Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill O'Reilly: Arpaio on Obama's birth certificate
Bill O'Reilly's You Tube Channel ^ | Mar 9, 2012 | Bill O'Reilly

Posted on 03/09/2012 1:19:30 PM PST by usar91B

Arpaio on Obama's birth certificate

"Bill explains to a BillOReilly.com Premium Member why he hasn't bothered to report on Arizona Sheriff Arpaio's assertion that President Obama's birth certificate is allegedly a forgery in this excerpt from our Backstage Conversation webcast."

Transcript: Bill O'Reilly- "Erin, Bentonville, Arkansas: Why do you ignore Sheriff Arpaio's assertion that President Obama's birth certificate is a forgery? Well, Because Sheriff Arpaio has not presented any hard evidence to back up his assertion. Secondly, I am very busy. I looked into the birth certificate myself and found out there were two separate birth announcements made in Honolulu newspapers on the day Barack Obama was born. It would be impossible for that to happen unless somebody was 'conspiratorialising' the birth of a little mixed raced baby. If that were happening, then I guess you could have birth announcements planted. But, the odds of that Lil, uh umm Aaron, are about 29 Gazillion to one. Alright..?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barackobama; billoreilly; birthcertificate; naturalborncitizen; sheriffarpaio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: Usagi_yo
So .... lets just focus on the crappy and partisan President part. I, for one, can chew bubble-gum AND walk at the SAME time.. it's not an all or nothing issue. We can keep on researching this while pointing out the 'crappy / partisan' stuff too. This just happens to highlight the fact that he has been less than honest with the American people. Dishonest, crappy, and partisan isn't too much of a stretch, is it?
21 posted on 03/09/2012 1:45:31 PM PST by usar91B (The question recurs, "how shall we fortify against it?" - AL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: usar91B
I looked into the birth certificate myself and found out there were two separate birth announcements made in Honolulu newspapers on the day Barack Obama was born...

OMG! BOR seems to be saying here that he believes that 0bama was BORN!

I have news, hard news, for him. We ALL agree little barry was born. What we dispute with the left is what is on the long form BC, and what it means for NBC. These are Constitutional issues... not a question of whether or not he was born.

22 posted on 03/09/2012 1:45:57 PM PST by C210N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usar91B

Oh! really.. Bill O’Really is in the bag for Barry Zero Half-White..
If he persues the “obvious” he may not get free air time on Leno or Letterman..
You know.... to promote his books..

He could end up like Glen Beck.. or worse Hermie Cane..
He wouldn’t like Maher calling him a “Chicken Hawk” a “Transvestite” or some other libel like he does other people..


23 posted on 03/09/2012 1:50:04 PM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usar91B

Well maybe you can but you’re making those of us who can’t look bad.

You’re more likely to convert an undecided with the crappy and partisan part rather then muddled and mired questionable natural born issue successfully portrayed as the lunatic thinking right.

The election was certified by the House and the Senate — which is a defacto approval. The best we can hope for at this point is to not reelect Obama.


24 posted on 03/09/2012 1:53:55 PM PST by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: paul51
It is like a poor man's patent where you put your idea in a sealed envelope and mail it to yourself.

Getting someone to put your child's name in a paper to provide evidence of citizenship was child's play.

25 posted on 03/09/2012 1:54:13 PM PST by FreeAtlanta (Liberty and Justice for ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: usar91B

Is that bloviating sack of sh!t still on the air? Why?


26 posted on 03/09/2012 1:58:42 PM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usar91B

Translation: Bill O’Reilly, didn’t even watch the presser so he doesn’t know even the most basic facts, including the evidence that the posse presented and the response to questions about the birth announcements. Mike Zullo said that they have evidence that foreign-born children and children up to 3 years old were included in the newspaper announcements. The end conclusion is that the birth announcements are not credible. I would add that this strongly refutes the claim that the announcements were even from the HDOH at all - which leads to the question of why Marsha McFadden at the Advertiser and the HDOH via Lori Starfelt deceived the public into thinking those announcements only came from the HDOH.

Anybody who claims they don’t have time to address the biggest scam in this nation’s history is either a liar or too stupid to know up from down.

