Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Consumers Energy looking to recover $32.6 million from electric customers
Mlive.com / Jackson Citizen Patriot. ^ | March 05, 2012 | Tarryl Jackson/ Mlive.com

Posted on 03/05/2012 9:41:10 AM PST by cripplecreek

JACKSON --Consumers Energy wants to recover $32.6 million from electric customers.


The Jackson-based utility filed an application last week with the Michigan Public Service Commission to recover revenue for the period of December 2010 through November 2011 to level out variations in sales.


Consumers filed two options to recover this money. The first would refund about $5.2 million to residential customers, charge $6.2 million to those who use lower voltages of power, and charge $31.6 million to higher-voltage customers.


The second option would be to charge all customers $28.2 million, charge $4.8 million to lower-voltage customers and refund $396,000 to higher-voltage customers.


The company wants to recover the money by Nov. 30, 2013.


Spokesman Dan Bishop declined comment on the case beyond what was filed in the application.


In a separate case, Consumers plans to refund about $12.7 million to electric customers and $5.7 million to gas customers.


The refund is the result of a Michigan Court of Appeals ruling last summer that said the Low-Income and Energy Efficiency Fund no longer was authorized.


Gov. Rick Snyder recently signed bills that created a new $58 million fund to replace the Low Income and Energy Efficiency Fund. The replacement plan – the Vulnerable Household Warmth Fund – called for refunding or rebating about $48 million that was collected in escrow since the Court of Appeals ruling. The charge on utility bills resumes until $48 million is raised for the new fund. An additional $10 million was directed to come from the state’s general fund.


The money is expected to provide heating assistance to 95,000 low-income Michigan residents.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: energy; michigan
I'm a bit confused by this but it sure sounds like they intend to charge us more for using less electricity.
1 posted on 03/05/2012 9:41:17 AM PST by cripplecreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Springman; sergeantdave; cyclotic; netmilsmom; RatsDawg; PGalt; FreedomHammer; queenkathy; ...
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
2 posted on 03/05/2012 9:42:34 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I'm a bit confused by this

Me, too. I think that's the idea.

3 posted on 03/05/2012 9:45:20 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I'm a bit confused by this but it sure sounds like they intend to charge us more for using less electricity.

More for using less, and more for using more. Some one has gotta pay to keep the ghetto warm. It ain't gonna be the company.

4 posted on 03/05/2012 9:45:49 AM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

It is the goal of all public utility companies. First they beg us to “use less” of their product and then they increase the price.....

Privatize them now! Grrr...


5 posted on 03/05/2012 9:50:20 AM PST by CSM (Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
6 posted on 03/05/2012 9:50:33 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

you want confused??? consumers is a gas company. Edison is the electric company. I get my electricity from consumers and my gas from edison.... some kind of state regulation or something...


7 posted on 03/05/2012 9:51:00 AM PST by joe fonebone (Project Gunwalker, this will make watergate look like the warm up band......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CSM

I just called Consumers this morning to correct their 1000 kwh overestimation on my bill. I didn’t realize they were just “leveling”.


8 posted on 03/05/2012 9:53:28 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

They are attempting to retroactively RAISE THEIR PRICES!!!

Tell them, as soon as your retroactive pay raise comes in, you’ll send the check.....


9 posted on 03/05/2012 10:01:47 AM PST by G Larry (We are NOT obliged to carry the snake in our pocket and then dismiss the bites as natural behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Do you own Consumers stock (if they are publicly traded)? You may get your money back in dividends. Some of it, anyway.


10 posted on 03/05/2012 10:02:10 AM PST by citizen (The Dims will all unite for Zero. We must soon unite behind our challenger and back him to victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CSM
It is the goal of all public utility companies. First they beg us to “use less” of their product and then they increase the price.

Years ago there was a "water shortage" in the Los Angeles area, so the utilities urged everyone to save water. The people saved so much the utilities came back and asked for a rate increase to maintain their mandated return on investment.

Others will no doubt add that the same game was played in their area.

11 posted on 03/05/2012 10:05:33 AM PST by Oatka (This is America. Assimilate or evaporate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

if they send you an estimated bill, simply send them back an estimated payment......


12 posted on 03/05/2012 10:21:32 AM PST by joe fonebone (Project Gunwalker, this will make watergate look like the warm up band......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

We’re in the Metro area, other parts of the state get both from Consumers.


13 posted on 03/05/2012 10:22:55 AM PST by Springman (Rest In Peace YaYa123 and Bahbah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CSM

Ah, Consumers is a privately owned utility thus it has already been “privatized” On the other hand the City of Lansing owns the electric company serving the community and thus is a “publicly” owned utility.


14 posted on 03/05/2012 10:23:38 AM PST by technically right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
More for using less, and more for using more.

And that, in a nutshell, is why Americans will never buy into conservation. It doesn't pay.
15 posted on 03/05/2012 10:36:21 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

“More for using less, and more for using more. And that, in a nutshell, is why Americans will never buy into conservation. It doesn’t pay.”

Several years ago, we were bombarded with “CONSERVE WATER!” messages during a particularly severe drought.

That Fall, the Indianapolis Water Utility demanded a RATE INCREASE, because water usage had dropped.


16 posted on 03/05/2012 10:58:19 AM PST by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Martinsville did the same thing with my business in town, thank God I’m rural with well and septic at home.


17 posted on 03/05/2012 1:52:17 PM PST by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

same with property taxes — my assessed value keeps going down, but how long can the city afford to run if they let all our taxes go down as well?


18 posted on 03/05/2012 7:53:17 PM PST by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

same with property taxes — my assessed value keeps going down, but how long can the city afford to run if they let all our taxes go down as well?


19 posted on 03/05/2012 7:53:29 PM PST by Sioux-san
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson