Posted on 03/09/2012 6:18:29 AM PST by Kaslin
This.
Critical Race Theory is an offshoot of neo-Marxist Critical Theory. At one point, Obama was clearly enamored with or at least thinking about this bravo sierra on some basis. Now, that's not to say he's still an advocate of it; maybe it was a youthful dalliance when he was younger, something he could afford. Big deal. But how does it inform what he believes now?
Did he transform into an American Fabian?
The thing that cannot be avoided is that Obama's past is peppered with some interesting people.
Jeremiah Wright
Derrick Bell
Frank Marshall Davis
Muhammad Hasan Chandoo
Bill Ayers & Bernardine Dohrn
I mean, sh*t . . .
IMO opentalk covers that quite well on this other thread at reply @#24 about picking Judges.
Shoot, I'm more and more convinced they could have a video of Obama in bed with a live boy or a dead girl and it still wouldn't faze the drones.
We are sooo screwed.
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0510/kagan_blemish2_gahr.php3?printer_friendly
From the article...
As articles editor for the Harvard Law Review in 1985 Kagan helped shepherd into print a racially noxious story by a radical law professor and architect of Critical Race Studies, which is essentially “blame whitey” in legal vernacular.
This was no literary fiction. It was the kind of story that would never get past Tina Brown at the New Yorker. What Derrick Bell, the author, was doing, observes legal scholar Arthur Austin, was “making broadside comments on the tyranny of white people.”
Austin, in an article, ranked Bell’s fable one of the top 10 politically correct law review articles of all time.
Bell’s fiction was a way to circumvent law review standards. He made outlandish statements through a fictional alter-ego, modeled after a six foot three black woman in Portland, Oregon that would have been impossible to sustain with the logic and evidence required in a non-fiction piece. The goal was to access a readership that otherwise would not have countenanced such hateful notions.
“What the hell was that doing in a law review article?” asked Professor Austin in an interview with JewishWorldReview.com yesterday. “Bell would publish these things in legal journals that had nothing to do with the law.”
ENABLER
Kagan was his enabler. She helped get something published that turned on all kinds of noxious sentiments about society and a relativistic view of the law.
Read the rest of it at the link.
I am not sure that this video is the story at all. Think of this as a trailer .... (maybe).
We need a veterinarian to vet 0b0z0.
Michael Savage said yesterday on his program that the video was a non-issue.
I have to admit that I was expecting much more of a “blockbuster”. If this is all there is, it’s not nearly enough to sink Obummer.
I’m thinking there’s more, and it will be revealed at the appropriate time.
Retread.
That jackass on CNN kept saying, in effect, “what are you afraid of, whitey?”
Well, name one policy of 0bama’s that didn’t use the power of the federal government to take from taxpayers to funnel to his preferred (race based) groups.
If we would be appalled at putting a anti-black racist in the position of presidency, why shouldn’t we be equally appalled at putting an anti-white racist in as president?
@The Vetting: CNN Implodes Over Breitbart's Obama/Bell Video
It's mentioned.
Also interesting -current Supreme court Judge Kagan...In 1985 helped Bell get his radical writings about blame whitey published at Harvard Law
You're talking about the reply by Pan_Yans Wife @45.
And yet another fact is largely overlooked. Collectivist Egalitarianism Sabotages Human Potential. Those misled by the tactics of envy to demand entitlements, never in the long-run actually benefit from the programs (or apples) they seek.
Obama's actual message is, and has been since his college days, as old as Genesis & as hopelessly flawed as that which has been misleading the wishful thinking throughout human history.
Of course, the fact that even at 20, Obama had already embraced the message of hatred against the American mainstream, certainly ought to wake some people up.
William Flax
“transformation” = revolution, Obama is not honest enough to say the word, but he is a Communist revolutionary taking the USA by stealth.
Aren’t all Obamster’s people half cast, gay or lesbian?
The only people interested in knowing what hussein is, already know what hussein is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.