Skip to comments.3 linked to Tucson man killed in SWAT raid arrested
Posted on 03/09/2012 4:50:46 AM PST by willamedwardwallace
Three people connected to Jose Guerena, the man shot and killed during a SWAT raid in May 2011, were arrested on drug and money laundering charges Thursday morning.
(Excerpt) Read more at azstarnet.com ...
After all, since he's now "guilty", they are both "connected" to him...
Two thumbs up from the Founders!
So in your mind it was OK to murder Jose for the sins of his sister in laws family???Idiot!
Wonder how many LEOs they put on this dragnet? They've got over 65 LEOs working diligently in Utah to execute the former paratrooper who handed the SWAT team its ass:
I am more worried about the SWAT donut munchers that killed him in front of his family than any associates.
Guilt by family association, eh?
Say, is William Edward Wallace the famous Scots patriot who cried “I wanna lick boot leather!” as the English were putting him to death?
Many donuts were momentarily safe in Tulsa on Wednesday:
Lot of freaking calories floating around in those pictures.
Well yes, since he was “connected” to 3 people merely accused, even possibly guilty of a crime, let’s assume it was proper to murder him!
do I really have to put a sarc tag in here?
He wasn’t murdered.
so, this clean former soldier was shot and killed because members of his wifes family sold..... pot??????
Interestingly enough, accusing people of murder is defamation per se.
He was executed.
He wasn’t “clean”.
Defamation per se.
In the new American Fascist Police State, there's a law against everything, lawdog.
The hell he wasn’t, and your still an idiot!
He wasn’t. Ad hominem.
'This is what it is , Mr. Baggins,' said the leader of the Shirriffs: 'You're arrested for Gate-breaking, Tearing up Rules, Assulting Gate-keepers, Trespassing, Staying in Shire-buildings without Leave, Bribing Guards.'
'And what else?' said Frodo.
'That'll do for now,' said the Shirriff-leader.
"I can add more, if you'd like it,' said Sam. 'Calling your Chief Names, Wishing to punch his Pimply Face, and Thinking you Shirriffs look like Tom-fools.'
Sam Gamgee has "percy defamed" the Shirriffs! Tase the bastard!
williamedwardwallace is here to spread the glad news. "The King's Men are innocent! Huzzah!"
George III could only dream about having our current police forces at his disposal during the runup to the "troubles" in 1776...
They probably spent a hundred grand on the follow-up investigation.
Those cops execute that kid. Now sue me.
He was “squeaky” clean... I guess that is why he was targeted for elimination.... yeah, that’s the ticket.... shaky warrant based upon a drug users word, we still do not know what was in the warrant, or the judge that signed it, and the cops are just spilling out all information pertaining to this killing, righhhhttt....
I won’t, but I can pass the necessary information on if you like.
Wrong. The warrant affidavit was released for all to see.
Nope he was executed by ignorance.
Can you not see the insanity of this type of SWAT Operation? And do not forget the idiot Sheriff Dipstick (Dupnick), political hack.
Please explain what crime the DEAD guy committed?
“so, this clean former soldier was shot and killed because members of his wifes family sold..... pot??????”
They were cutting into the sales of the SWAT teams market.
Be sure to include the wife since you are slandering her and her late husband who was murdered by the corrupt and incompetent police.
This article and the arrest is an attempt by Sheriff Dipstick (Dupnick) to cover his A$$ and to give them a chance to prevail in the lawsuit by his widow for their negligence, and the killing of her husband.
There is NO justification for this type of SWAT attack. The militarization of the Police is an extremely dangerous trend.
Dupnick will eventually be removed as Sheriff. The County and those involved will loose the lawsuit against them. Hope fully this type of insanity will stop.
Remember, Sheriff Dipstick is the guy who blamed Congressman Gilford’s shooting (and the murder of the Judge) on the Tea Party. (again without a shred of evidence)
Nope. You should learn the law.
What? Do you mean in an echo chamber of “sovereigns” and libertarian wackos who hate the police?
So should the sheriff, it might help his incompetence problem.
So what crime was the dead guy convicted of?
Why do you support summary executions?
If not, shuttenzeeupennen, Stasi-boy.
What you think the law is, and what the law is, are two different things.
If someone points a gun at you, and you shoot them, have you summarily executed them? What crime have they been convicted of?
Your talking point reveals your insanity.
Do you find it interesting that an enabler is on Free Republic basically threatening people with prosecution for voicing their opinions on this?
Why don’t you? You are the keyboard warrior after all?
A legend in your own mind.
Are you getting on that FOIA request, or do you just have a single agenda here?
What you think is “opinion” and what is actually “opinion” in a legal sense are two different things.
There is also a difference between “prosecution” and a tort action. Do you understand that?
Nope. You don’t, because you are mistaken on the law.
Why aren’t you?
When you drive drunk and kill someone you are responsible for the death.
This is no different.
LOL! See the new movie, Los Angeles Goes To Tucson!
What crime was the dead guy convicted of?
Your talking point is irrelevant. Keep repeating yourself though.
yeah, no surprise you consider dead innocents to be irrelevant.
Odd. I've always thought of myself as a conservative Constitutionalist.
Apparently, now I'm a "sovereign".
I'll bet the New American Police State would describe Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry and Benjamin Franklin as "sovereigns and libertarian wackos", when they weren't smearing them for being "slavers" and "drunken womanizers".
Which comes back to this thread.
Which is just a $100K smear on a dead veteran by the Police State that killed him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.