Posted on 03/06/2012 6:46:17 AM PST by SeekAndFind
You are going down hard azzhat.
Gee. I wonder if Rush can afford a good private detective...
This woman would be so drug through the mud and, frankly, if she is a typical 30ish lesbian in twenty first century western civilization that has reached a point where the democrats desperately wanted a press conference with her in the first place, he could prove she really IS a slut 20 times over.
And they know it.
There will be no lawsuit. It is why Rush apologized for his choice of words, rather than the generic accusation itself. In a court of law, the evidence would be clear that the choice of words fit. Of that I have absolutely NO doubt.
Yep, DO IT!
Rush has deep pockets and lots of powerful friends. The lefties won’t win this battle.
This is about an Assault by the Left on All Christians, Jews and some other faiths. An Assault to the very bedrock of our nation, the Freedom of Religion. You know, the Freedom of Religion granted by God and written into the 1st Amendment of our Constitution.
Doubt Ms. Fluke will want to participate in her own destruction.
FUBO!
RE: . I wonder if Rush can afford a good private detective...
Errr... Rush paid Elton John a million bucks to sing for a few hours at his wedding.
—RE: . I wonder if Rush can afford a good private detective...
Errr... Rush paid Elton John a million bucks to sing for a few hours at his wedding.—
So. Maybe he could get two! ;-)
It’s kinda comical when you think about it: Suing someone for calling you a slut.
I mean, although so many have pointed out by simply using the word “discover” it doesn’t really emphasise this enough: When you sue someone for calling you a slut, you are giving them permission to prove, in a court of law, that they were justified.
And all that that implies.
It really is comical. I would like to see her do it for the entertainment value, if nothing else.
Given her exploits and being a brain-dead liberal, there ought to be enough pictures on the web of Ms. Fluke (rhymes with) in compromising positions and in various states of undress to make the slut label stick.
Nope, she’s long since lost her “Private” Status, when she put herself out there to take on Georgetown and Conservatism... sorry Sandra, you’re Fluked.
Sue for what? Being called a slut?
Show the clips of the View when Laura Ingraham was on, with all the yentas yukking it up about how they call each other slut all the time, it’s no big deal, Laura, lighten up.
Then show the clip of the show when Sandra Fluke is on, and oh, how horrible, you poor deal, Rush is horrible, blah, blah, blah.
Move for dismissal.
probably well under ware, I mean way...
Rush has the ability to hire the very best counsel and investigators. Plus there’s that little thing called discovery in litigation.
Ms Fluke will be in the news for another 7 days, and then she’ll be a trivia question. Rush will continue to make tens of millions per year. The world will move on.
The truth doesn’t matter when liberals are out there, making their political statements and scoring their debate points.
Only conservatives are held to any standards.
The truth doesn’t matter when liberals are out there, making their political statements and scoring their debate points.
Only conservatives are held to any standards.
I hope everyone on FR will read Andrew Breitbart’s book, “Righteous Indignation,” and will then get to work. Andrew died trying to open the eyes of this nation to the corruption which will take us down. It has ratcheted up to unbelievable heights in the days since his death..
I am amazed how elected officials involve themselves in dustups between private citizens.
her parents need to be exposed so we know what kind of background she came from...has to be LIBERAL, political.
The term “slut” has no precise meaning. So proving it as defamation would be pretty tough.
I believe Rush also referred to her as “a prostitute.” Unless he can prove she has accepted money for sexual services, Rush would not have truth available as a defense for that one.
Rush's good friend Mark Levin was licking his chops over discovery on his show yesterday. I imagine he'd be more than happy to help out his good friend.
I almost wish she had testified under oath to Congress because perhaps then you could get her for perjury as she misrepresented the price of the pills.
If you can get them for under $100/year, you don’t have to pay $1000/year or $3000/3years.
She would have been corrected and made to look the idiot fool she is IMO for whining that she needs someone else to pay $100/yr for pills while her tuition (if she’s full time in the law school) is $46,865.00.
IMO she already sounded like a moron when she said she saw the concern over lack of free contraception on faces of the women there.
If you see concern on someone’s face, how do you know it’s over contraception and why would you assume contraception as opposed to a breakup with a boy friend, death of a friend or relative, bad medical news, bad grades... How far down that list comes contraception.
IMO she made herself (and this campaign) look ridiculous and I’ve got to wonder if Georgetown’s reputation can be damaged by having this level of intellect represented as part of its student body.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.