Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Santorum super PAC calls for Gingrich to drop out
AP via KnoxNews ^ | 3/7/12 | JACK GILLUM - Associated Press

Posted on 03/07/2012 8:21:10 AM PST by SmithL

WASHINGTON (AP) — A super political action committee supporting Rick Santorum in the Republican presidential race says it's time for Newt Gingrich to drop out.

Stuart Roy, an adviser for the Red, White and Blue Fund, told The Associated Press Wednesday that the former House speaker is splitting conservative voter and making it difficult for them to settle on a conservative alternative to front-runner Mitt Romney.

(Excerpt) Read more at knoxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: election2012; gingrich; romneylite; santorum; santorum4romney; whatanidiot; whatasnob

1 posted on 03/07/2012 8:21:16 AM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL

This super-pack is only helping romney by making Newt supporters turn from Rick.


2 posted on 03/07/2012 8:24:02 AM PST by Linda Frances (Only God can change a heart, but we can pray for hearts to be changed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL; All

When Lil’ Ricky becomes a Conservative, I’m sure Speaker Gingrich will take it with all the consideration it deserves.


3 posted on 03/07/2012 8:25:50 AM PST by j.argese (FR is a Newt-ist Colony, not a Romney Room, Paul Pavillion or Santorum Sanctum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Nuts.


4 posted on 03/07/2012 8:26:15 AM PST by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The numbers tell the whole story. Santorum hasn’t harmed Gingrich but Gingrich does harm Santorum.

In florida, Gingrich lost by more than Santorum took. In Michigan, Santorum lost by 3 and Gingrich took twice that much. In Ohio, Santorum lost by 1 and Gingrich took double digits.

Romney could have been knocked up by now.


5 posted on 03/07/2012 8:26:48 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Oh look, another one of bandwagon Rick’s flunkies demanding that people that actually value their vote mindlessly vote for him.

This isnt affirmative action. Newt is working for his vote, while Rick just wants it handed to him.


6 posted on 03/07/2012 8:27:33 AM PST by VanDeKoik (If case you are wondering, I'm supporting Newt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Why, so Santorum can come in second in Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana and Texas??

Romney came in second in Georgia, Oklahoma and Tennessee yesterday.

Keep the wins from Romney is the goal now, just as it was before Super Tuesday. To display his weakness and get us a winning candidate at the convention.


7 posted on 03/07/2012 8:29:39 AM PST by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

the two are less than 50 delegates apart.... why not have the bushes 4th term drop out, and let a fighter win it


8 posted on 03/07/2012 8:31:17 AM PST by joe fonebone (Project Gunwalker, this will make watergate look like the warm up band......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

With the organization and money that Romney has he wouldn’t have conceded any more than one of the other candidates. I voted Newt in Ohio yesterday and I would again - this needs to keep going with all - if it’s a convention call so be it. Let all the states have a say for a change.


9 posted on 03/07/2012 8:33:50 AM PST by reed13k (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Linda Frances

It’s being talked about here on the radio, in Ohio, that 100,000 dems voted for Romney.


10 posted on 03/07/2012 8:35:11 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik; STARWISE; b9; onyx; TitansAFC

Anyone know how Santorum’s money is holding out? I sent his campaign a message saying I was praying for Bella and receive several requests for money a day.

OTOH have donated to Newt and just was reminded about the 2.50 gas fundraiser.

There was a blurb this morning that Romeny was spending much faster than it was coming in.


11 posted on 03/07/2012 8:36:59 AM PST by hoosiermama (Stand with God and Sarah, the Gipper and Newt will be standing next to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

not good

but who am I to talk after voting for Hildabeast in the 08 Indiana contest per Op Chaos

payback is a b!tch I guess


12 posted on 03/07/2012 8:37:13 AM PST by nascarnation (DEFEAT BARAQ 2012 DEPORT BARAQ 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“Romney could have been knocked up by now.”

Not if he put some free Govt aspirin between his knees.


13 posted on 03/07/2012 8:41:10 AM PST by moonhawk (Rush, Mark, Sean: Conservative talkers. Sarah, Newt: Conservative DOers. Mitt: Conservative faker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

My state doesn’t hold its primary until May. I so want to vote and work for Newt here!


14 posted on 03/07/2012 8:41:57 AM PST by Mangia E Statti Zitto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
The numbers tell the whole story. Santorum hasn’t harmed Gingrich but Gingrich does harm Santorum.

This coming from the same people who had their Knickers in a bunch when Newt Gingrich suggested the same thing after SOuth Carolina.
15 posted on 03/07/2012 8:43:08 AM PST by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
The person who needs to drop out is Paul.

Ron Paul is dangerous.

Ron Paul, Soros and Defense

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K4q1vYx1V3g&feature=related

Before everyone gets their panties in a wad. Obama is already starting to make the moves to destroy our military.
Ron Paul will just drive the knife into their backs.
I thought it was clever how the Obama military haters are going to cut Benefits for veterans and wounded soldiers.
Wonder how far enlistment will drop on that one.