Or has been threatened. And we just so happen to know that Bill O’Reilly was threatened by Fox who had been threatened by Soros, Axelrod, and Emanuel.


27 posted on 03/09/2012 1:58:56 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usar91B


28 posted on 03/09/2012 2:01:32 PM PST by eCSMaster (Conservative patriots, Rise up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2CAVTrooper

My birth was announced in two papers in Cleveland, and one in Akron. I was born in Alexandria, Va.. It was announced in a paper there too. Grandparents sent in the ones in Ohio, Dad, or the hospital, sent in the one in DC/Alexandria. Birth announcements don’t prove squat.


29 posted on 03/09/2012 2:02:06 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo

This has nothing to do with the election. It has to do with crimes - for which the posse found probative cause. At this point they are looking to find out who committed those crimes. One of those crimes is fraud - the fraud of presenting a forgery as if it was genuine. And the person who presented this forgery as if it was proof positive of a Hawaii birth certificate.... is Barack Obama. They need to find exactly what Obama knew about what was shown, which would have to be that he knew it was a forgery if he truly had a copy of a birth certificate as claimed in his book and it turns out that there isn’t a genuine Hawaii BC that looks like this forgery.

This isn’t about politics; it’s about law enforcement. Are you saying we don’t need law enforcement, or that forgery and fraud are fine as long as they are done by POTUS, his advisors, and multiple government agencies at state and federal levels?


30 posted on 03/09/2012 2:03:25 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
The end conclusion is that the birth announcements are not credible.

It's not about the announcements being credible or not, only that they are limited in terms of any probative value because they do not contain the place of birth, the child's name, whether the registration was complete or delayed, etc. From other records and sources, however, we do know that Barack Sr. never lived at the address in the announcement.

31 posted on 03/09/2012 2:04:24 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: usar91B

O’Reilly is just plane SCARED he might lose his cushy income.


32 posted on 03/09/2012 2:07:01 PM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

The Hawaii announcements were generated from the Department of Health. They weren’t submitted to the papers from the family.


33 posted on 03/09/2012 2:07:29 PM PST by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: usar91B

‘Premium membership’ entitles one’s question to be blown off by a dismissive and, dare I say it, conflicted Bill O’Reilly. He’s not going to say anything that would jeopardize another prime time interview with the Usurper. I quit watching BOR long ago.


34 posted on 03/09/2012 2:09:30 PM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: usar91B

What BOR fails to understand or acknowledge is the ability in Hawaii to register a birth on the testimony of a witness, such as Obama’s grandmother. That registration, once accepted by the registrar, would have automatically generated the birth announcements in the newspapers.

FR birthers, please correct me (with cited evidence) if I am incorrect.


35 posted on 03/09/2012 2:09:37 PM PST by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kleon

There’s nothing formal to indicate that the health department was the ONLY place from which announcements were generated in the newspapers.


36 posted on 03/09/2012 2:11:16 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: usar91B

Why would anyone watch BOR? When I found out he despised Joe McCarthy and idolized Robert F. Kennedy, I turned his stupid clown show off. He is no conservative by any definition.


37 posted on 03/09/2012 2:16:13 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

“Is that bloviating sack of sh!t still on the air? Why?”

Because Ted Baxter coffee mugs don’t sell themselves.


38 posted on 03/09/2012 2:17:02 PM PST by tumblindice ( our new, happy lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: usar91B

It’s simple.. if O’Reilly reports anything about that no one from the Administration will appear on his show. The “no spin” guy is a whirling dervish.


39 posted on 03/09/2012 2:18:43 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo
"Well maybe you can but you’re making those of us who can’t look bad." Don't pin that on us.. "we" just happen to doubt Obama is legit. The media has painted us as "birthers" just like they called the Tea Party "racist teabaggers"..that was not our doing, we didn't adopt those names. It's pure 'Alinsky tatics'- attack / ridicule and drag the issue into conspiracy land, when the truth is, we just want the Constitution upheld and enforced.
40 posted on 03/09/2012 2:19:02 PM PST by usar91B (The question recurs, "how shall we fortify against it?" - AL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson