I would love to find that the Obama team has truly forged this stuff but so far we only have evidence that they are ‘forgeable’.
To me, a school chum, or 2-3, that would state under oath he was known as a foreign student from Africa or Malaysia would be infinitely better proof.
His father was NOT a citizen of the USA - that disqualifies him from being a natural born citizen from the get go.
No, they found that this document WAS inconsistent with other documents that have been scanned, including those using OCR and optimization. They showed a video of how a real paper document acts when scanned, optimized, and/or used with OCR software.
And they found that the draft registration has a date stamp that lacks the first 2 digits that were used by that post office at that time.
They also have a witness who heard Bill Ayers’ mother introduce Barack Obama as a foreign student around 1980 - a foreign student that they were helping to get an education.
They also have evidence that the newspaper birth announcements included names for children who were 3 years old (not newborns as presented in the paper) and children who were foreign-born. The people who claimed that those announcements HAD to come from the HDOH were dead wrong. Either they didn’t know what they were talking about or they were spreading disinformation. Since that is the whole basis for both O’Reilly and Beck arguing that Obama was born in HI, they need to adjust their excuses now.
Watch the videos, they could not reproduce the effects in a control document, and they tried.
He found that the documents, both the selective service and lfcolb, failed every test for authenticity,and their certifying seals were improper. The Sheriff stated these documents were probable cause of a felony.
The title is not misleading.
>> “The headline is very misleading.” <<
.
Nothing misleading about it.
His evidence is conclusive proof that the touted document is not a scan of a valid BC.