 

One of Ron Pauls best friends is George Soros..

http://www.orangepower.com/threads/george-soros-evil.95549/


16 posted on 03/07/2012 8:45:42 AM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Since you are so into numbers, read this;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/republican_delegate_count.html

Romeny already holds over a third of the Delegates, and has more than both Santorum and Newt combined. If the remaining states do what they are slated to do, Romney will have the nomination sewed up by the end of April.

It is what it is. You can blame whomever, till your face turns purple, but that won't change reality for what it is.

The facts are, the entire Republican Primary, has become a joke. Santorum can't win, and neither can Newt. Even if Newt were to quit now, Santorum does not have the necessary preparation or organization, to qualify for the number of delegates he needs to win.

17 posted on 03/07/2012 8:54:26 AM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I absolutely guarantee that under any circumstances, I will NOT vote for Santorum or his big brother, Romney. I will not vote for unqualified candidates, period.

** President Newt Gingrich-”Our beloved republic deserves nothing less.”


18 posted on 03/07/2012 8:58:18 AM PST by Gator113 (** President Newt Gingrich-"Our beloved republic deserves nothing less." ~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Sarah Palin’s reaction: “Oh, boo-hoo.”


19 posted on 03/07/2012 8:58:41 AM PST by Josh Painter ("We intend to change Washington, not accomodate it." - Newt Gingrich)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Since a combination of Santorum, Gingrich, and Paul will suck more votes from the onerous Romney than any single candidate, they should all stay in the race.

This will improve the odds for a brokered convention.

The critical thing is to keep the onerous Romney from getting the 1144 votes needed for a first ballot nomination. Because if he fails in this, it will be a wide open convention and delegates can vote for whoever they choose.

And it won’t be Romney. In fact, it probably won’t the Santorum or the other current candidates, either.

It is almost certain to be a more conservative candidate, who is *not* controlled by moneyed interests, and is *not* a whopping egomaniac. One who is focused on the obeying the constitution, conservative core values, and has a profound ethical sense.


20 posted on 03/07/2012 9:00:09 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Note Hard Totals:

Not sure how this running total will line up (formatting) but it can be found here:

http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P12/R

GOP PRIMARY: Popular Vote - — Soft Pledged –- - Soft Unpledged – — Soft Total –- - Hard Total

Mitt Romney: ….3,242,740, 39.20% …(314)17.36% …(72)15.09% …(386)16.89% ….(302)13.21%

Rick Santorum: 2,087,454, 25.23% ….(92) 5.09% ….(67)14.05% ….(159) 6.96% ….(79)3.46%

Newt Gingrich: 1,818,548, 21.98% .....(107)5.91% .…...(13) 2.73%...(120)5.25% ….(96)4.20%

Ron Paul: ……….,927,348, 11.21% ...…(35)1.93%.......(38)7.97%......(73)3.19% …..(16)0.70%


21 posted on 03/07/2012 9:02:25 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

Operation Hilarity told their people to vote for Romney last night to knock out Santorum, or so what I am hearing.


22 posted on 03/07/2012 9:04:35 AM PST by Thunder90 (Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: reed13k

Let all the states have a say for a change.
******************
Thank you.

I am tired of other states deciding for me and never having a chance to vote for anything more than left-overs.

If there isn’t a Gingrich to vote for in the primary, I won’t be voting. Perry and Gingrich are the only ones I am interested in voting for.

I will vote against Obama in Nov.

I am darn tired of the calls for Gingrich to drop out... darn tired.


23 posted on 03/07/2012 9:07:26 AM PST by Irenic (The pencil sharpener and Elmer's glue is put away-- we've lost the red wheel barrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

It is looking bad for Rick and Newt. Here locally, people have been on the radio like, VDH, Horowitz, etc. have given up on them.

They hated their speeches last night and considered both whiney.

We could have done this, but we needed far better conservative offerings as candidates.


24 posted on 03/07/2012 9:15:39 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I think Newt’s superpac should ask Mr. Sanctimonious to drop out for the benefit of conservatives.


25 posted on 03/07/2012 9:58:24 AM PST by varina davis (A real American patriot -- Gov. Rick Perry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Newt placed 2nd in Florida! Newt has 105 secured delegates to Santorums 78 and that is current. Newt is only 2% behind Santorum in the popular vote.

There are many voters that want to vote for Newt in the upcoming elections...why should they be denied? besides, many Newt supporters do not like RS.

HANG TOUGH NEWT! IT AIN'T OVER TILL IT'S OVER!

26 posted on 03/07/2012 11:30:22 AM PST by katiedidit1 ("This is one race of people for whom psychoanalysis is of no use whatsoever." the Irish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Gingrich is ahead in the delegate count -time for Santos to SHUT HIS PIEHOLE

http://elections.msnbc.msn.com/ns/politics/2012/all/republican/3/6#.T1fKFtXDvYC


27 posted on 03/07/2012 12:55:32 PM PST by Fred (http://whenmittromneycametotown.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“In florida, Gingrich lost by more than Santorum took.”

Your analysis is flawed. We don’t live in a static world. Rick not getting on the Romney smear train after South Carolina could have changed that race dramatically. Rick’s losses in Michigan and Ohio have little to do with Newt (who barely campaigned in either). They have more to do with Rick squandering leads with missteps, backtracing, poor debate performances, and not being able to get enough liberal Democrat union votes.


28 posted on 03/07/2012 1:06:43 PM PST by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan

Post number 9.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2853480/posts

Perhaps you’ve heard of the Reagan Democrats? There’s a whole new generation of them and only a moron would ignore them.


29 posted on 03/07/2012 1:19:35 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

It wouldn’t work that way. Newt and Rick always switch places from 1st to 3rd in each state they win because they’re drawing votes from mostly the same poll of voters. One of them needs to drop out sometime this month for there to be a chance of beating Romney.


30 posted on 03/07/2012 1:28:59 PM PST by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

I live two hours outside of Detroit “moron”. The day of the primary there was wall to wall local coverage. They interviewed person after person that voted. The “Reagan Democrats” in question were hardcore union members organized by Democrat strategist Joe DiSano and liberal talk show hosts like Tony Trupiano. The “Reagan Democrats” that voted for Santorum can’t stand him (some saying things like “I wanted to puke when I voted for him”), and felt that Obama could easily beat him in the fall. Give your head a shake.


31 posted on 03/07/2012 1:30:20 PM PST by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: moonhawk

LOL!


32 posted on 03/07/2012 1:30:26 PM PST by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Since a combination of Santorum, Gingrich, and Paul will suck more votes from the onerous Romney than any single candidate, they should all stay in the race.

This will improve the odds for a brokered convention.

It doesn't work that way. Because of winner-take-all distribution either by district or state, Romney now has 53% of the delegates awarded so far with only 39% of the popular vote. At this rate, he probably wins it straight up, especially since there are more WTA states coming up later and they mostly favor him (Mormon or liberal states like UT and NJ). I'm not sure if the increasing amount of proportional southern states will be enough to counteract that.

33 posted on 03/07/2012 1:35:33 PM PST by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan
I live two hours outside of Detroit “moron”

Exactly why your opinion means nothing. After all what kind of idiot believes that being forced into a union suddenly transforms someone into a liberal. Canada is effectively all unionized so its apparently all liberal by your standards.

And what kind of a freakin moron actually believes ALL of the candidates aren't scrambling for every vote they can get? If you really believe that robo calls aren't going to every household you're a particularly stupid idiot.
34 posted on 03/07/2012 1:36:33 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Canada is heavily unionized, and heavily socialist. What kind of moron believes hardcore union members organized by Democrat strategists, and liberal talk show hosts have the best interest of Republicans at heart?


35 posted on 03/07/2012 1:40:33 PM PST by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan

You’re of no consequence, consider yourself brushed off.


36 posted on 03/07/2012 1:41:58 PM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Perfectly fine by me.


37 posted on 03/07/2012 1:47:15 PM PST by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: CutePuppy

I just posted this to a friend on another thread!

Don’t look at me. I’ve been posting since before the Michigan primary that the “Reagan Democrats” that were going to cross over for Rick were being organized by Democrat strategist Joe DiSano, and liberal radio talk host Tony Trupiano. Nobody would listen.

They were interviewing the “Reagan Democrats” that voted for Rick on local news here. They were saying things like “I wanted to puke voting for Santorum”, “Santorum is so extreme I could barely vote for him” and “I hope Obama crushes Santorum in the fall”.

These people are still insisting that the voters were indeed “Reagan Democrats”. In fact some guy on here today called me a moron for telling him the same story I just told you.

So sad.


39 posted on 03/07/2012 10:02:30 PM PST by trappedincanuckistan (livefreeordietryin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy
I guess you don't have to be a liberal to understand the glee and reasons of Democrats' voting for Santorum (or Romney) - these are not "Reagan Democrats" who voted for Reagan in general elections; there are too few of those left, to begin with, and they wouldn't vote for a big government "conservatives" practicing their own class warfare.

Yup, and I have yet to hear of any Democrat crossing over to vote for Newt as strategy. They know nominating Newt would not be good strategy because he would clean their clocks. I think they also truly hate him too much to pull the lever for him, because he truly challenges the foundation of their beliefs in ways that they cannot respond to or argue with effectively.

40 posted on 03/07/2012 10:47:52 PM PST by JediJones (The Divided States of Obama's Declaration of Dependence: Death, Taxes and the Pursuit of Crappiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: trappedincanuckistan

Yep, you are right. I think it will be his support for Santorum, not his commenting on Fluke, that will ultimately hurt Rush.


41 posted on 03/08/2012 12:18:41 AM PST by C. Edmund Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: CutePuppy

Flap your jowls all you want but who is gingrich pandering tow when he promises to continue ethanol subsidies? Who is he pandering to when he throws himself at the feet of the open border lobby? Who is he pandering to when he promises to create a new federal environmental agency.

Your unwillingness to acknowledge such things doesn’t say much for or against Gingrich but it does say a good bit about his followers.


42 posted on 03/08/2012 4:27:15 AM PST by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson