Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AnnCoulter.Com ^ | Ann Coulter

Posted on 03/07/2012 3:00:12 PM PST by Syncro


March 7, 2012

  Mitt Romney won more than twice as many delegates on Super Tuesday
as Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum. The Non-Fox Media's take-away is that
Romney suffered a major setback Tuesday night.

     No matter what happens, Barack Obama's boosters in the NFM
portray it as a debilitating blow to Romney. On Nov. 7, The New York
Times' headline will be: "Romney ekes out narrow electoral victory,
leaving race uncertain."

     To explain the widening gulf in delegates won by Romney
compared to the others -- he now has more delegates than all other
candidates combined -- the media claim that a vote for any candidate
other than Romney is an explicit vote against Romney.

     Of course, even the NFM can't pretend Ron Paul's supporters
would pick Gingrich or Santorum, both big-government, career
politicians, as their second choice.

     But in what universe would the second choice of Santorum
supporters be a two-time adulterer on his third marriage, who lobbied
George W. Bush to support embryonic stem cell research?

     And are we to presume that voters who have no problem with
Gingrich's $1.6 million payoff from Freddie Mac would be morally
offended by Romney's hard-earned wealth? That voters willing to forgive a
man who called Paul Ryan's Social Security reform plan "right-wing
social engineering" could never trust Romney?

     Why isn't it possible that votes for Santorum are votes against Gingrich, and vice versa?

     The NFM doesn't explain. Reporting their hopes and dreams
rather than the facts, they simply assert that all votes for Santorum or
Gingrich are "anti-Romney" votes.

     It's not Republicans who are looking for the anti-Romney. It's Democrats.

     Obama is already spending millions of dollars on anti-Romney
ads. Obama's campaign adviser David Axelrod, is desperately tweeting
anti-Romney messages all day long. In open primaries in Michigan and
Ohio, Obama's Democratic supporters came out to vote for Santorum or
Gingrich. MSNBC hosts openly encourage Democrats to vote for Rick

Read More »

TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ann4romney; anncoulter; coulter; gope4romney; poison; santorum4gope; santorum4romney; santorumdemocrats
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Syncro

From the photo it looks like Miss Coulter is enjoying herself at some sort of cocktail party, apparently the center of attention and basking in the approval and acceptance of (what I can only imagine are) National Review, Weekly Standard and Wall Street Journal-types.
We should be happy for her, considering everything that she has done in increasing our consciousness over the last ten or so years, until recently of course. Once on the outside looking in, now she is an insider.
Of course, by befriending and adhering to an insectile, turd creature: Bill Maher, and supporting a reptile like Romney, she has made it clear that she is no longer a friend of conservatives.

In sum it’s really not much different from the Crips and the Bloods: You choose your side, you live with the consequences. Just re-stating what we already know as we separate from the sheep from the goats in the months to come. Death to the moderate GOP.

21 posted on 03/07/2012 4:26:59 PM PST by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

I’ve defended Ann Coulter in the past in spite of her very mild endorsement of Romney because she’s not the first person to make a mistake. But her attacks on Santorum and Gingrich are not helpful at all and if Obama is reelected (ugh), it’ll be harder to forgive and forget.

22 posted on 03/07/2012 4:29:36 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (A chameleon belongs in a pet store, not the White House)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound
To be nominated as a Republican, one must be either the “establishment guy”, or be the person whose turn it is.

Reagan was next in line. He lost to Ford in 1976.

23 posted on 03/07/2012 4:39:43 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

She called Newt “crazy” on “Redeye” one night. She and Beck ae out to destroy him as a person. Not only that, but they are doing so with glee. I consider it pure evil myself.

24 posted on 03/07/2012 4:54:34 PM PST by sheikdetailfeather (Sandra Fluck is a Schmuck and Obama is her Pimp!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: Tzimisce
It was his grandfather that really appealed to broads.

The wives do the sewing...

26 posted on 03/07/2012 8:10:50 PM PST by Syncro (So? -Andrew Breitbart [1969-2012] RIP King of The New Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice
Back in ‘06 when Jeffers Dodge was running for the 47th seat to the California Assembly, Ann Coulter helped him kick off his campaign in the lobby of a neat old hotel in Los Angeles.

A lot of FR members were there too, and I took a lot of pictures. One of which is the one at the top of this thread.

We all had a great time!

Oh, and the GOP is in the process of committing political suicide. RIP GOP

27 posted on 03/07/2012 8:22:43 PM PST by Syncro (So? -Andrew Breitbart [1969-2012] RIP King of The New Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

I’ve heard of guys carrying a torch, but Mitt looks like he’s proclaiming his undying love to it.

28 posted on 03/07/2012 8:35:25 PM PST by Lauren BaRecall (I declare for Santorum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

>> Reagan beat the odds and took out an incumbent by waging a charm campaign

How did Sarah describe last night, cheerful? Obviously, Cheerful has an edge up on Stiff, Disbelief, and... uh... Critical.

29 posted on 03/07/2012 8:39:23 PM PST by Gene Eric (Newt/Sarah 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
This woman has completely and utterly lost it. The left all week has been trying to destroy the career of her friend, or supposed friend, Rush Limbaugh, and she writes yet again another article bowing to the Romney. I've had it with her, this is the last article I am ever reading from Ann Coulter.
30 posted on 03/07/2012 11:08:33 PM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (How ironic that Ann Coulter should write a book called Treason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
This is an old cartoon, so don't forget the "Pro-Communist Health Care" and "Anti-Communist Health Care" podiums. Oh! And the "Pro-Government Union" and "Anti-Government Union", and the "Pro-Global Warming" and "Anti-Global Warming" podiums, too:

31 posted on 03/07/2012 11:18:12 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Romney has gotten where he is now in this race thanks to money. Tons of it, relative to Gingrich and Santorum, but a drop in the bucket compared to what BHO will have available. Recently it’s been written that he has used up most of the funds already that he’d planned on using through (at least) the nomination and is now fundraising for donations from small donors.

Romney, if he gets the nomination, may ultimately win the votes of most Gingrich/Santorum voters, but he won’t get them out as on-the-ground volunteers that are vital to any campaign. I don’t see hordes of folks willing to walk door to door to speak with voters or for lit drops, or standing outside polls, encouraging voters to go R, or working the phones, and all the other low level work that is done. I can see are the young Mormon missionaries taking up the slack. But that’s not the same as people in your own neighborhood doing the volunteer work.

One has to wonder if Romney’s ‘celebrity’ backers, Ann, the Buchanans, the Macks, et al have ever volunteered their time to work a campaign, or do they think it’s all done by [paid] consultants?

32 posted on 03/07/2012 11:36:48 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Ann Coulter, what a joke. She has no credibility any more with any conservative.

(See tagline)

33 posted on 03/10/2012 6:45:11 PM PST by Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears (Ann Coulter isn't about conservatism. Ann Coulter is about Ann Coulter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson