Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Sandra Fluke Gay?
Macsmind ^ | 3/1 | macranger

Posted on 03/05/2012 8:21:37 AM PST by Skeez

Fluke has been called a slut. Not only for sleeping herself through law school, but for pimping herself off as some kind of “reproductive rights” expert. But today I received an email from someone who claims to be from Georgetown stating that Sandra Fluke really isn’t who she says she is. That is heterosexual, and that she is in fact gay.

I have no idea if the email is real or fake. I don’t care if she’s gay or not. Having family members who are gay I’m not homophobic. The email headers check out and it appears legit. The writer states she knows this because, “We have been intimate, I know she hasn’t been with a man since I’ve known her”.

She further states that Fluke was “recruited” to testify, or rather act, as though she was at risk of having unprotected sex with men. So the obvious question is “Why is Fluke testifying to something she would never need?” Is that not indeed lying to congress?

So then maybe she’s not a slut after all, but simply a liar and a fake?

Again, have no idea if this is true, but it wouldn’t surprise me if it were. Wouldn’t be the first time liberals manufactured a character.

UPDATE: In 2010 The Woman Lawyers Association of Los Angeles cited Fuke as a 2010 Public Interest Grant Recipient.

Fluke has been called a slut. Not only for sleeping herself through law school, but for pimping herself off as some kind of “reproductive rights” expert. But today I received an email from someone who claims to be from Georgetown stating that Sandra Fluke really isn’t who she says she is. That is heterosexual, and that she is in fact gay.

I have no idea if the email is real or fake. I don’t care if she’s gay or not. Having family members who are gay I’m not homophobic. The email headers check out and it appears legit. The writer states she knows this because, “We have been intimate, I know she hasn’t been with a man since I’ve known her”.

She further states that Fluke was “recruited” to testify, or rather act, as though she was at risk of having unprotected sex with men. So the obvious question is “Why is Fluke testifying to something she would never need?” Is that not indeed lying to congress?

So then maybe she’s not a slut after all, but simply a liar and a fake?

Again, have no idea if this is true, but it wouldn’t surprise me if it were. Wouldn’t be the first time liberals manufactured a character.

UPDATE: In 2010 The Woman Lawyers Association of Los Angeles cited Fuke as a 2010 Public Interest Grant Recipient.

Seems Fluke is at the very least a celebrated activist with close ties to feminist causes as well with the LGBTQ, or lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender and queer and questioning groups.

UPDATE: More on Fluke at Pat Dollard’s blog. Turns out she’s a 30 year old activist.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: contraceptive; fluke; freebirthcontrol; isflukegay; rush; sandrafluke; sandytheslut; slut
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

1 posted on 03/05/2012 8:21:46 AM PST by Skeez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Skeez
The US government is taking in $1.5T in revenues but is paying out $3.0T, creating a deficit of $1.5T per year with our total debt something like $15T.

Stay on topic, man.

2 posted on 03/05/2012 8:25:12 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

My head is still spinning with all this back and forth about what Rush said and all that.

However, when Sandra made her statements, did she ever say that she personally was paying $3000 for the birth control? Didn’t she say that it costs “students” or some others that much? My point is, I don’t think she was meaning to talk about her own sex life. I don’t think she ever actually said that this cost and lack of coverage in the health plan was a personal burden to her. I think she was saying that this is a burden to unnamed girls who need birth control in college.

Something to think about. She was a spokesman for a point of view, but not necessarily a personal spokesman.


3 posted on 03/05/2012 8:28:06 AM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

Rush better not touch this one with a 10 foot pole

so to speak


4 posted on 03/05/2012 8:28:44 AM PST by silverleaf (Funny how all the people who are for abortion are already born)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

Don't make me pay contraception, DON'T EVEN MAKE ME PAY FOR CONTRACEPTION!!
5 posted on 03/05/2012 8:29:24 AM PST by struggle (http://killthegovernment.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skeez
Georgetown stating that Sandra Fluke really isn’t who she says she is. That is heterosexual, and that she is in fact gay.

Called it the first time I saw her. She's more butch than Kos. Her electric pickle looks like Nancy Pelosi. When she gets hitched to her partner, she'll be registered at Fists R' Us.

6 posted on 03/05/2012 8:29:28 AM PST by dragonblustar (Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

“‘I am astonished at the desperation of the elite media to avoid rising gas prices, to avoid a presidential apology to religious fanatics in Afghanistan, to avoid a trillion dollar deficit … and suddenly decide that Rush Limbaugh is the real national crisis this week.” (Newt Gingrich)


7 posted on 03/05/2012 8:29:28 AM PST by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

I do believe that this would be classified as lying before Congress.


8 posted on 03/05/2012 8:29:37 AM PST by nolongerademocrat ("Before you ask G-d for something, first thank G-d for what you already have." B'rachot 30b)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

Well, she isn’t on the 2012 women’s softball roster:

http://www.guhoyas.com/sports/w-softbl/mtt/gu-w-softbl-mtt.html


9 posted on 03/05/2012 8:30:41 AM PST by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skeez
What possible difference would that make?
She is a FLAKE that's all that matters. Or is it a Fluck, or Flucke
10 posted on 03/05/2012 8:31:11 AM PST by DeaconRed (Thanks ZERO, Thanks a lot. I have a broken bank account that's all I got. My apologies to E. Tubb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

And being gay isnt going to help Rush’s argument one bit...


11 posted on 03/05/2012 8:31:20 AM PST by 2ndamendmentpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

She sure doesn’t look very gay to me, rather glum really. She could be a homosexual though.


12 posted on 03/05/2012 8:31:38 AM PST by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skeez
You're a little late to the party on that one:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2854646/posts?page=21#21

13 posted on 03/05/2012 8:31:40 AM PST by traditional1 (Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: struggle
Brings new meaning to the term "bosom buddies," doesn't it?


14 posted on 03/05/2012 8:33:58 AM PST by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia

“‘I am astonished at the desperation of the elite media to avoid rising gas prices, to avoid a presidential apology to religious fanatics in Afghanistan, to avoid a trillion dollar deficit … and suddenly decide that Rush Limbaugh is the real national crisis this week.”

Add 13 Hostages in Egypt


15 posted on 03/05/2012 8:34:31 AM PST by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

You can google her transcript & see exactly what she testified. That being said, if you would permit me to make a suggestion, here’s a really good article to read that will stop a lot of the head spinning & put the whole kerfluffle in serious perspective (it’s also been posted as a FR thread):

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/03/05/the-real-point-of-the-left%e2%80%99s-uproar-over-limbaugh/


16 posted on 03/05/2012 8:34:41 AM PST by MissMagnolia (Being powerful is like being a lady. If you have to tell people you are, you aren't. (M.Thatcher))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
That's because she's the towel girl.
17 posted on 03/05/2012 8:35:32 AM PST by liberalh8ter (Barack has a memory like a steel trap; it's a gift ~ Michelle Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndamendmentpa

Lesbians can’t be sluts? It would certainly help because she has no need for it, being a vagitarian and all...


18 posted on 03/05/2012 8:36:45 AM PST by Wyatt's Torch (I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndamendmentpa

Gay people are more slutty than regular folks.


19 posted on 03/05/2012 8:37:19 AM PST by NoGrayZone (Jim "Firebrand" Robinson endorses Newt...with EPIC call to action!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Something to think about. She was a spokesman for a point of view, but not necessarily a personal spokesman.

Then her testimony is just hearsay. Anyway the GOP lost the "slut" vote long ago.

20 posted on 03/05/2012 8:40:09 AM PST by Mike Darancette (Romney just makes me tired all over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia

Thanks because I haven’t seen it...

“a display of progressive hypocrisy is Fluke’s claim that law students at a prestigious private school can’t afford birth control. If Fluke could produce one of her colleagues who doesn’t have an I-phone, an I-pad, an I-pod, a high-speed internet connection, or cable television; who doesn’t spend $20 a week at Starbucks, or has to eat ramen every night, or never takes a vacation, never eats out, never goes to bars or concerts; or who has parents on welfare who can’t contribute to her education, or works part-time at a burger joint, or has any other characteristics of someone so poor she can’t budget for birth control pills, then maybe she’d have a point. But even then, condoms are available for free at numerous clinics and even at some retail stores. And God forbid we should suggest that the young lady just say no”


21 posted on 03/05/2012 8:40:37 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MissMagnolia

Isn’t that the truth? Go Newt!!!!


22 posted on 03/05/2012 8:43:14 AM PST by SueRae (Tale of 2 Towers - First, Isengaard (GOP-e), then, the Tower of Sauron on 11.06.2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

geez..anybody got that bear on a crapper in the woods picture?!!

OF COURSE she’s gay....and the only thing worse than her doing what she’s done ..is how the right-including Limbaugh..re-acted on it.

It was all co-ordinated to keep Bammy’s numbers from tanking even harder than just 5.00/gal gas is gonna do to him...


23 posted on 03/05/2012 8:44:45 AM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voter#537
She further states that Fluke was “recruited” to testify, or rather act, as though she was at risk of having unprotected sex with men. So the obvious question is “Why is Fluke testifying to something she would never need?” Is that not indeed lying to congress?

This is another attempt to lead us down a blind alley.
She said that she is speaking for many women who are having trouble paying for birth control and then she gave several examples of women who allegedly told her about their difficult situations. Apparently lezzies also have problems, even though I don't know what that has to do with birth control.
She is combining all of this as a women's issues when some are clearly medical and some are clearly related to birth control.
This whole thing is a tar baby meant to distract from the first amendment freedom of religion clause.

24 posted on 03/05/2012 8:46:05 AM PST by oldbrowser (They are Marxists, don't call them democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi
"The US government is taking in $1.5T in revenues but is paying out $3.0T, creating a deficit of $1.5T per year with our total debt something like $15T.

Stay on topic, man."

Errrr... your numbers are way off. The federal government brings in about $2.4 trillion per year in revenue and pays out about $3.8 trillion per year.

25 posted on 03/05/2012 8:47:07 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

“So then maybe she’s not a slut after all, but simply a liar and a fake? “

She lied about the cost of “contaception” being $3000/year and she certainly looks gay to me. I don’t see any of her guys coming out to support her—but then, would you?


26 posted on 03/05/2012 8:47:57 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

Doesn’t matter if she is gay. She isn’t the slut.

She said that all her friends at Georgetown were sluts, broke sluts who might get pregnant if the government doesn’t pay for their contraception.


27 posted on 03/05/2012 8:49:27 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
Another parrot who didnt read/listen to the testimony...

The 3000 dollar figure was for 3 years and was phrased "as much as 3000 during law school" (generally 3 years).

28 posted on 03/05/2012 8:52:01 AM PST by 2ndamendmentpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

I thought that she looked gay, when I saw her picture, not that you can tell that much from a picture.


29 posted on 03/05/2012 8:57:06 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

So funny, Tom Hanks was more conservative dressed like that.


30 posted on 03/05/2012 8:57:29 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Most Conservative in the Primary, the Republican Nominee in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndamendmentpa

“Another parrot who didnt read/listen to the testimony...”

You’re right. Still, if it costs you more than $30/mo for birth control, you’re getting scammed. I imagine most of the gorls spend more than that a month on booze. Oooops, I shouldn’t have said that. Next, you’ll want me to pay for that, too.


31 posted on 03/05/2012 9:01:52 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

The thing thatreally stands out in this article for me is this sentence:”Having family members who are gay I’m not homophobic. “

That is the biggest problem today. Too many people have family that are homosexual.
Of course the family feels bad that their son/daughter is queer, and of course they love them in spite of it, so they are willing to look the other way.
We hear that there are only 1% homosexuals, which IMO is BS, but almost every family can name a fruit in it.

My own Nephew was molested by his father as a child and is now “married”. His sister who was also molested is in the Air Force and is a switch hitter.

It used to be that when you had a fruit in the family they just were not talked about, and they kept quiet about it themselves. In todays world they expect the family to accept them and their depraved lifestyle.

I believe this is the main reason for their gain in social acceptability.One of the main reasons politicians are voting to give them rights to which they are not entitled such as marriage.


32 posted on 03/05/2012 9:02:04 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

When you are in college, you should need BOOKS, NOt Birth Control.

Since Birth Control pills are about $9 a month at both Wal Mart & Target, the cost for 36 month is much closer to $300 & nowhere near the $3000 this ‘woman’ claims.

IF the balance of that $3000 is being spent by her or other college age women on condoms, they certainly are not working hard enough to get good grades at their chosen degrees. They are spending faaaaarr too much time on their backs.

Sandra Fluke is a deceiver of the first defree.

She can go march with Cindy Sheehan, IMO.

They are both nuts.


33 posted on 03/05/2012 9:09:46 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Something to think about. She was a spokesman for a point of view, but not necessarily a personal spokesman.

She also did not talk about multiple partners.

It is possible to have lots of sex with one person.

34 posted on 03/05/2012 9:10:07 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

College guys buy most of the booze college girls drink. Same in grad school. Same in adult life.


35 posted on 03/05/2012 9:10:07 AM PST by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

If anyone wants to discuss the issue, then hammer the absurdity of the situation. Point out that the economy is in the tank, gas prices are going up, millions of real people are unemployed, the military and seniors are facing cuts in insurance coverage along with increases in costs, and other issues facing ordinary Americans, and all the left can do is promote free birth control for rich people. I still think they overreached here, and I am using this to show how out of touch they are on the real issues. You won’t win over the true believers, but they are not the target audience. The normal Americans who hear you or read your comments on Facebook are the ones you are after.


36 posted on 03/05/2012 9:12:05 AM PST by yawningotter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone
Gay people are more slutty than regular folks.

or as Bette Midler observed on the issue of gay marriage, "I've been around gay people my whole life, and you guys can't handle monogamy!"
37 posted on 03/05/2012 9:14:11 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Skeez
Sandra Fluke is mixed up with the Reproductive Justice movement. As past president of the George Town University Law Students for Reproductive Justice (LSRJ), you wonder who is involved with this group and what it is about. I say it is a Marxist movement infecting the university scene nation wide. You go to their web sites and all you read is gobbledygook crap. Can anyone tell me what they are really about?
38 posted on 03/05/2012 9:17:13 AM PST by jonrick46 (Countdown to 11-06-2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voter#537
Or is it a Fluck, or Flucke

I heard Rush call it sounding like Fluck.

Breitbart could have a subsection to its web site called BIG FLUCK.

39 posted on 03/05/2012 9:19:50 AM PST by dragonblustar (Allah Ain't So Akbar!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

Why would anyone think that?

40 posted on 03/05/2012 9:22:48 AM PST by McGruff (The south shall rise again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zuben Elgenubi

bump dat


41 posted on 03/05/2012 9:23:26 AM PST by ▀udda▀udd (7 days - 7 ways a Guero y Guay Lao << >> with a floating, shifting, ever changing persona)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Rachel MadCow

you ruined my lunch, LOL


42 posted on 03/05/2012 9:25:38 AM PST by nascarnation (DEFEAT BARAQ 2012 DEPORT BARAQ 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser
How is it that the left is SO clever in deceiving and distracting and we fall for it? The country is in a huge mess, we are being taken over by communists, and yet the rats have fairly successfully orchestrated this side show.

Now even Rush...who ought to know better. He can't use words the left uses...unfortunate but true.

43 posted on 03/05/2012 9:27:57 AM PST by Aria ( "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
She said that all her friends at Georgetown were sluts, broke sluts who might get pregnant if the government doesn’t pay for their contraception.

So if we're paying Georgetown sluts for recreational activity, why aren't we subsidizing Georgetown men visiting Rub and tugs? Both are sex, both are about release without a child. What's the difference?

44 posted on 03/05/2012 9:32:50 AM PST by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

I guessed her as a homo from the start.

Perhaps her next fight will be for tax funded strap-ons.


45 posted on 03/05/2012 9:35:35 AM PST by Gator113 (** President Newt Gingrich-"Our beloved republic deserves nothing less." ~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

As predicted....will wait a couple of days for more of her ‘lovers’ to come out before declaring her a total fake.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2854240/posts?page=41#41


46 posted on 03/05/2012 9:39:06 AM PST by panaxanax (0bama >>WORST PRESIDENT EVER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gator113

>> “Perhaps her next fight will be for tax funded strap-ons.” <<

.
Gosh, a piece of an old shovel handle should do!
.


47 posted on 03/05/2012 9:39:49 AM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

I don’t know about queer, but definitely fugly.


48 posted on 03/05/2012 9:45:02 AM PST by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skeez

After viewing the entire hearing on c-span, it’s clear that Ms. Fluke did not misrepresent herself. She made it clear that she’s an activist advocate speaking for others. As such she’s very probably over-reaching, but she did make one point that seems to be overlooked in all the subsequent furor.

There are some women with serious legitimate medical problems (e.g. tumors and seizures) that can be controlled only by taking certain (probably expensive) prescription contraceptive medications - not for contraception, but for unrelated medicinal value these drugs happen to provide. It would be good if we could address this issue narrowly, without accepting financial responsibility for recreational contraception.

For any who wish to know the facts of her testimony, here is the link:
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/HealthandC


49 posted on 03/05/2012 9:48:24 AM PST by NECAWA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva

Well, when you’re plain faced and built like middle linebacker, and no man who isn’t drunk, desperate, or himself butt ugly will take a second look at you, where’s a girl to turn?


50 posted on 03/05/2012 9:54:30 AM PST by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson