Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arpaio investigation: Obama might be Kenyan: Records that could document status mysteriously missing
wnd ^ | 3/8/12 | staff

Posted on 03/08/2012 10:14:04 PM PST by Nachum

Among the records missing for Barack Obama that would be available for an ordinary president are passport records, school records such as those from Punahou, Occidental, Columbia and Harvard, Harvard Law Review writings, scholarly articles for the University of Chicago, state bar association records from Illinois, Illinois state senate records, the marriage and divorce documents for his mother, his adoption records and others.

Now it has been revealed that the Cold Case Posse assembled by Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Maricopa County, Ariz., cannot confirm yet that Obama was not born in Kenya and brought to the United States as a days-old infant for his birth to be registered in Hawaii.

The reason? Missing records.

Speculation has held that Obama actually was born in Kenya, and as the son of an American woman and Kenyan father, probably would not have been considered under any circumstances to be a “natural born citizen” of America, as the Constitution demands for presidents.

It’s been revealed that the Kenyan government actually investigated that possibility earlier, without conclusive results.

Now Arpaio’s team, which was assembled to work on a volunteer basis after hundreds of constituents expressed fear that Obama was having his name put on the 2012 election ballot in Arizona using a fraudulent document, has reported that it checked to determine whether a young mother arrived in the United States from Kenya in the days after Obama’s reported Aug. 4, 1961, birth date.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arpaio; certifigate; investigation; kenyan; naturalborncitizen; obama; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: AlexW; FedsRStealingOurCountryFromUs

Feds:”“the hospital name shown on his bc wasn’t even the name that was used for that hospital back in 1961.”

I’ve heard that too but I thought I had seen other LFBC examples from HI that showed the same hospital name as that on Obama’s. So I’m not sure that is a legitimate claim...


41 posted on 03/09/2012 7:21:50 AM PST by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

bfl


42 posted on 03/09/2012 7:29:46 AM PST by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bluecat6

The violation of oath to the Constitution has reached such a level that even if a birth record from a different country were presented as evidence, this fraudulent democrat operative will be protect ... and the demise of a handful of people at this point, in protecting barry the bassturd boy dunham shows this batch of criminals are not going to relinquish their power to feckless wimps. The rule of law is effectively over. We The People are a ruled bunch who have allowed a federal oligarchy to take over. panetta spilled those beans without batting an eye while doing it. And the Congress now run by feckless republicans have proven they don’t even get it when it’s spelled out for them in hearings!


43 posted on 03/09/2012 7:31:09 AM PST by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo

He’s trying to prove the negative that he was NOT born in Africa. When you cannot do that what do you get? A double negative. It’s not idiotic. Maybe less than desirable grammar but what can you do when there is no paper trail on our ‘leader’?


44 posted on 03/09/2012 7:31:55 AM PST by greenhornet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man
We can confirm that half a million men born in 1960 and 1961 mailed there Selective Service registration cards in with a postal date stamp of 1980, and that Obama was the only guy in America with a date stamp of 80.

We can also confirm that Obama’s registration was not on-line until fall of 2008, unlike the other 500,000 men born in 1960 - 1961.

Therefore, we must acknowledge that our president is a fraudulent POS who peddles forged documents.

45 posted on 03/09/2012 7:41:33 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
I do not believe anything was mentioned about records missing from a database during the Arpaio presentation. This supposed missing data strikes me as a bit odd. Anyone who had access to the database to delete things could have deleted or modified only a record potentially damaging to Obama rather than deleting an entire week's worth of information.

I seem to recall Sandy Berger stuffing documents down his pants. People who do such things aren't always efficent. If someone messed with the flight records microfilms, they may have had to delete more than one record and just took out a chunk for convenience or out of sloppiness.

46 posted on 03/09/2012 7:43:17 AM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj

Data base must have back up files.


47 posted on 03/09/2012 7:59:56 AM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: HANG THE EXPENSE

Yeh all the previous presidents sealed their records by executive order on day one in the whitehouse. Not.


48 posted on 03/09/2012 8:02:45 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: edge919

ABC-Berger has acknowledged being sloppy. NBC-He was sloppy. CNN-Sloppy.


49 posted on 03/09/2012 8:06:46 AM PST by JohnnyP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo
"It’s not the subject that I’m talking about. It’s the actual sentence. It’s like if I were to say: “I cannot prove that you havn’t ever masturbated to bestiality porn”."

But that is the subject. It's precisely the kind of argument this peice makes, and is a typical birther style argument.

50 posted on 03/09/2012 8:12:01 AM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2
Yeh all the previous presidents sealed their records by executive order on day one in the whitehouse. Not.

I assume you're talking about Executive Order 13489, which was limited to records produced by the White House during the Presidents term. It had nothing to do with the President's birth or school records, as those are already protected by existing privacy laws.

This is nothing out of the ordinary; it's been standard practice for every President since Reagan.

51 posted on 03/09/2012 8:31:40 AM PST by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

Vet:”The Diversion Continues.”

I would say this is a battle that can be fought on multiple fronts.

I don’t contest that Obama is NOT a NBC based on his Kenyan father, but the fact that he is also complicit in two forgeries is probably easier to bring to court. And our legal interpretations of forgery are much more resolved in the courts than the NBC issue.

In other words, being on the right side of things does not necessarily result in success. Our judicial system has shown this to be true on many instances.

Besides, the voting public has less understanding of the NBC issue because it involves actual deductive reasoning. Yet they understand the concepts of forgery and deception quite well.


52 posted on 03/09/2012 8:43:14 AM PST by visually_augmented (I was blind, but now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative
Hospitals don't keep medical records forever.

But surely they would keep birth records indefinitely, at least the probably lifetime of the person.

53 posted on 03/09/2012 9:02:02 AM PST by Albion Wilde ("The facts of life are Tory." -- Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

Why would a hospital treat “birth records” differently from any other kind of medical records, for records-retention purposes? Hospitals aren’t a repository for birth records, the department of health is. Retaining 50+ years of records would be prohibitively costly; especially medical records, which tend to be volumonous and even more costly to retain (due to medical privacy/security issues).


54 posted on 03/09/2012 9:11:36 AM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: opentalk

That’s the best news I have seen in a long time. Celine Dion will never sing again.


55 posted on 03/09/2012 9:19:46 AM PST by jarofants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

Because medical issues tend to be transitory in comparison to the establishment by birth of a human life.


56 posted on 03/09/2012 9:27:27 AM PST by Albion Wilde ("The facts of life are Tory." -- Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Albion Wilde

Again, hospitals are not repositories of birth records. Records concerning each birth are maintained by the department of health (or whatever it is called in your jurisdiction). The hospital records are not memorializations of the birth itself, but rather records related to medical care given before, during, and after birth. They are treated no differently than any other medical records, and would almost certianly not be retained after 50+ years.


57 posted on 03/09/2012 10:24:30 AM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

They’ll never find documentation of where Obama truly came from. Doubt they keep good records in Hell.


58 posted on 03/09/2012 10:31:45 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (Don't blame me; I voted for the American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FedsRStealingOurCountryFromUs
For example, the hospital name shown on his bc wasn’t even the name that was used for that hospital back in 1961.

Yes it was.


59 posted on 03/09/2012 11:02:58 AM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: bluecat6
It's also interesting that the penciled-in numbers, especially the "2" matches 0bama's handwritten "2" as shown here when he wrote the wrong year down when in Britain

60 posted on 03/09/2012 11:20:46 AM PST by FedsRStealingOurCountryFromUs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson