 3:08:13 PM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop

The “trailer park analysis” theory that you hold to can easily be extinguished with a simple piece of paper. Arpaio’s team of lawyers, investigators, and computer specialists, worked this problem for 6 months trying to make the problem go away. Of course it will never go away because guess what genius? The BC is a fake and if you took five minutes of your day looking at facts, instead of parroting an establishment website’s planted story, you would know that.


30 posted on 03/04/2012 3:21:41 PM PST by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can still go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo

Scanned document in to PDF, one layer. You are referring to a scanned document that was then “optimized”. After optimization you will get a few layers but not like what you see on Obama’s document. But you can’t use this point to legitimize the birth record because it proves computer generation. Any point you use that proves it is a computer created document proves it is not a scanned photocopy and therefore is not a copy of his original BC. Focus on that.


31 posted on 03/04/2012 3:24:29 PM PST by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ethical

ping.


32 posted on 03/04/2012 3:39:23 PM PST by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ethical
No one has been able to rebut this four-part analysis.

Obama Birth Certificate Faked In Adobe Illustrator - Official Proof 1 ( Layers )

The BC is an outright fraud.

33 posted on 03/04/2012 3:49:52 PM PST by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
I thought the "local registrar" was a hospital official, not an employee of the State Department of Health. It's the certainly the case on other near contemporaneous Hawaiian BC, specifically of those born in a military hospital, where the local registrar is shown as a Lt. Col. Army Medical Corps.

If there was a forger, don't you think they might have access to a Polk Directory too, and picked a name out. OTOH, if she routinely signed as local registrar, there should be other BCs from the period with her signature.

Did they check that Polk Directory for the woman who signed the Nordyk twins certificates as the Local Registrar? If she worked for the hospital, we have problem, if she worked for the State Department of Health, that would indicate that the local registrar was a state, rather than hospital, official.

I will say that the signature does not look like one by a woman of that era, who would have been taught penmanship, when she was in school. My mother went to the archetypical "one room schoolhouse" in a Nebraska corn field (or wheat or sorghum). She was 33 years old in August of '61. Her penmanship was much, much better than that, and she practiced the exercises she'd been taught to keep it that way. The signature on the Nordyke twins' certificate looks more like what I would expect from someone of that era, although not as good as my Mom's was then, and the copies I've seen of those certificates are pretty poor, still you can make out that her first name was probably Beatrice, her middle intial "L" and her last name as "Yqusin" or "Ygusin" or "Yqusia" or "Ygusia".

34 posted on 03/04/2012 4:17:23 PM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Right.That video deals with OCR and optimizing too. Neither of those create the fraud we see in Obama’s bC. But again. It is not a scanned photocopy. Period. It is not what he said it was, he asked for a waiver to get a photocopy NOT a computer generated document. So now Obama has yet another forged document to splain away. At this point law enforcement needs to just finish the investigation and throw some people in jail.


35 posted on 03/04/2012 4:21:50 PM PST by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ethical

Good luck getting anywhere with that.


36 posted on 03/04/2012 4:33:09 PM PST by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

http://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2011/07/18/1961-hawaii-department-of-health-registrar-identified/

I think everything you asked for is explained on the above website.

WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES BLOG. (WTPOTUS)

A group of researchers who are dedicated and don’t just sit around and argue the point with each other, or try to show each other how clever they are, or say MEMEMEMEIIII all the time.


37 posted on 03/04/2012 4:45:57 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

THAT INFORMATION HAS BEEN UP SINCE JULY 2011.

38 posted on 03/04/2012 4:48:29 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2711661/posts?page=14#14


39 posted on 03/04/2012 4:53:55 PM PST by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MrShoop
It doesn't even pass the common sense test.

What forger would put together a document using this bizarre cut and paste, layering method...and then forget to merge the layers or flatten the image?

The answer...NONE!!!

40 posted on 03/04/2012 4:56:40 PM PST by Tex-Con-Man (T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII 2012 - "Together, I Shall Ride You To Victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

The Nordyke twins LFBCs were signed by DEPUTY (look for the faint deputy stamp) Local Registrar Beatrice L. Ygnacio. Her existence and occupation were confirmed by an entry in the 1960-1961 HI Polk’s directory.

Ygnacio, Beatrice L Mrs clk State Dept Health r1014 Kupau Kailua


41 posted on 03/04/2012 4:57:19 PM PST by epicurious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
our side needs to do a serious review of mid-’80s electronic document processing...

The mid-80's may have been a little while before I got into computers, but I recall seeing a demo of Adobe's OCR scanning package and assumed that it would become "the industry standard."

The demonstrator hailed as a significant new feature a feature that created a miniature tiff of an unrecognizable character and assigned it to a separate layer. I assumed there should only be two layers.

One thing I noticed about the scan at the gov. website, which is flat, is that comparing the characters "6d." with the "6e." in the fold of the page you see that the shaded region is anti--aliased but that from the middle page is not, as if scanned at a lower color resolution. Also, note the period in both figures: they are exactly the same except for the left most column of pixels is missing from the shaded side.

One other thing, OCR software would have printed the doc in true-type or post-script fonts, which would have been smoother, it would seem.

Two other things come to bear in assessing this thing: the sheriff who's investigation found inconsistencies in 'bam's selective service registration, and the fact that 'bam went to a great deal of trouble avoiding their release.

42 posted on 03/04/2012 4:57:52 PM PST by tsomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Thanks Fred, I was just laying out what was needed to clarify the issue, and you provided it.


43 posted on 03/04/2012 5:16:08 PM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo

Lee was the local registrar for the same hospital in which Virginia Sunahara was born. Think about it.

DIFFERENT LOCAL REGISTRARS

Aside from the fact that Obama’s ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ Registration released by the Hawaiian Department of Health appears to be affixed with a signature which appears to play on the Hawaiian word, “UKULELE” (U.K.L. Lee), it is also represented by different local registrar than is shown on the Nordyke’s Hospital version of the Certificate of Live Birth. A different local registrar worked in each of the four branch offices in which births were registered in Hawaii. Obama’s birth was registered in an office which is not the office use by Kapi’olani to register births occurring in its facility.

The name of a local registrar is not associated with other birth certificates for births which actually occurred at Kapi’olani and which were attested by physicians who actually delivered those births. This registrar worked in a branch office not used by Kapi’olani to register births. This is why Obama’s birth registration number is out of sequence with other births at the same time as his.

OUT OF ORDER TOO: THE NEWSPAPER ANNOUNCEMENTS

Last month, The Daily Pen’s Dan Crosby, published the results of his investigation of the procedures used to publish birth announcements in Hawaii. He found historical evidence which supports that fact that Obama’s birth did not occur in Kapi’olani, but which was registered in a different local office after he was examined by a doctor at Kapi’olani on August 7th, 1961.

Crosby went to Hawaii to research and investigate the cavalcade of ambiguous information related to Obama’s covert natal history including the origins and protocols used to publish the birth announcements in 1961. He focused on the manner in which the Hawaiian Department of Health and local hospitals coordinated vital statistics information and how the chain of information from the Hospital to the Hawaiian Department of Health resulted in “Weekly Health Bureau Statistics” announcements published in the local papers.

Crosby found evidence that the order in which the announcements were published was not random or chronological. In fact, he discovered they were published by the order of birth registration numbers assigned by the main Office of Vital Records which, in turn, were based on reception from various local registration branches. He discovered that, regardless of when the birth may have occurred, the registration number, assigned by the geographic order of the registration offices, determined the order of the announcements.

This is why Obama’s birth announcements occur near the bottom of each column in each newspaper even though there are births which occurred before and after his but which are published above his in the papers. This is because the births published above his all occurred in the same place and were registered in the same office and then passed to the central main office. The numbers were, therefore, ordered by the main office of the Health department in reference to their geographic registration order, not their chronological occurrence.

An investigation of the addresses of the birth registrations reveals that they migrate proximally to either a medical facility or to a local registration office. This is logical because most pregnant women would desire a hospital in close proximity once contractions began.

The birth announcements and ordering based on geographic registration location are shown below as they appear in the two versions of the newspapers...etc etc

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com.au/2011/04/out-of-order-obamas-non-sequential.html


44 posted on 03/04/2012 5:23:59 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
THAT INFORMATION HAS BEEN UP SINCE JULY 2011.

I haven't been following the issue since well before then, and only started looking at it again in the last few weeks.

I got sick to death of the issue, once it became clear that no court was going to look at any facts concerning the eligibility issue. Instead I spent my time getting in better contact with family. Also looking for a new job, since the Obama cutbacks in defense wiped out my old one. I still haven't found one, 14 months later (+2 months after being notified but before being laid off). Despite literally hundreds of job applications. 35-40 for one one company, 27 for another. And many, many others in ones and twos. I've only had two on site interviews for all that, plus 3-4 technical screening telephone interviews that went nowhere. Even before being laid off, I had knee replacement surgery, for both knees at separate times a couple of months apart.

45 posted on 03/04/2012 6:13:14 PM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Sorry to hear that, and sorry I was snippy, I have spent the last two days trying to fill gaps and provide information to freepers, only to find that most of them are simply there to try and second-guess the information, regardless of the number of sources I qoute, or the links I provide.
Like you, I am also sick to death of the issue...hope you have better luck finding a job soon.


46 posted on 03/04/2012 6:22:56 PM PST by Fred Nerks (FAIR DINKUM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

How are those new knees doing?


47 posted on 03/04/2012 6:47:54 PM PST by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
Someone on our side needs to do a serious review of mid-’80s electronic document processing - before we get seriously embarrassed by the ignorant rhetoric being thrown around by the “multiple layers + multiple resolutions = fake” crowd. Please trust me guys: you’re building yourselves a trap and walking into it.

Go learn something about document forgery and how photoshop works before you make such an illogical statement. Look at the content of the layers. If nothing else, look at all the Arpaio press conference video handouts and those videos and analyses published elsewhere.

Yes, it is idiotic to parse a PDF which breaks a document scan into layers. 30 minutes of research, or a simple download of Adobe acrobat would explain all these issue. Plus it ignores the other image released the same day that wasn't layered. It is trailer park analysis of a computer document - embarrassing for conservatives, and helping Obama.

It would be wiser to learn something about pdf's, Adobe, and Photoshop before making such a statement. If it was EVER published in layers, you should know that correcting that FUBAR by subsequently flattening it simply proves it is a forgery.

It doesn't even pass the common sense test. What forger would put together a document using this bizarre cut and paste, layering method...and then forget to merge the layers or flatten the image? The answer...NONE!!!

A dumb liberal staffer or lawyer with more skill than sense! Who says some liberal lawyer or legal aid that is smart enough to know how to fiddle with photoshop isn't dumb enough to know to flatten the resulting document before publishing it. There are a lot of people out here that are smart enough to photoshop it ...but... which are not forensic document examiners to know what NOT to do!

If you want a real-world display of the incompetence and hubris of the Obama administration and staff, the idiotic nature of the forgery simply confirms it in spades!!!!

"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." Martin Luther King, Jr.
"The two most common elements in the universe are Hydrogen and stupidity." Harlan Ellison

48 posted on 03/04/2012 7:05:30 PM PST by dickmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dickmc

Clue: mid-’80s document processing involved, thanks to extreme limits on storage space, multi-layer document deconstruction involving multiple resolutions, varying compression, and auto-replacement of common components.

I knew then it would cause exactly the kind of consternation we’re seeing today. Ignorant of the past, you are setting yourself a trap and walking into it.


49 posted on 03/04/2012 7:13:13 PM PST by ctdonath2 ($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
You only have to read free republic to get your answer about Verna Lee, the registar...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2751301/posts

50 posted on 03/04/2012 7:35:47 PM PST by MrShoop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson